Hold the front page - nobody saw this coming!
90s Scandals Threaten to Erode Hillary Clinton’s Strength With Women
Yeah, Bill Clinton's one-man War on Women (although Kennedyesque!) was problematic even in the 90's; by contemporary standards it simply cannot be defended. Of course, if the legacy media can limit the "90's scandals" to the sex stuff it is still a win for Team Hillary - as Bernie Sanders casts about for examples of Clintonian ethical sleaze, the Marc Rich pardon may yet re-emerge. Tax breaks for the Rich indeed.
But back to rape and sexual assault allegations. As an example of how young progressives are backpedaling like a Patriot cornerback check out this Voxsplainer by Dylann Matthews on the Juannita Broddrick rape allegation:
So far, this issue has mostly been raised by conservative media and Republican politicians like Prudhomme-O'Brien. But it's a substantive matter worthy of coverage from non-right-wing outlets as well. There really are multiple accusations of sexual assault against Bill Clinton, accusations that have too often been conflated with his much better-established and much less morally concerning history of adultery. Are the women making these accusations survivors who deserve to be believed, to borrow Hillary Clinton's language? Or, as she later insisted, have their accusations all been found to be baseless?
The basic answer is that some of the claims appear more credible than others. There are three main accusers, of whom it seems by far the most credible — based on the publicly available evidence — is Broaddrick. Jones's claim was aired for years and faced several major problems (including the fact that she claimed the president's penis had a "distinguishing mark" that doctors and Monica Lewinsky said it did not have), and Willey repeatedly lied to federal investigators and changed her story dramatically between grand jury testimony and a deposition in the Jones case (among other issues).
But Broaddrick's allegation, while hardly proven, has not been definitively refuted. Only Broaddrick and Bill Clinton know what the truth of the matter in the case is. But if one generally believes it's important to believe the victim, it's hard to argue that this case should be an exception.
Ouch. Don't take my word for it - here is David French of the NRO:
A warning Mr. Trump issued to Mrs. Clinton on Twitter — “Be careful Hillary as you play the war on women or women being degraded card” — initially grabbed attention last month. Then, Paula Jones, who had accused Mr. Clinton of exposing himself while she was an Arkansas state employee, and Juanita Broaddrick, an Arkansas nursing home executive who alleged that Mr. Clinton sexually assaulted her in 1978 when he was attorney general of Arkansas, re-emerged in the news media.
Mr. Clinton maintained he was innocent but eventually paid Ms. Jones $850,000 to settle her sexual harassment case. He has denied, through his lawyer, assaulting Ms. Broaddrick.
Well. "Sexual assault" includes many non-rape actions, such as unwanted groping, so the Times is giving the Clintons a bit of space there. As for "he has denied, through his lawyer", well then, that means Bill has not personally denied it. No press avail, no teary "I did not have sexual relations with that woman...", and why should he waste his time or ours, since Bill's credibility would be zero anyway.
more popcorn please.
Posted by: henry | January 20, 2016 at 08:30 AM
But back to rape and sexual assault allegations. As an example of how young progressives are backpedaling like a Patriot cornerback check out this Voxsplainer by Dylann Matthews on the Juannita Broddrick rape allegation:
Since the topic is about a sex offender, perhaps Denver would have been a better example.
http://thebiglead.com/2014/09/18/peyton-manning-1996-tennessee-lawsuit-trainer-bare-butt-mooning/
Posted by: Rocco | January 20, 2016 at 08:46 AM
I read a story last night about Clinton's first affair, and Hillary's ongoing harassment of the woman. She was 21, Bill was 29. Hillary was a witch. The woman's name was Maria. And it was one sick story.
Anyone else see it?
Posted by: Jane | January 20, 2016 at 08:50 AM
Yes it was in the daily mail, now vox is focusing on inconsistent stories, Shirley.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 20, 2016 at 08:55 AM
Seems the Clintons have brought us to the point where we're yet again discussing differing observations of a President's, er, appendage. JATFI? Hard to see how that's good for Hillary.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | January 20, 2016 at 08:56 AM
Good morning!
Three inches of snow and still falling.
Daughter just called. It took her an hour and 45 minutes to get to work, normally a 45 minute drive. She said that NO streets are plowed in Indianapolis, like they didn't even try.
I wonder if this will fall on the new dem mayor's head.
Posted by: Miss Marple | January 20, 2016 at 08:57 AM
Yes, Jane, that was on the Daily Mail. The woman died not too long ago.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | January 20, 2016 at 08:57 AM
jane,
You mean this one?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3396589/Anonymous-phone-calls-fears-stalking-veiled-threats-power-hungry-Hillary-torpedoed-torrid-affair-Bill-Clinton-21-year-old-campaign-worker-threatened-destroy-master-plan-president.html
With some people like Hillary its in their DNA.
Posted by: Jack is Back (but On Alert with his Percocet and Prune Juice ) | January 20, 2016 at 08:58 AM
Buccaneer was too quick for me.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | January 20, 2016 at 08:58 AM
Twelve year lows in oil. Price is below 28. Futures are off over two hundred points.
Posted by: glasater | January 20, 2016 at 09:02 AM
That is a shocker from Vox. My older brother is inexplicably a fan. I think he is a Bernie fan, but will of course vote for Hillary if she's the nominee.
Posted by: Porchlight | January 20, 2016 at 09:07 AM
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2580967/
Headline: Kasich sees himself as "the prince of light and hope"
Posted by: Miss Marple | January 20, 2016 at 09:10 AM
$850K is a lot of cake to settle an unfounded sexual harassment claim, wouldn't you say, Voxsplainers?
Posted by: Porchlight | January 20, 2016 at 09:11 AM
don't know what to make of this, is there any chance it's accurate, I know Hilligula's trend line stinks, but these #s?: http://hotair.com/archives/2016/01/19/comedy-gold-new-cnn-poll-of-new-hampshire-has-bernie-sanders-leading-hillary-by-27-points/
Posted by: NK | January 20, 2016 at 09:17 AM
Yes Jane,I read that story also. Hillary had some kind of weird power over Bill from the beginning of their relationship. I think he was scared of her! She was a cold and scheming b*tch and got her claws into him.
They are sick people.
Posted by: Marlene | January 20, 2016 at 09:27 AM
NK,
Younger democrats like Bernie, at least the ones around here do. I have seen a couple of Bernie bumper stickers, no Hillary stickers.
It doesn't surprise me. Plus Bernie is from the next state over so almost has "favorite son" status in New Hampshire.
Posted by: Miss Marple | January 20, 2016 at 09:27 AM
Perhaps it's just proof even maggots can be induced to gag, NK. Comrade Sanders is "new" even though his idiocies are two hundred years old while the Red Witch with her Black Albatross choker and the Rapist dragging behind is "old" (and insufficiently commie).
There is a reality limit to what indoctrination and conditioning can achieve and the reality of the stink coming off Red Witch may just be too strong.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 20, 2016 at 09:29 AM
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_presidential_race.html
Rubio is the only one who can beat both Hil and Sanders.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 09:31 AM
I am aware of the young Progs Bernie support, but this is a stunning (IF ACCURATE) smackdown of Hilligula by Dems more than Bernie support. It's almost like they've caught on that she is a world class grifter, and as I thought for over a year, BJ hurts her with younger women. The 'rape culture' insanity is devouring the Clintons. It may be getting close to pass popcorn time. I would love for the Dems to run Bernie, let them come out as the socialist party.
Posted by: NK | January 20, 2016 at 09:32 AM
Steyer now backing Bernie....(seen on Twitter by our lurking friend).
Posted by: henry | January 20, 2016 at 09:32 AM
I really believe Bernie will win the NH primary.
He is seen as harmless,old,crazy Uncle Bernie.
I've seen quite a few Bernie bumper stickers in Florida,usually on cars with Massachusetts license plates.
Posted by: Marlene | January 20, 2016 at 09:34 AM
RickB-- I think you said what I was typing at 09:32, of course you said it much more eloquently.
Posted by: NK | January 20, 2016 at 09:34 AM
"Bombshell"
http://wibx950.com/breaking-news-ted-cruzs-parents-voted-in-canadian-election/Ted was born in '70, not after '74. Is the notion here that Ted lost his purported US citizenship when his parents purportedly became Canadians?
This attorney is in his eighties(not that there is anything wrong with that) so he may have been duped with a previously debunked story of Cruz's parents.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 09:43 AM
As you know, I spend but 30 seconds on my wife's WaPo each morning.
But today I scoured it cover to cover to see how they covered the IG letter about Hillary's super top secret indiscretions on her server.
You got it: Not one single word in the entire paper unless I missed it.
There were pages and pages bashing the Reps though.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 09:43 AM
Alright, anybody know the provenance of 'distant cloud no larger than a man's hand? I recently ran across this in something my father wrote almost 50 years ago: 'None of these alternatives are palatable.....they will continue to be ignored until the cloud becomes somewhat larger than a man's hand."
Posted by: I could search. | January 20, 2016 at 09:44 AM
Ah, I Kings 18:44.
Posted by: Now to my Interpreter's Bible. | January 20, 2016 at 09:46 AM
--Younger democrats like Bernie...--
That can be read two ways.
The first way I read it prompted me to wonder, if Bernie is one of the younger Dems are there any of them older than him who had not already fossilized.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 09:46 AM
well red queen is clearly jurassic, whereas commissar is cretaceous, I think that's right,
you don't expect pravda or granma to showcase the dissident voices, do you comrade,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 09:48 AM
The Fascist propaganda organs will wait until a Republican takes public notice of the IG DNI letter in order to make it a "political" issue. It's not going away. The intelligence community will not allow it to be ignored.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 20, 2016 at 09:52 AM
how about that,
http://www.jammiewf.com/2016/thanks-obama-a-50-caliber-weapon-funneled-through-fast-and-furious-found-at-el-chapo-hideout/
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 09:53 AM
Off topic, I find it amusing though disturbing that so many business/financial types think that a low oil price is a scary bad thing.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/oils-nightmare-scenario-dominates-davos-114532016.html
Maybe it's a symptom of a slowdown, but in and of itself low energy prices seem like a good thing, unless you're in the energy business. Reminds me of the climate nuts who seem to believe that there's an absolutely ideal temperature.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 20, 2016 at 09:53 AM
--Ted was born in '70, not after '74. Is the notion here that Ted lost his purported US citizenship when his parents purportedly became Canadians? --
This is an issue DoT utterly and properly destroyed. It is utterly meaningless what some other countries laws say about citizenship.
If Mexico passed a law stating anyone who visits Mexico is a Mexican citizen do we then have dual citizenship?
Absent some actual evidence Cruz's mother "purportedly" took action to become a Canadian citizen and renounced her US citizenship, stories like the one above are pretty much just smears.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 09:53 AM
Marlene, my understanding is that when Bill was ogling Hillary in the Yale Law Library, she challenged him to do something besides look.
Posted by: And that has made all the difference. | January 20, 2016 at 09:54 AM
I keep hearing about Super Delegates on the dem side and that - if I understand the concept correctly - the state primaries are largely irrelevant. Does that ring true?
Posted by: Beasts of England | January 20, 2016 at 09:55 AM
--Ah, I Kings 18:44.--
You beat me to it, kim.
Good old One Kings [heh] wherein Elijah lays it out.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 09:56 AM
DoT took care of every specious argument advanced by the drooler. Ringing the bell only guarantees more comment slobber.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 20, 2016 at 09:56 AM
it depends on why, the price is down, if it's because of fracking, which is one component it's fine, if it's because of China's slowdoewn it's troublesome,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 09:57 AM
Briefly, Ig.
DoT's argument was that another country has no say with regards to a child born in the US. Ironically he always supported that "another country" when the "another country" was the US making a claim on foreign soil. I dismantled that argument quite easily.
Specific to Cruz. His parents's actions could have cost him his US Code citizenship through their actions prior to his age of majority. US Code has specific statutes for him to reapply.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 09:59 AM
Poor Wittle Wickey...
:-(
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 10:00 AM
You got it: Not one single word in the entire paper unless I missed it.
Somewhat surprisingly, the NYT and CNN seem to be covering it, at least online. However, in the dead tree NYT it was in the bottom lower corner of page A16. The thing about online is that it you won't likely see it unless you're looking for it. Ditto with it being buried in an obscure part of the print edition.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 20, 2016 at 10:00 AM
It's down to where it should be because political and economic circumstances have for now, broken the back of the extortionate cartel that a healthy West would have forcibly broken decades ago.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 10:01 AM
Ted Cruz's Canadian Birth Certificate doesn't help the "just visiting" argument.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 10:02 AM
Maybe Palin is a mole set about destroying Trump.
http://m.nydailynews.com/news/politics/transcript-palin-endorses-trump-no-pussy-footin-article-1.2502732Ugh.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 10:04 AM
Rick 9:56. I wear it as a badge of honor (or stupidity) that I have never resorted to the Narciscolator to simply not see certain posters. But I swear if we go down this tiresome road again, I will beg for it.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:06 AM
-DoT's argument was that another country has no say with regards to a child born in the US.--
That's just not accurate. Another country has no say on who we deem citizens whether born here or not.
- Ironically he always supported that "another country" when the "another country" was the US making a claim on foreign soil.--
There's nothing ironic about that because it is exactly the same principle only without your inapt limitation of "born in the US".
--I dismantled that argument quite easily.--
No you didn't. It's really only a matter for argument in the same way some people are of the opinion they're really Napoleon.
If it's not an inarguable fact other countries could pass laws rendering no one on earth eligible for president.
I'm not arguing it further because there is nothing to argue.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 10:09 AM
Fine.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 10:11 AM
there was less flak over Hamburg .in '43, then Bezos and Carlos Slim puts out on any given day, whether pleading for copkillers, salafi, corrupt
potentates like Razorback, some combinations of all three,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 10:11 AM
I think TK's suggestion re Rick and TK following TK and Cecil's formula of ignoring each other was a good one.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 10:12 AM
Dow down 300 already.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:15 AM
Walter Williams as usual with a different and compelling point of view; Blacks and the Confederacy.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 10:18 AM
I know I would appreciate it.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 10:18 AM
John Stossel on economic myths.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 10:20 AM
Ignoring the shit on the comment sidewalk didn't work with Cleo and it won't work now. The intent is precisely the same in both cases and TM should consider the same remedy - it finally worked with Hit's help.
I won't suggest other commenters stop stepping in the shit and smearing it around. That never worked with 'poor' Cleo and it won't work in this instance.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 20, 2016 at 10:20 AM
I would say jim crow, was a more permanent wound on the nation,
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/01/19/gates-man-i-
hope-the-next-president-doesnt-surround-himself-with-yes-men/
shirley he can't be serious,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 10:21 AM
The Hill absolutely needs to keep her POTUS campaign viable to give her lawyers leverage in negotiating an exit from the race and, at best, no hoosegow time. I am becoming convinced that she would be el toasterino on an Espionage Act count (gross negligence).
Posted by: Thomas Collins | January 20, 2016 at 10:22 AM
What is the "intent," Rick?
Over the years everyone has seen the topic tone way down. One comment today and you are in a frenzy.
Let it go, man.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 10:25 AM
Absolutely agree, Rick.
Since I always pay attention to what certain posters think, it was terribly frustrating when DoT got sucked in because scroll-on-by with him and others required scanning the post first before rejecting it.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:26 AM
Gates has no shame, which isn't unique among the morning show coffee clatch of nepotism, fraud charges, and worse,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 10:28 AM
TK, it is like feeling the first tingle of a disease you thought you had kicked in the past. We are pre-sensitized and wary.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:29 AM
Gates deserves no more respect than the CIA guy in 13 Hours. Sell it once, pal, and you cannot get it back.
That is harsh, I suppose, but he was one of those I had counted on to provide adult supervision to the twerp in the WH.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:32 AM
I think it is new and topical, OL.
Sorry to hear you think of me in the terms set forth by Rick.
It only turns into romper room when he calls me things like "the drooler" in a conversation he wasn't invited to. It is all on this page to see.
Anyway, I still hold you in high regards.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 10:34 AM
Constabile, is a dead ringer for weasels, see Suits, and now Damian Lewis's mouthpiece on Billions,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 10:34 AM
-370.
You gotta be quick.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:35 AM
Posted by: Miss Marple | January 20, 2016 at 10:35 AM
is this localized or are we going to a towel, ala hitchhiker's guide,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 10:36 AM
TK, I do not think of you that way at all except on this one subject. That's what I meant about having to scan first before scrolling since on all other topics I do pay attention to your thoughts.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:37 AM
-400...
The dogs are not eating the dog food.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:41 AM
The Hill-Bill weird relationship:
I think since his mother abandoned him to got to CRNA school, then she stayed and practiced in a different town, he's got mommy issues that play a huge role in their perverse relationship.
Posted by: anonamom | January 20, 2016 at 10:42 AM
So when Rick maliciously dings me for pointing out Trump polling or crowd size, does it become apparent that his fixation is on more than one subject?
It is comment police profiling at this point.
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 10:43 AM
when does Chip dillard, interrupt his golf game?
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 10:43 AM
jimmyk,
If I were a highly credentialed planner/banker/oligarch such as those floating in the cesspool in Davos, I would be very concerned about losing the linchpin to the Malthusian models of scarcity used to create the illusion of 'growth' through inflation. Between increased CO2 driving crop yields up (and prices down) and fracking ingenuity demolishing the Peak Oil myth (while setting an upper bound for energy prices), what's left for a well credentialed moron to blabber about wrt the concept of Malthusian scarcity?
Poor grubers - they may be forced to look for jobs commensurate with their actual abilities.
Posted by: Rick Ballard | January 20, 2016 at 10:46 AM
I should have thanked you, OL.
I'm gonna drop it right now.
...and watch my life savings drop as well. :-(
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 20, 2016 at 10:47 AM
Rick, whenever I fantasize where one might do the most amount of good with one nuke, Davos always seems to be on my list.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:49 AM
Thanks TK.
Sorry about the market but you know well my thoughts about the Beatles and "Nothing is Real" as seen from out here on the Ledge.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 20, 2016 at 10:50 AM
this is why I asked Rick, what where the parameters for a correction,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 10:52 AM
This is good:
For the Sake of Capitalism, Pepper Spray Davos
Posted by: glasater | January 20, 2016 at 10:54 AM
now that allows them to get away, glas,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 10:56 AM
Great Davos post Rick!
Posted by: Clarice | January 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM
Down goes the DOW, -440 at one point now seeing a "dead cat bounce" to -425.
How's that economy now dems? 18K down to 15.5K?
Posted by: PDinDetroit | January 20, 2016 at 11:02 AM
"Now, I have to go back to work on my State of the Union speech. And I worked on it until pretty late last night. But I want to say one thing to the American people. I want you to listen to me. I'm going to say this again: I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never. These allegations are false. And I need to go back to work for the American people. Thank you"
Hillary was in the room near BC during that January presser. But it wasn't until August following his depo that Bill fessed up to deceiving the country, including"even my wife and daughter". How stupid and/or unperceptive would HC have to be not to have read the WaPo article in January and watched Bill's "listen to me" speech a week later, and not known the truth? Then we're to believe it wasn't until Bill came clean 6 mos. later than HC's eyes were opened? It still shocks me that NY voters elected her senator.
Posted by: DebinNC | January 20, 2016 at 11:09 AM
NY values, Deb. :)
Posted by: jimmyk | January 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM
$8.00/gal gas was Obummer's goal (along with his energy secy and science adviser) here we are $1.88 nationally and dropping. Note the Left's response, it's not drilling it's the lousy economy!... how can we have a lousy economy with the blessings of Obamanomics for SEVEN YEARS!!! http://hotair.com/archives/2016/01/19/video-remember-when-barack-obama-said-we-couldnt-just-drill-our-way-to-lower-gas-prices/
Posted by: NK | January 20, 2016 at 11:16 AM
It is as though the great lesson the world learned was that Paul Volcker's demolition of the 70s stagflation to attain price and currency stability was the giant mistake and the whole world is now populated by central bankers setting policy based on the Arthur Burns model, only supersized in a way Burns would have blanched at.
Or alternately, the great lesson to be learned may be that, like Japan, low-to-no-growth and stagnation can be maintained almost indefinitely so long as one gives up any chance of greater prosperity.
In the end of course the 'almost' part of 'almost indefinitely' can never be escaped and the pent up pain will be administered, because markets cannot be denied forever. The word "market" is a nickname for economic reality. Anything that distorts or "controls" markets works about as well as any other reality denying mode of survival.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 11:16 AM
What BC looks like after HC gets through with him. (click the picture to see it all)
MOST EMBARRASSING!!!
Posted by: PDinDetroit | January 20, 2016 at 11:16 AM
Interesting piece on Townhall re the Hil-LIAR-y server debacle, Top Secret classifications, and the impending flood of stories/leaks expected to result from these revelations:
"NBC: Intel on Hillary's Server Was So Secret, IG Needed Special Permission to Review It."
The 'SAP' intelligence on her server was so secret that the man whose job it is to oversee America's intelligence community had to be granted special permission to review a sworn declaration summary about its contents.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/01/20/nbc-intel-on-hillarys-server-so-secret-ig-needed-special-permission-to-review-n2107168
Posted by: Michael (fpa Patriot4Freedom) | January 20, 2016 at 11:17 AM
Ig-- as our friend in ChiTown always reminds us, Chairman Miller was even more destructive than Arthur Burns. Miller turned Burns' smoldering inflation campfire into roaring stagflation.
Posted by: NK | January 20, 2016 at 11:18 AM
NY values, Deb. :)
You ain't kidding, jimmyk. Down here in GA, I listen to Chuck Schumer and Peter King and question whether we live in the same country. De Blasio inhabits an alternate universe imo.
Posted by: DebinNC | January 20, 2016 at 11:19 AM
Bill Gross with a little reality; Davos fiddles while global markets burn. Monetary policy increasingly ineffective. Fiscal stimulation non-existent.
The tragedy is it is all so simple and wealth automatically created when people are left to their own devices. It is the attempts to eliminate or control the absolutely necessary and short lived effects of downturns that create the prolonged depressions and recessions that destroy wealth and put in place the self generating institutions which then make it their business to eliminate or mitigate what is in fact the natural and needed method of eliminating malinvestment.
They give us smallpox to avoid chickenpox.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 11:24 AM
more like ebola or marburg,
https://gma.yahoo.com/freed-iranians-never-boarded-flight-us-195732625--abc-news-topstories.html#
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 11:26 AM
Well, at least we NYers drew the line at Weiner's shenanigans, even if Huma seems very Hillary-like in her tolerance and enabling.
Yes, Ig and NK, it seems like the same bad ideas get reincarnated every generation, if only as an attempt by the meddlers and self-important policy gurus to provide some justification for their existence.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 20, 2016 at 11:28 AM
Well Burns was there a whole lot longer than Miller but they both were useless.
I'm not exactly a gold standard bug but I have to say the Fed lost a great deal of sobriety with the loss of the gold standard and the collapse of Bretton Woods.
Fed policy since then has become more extreme and damaging as time goes on.
Volcker gets a great deal of the "credit" for that, to temper whatever good he did as chairman of the Fed.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 11:32 AM
More dark money:
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/features/2016-01-20/what-kind-of-man-spends-millions-to-elect-ted-cruz-
I'd never heard of this guy's political activities, though I know about his firm. Perhaps Jane Meyer can do a sequel.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 20, 2016 at 11:32 AM
well but you ended up with mayor bane, really it's turtles all the way down,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 11:33 AM
like ted forstmann, I guess,
Posted by: narciso | January 20, 2016 at 11:35 AM
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/how-donald-trump-defeats-hillary-clinton-217868#ixzz3xjdJEox0
He picks up more support in the black community than people would have expected. Good article on demographics and strategy.
Posted by: Miss Marple | January 20, 2016 at 11:35 AM
jimmyk,
That;s a fascinating article on Mercer. I had never heard of the guy or the firm.
You can think you're well-informed, and then something like that pops up and you think to yourself, "I don't know what the hell's going on."
Posted by: Miss Marple | January 20, 2016 at 11:47 AM
Mercer at Renaissance? The other strange bit is that his partner at Renaissance, Simon, is a huge Hilligula supporter and crony, and I suspect got a lot of Clinton.com email inside info.
Posted by: NK | January 20, 2016 at 11:54 AM
Apparently only 6 people have SAP clearance.
Posted by: Jane | January 20, 2016 at 11:57 AM
like ted forstmann, I guess,
I recall Forstmann was mainly focused on schools, wasn't he? This guy seems like the left's worst nightmare across-the-board.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 20, 2016 at 11:59 AM
That Bloomberg article on Mercer was so canted and full of misleading innuendo attempting to paint every person in it as some kind of nut I had to stop reading about half way down.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | January 20, 2016 at 12:02 PM