Timesman Ross Douthat is more interesting than the rest of the Times columnists put together. The obvious explanation - as a righty writing for a lefty publication, he actually has to appeal to a wider range of intellectual viewpoints. Today's column on the pope is fascinating:
IN Pope Francis’ sprawling new encyclical, “Laudato Si’,” there are many mansions: A meditation on biblical ecology, a discussion of environmental policy, a critique of consumerism, even a reflection on the perils of social media.
What everyone wants to know, of course, is whether the pope takes sides in our most polarizing debate. And he clearly does. After this document, there’s no doubting where Francis stands in the great argument of our time.
But I don’t mean the argument between liberalism and conservatism. I mean the argument between dynamists and catastrophists.
OK, huh? But press on!
Primo, encora.
10:30 Italian Mass at St. Leonard's in Boston's North End. Bellissimo!
Posted by: Jack The Trans-Former | June 21, 2015 at 12:26 PM
Nearly anything is more interesting that the Times' columnists put together. A low bar, indeed.
Posted by: MarkO | June 21, 2015 at 12:34 PM
Happy Fathers Day - and why Dads are critical to your child's life!
http://commoncts.blogspot.com/2015/06/happy-fathers-day-and-why-fathers-dads.html
Posted by: Steve | June 21, 2015 at 12:53 PM
Happy fathers day all, just pure category error on sour hats part
Posted by: narciso | June 21, 2015 at 01:17 PM
Hey, I'm all for stewardship, and recognize the Holy Father as a particularly powerful spokesperson with undeniable moral authority, but . . .
The idea of a fixed bowl of goodies from which we all consume, and the ramifications that some are taking more than their fair share, leaving less for the poor; is fundamentally inapt when applied to humanity as a whole. Africa, for example, has more natural resources than any other continent, and the collection of humanity is the poorest. That's not because of colonialism and exploitation, it's because of societal and political dysfunction.
The only realistic conclusion one could draw from the encyclical is to reinforce those failed systems, and try to become more like them. And sorry, but that's exactly the wrong answer.
Posted by: Cecil Turner | June 21, 2015 at 01:56 PM
Sounds to me like the conversation I transcribed last night between Larry Kudlow and WSJ Columnist Bill McGurn was pretty much on the money.
Posted by: daddy | June 21, 2015 at 02:32 PM
To paraphrase MM, the pope is a dope.
Posted by: Cispigmented Heteronormative Microagressive Ignatz | June 21, 2015 at 02:41 PM
I know "O'Sullivan's Law" applies to non- profits but now it applies to Roman Catholic liturgy as well? Huh.
Posted by: lyle | June 21, 2015 at 03:37 PM
French doubter banned from Pope's "science" conference
Posted by: Extraneus | June 21, 2015 at 05:24 PM
Nice to see the Vatican and Left are the same. Muzzle debate. The "science" is settled.
Posted by: Gentlejim | June 21, 2015 at 10:06 PM
It's amazing and terrifying. Grand opera.
Posted by: I hope that fat lady standing up isn't about to direct the overture. | June 22, 2015 at 03:08 AM
It is like the Church propping up the Acient Regime in France in the !9th Century in the last gasps of the Counter Reformation--this is when they banned Mozart. This time though the current aristocracy, they are protecting where are the decedents oof those the proscribed before.
This is beyond surreal and will wound the Church. Shame on the Jesuits, Shame on the Curia, and shame on this Pope.
What a calamity. They will get there way with their bizarre lie, and destroy what is left of a free middle class in the West.
Serfdom, here we come. It is positively Medieval.
Posted by: squaredance | June 22, 2015 at 11:30 AM