One of life little mysteries, solved!
From ABC News:
Hillary Clinton Hasn't Answered a Press Question in 21 Days (And Her Opponents Are Taking Notice)
And from today's NY Times:
Hillary Clinton Walks Tightrope as Pressure Grows to Take Stance on Trade Deal
Liberal Democrats are intensifying their pressure on Hillary Rodham Clinton to oppose President Obama’s Pacific trade deal as detrimental to American jobs. But Mr. Obama’s allies want her to endorse the accord, which the president has called a boon to the United States economy.
And Mrs. Clinton, stuck between the progressives she must woo in a Democratic nomination fight and the president under whom she served, has remained, for the most part, mum.
The issue has become the first major policy test in her fledgling campaign, with Mrs. Clinton under mounting pressure to pick a side in the delicate and heated debate over the Trans-Pacific Partnership deal, a 12-nation trade agreement that Mr. Obama has aggressively pursued and that is facing a critical vote in Congress on Tuesday.
This game - Hillary obscuring her views and the press pretending to care - will be played until Elizabeth Warren is truly and definitively out of the race and the last progressive candle has been extinguished. It's about leadership!
SINCE YOU ASKED: The Times alludes to her one press question on the TPP. Here we go, from the National Journal:
Question 4: An MSNBC reporter asked Clinton on April 21 whether she had concerns about the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a trade agreement the Obama administration is in the process of negotiating.
Clinton: According to CBS: "Any trade deal has to produce jobs and raise wages and increase prosperity and protect our security. We have to do our part in making sure we have the capabilities and the skills to be competitive. ... It's got to be really a partnership between our business, our government, our workforce, the intellectual property that comes out of our universities, and we have to get back to a much more focused effort in my opinion to try to produce those capacities here at home so that we can be competitive in a global economy."
She favor good deals and opposes bad ones, and who amongst us can say differently?
First?
Doesn't matter - I'll get a JOM participation trophy either way :)
Posted by: Eric in Boise | May 12, 2015 at 10:20 AM
Ack, feast or famine with new threads. Can't keep up.
Posted by: jimmyk | May 12, 2015 at 10:36 AM
I'm glad you're posting, TM. I was going to do something on this - but that like takes effort and stuff.
Anyway - here's an angle: both Hillary and Obama view 8 as the magic number of questions the media should be allowed to ask.
2015:
Well. It's now 21, but who's counting? Oh, right: me!
2008:
But Obama was a piker for only going 10 days without making himself available to the press. Hillary's at 21 days now and she seems made of sterner stuff than Obama. Run Hillary Run (away from the media)!
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | May 12, 2015 at 10:39 AM
Oh, c'mon. Let's get this over with and swear in The Hill as POTUS so The Bill can launder even more bribes through his foundations.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 12, 2015 at 10:45 AM
If you had a serious stroke would you want to answer questions publicly? You'd look drunk and idiotic like that fat lady did when talking with Diane Sawyer about her 'concussion'.
Posted by: NKonChrome | May 12, 2015 at 10:46 AM
Hillary won't take any questions from the press from Jan 2017-2021 because she won't be pres.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | May 12, 2015 at 10:53 AM
Oh, c'mon. Let's get this over with and swear in The Hill as POTUS so The Bill can
launder even more bribes through his foundationscavort with even more young interns in the White House.Fixed. That's the ultimate goal, isn't it? For Bill, at least.
Posted by: jimmyk | May 12, 2015 at 10:55 AM
Hillarity: "Can't I just eat my waffle?"
Bill (eyes comely reporter): "Can't I just eat..."
Hillary: "Shut up, Bill!!"
Posted by: Eric in Boise | May 12, 2015 at 10:56 AM
All through the 90s I believed BillyC craved the power more than the $$$$. Now the $$$$ is at least as important to these uber grifters.
Posted by: NKonChrome | May 12, 2015 at 10:58 AM
I agree Ig
She will drown under the weight of her baggage
Wait until the Benghazi hearings
We all know she hates to be challenged
Everyone knows she's running a stealth campaign
Warren will be drafted at the convention after Hil implodes
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 11:01 AM
NK
I honestly don't think Bill Clinton supports this run
I mean really he doesn't want to be under the microscope again
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 11:03 AM
GOP no doubt will add a platform plank opposing TPP...
LOL.
Posted by: Ben | May 12, 2015 at 11:10 AM
So, Henry and legal beagles, if Anderson prevails (fat chance) about her interpretation of being able to stay in office until the end of her term, short of impeachment, is there nothing voters could do to rectify a mistake.
Of course, not leaving her seat in the face of voters' will is probably a high crime or misdemeanor.
Posted by: sbw | May 12, 2015 at 11:11 AM
--Wait until the Benghazi hearings--
I don't expect any Republican to sink her nor these hearings because let's face it what difference DOES it make to anyone at this point?
She will as you say maryrose sink herself over unforeseen icebergs.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | May 12, 2015 at 11:12 AM
sbw, if Abrahamson prevails on that, law has no meaning and the revolution has started.
Posted by: henry | May 12, 2015 at 11:14 AM
She will as you say maryrose sink herself over unforeseen icebergs.
Named Bill.
Posted by: Some Guy | May 12, 2015 at 11:18 AM
http://mcclintock.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/rep-mcclintock-delivers-weekly-republican-address-trade-means-freedom-and
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 12, 2015 at 11:25 AM
Henry, thanks. As Clarice said a few days ago, has the word lawless lost its meaning?
For progs, if they don’t want a law, it’s a recommendation. If they want a recommendation, they treat it as law.
The schools have graduated MSM regurgitators who won’t notice.
Joke repeated:
Teacher asks, “Johnny, what’s the difference between ignorance and apathy. Johnny replies, “I don’t know and I don’t care.
Posted by: sbw | May 12, 2015 at 11:25 AM
I actually think Bill wants this more than Hillary. He loves the free stuff, and the adoration and the perks.
Posted by: Jane | May 12, 2015 at 11:26 AM
She thinks voters elected Obama because of all the great platitudes in his endless speeches, plus the novelty of his being black, and that platitudes and being female will work for her. But Obama was a fresh face without a track record. She's just a tired act.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | May 12, 2015 at 11:28 AM
She reminds me of this:
Judge Smails: Good. Good. You know, despite what happened I'm still convinced that you have many fine qualities. There's a lot of...well, badness in the world today. I see it in court every day. I've sentenced boys younger than you to the gas chamber. I didn't want to do it. I felt I owed it to them. The most important decision you can make right now is what you stand for. Goodness...or badness.
Danny: I've made some mistakes in the past. I'm willing to make up for that. I want to be good!
Posted by: MarkO | May 12, 2015 at 11:32 AM
I just wish the republicans were not saying "we have to pass this to find out what's in it."
Who can trust anything obama says, yet the republicans in the senate seem to along for the ride.
Posted by: jim | May 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM
Wonder if Cankles will let Slick take the big jet down to Pedophile Isle?*
*And I hope we never get that answer.
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM
Re: McClintock
What 150 objectives? And why can't we seethe damned bill?
Posted by: sbw | May 12, 2015 at 11:39 AM
How 'bout a Fresca!
:::tossles hair:::
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 11:40 AM
jimmyk,
There just ain't enough Febreeze in the world to overcome the skunk roadkill smell in the upholstery. The MFM can buy all the polling air freshener for her that it can afford but she will never smell any better than Labour did in the UK.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | May 12, 2015 at 11:42 AM
I think Bill is bored and misses the wheeling and dealing of the political life and being top dog in DC. The women and money are fun, too, but he has as much of that as he wants already.
Posted by: Porchlight | May 12, 2015 at 11:45 AM
I also think Bill wants revenge on Obama for painting him as a racist in 2008. The Clintons hate the Obamas and want to show them how it's really done.
Remember this:
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/12/10/great-news-bill-clinton-apparently-now-president-again/
Posted by: Porchlight | May 12, 2015 at 11:47 AM
Obama's biggest problem now is that virtually no one trusts him. It's the old duck clause; "if it walks like a duck..."
He is now hiding his Iran negotiations and his trade negotiations and thinks he can get away with it, but hopefully the idiots on the Republican side will realize that they had better review every single clause, comma, and footnote because that is how slippery the scumbag in chief is.
With the clock running down Obama has little to lose.
Is there any way to revoke his pardon privileges? I want to see the bunch of them in jail.
Posted by: matt | May 12, 2015 at 11:48 AM
Btw, catching up on overnight thread...I have only tried snuff three times. Come on guys. :)
Posted by: Porchlight | May 12, 2015 at 11:49 AM
CATO/Koch support TPP. It's a two-fer.
Posted by: Ben | May 12, 2015 at 11:50 AM
I also wonder about the 150 objectives, sbw.
Ingraham was so close to finding out when she decided that conflating the TPP with the TPA McClintock was talking about would score better faux gotcha points.
http://www.lauraingraham.com/b/GOPs-Top-Pitch-Man-For-Americas-Largest-Global-Trade-Pact-Admits-He-Hasnt-Read-One-Word-Of-It!/-984865794040615383.html
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 12, 2015 at 11:59 AM
Matt @ 11:48
Nobody trusts him, and yet McConnell gave him his choice for AG, and is pushing to give him fast-track authority to negotiate the TPP site unseen, and on and on and on...
Posted by: James D. | May 12, 2015 at 12:14 PM
That's what they all say, Porch...
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 12:16 PM
According to our local rag, the last member of von Braun's original team from 'Operation Paperclip' has died at 95 years old. Oscar Holderer brought from Germany the first rocket wind tunnel and reassembled it himself. He became a US citizen in 1955.
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 12:21 PM
That's the ultimate goal, isn't it?
Cavorting? Not quite.
He loves the free stuff, and the adoration and the perks.
Bingo.
He wasn't just cavorting with Monica, or having sex. He was having a certain type of sex.
Posted by: Extraneus | May 12, 2015 at 12:22 PM
Democrat, plagiarist, what at this point does it matter? Hard Choices was about what to plagiarize & from whom. (ht our Obama Library neighbor type lurker).
Posted by: henry | May 12, 2015 at 12:23 PM
Judge reinstates lawsuit to force surrender of Hillary Clinton e-mails
Captain Ed:
She still has the server? Says who? How do we know there was a "server" at all, and that the email domain wasn't hosted somewhere?
Somehow the world got this picture of a computer whirring away in Hillary's basement. Is there any evidence of this?
Posted by: Extraneus | May 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM
Insty links to the bleeding obvious:
http://dailycaller.com/2015/05/11/political-correctness-has-destroyed-the-armys-readiness-and-morale/:
I see no evidence of "remaking," just destroying. Cankles in the WH will do it in for good.
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 12:37 PM
Plagirized herself? Obama might consider copywriting his selfies to avoid infringement allegations. :)
Posted by: Ben | May 12, 2015 at 12:37 PM
Henry
Abrahamson better start packing up her office belongings
Anyone who thwarts the will of the voters is a fool and will most likely lose her seat in the next term election
She should go quietly while she still has a shred of dignity left
When did we become a society forced to endure grifters cheats and liars in our elected officials
There must be better people somewhere
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 12:39 PM
Øbama has destroyed military morale? No shit. Exactly as planned.
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Maryrose. Shirley is over 80 and not up for reelection until 2019. Not clear she ever had a shred of dignity. Simply a bitterly clinging hag.
Posted by: henry | May 12, 2015 at 12:41 PM
Ext
Next we will learn Hil has burned the server and taken it to a landfill
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 12:42 PM
Henry
I am sure she wants to run as an eighty four year old harpy
Drunk with power is her signature attribute
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 12:44 PM
Henry
I know she's there until2019 she's just not going to be the Chief
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 12:46 PM
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/12/shameful-nfl-teams-being-paid-to-salute-our-troops/
The hits keep on a-comin'.
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 12:48 PM
An interesting site for lovers of the music often referred to as Americana:
http://americanamusictriangle.com/
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 12:56 PM
Pro-wrestling, lyle.
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 12, 2015 at 12:56 PM
The level of naiveté here is astonishing. "Jazz Hands" Shaw:
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/05/12/hillarys-continuing-quandary-what-do-you-do-about-bill/
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 12:59 PM
I hear ya, TK.
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 01:00 PM
It looks as if politicians are using Law and Order-Special PSI Unit to promote their causes having nothing to do with football. Here is what the US Senate's Minority Leader and the Massachusetts Attorney General have to say.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2015/05/12/senator-harry-reid-weighs-deflategate/uto6cNDeEAXscRsucckQYO/story.html
http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2015/05/12/nfl-focus-deflategate-out-line-healey-says/KNVG5dk7SslEAtiZ2dRPiO/story.html
As far as I know, Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong un haven't weighed in yet (although Brady should be glad the NFL doesn't use the North Korean "suspended for life" penalty).
Posted by: Thomas Collins | May 12, 2015 at 01:17 PM
Union goons have the right to your address, phone number, and work schedule, per the NLRB. The Obama Library graffiti artist lurker suggests this will turn out worse than 3 am John Doe raids.
Posted by: henry | May 12, 2015 at 01:24 PM
Slick is a sociopath with narcissist tendencies, and there are parts of his psyche that do want to help others - as long as it fulfills his needs first.
The doctor is IN.
5¢
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 01:26 PM
The unions are gonna get my work schedule? Crap. Does this mean I have to get a job?
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 01:28 PM
Slick likes to help others help him.
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 01:29 PM
What difference does it make what she days? It won't be believable.
Posted by: clarice | May 12, 2015 at 01:36 PM
Letterman's "Why Golf Is Better Than Sex":
#10... A below par performance is considered good.
#09... You can stop in the middle and have a cheeseburger
#08... It's much easier to find the sweet spot.
#07... Foursomes are encouraged.
#06... You can still make money doing it as a senior.
#05... Three times a day is possible.
#04... Your partner doesn't hire a lawyer if you play with someone else.
#03.... If you live in Florida , you can do it almost every day.
#02... You don't have to cuddle with your partner when you're finished.
And the NUMBER ONE reason why golf is better than sex.....
#01... When your equipment gets old you can replace it!
The sender of this email included a BC cartoon that I can't get to paste but the first panel shows one of them lining up a putt and the other one asking the first:
"Isn't that your new putter?"
"Yep."
"What happened to your old one?"
"It couldn't swim."
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 01:39 PM
Can't believe that NLRB order will be sustained.
Posted by: clarice | May 12, 2015 at 01:41 PM
Lyle,
Letterman must have stole that because it's been around for years. Either that or it's one of his 20 years ago. Had a comedian once tell me that the best comedy writing comes out of prisons.
Posted by: Jack is Back | May 12, 2015 at 01:50 PM
Back in my anger management days, I could fling a club farther than I could hit a lob wedge. I had perfectly cut the corner on a short Par 5 in a big money game, and had only ~165 yards to the pin to set up an eagle putt.
I tugged it left into the water, killing even a birdie try. I launched my 6-iron sky high into a loblolly pine - where it remained for months; never to be seen again. Don't know if it could swim or not. And it's tough to replace a vintage BeCu Ping Eye 2+.
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 01:58 PM
From a Reason commenter:
Tom Brady would have been better off slugging Giselle in an elevator.
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 02:04 PM
"Back in my anger management days, I could fling a club farther than I could hit a lob wedge. "
Hah, I've broken a few tennis rackets in my day. In this case distance is not the objective of the fling, just maximal damage. Pour encourager les autres.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | May 12, 2015 at 02:07 PM
"Anyone who contributed a dime to McConnell’s fraudulent re-election campaign should sue."
Plus a whole lot of others. IMO, there is no excuse for any US Senator voting for this bill.
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2015/05/12/as-gop-folds-rooting-for-the-democrats-to-block-obama/
Posted by: pagar | May 12, 2015 at 02:13 PM
The TPP:
"At his April 28 press conference with President Obama, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan confirmed that the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), the secret treaty he is negotiating with Obama, is designed to enable the free flow of people among the twelve participating countries (which include both Mexico and the United States)."
"...it's an ambitious attempt to create a new economic sphere in which people goods and money will flow freely within the Asia-Pacific region. ..."
Just more immigration to the US of cheap labor. The republicans, if they had any sense, would be opposed. I've several liberal FB friends that are livid and would likely vote republican if they would get their heads out of the US Chamber's ass on this issue. They hate the dems stand on illegal immigration and the jobs that are going to immigrants.
Posted by: Stephanie | May 12, 2015 at 02:31 PM
Link for above:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/05/cnn_quickly_cuts_away_from_japanese_leader_saying_tpp_will_enable_free_flow_of_people.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook
Posted by: Stephanie | May 12, 2015 at 02:32 PM
With a little luck Barry will make our economy as efficient and as growth oriented as the EU's.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | May 12, 2015 at 02:37 PM
Voting right now only need 9 more votes to kill it
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 02:44 PM
Now only need 4
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 02:45 PM
Now2
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 02:46 PM
http://www.wsj.com/articles/fast-tracking-americas-post-obama-future-1431386368?tesla=y
And why should they? Precious has never given them one effing reason to do so. But how does this columnist or any of the other editorial writers for the WSJ even know what's in this deal?
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 02:46 PM
Issue fails
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 02:48 PM
Obamas merde touch strikes again
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 02:49 PM
Just more immigration to the US of cheap labor. The republicans, if they had any sense, would be opposed.
I think I spotted the problem there.
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 02:49 PM
Issue fails. We like that.
Posted by: NKonChrome | May 12, 2015 at 02:52 PM
He is short by 4 votes
Evidently his arm twisting didn't work
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 02:52 PM
Stabbed in the back by his own party
That is going to leave a mark for the lame duck
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 02:55 PM
Text of what failed:
http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc114/s995_is.xml
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 12, 2015 at 02:57 PM
Are you talking about the trade bill failing by 4 votes?
I would not vote for anything Obama proposed that I couldn't read first. (And most of what I did read because I don't trust him on anything)
Posted by: Jane | May 12, 2015 at 02:59 PM
I think that was the Bill.
Posted by: Threadkiller | May 12, 2015 at 02:59 PM
Politics makes strange bedfellows. Beside the stealth immigration plug there was also a stealth greenhouse gas reduction deal included.
Posted by: Jack is Back | May 12, 2015 at 03:01 PM
As a Catholic, I find this so depressing:
"Pope Francis’ closest adviser castigated conservative climate change skeptics in the United States Tuesday, blaming capitalism for their views."
http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/241769-popes-top-adviser-blasts-us-climate-skeptics
Posted by: CR | May 12, 2015 at 03:03 PM
I've had it with my Episcopal Church for all the obvious reasons, but I sure have no interest in this guy's snake oil as an alternative.
Just when the previous Pope was actually luring Protestants back who wanted something better to believe in, along comes this political junk? No offense intended to my Catholic friends.
The Hill "Pope Francis’ closest adviser castigated conservative climate change skeptics in the United States Tuesday, blaming capitalism for their views. Speaking with journalists, Cardinal Oscar Rodríguez Maradiaga criticized certain “movements” in the United States that have preemptively come out in opposition to Francis’ planned encyclical on climate change. “The ideology surrounding environmental issues is too tied to a capitalism that doesn’t want to stop ruining the environment because they don’t want to give up their profits,”
Posted by: Old Lurker | May 12, 2015 at 03:07 PM
Damn CR, you beat me to it by one post!
Posted by: Old Lurker | May 12, 2015 at 03:09 PM
The ideology surrounding environmental issues is too tied to a capitalism that doesn’t want to stop ruining the environment because they don’t want to give up their profits
I'll get behind capitalists giving up profits when the Catholic church--The Vatican in particular--gives up all their money. Deal?
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 03:10 PM
Why would the socialist desires of an Argentine Jesuit surprise anyone? The best part about that story is the propaganda spewed by the the Hill journalist. What a fraud he is, Tim Cama should work for Bloomberg News. He propagandizes that we should listen to a Cardinal when he is a socialist and rent seeking Climate fraud. Please. And as far as Pope Frank and Cardinal Rodriguez, render unto Carbon Taxes what are carbon taxes and unto God what is God's. That's right from the Gospel. Look it up.
Posted by: NKonChrome | May 12, 2015 at 03:10 PM
Lyle-- the Vatican says it has no 'money' just some real estate and illiquid art work.
Posted by: NKonChrome | May 12, 2015 at 03:12 PM
The butt-hurt, it's strong:
Read more at http://observer.com/2015/05/obama-hurls-insults-at-liberals-on-trade/#ixzz3ZxA1aduY
Follow us: @newyorkobserver on Twitter | newyorkobserver on Facebook
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 03:13 PM
--Why would the socialist desires of an Argentine Jesuit surprise anyone?--
They don't. What surprises me is a majority of the guys who had a vote thought he would make a good Pope.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | May 12, 2015 at 03:14 PM
Vatican says it has no 'money' just some real estate and illiquid art work.
Do they have a GoFundMe account?
Posted by: fella with a tall hat | May 12, 2015 at 03:15 PM
Fine, NK. Since I'm a reasonable guy, have the Vatican put those assets up for bid on the market.
Posted by: lyle | May 12, 2015 at 03:15 PM
Misery loves company Old Lurker :)
Posted by: CR | May 12, 2015 at 03:17 PM
I wonder who Maradiaga thinks makes all those big donations to Caritas? Beggars in the street? I'm with CR.
Posted by: Jack is Back | May 12, 2015 at 03:17 PM
Allow me to correct Cardinal Maradiaga: the ideology surrounding environmentalism is too tied to statist politicians who continue to fail the poor; the very people those politicians and the church claim to care about.
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 03:17 PM
Actually Lyle, I believe the Vatican's finance guys prefer to leverage off of that real estate and art work, and hold on to them for future collateral purposes.
Posted by: NKonChrome | May 12, 2015 at 03:18 PM
Pope is infallible ble on faith and morals issues
Climate Change doesn't meet that criteria
You can't hate the Cardinal for ha I g a different scientific point of view
Then you be just like a prog and we sure do not want to be tagged that way
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 03:18 PM
Well, if the dems now have their feelings hurt by Obama's strong-arm tactics, I have no sympathy. He's been insulting us for six years.
Posted by: Miss Marple | May 12, 2015 at 03:18 PM
The Dems are finding out Obummer's a bratty punk, who connives behind your back? I'm sure they are shocked.
Posted by: NKonChrome | May 12, 2015 at 03:20 PM
Pope Francis is a good Pope
We can agree to disagree
Posted by: maryrose | May 12, 2015 at 03:20 PM
Yes, that art is illiquid. It's not like an art auction could bring in more than a few hundred grand, right? da Vinci? Raphael? Titian? Caravaggio? Illiquid my ass.
Posted by: Beasts of England | May 12, 2015 at 03:21 PM