Carl Hulse of the Times reports on an intersting point made by Republicans:
Did Senator Harry Reid’s strategy of protecting Democratic senators up for re-election from having to take politically risky Senate votes backfire?
With the Senate on the verge of slipping away from Democrats, some Republicans think it did.
The two parties have been locked in a running battle over Republican efforts to force floor votes on sensitive issues such as repeal of the health care law, gun rights and approval of the Keystone XL pipeline. Mr. Reid, the majority leader, has thwarted many of the efforts by limiting amendments. In response, Republicans have filibustered numerous pieces of legislation.
Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri, a member of the Republican leadership, said he thought the approach boomeranged since Democrats on the ballot in Republican-leaning states such as Alaska, Arkansas and Louisiana have come under fire for voting too often with President Obama.
“Basically the only votes they have are the votes they had to take to move the Obama agenda forward and they had nothing else going for them,” said Mr. Blunt. He suggested some Democrats would have been better served by being able to point to votes where they broke with the president and Democratic orthodoxy.
Democrats say that Republicans were going to hammer their candidates no matter what amendments were voted on.
That is not much of a response. Of course, something honest, like "Our big progressive donors would have freaked out if Reid allowed ther Senate to pass Keystone bill" might not be helpful either.
Is this a Hillary! thread?
Posted by: Frau Bahnhof | November 05, 2014 at 12:03 PM
(Pssst...Posterior)
Posted by: Frau Bahnhof | November 05, 2014 at 12:04 PM
progs be honest, TM you are such a kidder. Its the Liar Party for a reason
Posted by: GMax | November 05, 2014 at 12:09 PM
Tom Steyer and his environmentalist buddies had a bad night.
The voters (and the public) might care more if these clowns didn't have the largest "carbon footprints" in the world.
"Do as I say and not as I do" sells about as well as "Hope and Change"
Posted by: Neo | November 05, 2014 at 12:15 PM
I urge everyone to go back to the One Damn Wave After Another thread and read Pagar's last comment and then never forget.
Posted by: Iggy | November 05, 2014 at 12:19 PM
The voters were rebelling. Reminds me of the line that the Marlon Brando character in the movie "The Wild Ones" uttered. The frightened town person asked, "What are you rebelling against"? The Brando character replied, "What have you got?"
Harry Reid shut down the Senate--the laughably self titled "Greatest Debating Society In The World". There were no debates under Dictator Reid---only the sound of crickets. There was a price to be paid for that--and the first installment came due last night.
Posted by: Comanche Voter | November 05, 2014 at 12:19 PM
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | November 05, 2014 at 12:20 PM
Is that the thread with the picture of Soylent holding a urinal cake in his hand?
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 05, 2014 at 12:24 PM
Leading with your behind?
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 05, 2014 at 12:26 PM
Cecil from a previous thread:
That's why I want Keystone first. I would incorporate fast track authority on at least two nuclear plants as well and toss in opening the Yucca nuclear waste storage facility to make sure Reid shares some of Obama's joy.
Posted by: RickB | November 05, 2014 at 12:29 PM
Stephanie has photos of Hillary's buttocks? ewwwwww!
Iggy, I went back and read pagar's last comment and would like to see it sent to all the Republicanmen and women who will be in charge come January 2015.
pagar and I agree on the necessity to true the vote quickly for the future of democracy in the U.S.
Posted by: Frau Bahnhof | November 05, 2014 at 12:29 PM
Anybody hear from DWS this morning? :)
Posted by: Eric in Boise | November 05, 2014 at 12:32 PM
RickB-- I think the Repubs have to be a bit more ambitious than that. Push Keystone, nuke plants, Yucca (Nevada needs the jobs) PLUS continental shelf drilling (which the Va Dems want so there are 2 Cloture votes right there), PLUS no CO2 authority for EPA. Push all of them in one omnibus bill, Force the Senate Dems to vote for Cloture, then force Bam to veto, and let the Senate Dems triangulate against Bam to save the bill in some form. That's what I'd do.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 12:35 PM
Do people here the senate dems will can the Pederast? For Schumer?
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 12:37 PM
From the previous thread. my opinion is that Obummer goes full rogue, and opens the borders
It would seem that, there being no immediate crisis, a federal judge could issue a restraining order holding implementation of the executive orders until their legality could be properly litigated.
Since immediate implementation was not necessary, one would imagine that the hearing could be delayed in discovery and pretrial motions until after the new Congress was seated.
At that time both the House and Senate could defund any implementation of the executive orders, daring Obummer to veto.
Meanwhile, Congress could work up several smaller bills for border security, and limited legal residence for some aliens for certain circumstances.
Any citizenship plan would not happen immediately and certainly would not jump anyone ahead of others in line.
Meanwhile, job visas could be selectively approved, only for those narrow fields required.
And chains of family could be restricted to immediate family and also consider repatriation.
Let Obama swing on his own rope for months.
Posted by: sbw | November 05, 2014 at 12:40 PM
god forbid Schumer is smarter than Reid
Posted by: Peter | November 05, 2014 at 12:42 PM
I wonder who the Dems need to contact about their losses -
"The White House is under fire for a blog post asking supporters to send "fishy" information received through rumors, chain e-mails and casual conversations to a White House e-mail address, '[email protected]'."
Maybe this email address is still good?
Posted by: Janet | November 05, 2014 at 12:43 PM
Washington Post, The Fix has a list of "firsts" due to this election. This one is my favorite (loser, loser, loser):
Charlie Crist lost his third election in Florida -- but his first as a Democrat. He is also most definitely the first former governor to lose races as a Democrat, Republican (the 1998 Senate race) and independent (the 2010 Senate race).
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Posted by: centralcal | November 05, 2014 at 12:45 PM
or Obama could resurrect the "Not Optimal" meme
OBAMA ON COMEDY CENTRAL: 'WHEN FOUR AMERICANS GET KILLED, IT'S NOT OPTIMAL'
Posted by: Janet | November 05, 2014 at 12:46 PM
NK,
The objective is to break the broomstick and burn the teepee over 12-14 months. I'm only writing about what I'd like to see up first. I'd put convening a few joint select committees on various items of grave concern second. Red Witch looks a little tired to me. A good flogging on Benghazi and the entire Arab Spring fiasco should help lift her spirits.
Posted by: RickB | November 05, 2014 at 12:47 PM
Republicans winning is "Not Optimal"!
Posted by: Janet | November 05, 2014 at 12:48 PM
From the "Need Better Editors" dept. and completely OT:
Walking the dog AND giving oral sex? Any of you libertines have any thoughts?
http://www.tmz.com/2014/11/05/ex-nfl-cheerleader-molly-shattuck-indicted-for-raping-15-year-old/
Oh, and did something big happen in the last 24 hours? ;-)
Posted by: lyle | November 05, 2014 at 12:50 PM
RickB@12:47-- you do have a way with words.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 12:52 PM
I like all of NK's & Rick's energy ideas and would add fast track for a refinery or two as well.
But as soon as it covers several bases it gets long and complicated and time consuming.
Perhaps a one page Keystone Approval yes or no could start the flow? Then flood the system with a bunch of bite size very clear bills that force cloture votes then veto override votes as said above.
BTW, could someone remind me what class of bills (budget?) can get floor votes with 51 not 60?
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 05, 2014 at 12:55 PM
Here's the story. So Obummer will grow his own and Choom constantly... oh... this will be GOOD. He'll be effin' constantly stoned.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/4/dc-marijuana-legalization-measure-on-track-for-eas/#!
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 12:56 PM
NK@12:35 - Sounds like a good start!
Posted by: Beasts of England | November 05, 2014 at 12:56 PM
Why are VA and AK not called yet?
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 05, 2014 at 12:58 PM
lyle, like Barry, Ms. Shattuck is flexible.
Posted by: Frau Scherzhaft | November 05, 2014 at 12:59 PM
Insty asks if the GOPe will get the message.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/05/what-schumer-wrought/
Click to see how all the dems who backed Schumer's Gang of 8 immigration bill fared yesterday. No guessing!
Posted by: lyle | November 05, 2014 at 12:59 PM
OL-- 51 votes will be 'reconciliation' of the House and Senate Budget bills after conference committee. Here's a primer from 2009: http://prospect.org/article/50-vote-senate
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 01:01 PM
My guess is that this guy will definat; he knows no other way. I can't think of a single instance where he has compromised on anythimg.
Dangerous times.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 05, 2014 at 01:03 PM
The Rothman kid is pretty dense, but he's right about this:http://hotair.com/archives/2014/11/05/democratic-civil-war-begin/
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 01:04 PM
lyle:
Oh, and did something big happen in the last 24 hours? ;-)
Butch won by 13 points.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | November 05, 2014 at 01:05 PM
Dangerous times.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 05, 2014 at 01:03 PM
Yes they are, but remember your Frederick the Great (and Patton) L'audace, L'audace... toujours l'audace.' This is an opportunity to forge a majority conservative consensus as an alternative to Obummerism.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 01:07 PM
OL,
I'm not so hot on simple bills. I like the idea of varying dosage and type on the poison pills included to preclude habituation and increased tolerance.
Sure, it means the progs will linger a bit longer but at least they'll suffer more during the remainder of their pathetic existence. If it gets boring, we can always switch to scorpions in a bottle.
Posted by: RickB | November 05, 2014 at 01:07 PM
Can you believe this guy?
What a jackass.
Posted by: lyle | November 05, 2014 at 01:08 PM
Is that the thread with the picture of Soylent holding a urinal cake in his hand?
That was a giant marshmallow.
So Obummer will grow his own and Choom constantly
This presumes he's not already doing that, and probably more. He has the manner of a person who does copious amounts of coke, and then chooms to get the edge off when out in public. It has been mentioned here before that he has the dead, soulless black eyes of a habitual drug user.
My only question is how long it takes for him to spark one up publicly.
BTW, I'll bet he's worked his way through several hundred dollars of Kools and Nicorette in the last 48 hours.
Posted by: Soylent Red | November 05, 2014 at 01:08 PM
Soylent@1:08-- excellent observations I bet you are right.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 01:11 PM
He he, Soy...
So Obama is growing his own dope? Probably in MO's garden beside the WH, right? Is that not the garden found to be contaminated with lead paint? Perhaps lead tainted smoke explains a lot.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 05, 2014 at 01:12 PM
Dangerous times, you betcha, if we focus on things like Ernst's giddy laughter last night and allow that to define her just as Palin's accent was used to make her laughable and distract from her messages.
Posted by: Frau Scherzhaft | November 05, 2014 at 01:13 PM
The message from voters is clear: Stop Obama.
FTFY (alleged) Pederast!
Posted by: Beasts of England | November 05, 2014 at 01:13 PM
lyle,
He is just stealing Brokaw's lines:)
In Re: Immediate action on Keystone. H.R. 3 passed the house in March of 2013 and is in the Senate in-box. Wouldn't take much to move it to the PosTUS' desk. Let him veto and let the Dems pass on over-riding.
The reason the Dems won't be as intimidated as they should be is the lack of Dem seats in Red states up for renewal in 2016. Its the reverse then. Mostly Red state republicans will be up that year. They may just sit it out and bet they keep the WH and it has coat-tails to win back the Senate.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 05, 2014 at 01:15 PM
OL-
I posted this on the dead thread for DoT but I'll drop it here too. VA still has some counting left but it will probably be Warner absent something earth shattering.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 05, 2014 at 11:08 AM-
Coleman v. Franken would most likely be the standard. Absent a clear rule, the entire state would be recounted. In VA there is not an automatic recount procedure but if the total difference is <1% the loser can pay for the recount. Given there are clear rules in VA with what counts and what doesn't, Gillespie would have to find evidence of substantial fraud to challenge at the precinct level. Given the history of voting patterns around the state, and his vote difference, it would be difficult for Gillespie to make that challenge. Again it comes down to turn out ... Gillespie needed to lose Fairfax less badly and needed to do better in the rural areas to have closed the gap. The killer is how much ground the GOP has lost in Loudoun County over the years. Gillespie won it by a few hundred votes, but less than a decade ago a Rep would have taken the county by thousands.
Coleman v. Franken for your review
http://www.minnpost.com/politics-policy/2009/06/impressive-unanimity-historical-significance-coleman-v-franken
Posted by: rich@gmu | November 05, 2014 at 12:24 PM
Posted by: rich@gmu | November 05, 2014 at 01:18 PM
Return message to Harry Reid: "If you like your 60 vote cloture, you can keep your cloture. By the way, don't let your desk block janitorial access to the brooms."
Posted by: henry | November 05, 2014 at 01:19 PM
Don't know, JiB. After that ass whipping last night, I'll bet there were a lot of sleepless nights and their confidence is flatlined. Not a single person on the left saw that coming. No one.
Posted by: Beasts of England | November 05, 2014 at 01:19 PM
I hope Mitch McConnell gives the pederast the Dick Cheney salute to Leahy.
Wasn't it Reid the Racemonger who called Justice Clarence Thomas "an embarrassment"?
Posted by: Frau Scherzhaft | November 05, 2014 at 01:20 PM
Thanks Rich.
AK, anyone?
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 05, 2014 at 01:21 PM
There are about a dozen (bipartisan!) VA reform bills sitting in the Senate since before the scandal that could be dusted off and passed.
Posted by: AliceH | November 05, 2014 at 01:23 PM
The 16 Most Epic Meltdowns on Democrat Underground Last Night.
http://dailycaller.com/2014/11/05/the-16-most-epic-democratic-underground-meltdowns-over-the-2014-republican-rout/
Worth a few laughs. One guys suggests OhNobama resign so as not to give the ReThugs the plesure of impeaching him. I agree.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 05, 2014 at 01:23 PM
Great photo of Mia Love at the top of Drudge! Awesome!!
Posted by: Beasts of England | November 05, 2014 at 01:24 PM
Is that historically true, the Republicans lost the Congress in '54, and Eisenhower was reelected, now when there were further losses in '58, that presaged the narrow loss in '60,
then you have '94 and they subsequently lost in '96, and then you have 2006 and they lost in 2008, the record is at best mixed,
Posted by: narciso | November 05, 2014 at 01:25 PM
media coverage of the VA senate race ...
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Mark-Warner-Ed-Gillespie-Virginia-Senate-Race--281500861.html
and I was in error. The state picks up the tab if the difference is between 0%
Posted by: rich@gmu | November 05, 2014 at 01:26 PM
OL,
As I understnd it Alaska has 30K ballots from 70 outlying villages to be counted and it will take a week. Supposedly, this is an Alaska process in place for years to allow the natives to get their ballots in.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 05, 2014 at 01:26 PM
OL-
in re: Alaska: I think that has to do with remote precincts and absentee ballots (reservations?) but historical patterns look good for Sullivan. Not sure of election laws there so Begich might challenge the outcome as well.
Posted by: rich@gmu | November 05, 2014 at 01:28 PM
Anybody remember who predicted 52 / 245 the other day?
Not to brag, or anything. ;)
Posted by: Beasts of England | November 05, 2014 at 01:30 PM
The killer is how much ground the GOP has lost in Loudoun County over the years. Gillespie won it by a few hundred votes, but less than a decade ago a Rep would have taken the county by thousands.
And that ladies and gentleman is another illustration of how the government and its receipient culture (beltway bandits, contractors, etc.) has grown and grown and grown.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 05, 2014 at 01:30 PM
I'm losing count, BOE. Does 52 include Alaska and Louisiana, or could it go up to 54?
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 05, 2014 at 01:31 PM
DoT - This Obama quote in a Jack Cashill article (American thinker 4 Nov 2014) reminded me of the Obama Jr. vs Obama II designation I mentioned recently:
Again, curious, but not important.
According to Bill Ayers' book "Dreams From My Father," Obama saw/had his birth certificate.
Posted by: Frau Scherzhaft | November 05, 2014 at 01:32 PM
Thanks guys. I'm just trying to get Rick to his 8 with his 9th coming when LA decides.
If we were Dems, we could probably find enough votes to get VA back through the challenge process but since we aren't, that is not going to happen. Sadly. That was a great run by Gillespie, and the lesson there is that he ran on, you know, actual things.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 05, 2014 at 01:33 PM
weird my 1:26 got clipped ...
the state picks up the tab if the difference is between 0 and .5. the current difference is .57 or about 12k votes. it would come down to challenging absentee ballots.
Posted by: rich@gmu | November 05, 2014 at 01:33 PM
TC, 52 counts neither AK nor LA, and the Dems 45 does not yet count VA. So it is 52:45 with VA,AK and LA tbd.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 05, 2014 at 01:35 PM
52 now, which was my Wednesday morning prediction! ;)
Posted by: Beasts of England | November 05, 2014 at 01:37 PM
did you put some money on those picks beasts?
I was out on the ledge with OL, James, and others. Think I promised to bbq up some crow and a hat ... dang it.
in other news gotta interview here this afternoon. probably saying something about will jinx it but it looks promising.
Posted by: rich@gmu | November 05, 2014 at 01:39 PM
OK, thanks, OL. So we are probably looking at 54-46 (although I'm not giving up on Gillespie just yet).
Has David Brooks come out with an op ed pontificating that the GOP Reps and Senators need to be like Rockefeller Republicans now that they control both branches of Congress?
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 05, 2014 at 01:39 PM
well Bruni is a proud acolyte of the sky dragon netters;
http://www.rightwingnews.com/elections-polls/ny-times-editorial-board-already-sour-grapes-mode/
honestly no decent oligarch should touch them now,
Posted by: narciso | November 05, 2014 at 01:48 PM
Fingers crossed for you, rich, and "Toi! Toi! Toi!"
Posted by: Frau Scherzhaft | November 05, 2014 at 01:50 PM
http://hamptonroads.com/2014/11/voting-irregularities-reported-virginia-beach
My touch screen phone didn't experience calibration issues after I threw it through a sliding glass door.
I call BS.
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 05, 2014 at 01:51 PM
Thanks Rich. I'd forgotten that case.
Likely to end up at 54-46.
Be honest, Frau: dismying as it may be, Palin's voice and accent were/are quite a detriment.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 05, 2014 at 01:52 PM
TK,
I am with you. I believe that "calibration issue" is the technology version of "5 low-level employees in the Cincinnati office."
Posted by: Miss Marple | November 05, 2014 at 01:53 PM
The current Virginia numbers have Gillespie behind by a little more than 12,000 votes, so that could well be a stolen election. However, the Libertarian candidate probably helped Warner more than fraud.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 05, 2014 at 01:54 PM
Low level button pushed-ers.
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 05, 2014 at 01:55 PM
Danube,
If she had wanted to be a serious contender, she should have gotten a vocal coach. It wasn't her voice or her accent which bothered me, but her odd sentence emphasis, like stopping in weird places and running on in others. It made her difficult to listen to.
Posted by: Miss Marple | November 05, 2014 at 01:55 PM
Narciso-- Carlos means to eat the NYT whole. He's not shy about his plans, post defenestrating the Ochs-Sulzbergers he plans to shut doen the dead tree edition but keep the 'content' and 'content' only. That means he will turn the staff into serfs, do you think the union/guilds survive that Mexican Standoff? Pass the popcorn.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 01:55 PM
I want to give the performance of the night to Gillespie (even if in a losing cause) or Love or Hogan, but, given that he faced corrupt prosecutors and unions for whom defeating him was priority number one, I'm leaning towards Walker's 53 something percent as the performance of the night.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | November 05, 2014 at 01:57 PM
I am posting this for GMax (to use as future reference for polling info):
John Ekdahl @JohnEkdahl 10h10 hours ago
Final RCP Averages:
Cotton +7 (+18 actual)
Orman +0.8 (Roberts +11)
Perdue +3 (+8)
Ernst +2 (+8)
McConnell +7 (+15)
Warner +10 (+1)
Posted by: centralcal | November 05, 2014 at 01:57 PM
"Be honest, Frau: dismying as it may be, Palin's voice and accent were/are quite a detriment."
I quite disagree. I believe she has a lovely voice, and that those who found it "annoying" or whatever were doing so only out of pure bigotry. What is truly dismaying, is that those people weren't derided and marginalized.
Posted by: Some Guy | November 05, 2014 at 01:57 PM
The only way the democrats win, ahead, is through fraud.
And, there's no software written yet that can detect machine failures.
The only way out of this is to DEMAND paper ballots. People want to press computer buttons? Let them. The machine should give them a receipt while it makes a deduction from their debit card.
But paper ballots also have their problems. LBJ once bragged that he had a full box of votes ... And, if he saw his numbers dropping, he'd just have "voting inspectors" open up his special box. And, count.
Sure. Exit polling works, too. In that it could uncover chicanery. But most people who volunteer to work at polling places don't want to go to jail. About as close as you can get to an honest system. (While computer software changes the ballgame's results into the "unknown" category.)
Posted by: Carol Herman | November 05, 2014 at 01:58 PM
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/11/05/strong-kentucky-woman-not-particularly-gracious-in-concession/
Unsurprising. She's...entitled, dontchaknow.
Posted by: lyle | November 05, 2014 at 01:58 PM
I rather agree with you Some Guy. It's not her voice or her accent that annoy me at all - but sometimes her pacing in speaking her sentences sure needs some work.
Posted by: centralcal | November 05, 2014 at 02:00 PM
Hope Mitch remembers this:
"100% of Newly Elected GOP Senators Campaigned on Repealing Obamacare"
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 05, 2014 at 02:04 PM
Palin's time has passed.
Posted by: MarkO | November 05, 2014 at 02:05 PM
The killer is how much ground the GOP has lost in Loudoun County over the years. Gillespie won it by a few hundred votes, but less than a decade ago a Rep would have taken the county by thousands.
I don't know VA, but it seems to me that Gillespie didn't try very hard or spend very much. He was considered toast from the beginning. Presumably past Rs campaigned more seriously.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 05, 2014 at 02:05 PM
Fluke lost by 22 points. :)
http://www.tpnn.com/2014/11/05/fluke-flunked-condom-queen-sandra-fluke-crushed-by-whopping-22-points/
Posted by: Porchlight | November 05, 2014 at 02:07 PM
@Porchlight from a couple of threads back, re: being a secret red in a blue workplace.
All during the W Bush years I worked at Lincoln Center. I think, and this really is not an exaggeration, that there were fewer than 20 of us on the entire campus who voted for Bush. When the Republican convention was held in New York, we received an email from an exec (for every Lincoln Center employee) of one of those phony Republic Convention Schedules that started out: "9:30, The Burning of the Constitution", etc. etc.
After Bush won, I was at a programming meeting, and the head of programming said, "Well, I know we're all depressed, so we'll just sit here in the dark and listen to Shostakovich."
My department head (Community Programming) was always trying to get Amira Biraka or Mumia (reading from jail) included in Lincoln Center Out of Doors events.
It was like going into a war zone everyday.
Posted by: Tonto | November 05, 2014 at 02:07 PM
"the record is at best mixed,"
What's not so mixed is that the party of the 2nd term President loses the next Presidential election. Only Ronaldus Maximus was able to carry the Rs into another victory. Before that, the last was Hoover, or maybe FDR if he counts. (Truman doesn't count because he was an incumbent in '48).
Posted by: jimmyk on iPad | November 05, 2014 at 02:07 PM
So Drunken Danny won in Ct this year with fewer votes than Foley had in 2010. Just pitiful. Foley is a capable enough guy but he gives normal people no reason to vote for him. There is NO Repub party in Ct. Just pitiful.
Posted by: NKreBootDeux | November 05, 2014 at 02:08 PM
Talk about "every vote counts". Col. Martha McSally (USAF Ret.) is up 36 votes on Ron Barber in Gabby Giffords old district. She is someoe I have been supporting for the last two election cycles. Imagine a recount is at hand.
http://townhall.com/election/2014/results/az#house
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 05, 2014 at 02:08 PM
Palin suffered from creating made-up colloquialisms* to sound like one of the guys/gals.
"Joe six-pac" and "good ole boys club" type shit should have never been said more than once on a national stage.
Her accent made a dumb saying sound like an f'd up line from a middle school rendition of "Oklahoma."
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 05, 2014 at 02:10 PM
I agree with Some Guy.
Re-listen to the announcement and convention speeches that electrified tens of millions of people. Nobody was cringing about her voice back then.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfSUOMTh5xo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCDxXJSucF4
Posted by: Extraneus | November 05, 2014 at 02:10 PM
*spellchecker
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 05, 2014 at 02:11 PM
I'm afraid 36 vote is not nearly enough to cover the margin of fraud. A box of ballots will be discovered somewhere in a blue precinct.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPad | November 05, 2014 at 02:11 PM
It was like going into a war zone everyday
I'll bet it was. You're a better person than I. I would have mouthed off.
Posted by: lyle | November 05, 2014 at 02:13 PM
"Palin suffered from creating made-up colloquialisms* to sound like one of the guys/gals."
Which Barry and Hillary never ever do./sarc
The difference is that the Ds and MSM and Hollywood don't jump all over them.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPad | November 05, 2014 at 02:14 PM
Porchlight-
My take is that his race suffered some of the same defects that the GOP gov race and the Presidential race. A bad turn out and gotv model and not deploying adverts well (spending way too much on TV in Fairfax and not sending out volunteers in the rural areas). Overall though, I think Gillespie should have hit the corruption theme harder (local scandal involving a judgeship and state senator) and better targeted adverts esp showing how much Warner is as liberal as Obama. Warner was a tough beat though (he has a folksy charm that can cover his progressivism well) and actually learning some lessons from 2010-2014 would be nice.
Posted by: rich@gmu | November 05, 2014 at 02:15 PM
I doubt I'll ever see a convention speech better than Palin's - speech, delivery, everything. Plus she looked like a million bucks, of course.
Her relatively late endorsement pulled Walker over the finish line quite easily. Not bad for someone whose time has passed.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 05, 2014 at 02:15 PM
jimmyk
And that is the crux isn't it. The only ballots ever found in a red district were by Thad Cocoran this year:)
Posted by: Jack is Back! | November 05, 2014 at 02:16 PM
Tonto,
Thanks for that. I know many have or had it worse than I do. That must have been tough. Librarians vote D about 500-1, and our organization has fewer than 500 employees.
People here assume you share their politics, but they can't do anything officially (state university in a red state), so at least I don't get emails or anything like that.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 05, 2014 at 02:18 PM
--@Porchlight from a couple of threads back, re: being a secret red in a blue workplace.--
I'm not sure whether to cringe at the possibility of being a "secret red" these days or if it's an ironic badge of honor that we are now patriotic insurgents against an established politburo.
Posted by: Iggy | November 05, 2014 at 02:18 PM
Did someone say "Hollywood"?
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hollywood-reeling-bitter-election-defeats-746423?mobile_redirect=false
Schadenboner.
Posted by: lyle | November 05, 2014 at 02:19 PM
Those speeches struck intense fear into the entire left wing of this country. They weren't making fun of her accent back then. They were too busy worrying about her being president someday, and fantasizing about murdering her.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 05, 2014 at 02:19 PM