Glenn linked to this days ago but the "Peak Left" essay by Walter Russell Mead will be a perennial. An unfair use intro:
Next Up in America: The Liberal Retreat
The Obama administration may represent “Peak Left” in American politics. As a result, what we are getting from the left these days is a mix of bewilderment and anger as it realizes that this is as good as it gets.
As the United States staggers toward the seventh year of Barack Obama’s tenure in the White House, a growing disquiet permeates the ranks of the American left. After six years of the most liberal President since Jimmy Carter, the nation doesn’t seem to be asking for a second helping. Even though the multiyear rollout of Obamacare was carefully crafted to put all the popular features up front, delaying less popular changes into the far future, the program remains unpopular. Trust in the fairness and competence of government is pushing toward new lows in the polls, even though the government is now in the hands of forward-looking, progressive Democrats rather than antediluvian Gopers.
For liberals, these are bleak times of hollow victories (Obamacare) and tipping points that don’t tip. For examples of the latter, think of Sandy Hook, the horrific massacre in Connecticut that Democrats and liberals everywhere believed would finally push the American public toward gun control. Two years later, polls show more Americans than ever before think it’s more important to protect gun access than to promote gun control...
He also notes the IPCC climate change report that will not sway the Senate, the Ferguson/Garner protests that have ended in disaster, the UVA rape story that ended in debacle, the Senate torture report that left the public waterbored, and of course the multitude of foreign policy fails that were supposed to be avoided by embracing our allies and ending cowboy diplomacy. No mention of the likely immigration reform backlash, but that is more of an establishment fail than a purely progressive bellyflop.
Do read it all. And try to avoid Peak Schadenfreude (if you can, you're a better person than yours truly.)
We are getting to peak ACA fail and peak pension fail. Plenty of upside for the schadenfreude.
Posted by: henry | December 23, 2014 at 09:46 AM
Exclusive: Obama Impeachment Reportedly In Planning Stages
HAVE “STEPS TOWARD IMPEACHMENT” BEEN TAKEN?
by Sharon Rondeau
http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/12/report-obama-impeachment-reportedly-in.html?m=1
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 09:51 AM
Don't worry, Top Men are depending on their preferred group of consultants who say it's not the time to "overplay their hand" and pretty much bend over to the socialist agenda. Elections matter to everybody but the GOPe.
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 23, 2014 at 09:52 AM
More like Peak Capitalism. Just as Sino/Soviet Communism had to reboot after their trial run, so too the promise of Capitalism has resulted in Serfdom and the erosion of trust that it is working for the population in a good way. Wresting control from the execrably avaricious is the fly in the ointment
Posted by: Ben | December 23, 2014 at 10:01 AM
After what Orangeman did to his power of the purse, you think he's going to allow an impeachment?
right.....
Posted by: Old Lurker | December 23, 2014 at 10:05 AM
Interesting piece on how David Gregory lost his MTP job. In the ensuing history, there's a description of how Comcast got the feds to ok the deal to acquire NBC from GE, with a special mention of how Al Sharpton got his own TV show...
http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/how-david-gregory-lost-his-job/index.php
Posted by: Extraneus | December 23, 2014 at 10:07 AM
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/avaricious
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 10:11 AM
TK:
Oh dear -- impeachment is being considered by these Republicans:
“Palin, Cruz, Huckabee, Gingrich.”
I'd be worried, if it didn't sound more like the casting call for a new reality show. "The Four Retreads of the Apocalypse."
Posted by: Appalled | December 23, 2014 at 10:12 AM
You'll never be worried. That is the safety of being a "moderate."
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 10:15 AM
let's hope it is peak. screw all the progressive two faced liars
Posted by: peter | December 23, 2014 at 10:20 AM
Ext, from our Chitown lurker Reid's chief of staff was a Comcast VP. Dens of thieves.
Posted by: henry | December 23, 2014 at 10:23 AM
Mead's observations are brilliantly accurate. The Progs thought that by taking over the Dem Party from faux centrists, they'd acquire the same power the Dems have had since 1933. Heh, idiots. From 2006-2010 the Progs merely projected their own bleak political future on what they claimed would happen to Repubs/conservatives. The irony is just delicious.
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 10:25 AM
TK:
The curse of being a moderate is to be always worried that the crazies are going to take control and break all the furniture.
Anyway, I prefer the RINO handle these days...
Posted by: Appalled | December 23, 2014 at 10:28 AM
I don't believe we've hit Peak Merde Touch. Estimates of the President's reserves of incompetency and stupidity do not incorporate the very latest recovery techniques. Any prog thinking the damage won't get worse is going to be sadly mistaken.
Posted by: RickB | December 23, 2014 at 10:36 AM
On balance, I prefer crazies breaking furniture to crazies obsessive spending to pack the room with more and more furniture.
Posted by: AliceH | December 23, 2014 at 10:40 AM
I these trying times, moderates find comfort in RINO clothing.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 10:41 AM
One more for the peak oil crowd. It has Saudi costs at $4-6.
Posted by: henry | December 23, 2014 at 10:45 AM
TK:
Since being a moderate in these precincts requires a very thick skin...seems like a RINO'S hide would be very helpful...
Posted by: Appalled | December 23, 2014 at 10:46 AM
RINOs have a thick skin. John McCain is a perfect example.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 10:47 AM
Appalled, are you claiming you vote Republican? And did you for Romney? McCain? Bush?
Posted by: Cecil Turner | December 23, 2014 at 10:55 AM
Hi JOM! Been busy, but hope to catch up one of these days.
Posted by: Porchlight | December 23, 2014 at 10:56 AM
Hi Porch!
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 10:58 AM
TK, here's the bet if you want to take it. If Obama is impeached and convicted, I'll provide you with a free month of legal advice. If Obama either serves out his term or otherwise leaves office without being impeached and convicted, you'll do free maintenance on my car next time you travel to the East Coast.
Now, I know that's an unfair bet for you, since your car maintenance skills have more value than my legal advice. So I'll throw in a bonus: If you win the bet, you get to pose with me while I am treadmilling in a three piece!
Posted by: Thomas Collins | December 23, 2014 at 11:04 AM
I do not believe Obama will ever get impeached, TC. I can't take the bet.
But I will gladly take you up on the treadmill offer!
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 11:07 AM
As an added bonus, I will take that photo.
Posted by: MarkO | December 23, 2014 at 11:08 AM
-- It has Saudi costs at $4-6.--
Henry, when you were little didn't anyone tell you the fairy tale of Goldilocks and the Three Bens?
High Saudi production costs confirm Ben's point, whereas low Saudi production costs confirm Ben's point and just right production costs really confirm Ben's point.
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 11:11 AM
https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2014/12/23/malaysian-flight-777-shot-down-by-us-military-near-diego-garcia-marc-dugain-theory-feared-september-11-style-attack-on-us-navy-base-planes-computers-may-have-been-subject-to-remote-hacking/
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 11:14 AM
@11:14- a conspiracy so vast....
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 11:16 AM
Iggy, that was more for Sandy Daze given his daughter's potential employment in the business. Your point on trolls is spot on.
Posted by: henry | December 23, 2014 at 11:19 AM
I'm stealing "waterbored" . . . I guess it's been around awhile (e.g., Slate used it--albeit hyphenated--in a 2009 article) . . . but I hadn't seen it.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | December 23, 2014 at 11:19 AM
So true, NK.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 11:20 AM
Posted by: Cecil Turner | December 23, 2014 at 11:24 AM
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/former-proteus-airlines-boss-marc-dugain-claims-mh370-may-have-been-shot-down-by-us-military-near-diego-garcia/story-fniztvne-1227164555636?from=google_rss&google_editors_picks=true&nk=6f03489e59bf485fe41d019d5b0061db
Better?
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM
Hey, after a bazillion hours of coverage of these protests, die-ins and the like, I would be glad to go back to solving the missing plane mystery.
Posted by: Miss Marple | December 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM
Putting on my prog, multi-culti, bean-counter beanie it's interesting to note in that most/least admired conservatives poll
that 4 of the top 10 most admired are black, 3 are women, 1 is Filipino, 1 is Jewish and 1 a Mormon. Haters.
Also interesting to note 17 of 20 of the least popular are white men [16 of 20 if Lindsey Graham is counted on the chick side].
Be interesting to see a similar ranking by progs.
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 11:29 AM
My thoughts exactly, Cecil. Even if it wasn't an original thought from Tom Maguire's head, it's still brilliant.
Use in a sentence: "My whole body felt waterbored after listening to the Obama press conference."
Posted by: iqvoice | December 23, 2014 at 11:33 AM
Be interesting to see a similar ranking by progs.
Yes, but will Appalled lower his/her faux RINO shield long enough to give us such a list?
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 11:33 AM
Appalled, are you claiming you vote Republican? And did you for Romney? McCain? Bush?
1. Romney in 2012
2. Bush in 2000 (not 2004)
3. Not McCain. I don't like McCain, at all. He's a statist with an intervention everywhere bias. Sort of the inverse of almost all my preferred policy points. (I only agree with him on immigration.)
4. I am likely to vote Republican in 2016, barring a Ted Cruz nomination. (I happen to like Walker...)
Posted by: Appalled | December 23, 2014 at 11:35 AM
Better?
Actually, quite a bit better. The headline of the first one: "Malaysian flight 370 shot down by US military . . ." gives a patina of plausibility that absolutely is not warranted. But neither story is doing their respective publications much good.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | December 23, 2014 at 11:35 AM
Non holiday cheer from the US.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/cuba_libre.html
"Poor Cuba. Poor free Cubans. So far we can see the demoralizing results of cozying up to the tyrants. The Obama administration has succeeded in demobilizing and dispiriting Cuban exiles and their progeny. There is no Ferguson in Miami. And America’s Cubans should be sending an unequivocal message to the White House on the behalf of their enslaved sisters and brothers: “no hay justicia no hay paz.” Not for the sake of “the process,” or the president’s youthful romance with Che Guevara and other socialist mass murderers, this must be for the sake of freedom. "
IMO, every Cuban and every American who loves freedom has been sold out by the Obama regime.
Posted by: Pagar | December 23, 2014 at 11:35 AM
Waterbored
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 11:37 AM
Henry,
If Saudi economists have determined "this is the moment" wrt the OPM Famine and are correct, then it will be some time before we see oil prices return to $100. China is highlighting the idiocy of the flaccid power aspect as well as the weakness of the IMF/World Bank thieves cartel. China will loan to those with the productive potential to repay. You won't see them advancing yuan to Greece or Ukraine to maintain profligacy or prop EUtopian fantasy.
The flaccid power failure really belongs on the Peak Prog list.
Posted by: RickB | December 23, 2014 at 11:37 AM
"claims MH370 may have been shot down by US military near Diego Garcia"
Equally true statement:
"claims MH370 may have been shot down by aliens from outer space near Diego Garcia"
"may" negates the entire statement, seems to me.
Posted by: Old Lurker | December 23, 2014 at 11:38 AM
That didn't work so well
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 11:38 AM
No TK. That's waterboring.
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 11:40 AM
"claims MH370 may have been shot down by US military near Diego Garcia"
equally true:
"claims MH370 may have been shot down by aliens from Mars near Diego Garcia"
Writers used to know what the word "may" does.
Posted by: Old Lurker | December 23, 2014 at 11:42 AM
TK:
I'm afraid you'll have to get your list from Ben.
Personally, I think DublinDave is a fake leftist, so his list will be more a drinking game than anything else...
Posted by: Appalled | December 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM
"claims MH370 may have been shot down by US military near Diego Garcia"
equally true:
"claims MH370 may have been shot down by aliens from Mars near Diego Garcia"
Writers used to know what "may" meant.
Posted by: Old Lurker | December 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM
--China will loan to those with the productive potential to repay. You won't see them advancing yuan to Greece or Ukraine to maintain profligacy or prop EUtopian fantasy.--
It's a marshmallow world in the winter when the ChiComs are less willing to prop up the prog winter wonderland than the IMF and other welfare statists.
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 11:44 AM
TP being TP again I see.
Posted by: Old Lurker | December 23, 2014 at 11:45 AM
Speaking of EUtopian fantasy, there seem to be some protests taking place in Germany as well that have the usual suspects clutching their pearls:
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2014/12/23/17500-germans-gather-to-sing-christmas-carols-against-islamisation/
Peak Islamization?
Posted by: Eric in Boise | December 23, 2014 at 11:47 AM
CEOs of airlines believe in Martians.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 11:53 AM
2. Bush in 2000 (not 2004)
3. Not McCain.
If you voted Kerry and Obama, I don't think that qualifies as a RINO (or any other kind of "R") . . . DINO, maybe.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | December 23, 2014 at 11:56 AM
Kerry and Obama are more moderate that Bush and McCain.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 11:59 AM
IMO, every Cuban and every American who loves freedom has been sold out by the Obama regime.
Marco Rubio has been making this point when he doesn't have to fend off the extremely strange attacks by Rand Paul.
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 23, 2014 at 12:01 PM
US economy grew at 5% last quarter.
Let the in spite of/because of debate begin.
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 12:06 PM
This seems to have the order of events, CH.
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2014-12-19/rand-paul-battles-marco-rubio-over-cuba-policy
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 12:08 PM
Igy-- we can all drill down on the numbers.
BTW-- sorry about not getting that your Joe Pepe's pizza to you last night.
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 12:10 PM
"when the ChiComs are less willing to prop up the prog winter wonderland than the IMF and other welfare statists."
When it's tankety tank v tweety tweet, the ChiComs know where to put their money.
The Germans are actually following the lead of the Swedes in rejecting the Peak Mahometan movement and the French are coming along as well. I credit the OPM Famine as the prime cause in all instances. Achmed just costs too much.
Posted by: RickB | December 23, 2014 at 12:13 PM
That's ok NK, acolytes gotta eat too.
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 12:15 PM
I will take that photo
Hey!
Posted by: glasater | December 23, 2014 at 12:16 PM
Paul asked why Rubio didn't want a "new approach" instead of the continuance of an obvious debacle.
If the "debacle" is so fucking obvious, why don't I see it? Is he seriously blaming the embargo for the lack of human rights in Cuba?
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 23, 2014 at 12:18 PM
I am not optimistic about the French, Dutch Belgians-- I see a moon and star flag flying over Elysee Palace, not the Tri-Colour.
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 12:19 PM
Rick,
In rejecting Peak Islam are the EUrotrash stopping new arrivals or tossing already theres?
The already theres are having way more little baby musselmen than there are baby EUroweenies so how do they stop that?
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 12:20 PM
Carter White House Christmas ornaments, 1978:
Posted by: Miss Marple | December 23, 2014 at 12:20 PM
Did you mean pique left?
Any way a really important oil article by Conrad Blackhttp://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2014/12/20/conrad-black-the-saudis-believe-the-the-west-is-about-to-give-in-to-iranian-demands-crashing-the-price-of-oil-is-how-it-fights-back/
Posted by: clarice | December 23, 2014 at 12:21 PM
Moon & Star or the Black Flag of ISIS seems to be the question to me.
Posted by: Old Lurker | December 23, 2014 at 12:22 PM
I think he is saying the embargo didn't do any good for the people of Cuba. Tough to argue that point.
Rubio decided to be a dickhead and attack Paul first and Paul isn't walking away from the fight. A quality I admire.
Now Rubio left a gaping hole in his own argument by saying that it is the oppressive regime that is the problem, not the embargo, and Paul is making him answer for it.
The go-to Cuban will not win the debate by his Cuban-ness alone.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 12:25 PM
Carlos Slim's trained chimps and support garment challenged file clerk struggle to define the great issues of the world:
http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=353942
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 23, 2014 at 12:27 PM
Wonder if Amy still has nightmares.
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 12:27 PM
OL-- is it too much to expect the UVa Board to demand Sullivan's resignation? http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/u.va.-board-chair-blasts-rolling-stone-for-damage-to-universitys-reputation/article/2557719?custom_click=rss#!
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM
T Boone PIckens has some thoughts on oil.
The comments at the link are pretty good too.
Posted by: glasater | December 23, 2014 at 12:29 PM
Amy? is she still a gal, or did she become a dude like Chaz Bono?
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 12:30 PM
Tis the season...
A Republican, in a wheelchair, entered a restaurant one afternoon and asked the waitress for a cup of coffee.
The Republican looked across the restaurant and asked, "Is that Jesus sitting over there?"
The waitress nodded "yes," so the Republican requested that she give Jesus a cup of coffee, on him.
The next patron to come in was a Libertarian, with a hunched back. He shuffled over to a booth, painfully sat down, and asked the waitress for a cup of hot tea. He also glanced across the restaurant and asked, "Is that Jesus, over there?"
The waitress nodded, so the Libertarian asked her to give Jesus a cup of hot tea, "My treat."
The third patron to come into the restaurant was a Democrat on crutches. He hobbled over to a booth, sat down and hollered, "Hey there honey! How's about getting me a cold mug of Miller Light?" He too looked across the restaurant and asked, "Isn't that God's boy over there?"
The waitress nodded, so the Democrat directed her to give Jesus a cold beer. "On my bill," he said loudly.
As Jesus got up to leave, he passed by the Republican, touched him and said, "For your kindness, you are healed." The Republican felt the strength come back into his legs, got up, and danced a jig out the door.
Jesus passed by the Libertarian, touched him and said, "For your kindness, you are healed." The Libertarian felt his back straightening up and he raised his hands, praised the Lord, and did a series of back flips out the door.
Then, Jesus walked towards the Democrat, just smiling. The Democrat jumped up and yelled, "Don't touch me .... I'm on disability."
Posted by: lyle | December 23, 2014 at 12:33 PM
Exploding economic growth,the dow reaching an all time high...Merry Christmas from the Liberal President of the United States to all of you and your portfolios.
No, seriously, no thanks are needed.Christmas is about giving not getting and considering the brutal time you all had under a Republican run economy we feel it's the least we can do for you.
Marry Christmas to one and all xxxxxxxxx
Posted by: Dublindave | December 23, 2014 at 12:35 PM
I think he is saying the embargo didn't do any good for the people of Cuba. Tough to argue that point.
The embargo has made it tougher on the leaders of the country. How they react to the people they oppress is completely on them. 404 had a chance to squeeze them into backing off of their human rights violations, particularly against Stedman's "my people" and voted "present". Nothing will change by lifting the embargo except diminished pressure on the leaders.
Neither Rubio nor I need lectures from the likes of Rand Paul or his insane father on foreign policy. I've criticized Rubio before on things but not here.
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 23, 2014 at 12:39 PM
Those economic numbers will be dialed back like they always are.
Posted by: Captain Hate | December 23, 2014 at 12:41 PM
From Rubio:
Bold mine.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 12:44 PM
Exactly, CH.
Why would we look at ANYTHING from Obama's Commerce Department with anything other than complete distrust?
Posted by: James D. | December 23, 2014 at 12:45 PM
Rand Paul does ask, IMO, a good question;
If an embargo on Cuba is good policy why don't we have one on China?
With the fall of the USSR Cuba is no longer a threat and we no longer need China as a counterweight to the USSR. China seems more of a long term threat to us than Russia so wouldn't it make even more sense to crunch their economy by embargoing them?
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 12:46 PM
Paul's comment that set Rubio off:
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 12:46 PM
Have to check the GDPs to ascertain what moved them. Cathy is always informative on those things. Suffice to say, whatever the reason, Obummer had NOTHING POSITIVE to do with them. He's still trying to jack up gas prices (epic fail there) and he has sucessfully killed the full-time job market. So the economy benefitting from collapsing energy prices is DESPITE Obummer.
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 12:47 PM
TK-- I'll put this as plainly as I can. About Cuba, Obummer is a commie idiot, and Randie Paul is a bigger libertarian idiot.
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 12:49 PM
NK, ZH has a couple posts up on the GDP. The "Obamacare boost" from Q1 was revised into Q3.
Posted by: henry | December 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM
TK, I believe Paul is misstating Rubio's point.
Rubio is saying that while the embargo doesn't hurt the people of Cuba, it does hurt the aspirations of the Castro bros and ending it will not help the Cuban people but the extra money will be swallowed by the party and strengthen the Castros' grip and neighborhood mischief.
Not an implausible argument.
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM
Since you believe Gillespie lost in Virginia due to a handful of Libertarians, NK, I will not challenge your opinion.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 12:53 PM
This is
unbelievabletotally believable:http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/anti-police-remarks-dispute-911-center-sources-article-1.2054253?cid=bitly
Posted by: lyle | December 23, 2014 at 12:54 PM
[email protected]:46--- that's a simple one. Money. We don't need anything from Cuba nor do we need to export anything to them. In contrast, the USA manufacturers wanted cheap China labor to compete with Japan/Taiwan inc. so we made China the world's factory floor in the 90s. We were so sucessful buying cheap Chinese manufactured goods, that we needed China to buy USA T-Bonds to balance the trade account deficit. Then Obummer/Bernanke dialed up the deficit to eleventy, so we really needed China Bond buying. Embargo our bond buyers? My ass that happens.
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 12:55 PM
I think Paul's point, prior to Rubio's tantrum, was along the lines that the regime could no longer blame the embargo. Perhaps Paul believes that a better informed Cuban population will make good use of that news.
Posted by: Threadkiller | December 23, 2014 at 12:57 PM
Gillespie lost because he received slightly fewer votes.
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 12:57 PM
Glasater I beat you to the T Boone prediction of $100 by a week. Sounds like he is doubling down.
NK, I don't see UVa firing the lady.
Posted by: Old Lurker | December 23, 2014 at 01:00 PM
no, neither do I, funny how when it was South Africa's turn, there was no expense
or time spared, to make it airtight, binding at the local, state, national level,
when it's a regime that is not actually allied with us, like Iraq, the waterworks come up, despite they invaded two of their neighbots,
Posted by: narciso | December 23, 2014 at 01:00 PM
I know why we did it NK.
My question was more of the 'should we have done it' variety.
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 01:03 PM
Of course they will, they will ask for reparations to make up for the damage by the blockade, if you haven't seen this train coming,
now, that wasn't the original region, they thought China could be a proxy against the Soviets, as they served in Afghanistan, and possibly stop aiding Vietnam, I think what we got out of it was the "Jacob Marley' chain of supporting the Khmer Rouge, as you can tell, I'm not a friend of Kissinger, on that score,
Posted by: narciso | December 23, 2014 at 01:04 PM
The Cuban people need to have the Castro gang's goons disarmed so they can avail themselves of their inalienable rights. Instead, commie Obummer is throwing some dollars at his fellow commies to prop up their tyranny a few more years. This is not complicated.
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 01:06 PM
Why don't we embargo China?
I was just going to snark "Wal-Mart shelves", but NK made the point, and others, much more skillfully.
Posted by: Eric in Boise | December 23, 2014 at 01:07 PM
'Should have'.. realpolitics say there is no such thing, ultimately Cuba is Cuba and the ChiComs are the Chicoms and never the twains shall meet ;)
Posted by: NKvirusedand back | December 23, 2014 at 01:08 PM
I know facts rarely enter into it, but recognition of the Soviet Union, and the retiring of property claims, in 1933, did not make a bit of difference, even the somewhat less hardline Kruschev didn't change things, the DGI, which 'guy in the neighborhood' Ayers is well familiar with, the bloc committees, the ration book, the
sugar cane archipelago of gulags, that's why that idiocy by Valerie Plame, re Cheney
struck me as particularly daft, is the reason why Cuba is the way it is,
gal V
Posted by: narciso | December 23, 2014 at 01:12 PM
--'Should have'.. realpolitics say there is no such thing--
If we someday lose a war to China using a military we party financed for them who will have been engaged in real realpoltiks?
Posted by: Iggy | December 23, 2014 at 01:13 PM
DOOM™®
Posted by: MarkO | December 23, 2014 at 01:13 PM