As we brace for tonight's diktat we cannot shake the feeling that Allison Williams and the Peter Pan spectacular are airing a few days early. Obama hopes to rally his base and re-establish his relevance by picking a huge, divisive fight with the Republicans. Couldn't we be spared this drama if people would simply gather around their televisions tonight and clap if they believe in Obama?
It always worked when I was a kid. For Tinkerbell, anyway.
ERRATA: Recent problematic metaphors include Sen. McConnell announcing that Obama's executive action on immigration will be "like waving a red flag in front of a bull". Umm, matadors do that because bulls are stupid and predictable, and the red flag is a useful distraction prior to going in for the kill.
McConnell has a good feel for his caucus so this metaphor may be apt. Or maybe McConnell is bullish on America.
Primo ?
Posted by: Sandy--fallow districts, fat capital--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 04:36 PM
By the way,
I stand with Walker 2016.
That is all.
Posted by: Sandy--I Stand With Walker 2016--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 04:38 PM
The Peter Pan Spectacular gets a TomM shoutout! Co-Starring Christopher Walken (WILTON/Block Island's Own!) as Capt Hook... Tick-Tock... Tick-Tock....
Posted by: NKontheNovreboot | November 20, 2014 at 04:39 PM
Well the the of us are having a grand old time here, me myself, and I.
Reminds me of Winkin, Blonkin, and Nod.
Posted by: Sandy--I Stand With Walker 2016--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 04:40 PM
*the three of us*
posting from a hand-held communicator is a female canine.
Posted by: Sandy--I Stand With Walker 2016--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 04:42 PM
If Obama is as good at matador stuff as he is a golf, the bull will have his ears.
Posted by: henry | November 20, 2014 at 04:43 PM
McConnell and Boehner aren't going to do jack shit about this, tough talk or not. Everyone knows it.
It would be nice if there was a party that represented my interests for a change, rather than those of the elected elite.
Posted by: Soylent Red | November 20, 2014 at 04:43 PM
! Blockin !
Blinkin's rarely mentioned brother who has a mind like a gruber...
Posted by: Sandy--I Stand With Walker 2016--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 04:45 PM
Sometimes the bull wins.
Still don't know what McConnell and Boehner are supposed to do. What is the remedy for a rogue executive? We know impeachment isn't possible (yet).
Posted by: Porchlight | November 20, 2014 at 04:46 PM
No Sandy, Tacklin is his brother.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 20, 2014 at 04:48 PM
henry, the resident is the best matador in the room, if you don't believe that, just ask him...
Posted by: Sandy--I Stand With Walker 2016--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 04:48 PM
shoulda refreshed.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | November 20, 2014 at 04:49 PM
Wasn't this JiB's house in the LUN?
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 20, 2014 at 04:50 PM
Could be Sandy, Mooch hasn't trampled him yet.
Posted by: henry | November 20, 2014 at 04:51 PM
Solent, I hear you.
Interesting that Turley has been retained by the Speaker. Has spoken forcefully over constitutional process in every interview I've heard, sports Rule of Law, vice Law of Rule, even though I understand him to be a dyed-in-the-wool leftist.
Posted by: Sandy--I Stand With Walker 2016--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 04:51 PM
Tacklin !!!
HaHa HaHa
That is great, OL :-)
Posted by: Sandy--I Stand With Walker 2016--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 04:54 PM
Mooch...
Well in a matador's arena, wouldn't she be Elsie the cow ?
Posted by: Sandy--I Stand With Walker 2016--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 04:57 PM
Turley is just window dressing. He's more worried that a President Cruz will enact legislation to require mandatory possession of a firearm, overturn Roe, and force all university endowments to start paying taxes. Okay, maybe those are president lyle's legislative initiatives...
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 04:57 PM
Mukasey's rationale was that the courts would declare it a political qyestion and decline to hear it.
No one was ever going to deport these people anyway, so this doesn't really blow that much air up my dress. Let's see what he does beyond making that official.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 20, 2014 at 04:58 PM
$140M? How much for one with a dock?
Posted by: Extraneus | November 20, 2014 at 04:59 PM
Lyle, I'd be happy to just make those college endowments buy any student loan Note that is 90 days in arrears from the original lender, at par.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 20, 2014 at 05:00 PM
Doesn't the "screw separation of powers, I can do what I want, try and stop me" part bother you, DoT?
Surely this is only the beginning (actually not the beginning, but maybe the beginning of the major ramp up).
Posted by: Porchlight | November 20, 2014 at 05:00 PM
A dock? Then you're talking BIG money, Ext.
Posted by: Old Lurker | November 20, 2014 at 05:01 PM
Speaking of Tinkerbell, anyone remember this guy?
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 05:03 PM
--Umm, matadors do that because bulls are stupid and predictable...--
I have a hunch TM has never had the privilege of being in a confined space such as a chute, corral or cattle truck with a couple thousand pounds of agitated bull.
I have found them to be neither.
Posted by: Iggy | November 20, 2014 at 05:06 PM
Obama & Holder are predictable. email proves White House & DOJ targeted Attkisson in F&F coverup. Chickens the size of bulls coming home to roost. (ht Mel).
Posted by: henry | November 20, 2014 at 05:14 PM
Every time that DoT says he doesn't mind when the laws aren't enforced by people who took an oath to do so, a kitten is thrown in a Korean meat grinder.
Posted by: Captain Hate on the iPad | November 20, 2014 at 05:16 PM
Doesn't the "screw separation of powers, I can do what I want, try and stop me" part bother you, DoT?,
Exactly, it's the principle, not the specific issue, plus the fact that like any punk, if we let him get away with this, he will only up the ante next round.
Posted by: jimmyk | November 20, 2014 at 05:17 PM
I'll second your 5:00, OL.
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 05:19 PM
henry:
This is a bombshell! No wonder Holder is heading for the exits. I am sure one of these scandals will be the undoing of Obama. If only we had a Gap blue stained dress...
Posted by: maryrose | November 20, 2014 at 05:19 PM
Surely this is only the beginning (actually not the beginning, but maybe the beginning of the major ramp up).
Yup. Once he figures out he can do it with the tiniest sliver of legal cover, and that Orange and Bitch aren't going to lift a finger to stop him, the motherfcuker is going to spend the next two years turning us into Venezuela.
The way to stop a street punk like Obama is to hit him hard and often until he backs off, otherwise they will just keep pushing and pushing. There isn't any GOPe leadership willing to do much more than issue stern statements of concern.
We'll be lucky if the asshole decides to step down in January 2017.
Posted by: Soylent Red | November 20, 2014 at 05:19 PM
I see your point, lyle, but Turley would be even more credible in arguing against this action because of his unqualified leftist bonafides...
If he argues against the resident's action, I expect it to be no holds barred. IANAL, but I think he is sincere in his support for the constitutional order.
Sincerity in Lawyer ?!?! And it is barely after 5pm, maybe it is what I'm smoking...
Posted by: Sandy--I Stand With Walker 2016--Daze | November 20, 2014 at 05:19 PM
a kitten is thrown in a Korean meat grinder.
Mmmm...catgogi.
Posted by: Soylent Red | November 20, 2014 at 05:21 PM
CH and jimmyk
Actions have consequences which is why the defeat of Begich in Alaska is my favorite!
How dare you take down a sitting Senator {Ted Stevens}by withholding evidence and a false prosecution! Cheaters never prosper for long.
Posted by: maryrose | November 20, 2014 at 05:22 PM
I have complete confidence that Tippy Turtle and the Orange Crybaby are going to do Jack Squat.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | November 20, 2014 at 05:23 PM
"Yup. Once he figures out he can do it with the tiniest sliver of legal cover"
It's all he needs, a sliver, and y'all showed him the path so bone it up.
Posted by: Ben | November 20, 2014 at 05:23 PM
I like Turley and he is a true believer in what is constitutional. The joke here is Obama fancies himself smarter than Turley. Only time will tell if hubris will again be the undoing of Preezy.
Posted by: maryrose | November 20, 2014 at 05:24 PM
Ben: He is not getting away with a sliver of anything. The following trees are about to fall on his head.
Benghazi-Hil will also be a victim of hubris here
Fast and Furious
Obamacare Dental enrollments indeed!
Immigration meddling and failure to support laws on the books
Iran
gets a nuke
Putin saying take your sanctions and shove it
Defeat for dems in 2016.
Posted by: maryrose | November 20, 2014 at 05:28 PM
I have found them to be neither.
Man, oh, man, can I affirm this. Bullriders are the craziest mofos on earth.
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 05:30 PM
Anyone else think today is an interesting day to make giving jobs to "disconnected youth" a top priority "for government and the private sector."
http://www.clasp.org/resources-and-publications/publication-1/Campaign-for-Youth-Road-Map-2014-Final-November.pdf
Posted by: rse | November 20, 2014 at 05:35 PM
Notice that the National Council for La Raza is one of the sponsors.
Posted by: rse | November 20, 2014 at 05:37 PM
Why shouldn't a president do whatever he can get away with?
Limits on power are not limits if they rely on the good will or timidity of the person holding that power.
I would love to see a President Walker or Cruz push it to the wall.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 20, 2014 at 05:38 PM
And that's a heck of a prize.
Posted by: Tom Maguire | November 20, 2014 at 05:42 PM
Notice that the National Council for La Raza is one of the sponsors.
Ugh, so much for the credibility.
Regarding Turley, he's an honest lib with a respect for the Constitution; kind of like a less aggressive Dershowitz.
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 20, 2014 at 05:44 PM
jimmyk, left a reply for you on the last thread re: Iowahawk. Hope you make it out tonight!
Posted by: Porchlight | November 20, 2014 at 05:53 PM
@Old Lurker: " I'm still trying to understand what Tonto's brother was doing outside the Monterey Jail."
An even better question would be, "How did he recognize those mushrooms so swiftly and certainly?" He's a former Deadhead who now works as a naturalist for the city of Monterey. Do what you love, etc.
Posted by: Tonto | November 20, 2014 at 05:55 PM
Sorry for my earlier diatribe and its course language.
I live twenty miles from the home of the Klan. I remember driving through Pulaski, Tennessee as a teenager and having Klukkers in robes and hoods standing at intersections with KFC buckets trying to collect dollar bills from everyone stopped at the light. Terrifying. And I'm pretty much white.
My lake house is ten miles from Scottsboro, Alabama and two miles from Sand Mountain - two of the former most virulently racist places in the country. I've witnessed the Klan bumper stickers and treatment of blacks that is sickening. Most of that has ended over the last twenty years, but the memories remain.
That said, I view Sharpton a dark-skinned Kleagle in a bespoke suit, yet I lack the vocabulary to adequately capture my disdain for him. Pax
Posted by: Beasts of England | November 20, 2014 at 05:56 PM
Ha, Tonto, my UCSC brother is a former Deadhead too, now working for Google.
Posted by: Porchlight | November 20, 2014 at 05:57 PM
Remember too that it isn't just Hispanics we're talkin' about here. Lots & lots & lots & lots are from the ME.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obamas-immigration-announcement/story?id=27052740
"Who Gets Relief?
4.1 million undocumented parents and families of U.S. citizens who have been in country more than 5 years with no criminal record."
Parents & families
Posted by: Janet - I wish my family had a poncho | November 20, 2014 at 06:01 PM
Shake it off, Beasts. Were all grownups here. Or so I think...
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 06:01 PM
Hey henry, the House just increased duck stamp prices from $15 to $25.
Waddya gonna do about that?
Posted by: Iggy | November 20, 2014 at 06:02 PM
http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/11/video-sheriff-arpaio-speaks-forged.html?m=1
Maybe Howard Kurtz will take a look.
Hahahaha!!
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 20, 2014 at 06:03 PM
Were all grownups here.
I was told that wasn't a prerequisite. Now, I'll have to find somewhere new.
Posted by: Some Guy | November 20, 2014 at 06:04 PM
Beasts, FWIW, I thought your original comment was spot on. XXOO
Posted by: maryd | November 20, 2014 at 06:07 PM
Growing old is inescapable, SG. Growing up is optional.
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 06:08 PM
And for gawd's sake, DO NOT CLICK:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/393089/rand-paul-meets-al-sharpton-discuss-criminal-justice-reform-christine-sisto
Not that he was ever in the running for me, but Paul has crossed the Rubicon.
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 06:11 PM
Iggy, I'll keep hunting in Canada -- where the ducks are. ; )
That increase sucks, but is less painful than the run up in ammo prices -- I buy one stamp, but cases of ammo.
Posted by: henry | November 20, 2014 at 06:13 PM
Listen up, yanquis:
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 06:15 PM
"Doesn't the 'screw separation of powers, I can do what I want, try and stop me' part bother you, DoT?"
Only if the propos d action is, indeed, beyond the power of the executive, which is not a slam dunk to me. When I hear Michael Mukasey say it isn't, it gets my attention. Nonetheless, I hope Turley sues and wins.
It bothers me isomewhat n this instance, CH, but remember, since 1986 we've had three terms of GOP presidents not doing anything either.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 20, 2014 at 06:17 PM
Porchlight -- My brother also plays the guitar and worshipped Jerry Garcia like a god. He took me to a few Grateful Dead concerts at the Fillmore (he knew how to show his little sister a good time!) and I remember the strobe lights playing over the interpretative dancing hippies while those endless guitar solos played on as a special kind of hell.
Posted by: Tonto | November 20, 2014 at 06:19 PM
Top. Men.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/393142/republican-leaders-urge-restraint-eliana-johnson
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 06:20 PM
Ad infinitum:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/111914-727280-unfunded-pensions-for-public-unions-threaten-states-fiscal-health.htm
4.7 Trillion
Posted by: lyle | November 20, 2014 at 06:24 PM
LOL, Tonto.
Posted by: Iggy | November 20, 2014 at 06:24 PM
Andy McCarthy's take is interesting:
No, ‘Prosecutorial Discretion’ Does Not Justify Obama’s Lawless Amnesty
Posted by: Jane | November 20, 2014 at 06:26 PM
Let us all put our heads together and see if we can figure out why Howard Kurtz, Fox News et al. would pay very serious attention to Grubergate (even though it's very harmful to Obama) but assiduously ignores every bulletin from the Birther Report.
Sure is a head-scratcher, ain't it?
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 20, 2014 at 06:26 PM
I'm beginning to think it's a set up. Obama will get very very very close to the line, to rile up the right and hope for a big fight that he can blame on us and get his party back. He's dying to shut the government down.
Maybe we should just shut up, and plot revenge until January.
Posted by: Jane | November 20, 2014 at 06:28 PM
The Koch Brothers choice for the next president is being interviewed by Brett.
Posted by: Jane | November 20, 2014 at 06:30 PM
Btw, has anyone on here been through - or just attended - one of these? http://becuo.com/american-citizenship-ceremony
i have. and, imho, it's a significantly different 'new beginning' to something like this: http://toprightnews.com/?p=7281
Posted by: exdemocrat | November 20, 2014 at 06:30 PM
I think you're onto something, Jane.
It mat be that the Youngsyown Sheet & Tube case may pit some daylight between what Reagan-Bush did and what Obama is proposing to do.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 20, 2014 at 06:39 PM
Should Kurtz look into the Khalidi tape, Danube?
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 20, 2014 at 06:40 PM
I think its a big nothing burger, he has not been deporting folks anyway. He wont deliberately create law out of ether.
Posted by: GMax | November 20, 2014 at 06:42 PM
It's amusing, really, we worry about even mentioning impeachment, because we may not have the vote. You note the left doesn't have those scruples, they turned a botched political intelligence exercise, into a high crime, they ran a through a baker's dozen of Reagan's cabinet, they got maybe one or two, Scalia did raise the Olsen appeal, memories run short, apparently even for him, they went after North, even running roughshod over procedure, as they did with an earlier
Watergate figure, that Clarice knows well,
When the statute lapsed, they memorized Olsen and 'salted the battlefield, in defense of the Razorback Borgia and his retinue,they shredded Ken Starr's reputation like confetti, then the statute lapsed,
Posted by: narciso | November 20, 2014 at 06:43 PM
I disagree with McCarthy. The president *can* decide not to prosecute certain crimes, and there is nothing in the Constitution that forces him to prosecute those crimes.
If a US Attorney made such a decision, he could be fired, but only if the president chose to fire him.
The president can only be fired through impeachment, but it is not a high crime or misdemeanor to instruct the Justice Department and US Attorneys not to prosecute certain crimes, although it surely is a violation of his oath to see that the laws are faithfully executed.
Should he choose to take this path, the only recourse short of impeachment is the ballot box.
It's unlikely that Obama will announce a flagrant violation of the Constitution tonight. On the other hand, it's likely that he'll announce something that the majority of voters will oppose, endangering Democrats in 2016.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 20, 2014 at 06:44 PM
but remember, since 1986 we've had three terms of GOP presidents not doing anything either.
I haven't been leading the cheers for them either.
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 20, 2014 at 06:45 PM
I linked the underlying article on a previous thread but here's the Ewok's take on this:
http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=353284
Posted by: Captain Hate | November 20, 2014 at 06:48 PM
After criminalizing an election victory, they were able to resurrect the special counsel, by
appealing to the unethical and ambitious junior Justice Dept official, and they were off to the raises, of course we know wnat they did to Newt in the previous interval, they weaponized one good government rule, through Ronnie Earle to get at the Hammer, they allowed suborned testimony to get a bogus indictment of Stevens,
then they turned their guns on perhaps the honest public servant, and forced to chose between bankruptcy and holding her office,
Posted by: narciso | November 20, 2014 at 06:49 PM
First, credit to Tom Maguire to paying attention to the bull metaphor.
(Those who don't pay attention to metaphors often produce unintentionally comic effects. I usually try to visualize metaphors, so I often end up chuckling at an argument that is intended to be serious. Or just groaning, if I have seen the mistake a hundred times before.)
However.
Unless you happen to be a trained and experienced matador, you should not provoke a bull. (And even matadors have a lot of help near by, just in case they miscalculate.)
One of my nephews grew up on a dairy farm and he and I were discussing just how dangerous bulls are. He told me that every dairy farmer that he knew who kept a bull for any length of time got injured by it, at some point.
And those farmers are way more experienced in working with bulls than the average person, especially a person who has never spent any time on a farm.
Posted by: Jim Miller | November 20, 2014 at 06:50 PM
Narciso -- Your 6:43 post is dishearteningly on point. "Razorback Brogia", however, is a mood lifter!
Posted by: Tonto | November 20, 2014 at 06:51 PM
they weaponized one good government rule, through Ronnie Earle to get at the Hammer
Channeling Gruber: The rule that an indictment was tantamount to a conviction was stupid.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 20, 2014 at 06:51 PM
Every once in awhile the matador has to make a mad dash to a wooden barrier. And occasionally he does not get there and gets gored, stomped or maybe both. I can dream now cant I?
Posted by: GMax | November 20, 2014 at 06:56 PM
"I haven't been leading the cheers for them either."
I haven't either, CH. But I don't see any reason to become more exercised about this instance, other than that I hate Obama.
Posted by: Danube on iPad | November 20, 2014 at 06:56 PM
Nice to have Tonto here, in my view.
Posted by: Extraneus | November 20, 2014 at 06:58 PM
BTW, it's too bad that Rand Paul didn't bring his dad along to that meeting, perhaps with some samples of those old newsletters that -- if I recall correctly -- Ron claims not to have read.
Or his former aide and ghost writer, Jack Hunter, the "Southern Avenger".
Either would have made the meeting even more interesting.
Posted by: Jim Miller | November 20, 2014 at 07:00 PM
I am pretty sure this is nowhere as popular as Zero hopes, and it will put an already endangered species, Democrats in further jeopardy. Since he can not give them citizenship, and any executive action ends at the end of ever approaching end of his term. I am not going to get worked up about this, other than to watch Democrats sizzle on the griddle. I have been right about that for some time now, AND I think I am reading this exactly right one more time.
Posted by: GMax | November 20, 2014 at 07:02 PM
Jane,
Things will be done before January. They won't be "exciting" or "in your face" but the majority controls committee numbers, staff budgets and allowances and minority personnel allotments. The appropriate response is to bleed the Fascists in those areas until they scream for BOzo to sit down and shut up.
January will mark the beginning of two years of vivisection.
Posted by: RickB | November 20, 2014 at 07:04 PM
"No one was ever going to deport these people anyway"
Which ignores that 5 years from now there will be a much larger group that "No one was ever going to deport ... anyway".
Shortsighted to excuse this as something most people would support if it solved a problem without creating a bigger one down the road.
Posted by: boris | November 20, 2014 at 07:04 PM
GMax, see TM's YouTube link.
Posted by: Threadkiller | November 20, 2014 at 07:06 PM
well I'm sure he didn't bring up, Freddie's Fashion Mart or Tawana Brawley either, although they won't be so circumspect the next time,
So then they didn't take Walker's election as a fait accompli, they pushed for the first recall in state history, and then went after the supreme court justice, and then came the John Does in the background,
Posted by: narciso | November 20, 2014 at 07:09 PM
It's funny Dot, I just went on Facebook and Clarice also posted that she thinks it's a set up. So maybe we are all getting on the same page.
Posted by: Jane | November 20, 2014 at 07:10 PM
Well hellfire--when Good King Obozo goes all Stalinist dictator on us, a red flag is appropriate.
As I understand it, Josef Stalin was a clean cut Georgian from the Georgian Republic who spoke Russian with a clear accent. Prince Josef Bidenski told me so. Unlike Stalin, Good King Obozo doesn't have any bank robberies in his background. He prefers to rob the American taxpayer, and destroy the health system--do you think Rasputin would last long if he was enrolled in Obamacare? He also gets off on trampling the constitution. He'll have an armed rabble behind him--five million Hispanics with lawnmowers, butcher knives, and hedge clippers in their hands.
Posted by: Comanche Voter | November 20, 2014 at 07:12 PM
Nice to have Tonto here, in my view.
I agree!
Posted by: Jane | November 20, 2014 at 07:13 PM
How wonderful it would be if some enterprising hackers hijacked the Univision broadcast and played a Speedy Gonzalez cartoon over zero's proclamation decree!
Posted by: Skoot | November 20, 2014 at 07:23 PM
Watch Live Stream: President Obama Delivers an Address to the Nation
http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2014/11/watch-live-president-obama-delivers.html
Posted by: Steve | November 20, 2014 at 07:29 PM
Yeah, McConnell messed up that metaphor. I think he meant, "like a rodeo clown waving an Obama mask in front of a bull"
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | November 20, 2014 at 07:29 PM
" played a Speedy Gonzalez cartoon over zero's proclamation decree!"
Or how about the Frito Bandito?
Really wasn't the Emancipation Proclamation of the same order"
Shuck and Jive you merry minstrels !
Posted by: Ben | November 20, 2014 at 07:32 PM
An NBC/WSJ poll released yesterday supports my reading of the electorate BTW:
Zero is playing with matches in the middle of a refinery, and his home team is the one going to get burned. Bring it Zero. I am fairly certain history is going judge you a huge failure who squandered an advantage and even consigned his party to minority status for a generation...
Posted by: GMax | November 20, 2014 at 07:34 PM
Would it be inappropriate to call Obama's action "divisive?" Not in the spirit of "getting together to govern in a bipartisan fashion" as the electorate that just voted all those Dems out of office supposedly wants the Republicans to do? Any comments from our betters on the damage this is doing to the constructive lawmaking relationship and spirit of bipartisan harmony that the founders so fondly hoped for so government could accomplish so much?
I stand with Scott Walker (only because Ted Cruz doesn't appear to be in the running at this point).
Posted by: boatbuilder | November 20, 2014 at 07:35 PM
Shuck and Jive you merry minstrels !
Said the head feather passer with nary a speck of introspection...
Posted by: GMax | November 20, 2014 at 07:35 PM
heh. rent free in sum bitches head.
Posted by: Skoot | November 20, 2014 at 07:40 PM
Illegals are close to slave-labor in status. Many are effectively piece-workers with the cover of minimum wage because they have quotas for field work that I've seen as high as 2000 lbs of produce per day.Of course they still get the wages for hours worked that day, but are looking for a job the next.
And there aren't any longer camps for 'Braceros' where living costs were subsidized. today illegals have to find food and lodging without such.
So an Emancipation Proclamation is not really that far off
Posted by: Ben | November 20, 2014 at 07:45 PM