Powered by TypePad

« Lost In The Bushes | Main | True, Or Just Too Good To Check? »

September 03, 2015

Comments

glasater

The Kentucky clerk who refuses to issue a wedding license to a gay couple is now in custody for contempt of something..

Thomas Collins

Sounds as if this is an open thread. So, let's be happy that we are going to see Tom Brady in September and another great athlete a little later on.

http://espn.go.com/horse-racing/story/_/id/13565101/american-pharoah-continue-racing-owner-ahmed-zayat-says

Thomas Collins

As far as the Yankees go, let's not forget the run the Rangers are making. It could be Rangers/Yankees competing for the last AL playoff spot during the last week of the season.

The science wasn't settled.  Paid handsomely for, though.

See p. 7 of the ruling where Berman emphasizes that the Wells Report admits that the science isn't definitive for culpability.

glasater

I should have made note that the Kentucky clerk is a D!

MarkO on laptop pretending to listen

Roger turned this into a fight over his power under the CBA and lost. He should rescind the Pats' penalty and resign in disgrace.

Captain Hate on the iPad

This is just Goodell's latest high exposure screw up in dishing out discipline. This commissioner role is something he's been ill equipped to handle.

Eric in Boise

Wait, is this the Kentucky clerk thread?

Thomas Collins

Here is a link to an article on the Kentucky clerk.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/03/us-usa-gaymarriage-kentucky-idUSKCN0R13S220150903

Rocco

Popping up all over the place

https://twitter.com/davidwade/status/639463279228780544/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc^tfw

Beasts of England

It should really be the Taylor Swift's new privileged, white colonialist, oppressive hegemony video thread.

#WhiteGirlsMatter

Rocco

Well that didn't work

 photo Vindicated_zpsnt9hsdjq.jpg

narciso

Like I say I hold no brief for Brady, but 'against Zur and the Kodan Armada' I mean the NFL Owners,

What was she thinking?

Heh, maryrose, I'm gonna wash and dry that cloth until it's in tatters. One of the truly great gaffes of all time.

Only my keyboard knows for sure.  Shirley, it is I.

Now how did that happen? I was responding to a comment by maryrose on the last thread.

Is it me or typepad?

henry

Maybe Brady deflated Rutgers' footbals.

Skoot

Deflategate entirely predictable. Kentucky clerk jailed? Wow. This will lead to something large, I think. Kennedy's chickens coming home...

Thomas Collins

This is an open Freaker's Ball Thread. Every post is welcome.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uo9bKdIG_Yw

Well, I guess within reason.

Porchlight

I don't know why people think Brady has been vindicated. His suspension has been lifted, but the Berman ruling was on the NFL's failure to follow union personnel rules, not on Brady's involvement in deflation. No judge has ruled on the merits of that charge.

BTW, who knew JOMers could be so pro-union? ;)

henry

from our lurking friend:

Please tell this to Janet re "The State Dept. is corrupt."

"Ya think?"

glasater

The Trumpster is having a presser. It is something!

Thomas Collins

He could never really be vindicated, Porchlight, because we don't really know what transpired between Brady and his ballwashers. However, I would question whether he or the Pats really need vindication. I think the overall record indicates the Pats are well within the professional sports' "law of the street" with respect to rule stretching. When Brady and Aaron Rodgers go into the Pro Football HOF, I'm not going to be focused on Brady's possible role in ball deflation, and Rodgers' admitted role in ball inflation.

Porchlight

He could never really be vindicated, Porchlight, because we don't really know what transpired between Brady and his ballwashers.

That is true, but it only reinforces my point. This ruling does not say anything about Brady wrt deflation. It only says that the NFL's specific choice of punishment was arbitrarily/inappropriately applied. A lighter punishment, say a $25K fine, might have sailed through unchallenged by the union - we can't know.

He used a bent needle legal gauge.

Heh, Berman's nailed Goodell with a 'rules violation'.

clarice

http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-snapback-snow-job-1441301210

Deflecting blame, and all, and he'd be right, too.

Goodell could have gotten out of this so easily, just by blaming the refs.

Porchlight

When Brady and Aaron Rodgers go into the Pro Football HOF, I'm not going to be focused on Brady's possible role in ball deflation, and Rodgers' admitted role in ball inflation.'

TC, isn't that another way of saying "he's a great QB and the Pats are a great team, so it doesn't really matter"? Understandable from a fan's POV, sure, but...

Some Guy

This ruling does not say anything about Brady wrt deflation.

Technically yes, but Berman did highlight the fact there is no evidence in his ruling. Which is like him putting up a billboard saying, "There is no 'there' there. You idiots never should have wasted the courts time on this nonsense."

Beasts of England

Are all the city/county clerks in Colorado, et al., who issued licenses for recreational marijuana (illegal under Federal law) businesses in jail?

sbw

Good question, Beasts.

Some Guy

btw, anyone hear if Mark Brunnell cried when he heard the ruling?

Some Guy

Are all the city/county clerks in Colorado, et al., who issued licenses for recreational marijuana (illegal under Federal law) businesses in jail?


Is Zero in jail?

Cecil Turner

I totally agree it should never have gone to court. That said, the ruling was, essentially: "you never told Brady he could get suspended for deflating footballs, so you can't suspend him for it now" . . . which is beyond ludicrous.

Maybe we should make a new Seinfeld episode? Nah, it's been done: "Was that wrong?"

Porchlight

Technically yes, but Berman did highlight the fact there is no evidence in his ruling.

Can you point to this part of the ruling? There is much discussion of evidence, but IANAL so I wasn't able to figure out where exactly he says that.

MarkO on laptop pretending to listen

Glad to know that a not guilty verdict would never be considered vindication.

Tough crowd.

Some Guy

The more important part of the ruling was regarding the withholding of investigative files and testimony that prejudiced Brady's ability to vindicate himself in the appeal.

The notice issue was important only in vacating the arbitration and suspension, rather than returning it to Goodell to f*** it up again.

Cecil Turner

The good news for Pats fans is that nobody else cares. Considering they demolished the Colts in the second half with overinflated footballs, it obviously didn't matter. But vindication? [/eyeroll]

And I'll be chuckling snarkily if it gets overturned on appeal and Brady misses more important later games.

Some Guy

heading out will return later

Miss Marple

Glasatar,

Liked that ending where he introduced the Secretary of State of Indonesia.

Lol!

narciso

As with many such controversies exoneration means nothing, if it challenges the narrative

Porchlight

Glad to know that a not guilty verdict would never be considered vindication.

MarkO, how is it a "not guilty" verdict? Berman did not saythat Brady was not guilty. He did not rule on Brady's guilt (or non-guilt) at all.

henry

Can we beat up on the Yankees now? (no particular reason, but they deserve it on general principles same as Brady and the Pats)

GMax

I do wonder if the gloating Pat fans, will think this is so wonderful if the appeal goes against them and Brady must sit out playoff games?

Trump takes the pledge. That is the right thing to do, and the smart thing for the frontrunner. I think his only real misstep was failing to make a pledge. I now must worry about the Richard Lugar's in the rest of the pack, I suppose.

And finally, Hillary is trying furiously to spin a former campaign worker and then IT employee at State taking the their right to not testify since it might tend to INCRIMINATE him ( and his boss). OOPS.

henry

Brady wiped his phone... but vindicated.

Hilligula got some guy to wipe her don't go there server and take the 5th with the FBI and State IG as well as with Congress so no evidence*. Does that vindicate Hilligula??

Why is Brady special?

* ht Chitown lurking unit.

Who Dame Justice would destroy, she first makes 'Pash'ionate.

Heh, the NFL got im'Pash'ioned.

Captain Haiku

IT technician
Pleads the fifth, Hilligula
Just pleads for a fifth

If it gets to that.

I don't think the NFL will win the appeal. The science is unsettling.

Bang that gavel.

Has anybody argued that Hillary was a victim of bad process?

MarkO on laptop pretending to listen

Porch,

The NFL's application to confirm the arbitration award was denied. Brady's motion to vacate the award was granted.

In other words, all the allegations and conclusions of guilt were stricken. That's what happens with a not guilty verdict.

No one is adjudicated innocent.

henry

Kim, yes... the whole "Classification process is too confusing" excuse has been active for at while now.

MarkO on laptop pretending to listen

Here is a link to the decision:

http://www.bostonherald.com/sites/default/files/blog_posts/NFL.pdf

Buckeye

Good one Captain Haiku!

maryrose

Well
I feel better now knowing others share my concerns
Berman says. No there there
That is his opinion
I choose to disagree with that
So when Minnesota Vikings player was suspended for child discipline considered abuse he was told ahead of time that he would miss the season
As long as players know ahead of time then they won't be tempted to throw away their cellphones or engage in sheepish press conferences

My bad.

Well, there's a fallacy there somewhere, Henry. Oops, I guess you were joking.

Captain Hate on the iPad

The judge most certainly did not say Brady was innocent such as was the case in the Duke LAX case when the state attorney took the unusual step of declaring they had done nothing wrong. The judge just shoved Macy's Christmas tree up Goodell's fat ass for conducting a slipshod investigation to which King Roger said MOAR PLEEZE.

Even in the Duke LAX case there are still loons who considered them guilty of SOMETHING. Not to point any fingers but such people have been known to fellate Willard and Eldrick.

Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki

I'm with Jimmy on this; absent some substantial civil rights violation (which I see none of in Berman's decision) if an employer wants to discipline an employee it's none of the government's damned business.

James D

The Kentucky clerk who refuses to issue a wedding license to a gay couple is now in custody for contempt of something..

She shouldn't be in contempt. The judge ruled wrongly, and the marshals should have refused to take her into custody.

I'm sorry. If the President of the United States can refuse to obey or enforce any law he doesn't like; and if he can order his underlings to do likewise, then I don't see why this clerk, or anyone else, has any obligation to execute a law with which she disagrees, and I don't see why she should be subject to any punishment for doing so.

Thomas Collins

Porchlight, I'd say the same thing about a receiver who made it into one NFL game and used stickum. If anything, I'd likely to be harsher on the Brady's and Rodgerses of the world, just as I am harsher on Nolan Ryan for occasionally pitching in from of the rubber with his zillion mile an hour fastball.

Some Guy, my reading of the opinion is that if Judge Berman had concluded the procedures were sufficient, and Brady had received sufficient notice of possible penalties, Judge Berman would have deferred to the factual finding of scheme, due to the great deference owed to the factual findings of a properly conducted arbitration proceeding.

Peter

Ted Wells was involved in baseball's investigating steroids and gave Big Papi a pass while coming down hard on other players, so no we can not use this thread to beat up the Yankees.

Captain Hate on the iPad

The Richard Lugars in the pack are always who you have to worry about, not the conservatives. But as Reagan proved with John Anderson, if you run a superb campaign, no problem.

Jeff Dobbs

The important thing here is...

The 2015 Grand Slam of golf featuring the year's major champions has been canceled as the PGA of America found it too complicated to move it from Donald Trump's Los Angeles course.

...I can't wait for Trump's tweet response.

maryrose

I am first and foremost a fighter for the underdog
How else could I be a Browns fan

Thomas Collins

Peter, I think Wells may have taken undue grief in this whole matter. Certainly Wells and his cohorts are smart enough to know that "generally aware" might not cut the mustard (or properly calibrate the gauge, as it were). Perhaps Team Wells told Goodell it couldn't in good conscience go beyond "generally aware", which left it to Goodell to cook up "scheme".

I know, go ahead and say it. TC is defending the big firm lawyers.

Thomas Collins

The Browns will rise again, maryrose.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19KabU3SVFw

henry

Kim, Brady spoke to the investigators without recourse to the 5th or "what difference at this point does it make." He is merely a player on a team that nobody likes. Hillary is pure evil.

Jeff Dobbs

But while we wait for Trump's response to the PGA....we have this:


maryrose

Jeff
I would be interested in your take on this Brady decision

narciso

So guccifer apparently turned the emails to the fbi, re the daily mail.

Peter

I don't really know much about it TC, I am just repeating stiff I read on some Yankee fan forum. Everybody cheats as they said in the movie Breaking Away

Thomas Collins

I'll bet Trump has employed more Mexicans in good jobs than the PGA poo-bahs.

Captain Hate on the iPad

Yes, as much as I regard Brady as a whiny vag, he's an infinitely better human being than Sir Edmund Hillary Rodham.

maryrose

I agree with Jimmyk and Iggy

Captain Hate on the iPad

Golf is having enough problems with courses closing than for the PGA to cop a snotty attitude toward someone whose popularity is on the rise.

Neo

The person who hacked into Hillary Clintons email server has pulled the emails off the block and turned them over to the FBI, RadarOnline.com has exclusively learned.

After speaking with my lawyers the hacker told Radar exclusively, I was advised I could not legally sell these, and to get rid of them and turn in everything I had to FBI.

... at least, now, we can find out just how serious Hillary was into Yoga

maryrose

Cecil
I disagree with the statement that other teams don't care
Of course we do care because we have to play the Patriots

Jeff Dobbs


maryrose:
I would be interested in your take on this Brady decision

This is the greatest decision since that time I chose decaf for my after lunch coffee an hour ago.

No, wait. I forgot that time I decided to plug my phone in before the battery died 10 minutes ago.

Best decision since then, definitely.

Neo

The Night They Drove Old Hillary Down

Thomas Collins

If The Hill pulls off the "Keeping POTUS Hopes Alive While Negotiating Plea Bargain To Avoid Club Fed" yoga position, I tip my PSI gauge to her.

Eric in Boise

Insty commenter re Despicable She: "At least she didn't refuse to issue a license to some gays."

Indeed.

Janet

"The State Dept. is corrupt."

"Ya think?"

Hah! I realize that sounded kinda silly. I just meant that all the way down...it is a mess over there.
The archiving people, the people responsible for setting up computers for new people at State, the computer security people, ....
Where were all those people & departments?

And, you know, there are tons of classes, annual tests, PC crap that fed. employees have to take & attend...did any of Hillary's crew have to do those things?
Did Huma take the LGBT sensitivity training?
Did Mills pass the racial sensitivity training?

Frau Edith Steingehirn

glasater - from the Daily Caller a reminder:

As is now well-known, Kentucky clerk Kim Davis stopped issuing marriage licenses after the Supreme Court ruled in June that states are required to recognize same-sex nuptials. But the fury aimed at Davis has been disproportionate to the actual facts of the situation, and shows galling – and revealing – inconsistency on the part of her critics.

In particular, where was the outcry when Attorney General and later Governor of California, Jerry Brown, refused to mount a defense of gay-marriage ban Proposition 8? Representing the state in court was at the center of his job. Yet he put his personal preferences – some influenced by his liberal version of Catholicism – ahead of the clear dictates of his state’s voters, who had been forced to use the initiative process when politicians failed them.

The Washington Post underscored this double standard today (surely by accident) in its editorial lambasting Davis’s stance.
..................
In 2004, clerks who violated the law to perform same-sex marriages were celebrated. In 2009, Gov. Jerry Brown was a civil rights hero for refusing to perform one of his essential duties. Yet in 2015, the Kim Davises of our country need to watch out for people with pitchforks who cannot tolerate even a pebble threatening the Goliath of the new marriage regime.


LUN


Hillary Clinton

"Did Huma take the LGBT sensitivity training?"

I don't know about the GBT part, but I covered the L in personal training sessions with her.

Trust me, she is very sensitive.

Some Guy

"Some Guy, my reading of the opinion is that if Judge Berman had concluded"

Of course, at that point he'd be restrained by precedent. Of course if my aunt had nuts...

Peter

Ha! TC. the cankles twisted while Huma takes a dive and foundation empties pockets pose might be a good name

Some Guy

"I do wonder if the gloating Pat fans, will think this is so wonderful if the appeal goes against them and Brady must sit out playoff games?"


There is no reason the Court of Appeals will lift a finger to resolve this in an expedited manner. IOW, it won't be ruled on anytime this season or the postseason.

I'm not certain the CA will even agree to hear the case because Berman used CA2 case law in his opinion.

maryrose

Some Guy
You are back
What do you think of other comments wrt Brady decision

Captain Hate on the iPad

Tammy Bruce was slattering everybody in the Kentucky marriage license dust up including the drama queen homos with visions of being a victim.

Some Guy

Still catching up, was there a specific comment maryrose?

Jane

So the Millis cop shooting yesterday was a shooting by the cop, who then crashed his car and set it on fire.

I like defending the police and this guy makes it harder.

GMax

You mean ex cop, he has been summarily fired and probably will face some criminal charges...

Dave (in MA)

Jane: D'OH

Dave (in MA)

Maybe he crashed because he fell asleep while driving or was dicking around with his phone, and tried concocting a more heroic-sounding story.

Thomas Collins

Some Guy, I'll bet the NFL bargains for "general awareness" justifying a penalty in the next CBA. In any event, I find it ironic that the Wells Report boxed in the NFL.

Now THAT's a yoga position, Peter!

Thomas Collins

Some Guy, I don't think CA-2 will summarily dismiss the NFL's appeal. But I agree that CA-2 is not going to adjust its winter schedule to accommodate the NFL Management Council. This is hardly a matter justifying expedited review. Of course, the NFL Management Council probably considers it comparable to US v. Nixon.

maryrose

Comments by Iggy Jimmyk Porch and cecil

Some Guy

Success of winning an appeal in CA-2 for civil cases = 7.5%

Janet

Virginia's Attn. General did the same thing - http://legalinsurrection.com/2014/01/virginia-ag-mark-herring-refuses-to-do-his-job-and-defend-state-law-on-marriage/

"Newly-elected Virginia AG Mark Herring announced he will be joining the plaintiffs in lawsuits challenging the state’s ban on gay marriage. So not only is he declining to defend Virginia’s gay marriage ban, which was passed with 57% of the vote (including Herring’s) in 2006, but he is arguing for the courts to strike it down as unconstitutional.

If the people of Virginia wanted to repeal the ban, the proper remedy would be to repeal the ban." ...

"AG Mark Herring is tasked with defending the law of Virginia in court. If Herring wanted to declare it unconstitutional, he should have tried to become a judge rather than running for AG." ...

maryrose

TC
Some Guy
I am now cynical enough to believe if Pats are winning case will be held up
If Pats lose 4or5games at the beginning case will proceed

Thomas Collins

Wildest scenario, maryrose: Pats and the Second Circuit NY Football Giants end up in Super Bowl for third time. Rumors arise that a decision is coming down late in the first week between the conference championship games and the Super Bowl. A true JOM threadbuster!

But if it's Browns vs. Pats in the AFC Championship Game, maryrose, wouldn't you want Brady to play so your team would have a chance to stop Tom's drive toward Super Bowl number five?

Some Guy

maryrose, I don't even understand Iggy's (or jimmy's) comment.

This was a civil and labor law case which the courts are the only possible venue. The government isn't sticking it's nose in, the parties sought remedy in court which happens all the time.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Wilson/Plame