So after months of preparing for a courtroom showdown the FBI says "Nevermind, for now anyway"?
Yesterday, it came to light that the FBI may no longer need Apple to unlock the San Bernardino iPhone. The two sides were due to meet in court again today, but the hearing has been delayed.
The news that the FBI may not need Apple’s help saw the courts quickly grant a two-week pause while the government tries out a new approach. It claims that it’s been presented with alternative means of unlocking the phone by a third party, which could be used to break into the now infamous iPhone. It’s not clear who has provided the FBI with the alternative, or what it entails.
As to the technology side, some guesswork here. I like the Apple on the edge of Tomorrow death/rebirth approach myself:
What’s stopping the FBI from trying to guess each and every PIN combination until it gets the right one is the fact that the iPhone might be set to erase the data after the tenth wrong PIN input. Edward Snowden already suggested that the FBI has a memory mirroring technique at its disposal that could be used to beat the system.
What happens here is that the iPhone is again dismantled and the NAND memory module is removed so that it can be copied. With the help of software, the FBI can then try each and every PIN combination available. If the phone erases itself after the tenth attempt, the FBI would just restart the process. After all, it still has the original memory that can be copied over and over.
“This technique is kind of like cheating at Super Mario Bros. with a save-game, allowing you to play the same level over and over after you keep dying,” security researcher Jonathan Zdziarski wrote on his blog – you should read the entire post to better understand how this technique works.
But as to timing, well, hmm. I have long said that Apple ought to be protesting publicly while cooperating privately, to protect their brand while getting this resolved. I am not getting off that horse now. My guess? Apple brought in a consultant, made a few "suggestions" as to how to crack this, and sent the cut-out on to the FBI.
No adverse court ruling, no awkwardness about ignoring court orders in the event they lose, no publicity about publicly cooperating with the FBI. OK, there is some negative press about seemingly secure iphones being hackable, but they can claim the next generation solves that, so hurry out to the Apple Store and upgrade.
Or, the FBI got lucky. Maybe time will tell.
Unless and until Milhous-Rodham trades the orange pantsuit for a one-piece, I'm going with the Apple helped the FBI on the down-low theory over some theory based on the FBI's competence and technical prowess .
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 22, 2016 at 04:18 PM
The FBI figured out it was going to lose this case... it is regrouping to try to find another to set precedent with.
Posted by: henry | March 22, 2016 at 04:43 PM
I stand with Dave(inMA). It has come to my attention that nothing in the media can be taken at face value.
Posted by: Frau Frankreischhhhhhh | March 22, 2016 at 04:53 PM
I think henry's on the mark here.
Posted by: NK | March 22, 2016 at 04:55 PM
Any iPad Pro owners out there in JOMLand? I've resisted the temptations of the other newcomers and have kept to my beloved iPad Classic (that is, the original one). I like the weight and size of the Classic, but I understand the iPad Pro is a big one also.
As to unlocking iPhones, I have an Android, and I have no clue about whether it can be unlocked.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 22, 2016 at 04:55 PM
Most Androids cannot be locked.
Posted by: henry | March 22, 2016 at 05:00 PM
h/t Ace, Reuters is reporting that FARC communist rebel leaders were attending the baseball game along with the Big O.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 22, 2016 at 05:03 PM
is that so, this is a squirrel, because of the squashed haney inquiry into hizbu tahir,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 05:05 PM
Security related evacuation at Denver airport. Not clear on cause.
Posted by: henry | March 22, 2016 at 05:07 PM
"Wir schaffen das!"*
Frau Merkel's slogan is now being used by ISIS in Europe.
I'm waiting to hear what JiB's Belgian in-laws say. We haven't spoken with our German family but will before Easter.
*We'll take care of it/We can manage that
Posted by: Frau Meine Herren! | March 22, 2016 at 05:08 PM
"h/t Ace, Reuters is reporting that FARC communist rebel leaders were attending the baseball game along with the Big O."
Was Eric Holder in the American entourage?
Posted by: Frau Meine Herren! | March 22, 2016 at 05:10 PM
Reposting:
Don't need no stinkin encryption when you have crates of "burner" prepaid phones which are a dime a dozen in Europe because of roaming charges for US visitors.
Posted by: Jack is Back!ll | March 22, 2016 at 05:11 PM
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a blistering rebuke of the IRS today in Tea Party groups' suit against IRS targeting.
In closing, we echo the district court's observations about this case. The lawyers in the Department of Justice have a long and storied tradition of defending the nation's interests and enforcing its laws -- all of them, not just selective ones -- in a manner worthy of the Department's name. The conduct of the IRS's attorneys in the district court falls outside that tradition. We expect that the IRS will do better going forward. And we order that the IRS comply with the district court's discovery orders of April 1 and June 16, 2015 -- without redactions, and without further delay.
Posted by: Neo | March 22, 2016 at 05:15 PM
A paycheck's a paycheck, I suppose.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 22, 2016 at 05:18 PM
The 1st episode is Joe six-pac vs Larry lunch pail
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 22, 2016 at 05:30 PM
Dave, I think it would be perfect for her.
Posted by: newlurker | March 22, 2016 at 05:40 PM
Leftists hang Trump in effigy and then decapitate him in Salt Lake City.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 05:56 PM
civility, how do you spell that.
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 06:01 PM
Neo, the speed with which the court got around to its "blistering rebuke" is not encouraging.
Posted by: Frau Meine Herren! | March 22, 2016 at 06:07 PM
as for that report, give it four pinocchios,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 06:07 PM
the previous one, the latter is all too believable, as the huntress would tell you herself,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 06:09 PM
This is easy:
1. The FBI or more likely the NSA has a way to crack the phones and has all along.
2. If they used it for evidence, they'd have to reveal its existence, ie, sources and methods.
3. They tried to get Apple to do it and Apple fought.
4. Things didn't look good for winning against apple, and a decision against the FBI would be an unfortunate precedent.
SO,
5. They said "Never mind, we'll do it ourselves", revealing the existence of a method without its detgails, and avoiding the precedent.
Posted by: Charlie Martin | March 22, 2016 at 06:14 PM
http://freebeacon.com/issues/trump-yarmulkes-are-biggest-seller-at-aipac-conference/
Posted by: clarice | March 22, 2016 at 06:18 PM
we've seen ncis, mcgee can crack those things in two shakes,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 06:19 PM
record turnout in Az:http://www.12news.com/news/local/valley/maricopa-country-poll-lines-presidential-primary-places/96704015
Posted by: clarice | March 22, 2016 at 06:20 PM
I just realized why those Obama girls always look so miserable--they are as appalled by their father as I am.
The world burns, and he's at a baseball game in Cuba.
Posted by: anonamom | March 22, 2016 at 06:20 PM
Clinton has added a late speech at Stanford University "focusing on steady leadership post-Brussels" according to Fox, contrasting herself with Trump.
Steady leadership seems to have gotten us in quite a mess, if you ask me.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 06:28 PM
Forgot to include that the speech is tomorrow.
Someone else will have to report on it. I used up my tolerance for her voice at the AIPAC appearance yesterday.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 06:29 PM
well speaking of said leadership,
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/10115#efmBESCAL
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 06:31 PM
I'm voting for Charlie's theory. In re Item #3, I think the gov may originally have hoped to finagle a precedent setting ruling in their favor -- with a (wholly disingenuous) "it's just one phone" sales pitch. Turns out that the only person stupid enough to buy it that line was the judge who issued the original order. Comey sounded like an idiot when questioned about it by Congress.
Posted by: JM Hanes | March 22, 2016 at 06:34 PM
If the co-author of the pullout from Iraq, the handing over of Egypt to the Muslim Brotherhood [temporarily, no thanks to her], the red-line Syrian follies coupled with the rise of the JV IS crowd, the reset-deer-in-the-headlights petrification re Ukraine and Crimea and the Libyan disaster featuring the Benghazi debacle thinks foreign policy is going to be her winning hand I've got a 3AM phone call to place.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 06:37 PM
Ig--exactly.
Lord, she thinks we are all as moronic as the bulk of her supporters.
Posted by: anonamom | March 22, 2016 at 06:39 PM
Comey sounded like an idiot when questioned about it by Congress.
Anybody still have any faith in this dunce?
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 22, 2016 at 06:42 PM
I have little faith in anyone, Captain Hate. The efficient and responsible people have retired, been fired, or are being ignored.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 06:43 PM
inspektor dreyfus, got his job because of the vapors over the nsa, retroactively voiced, and the job he did with fitzapalooza,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 06:49 PM
and the irony of the former, is it happened right before an event like today, in madrid,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 06:56 PM
We do not have a coherent foreign policy
It is non existent
Hillary and Obama are responsible for the current mess
Hillary wants to continue failed policies
We cannot allow her to do so
Posted by: maryrose | March 22, 2016 at 06:57 PM
Captain Hate:
I don't think Comey would ever allow himself to go down in history as the man who derailed Clinton's campaign. If he were investigating Trump, however, I can easily imagine him persuading himself that indicting The Donald was the right thing to do.
Posted by: JM Hanes | March 22, 2016 at 06:57 PM
The world burns, and he's at a baseball game in Cuba.
As if some 31 dead people were going to interfere with another opportunity to give the middle finger to the country. Can you imagine having a classless mentally ill clown like Zippy for a father?
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 22, 2016 at 06:59 PM
Bang spot on, JMH.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 22, 2016 at 07:00 PM
right on the money, jmh,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 07:02 PM
Nail on the head, JMH
Posted by: boris | March 22, 2016 at 07:23 PM
I thought this was so appropriate, given Obama's speech. Right click for the end.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 07:25 PM
when they need information they get it, by hook or by crook,
http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/03/6th-circuit-dings-irs-in-tea-party-targeting-case/
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 07:38 PM
Our current foreign policy is perfectly coherent, maryrose.
Pay lip service to our allies while slyly diminishing the relationship and distancing ourselves from them.
Engage our second tier enemies and occasionally criticize them, but be certain they are stronger and more legitimate after the engagement.
Fear and retreat from our first tier enemies.
Jaw, jaw grand strategy with smart ass, know it all platitudes [ie don't do stupid shit] which in fact serve as a mask for the withdrawal of any real US grand strategy because we are not a force for good in the world or are simply one power among many.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 07:46 PM
who am I to quibble with eighteen credits,
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2016/03/21/brian-williams-eugene-robinson-pulitzer-prize-winning-communist
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 07:55 PM
CityJournal on the Finnish experiment with the negative income tax, AKA a guaranteed income.
It is supposed to replace the vast majority of welfare programs and their attendant bureaucracies.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 08:00 PM
Noted Luddite Theodore Dalrymple doesn't understand the purpose of art is to celebrate ugliness.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 08:01 PM
Here's another take on Obama in Cuba--have at it:https://pjmedia.com/ronradosh/2016/03/22/obama-confounds-critics-and-surprises-raul-castro-with-his-strong-defense-of-democracy-in-communist-cuba/
Posted by: clarice | March 22, 2016 at 08:07 PM
David french says sue the leftist groups who are blocking roads and assaulting people into penury.
Hmmm, sounds like a good idea. Where have I heard it before?
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 08:08 PM
See the third paragraph of my 7:46, clarice.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 08:10 PM
Hillary’s Really Bad Week No One Heard About Because Guess Who.
Presented for your perusal. Read into it what you will. :)
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 08:14 PM
he overreaches on occasion,
http://babalublog.com/2016/03/22/most-shameful-photos-of-the-day-naaah-probably-not-but-still-damn-shameful/
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 08:14 PM
yes, it's trump's fault that there has been enough vapor expended in the last week to send fulton to london and back, shirley
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 08:17 PM
Ignatz,
I believe I have talked before about my daughter's major in fine arts, specifically, painting.
They destroyed her love of painting. I doubt she has done 3 works since she has been out of school (15 years) and except for a picture of my dog Maggie, which I begged her to do, she has only produced depressing mixed media collages with oil that convey despair.
The reason is because everything she produced at the art school was deemed "sentimental" and "mere illustrations", trashed by student criticism, and she was shoved into the modern art box.
Today, she works for an insurance company. I have a beautiful watercolor self-portrait she did, and she did a wonderful portrait of my nieces when they were small. But she doesn't consider those "art."
Anyway, such is what is being produced in art schools. And the graduates will be unable to sell their work, will curse the philistine customers, and live in penury due to their student loans.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 08:25 PM
So, the taxi driver got suspicious because his fares didn't want him to handle their bags? Which led him to tell the Politie that these guys where up to know good. Now that is Hercule(an) dot connecting.
I need my rest. Driving Mrs. JiB and Frederick to JFK tomorrow for flight to Schipol and onto Antwerp. Prayers, please.
Posted by: Jack is Back! | March 22, 2016 at 08:28 PM
Prayers offered and will continue to be offered, Jack.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 08:30 PM
Is anyone listening to this interview on O'Reilly with Ted Cruz?
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 08:34 PM
I read all of your posted stuff, Iggy.
JiB--I wish them a safe trip and return home.
Posted by: clarice | March 22, 2016 at 08:34 PM
prayers for you jack,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 08:35 PM
From the last thread (I can't keep up):
Funny that AIPAC applauded Trump. But even then most will still vote straight line Democrat. Sheep to the slaughter.
Sorry I missed the Trump-Hillary-AIPAC discussion in the last thread--unlike most topics here, I know a little bit about this, having attended some events and knowing people heavily involved in the organization. I'm pretty sure that AIPAC is, relative to the Jewish population as a whole, a bit more evenly split between Republican and Democrat, Obama supporter and not (admittedly that's not saying a lot). That's because meaningful support for Israel is much higher among Republicans than Democrats.
But the organization itself is zealously non-partisan, and avoids any impression of critique or endorsement of candidates or of office-holders. AIPAC opposed Obama on the Iran deal, but they would never voice general approval or disapproval of Obama or anyone else as president. They really want the speeches to talk about policies, not individuals, as pro- or anti-Israel policies, especially when it comes to the President. Appealing to and from both sides of the aisle is their bread an butter and they zealously guard it. That's why they didn't like it (although apparently a lot of audience members did) when Trump said:
So I think that's what that lady meant by "ad hominem." I suspect that they would have been equally upset if someone had spoken about a Republican President in those terms. Just not their MO. I often don't enjoy their gatherings for that reason. Hillary knew enough not to actually say in her speech, even tough it was obvious to whom she was referring.
I'm not defending AIPAC in general (I'm not a member), just trying to explain their MO. Now if someone digs up a partisan attack on W at an AIPAC meeting that they were just fine with, I'll concede that I was wrong.
Posted by: jimmyk | March 22, 2016 at 08:37 PM
https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/12494928_996006310453107_5349239260989070583_n.jpg?oh=84f017494e6cf6b0ab939c0165d070d4&oe=57863615
Belgian teacher asks how he can teach when his class applauds this attack?
Posted by: clarice | March 22, 2016 at 08:42 PM
Thanks for the clarification, jimmyk
Posted by: clarice | March 22, 2016 at 08:43 PM
I'll add that I think Trump did hurt himself among AIPAC types with that "neutral" statement some time back, so that might explain some of the wariness toward him. Though I think a lot of it is the general bad press that Trump gets that makes publicly supporting hims sometimes uncomfortable, and trashing him sort of de rigueur among the smart set. I'm willing to give Trump the benefit of the doubt that by "neutral" he only meant "honest broker," but that's not what the term conveyed to most people.
Posted by: jimmyk | March 22, 2016 at 08:59 PM
jimmyk,
I appreciate that explanation. It is so hard to understand the ins and outs of organizations that I have no experience with, which is the boat I am in regarding AIPAC.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 09:01 PM
MM - a similar thing happened to my son. He prepared all throughout high school to major in Architecture. His freshman year he was given the assignment to design something you consider beautiful using only natural elements. He spent days designing a replica of the 18th hole of Pebble Beach golf course (he was also on the golf team). He bought all sorts of natural colored mosses and things and I thought it was great - he got a C. A fellow student turned in a stick and a leaf - he tied the leaf to the stick with a piece of jute - he got an A.
My son transferred into Industrial Design and is now in grad school. They only rewarded far out-there design. He liked more traditional, historic architecture. The professors only liked modern - bold, colorless, and cold.
It seems the universities intentionally try to stamp out any appreciation for what has been considered beautiful for generations. They actually penalize students who do not see the world through those same eyes.
Posted by: Momto2 | March 22, 2016 at 09:03 PM
yes, sloppy speaking has been one of the dagg ers, he has delivered to his enemies, who still have the skill of vizzini in striking him, or at least prince rugrin,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 09:05 PM
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/273914-speaker-ryan-to-give-address-on-state-of-american-politics
Prediction: this will infuriate even more people, coming right after the terror attack in Brussels.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 09:05 PM
Thanks, jimmyk.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 22, 2016 at 09:09 PM
I see in the daily photos that grandmother is along with the group in Cuba. I remember 8 years ago the story was that she was along to "babysit". Are they sticking to the story now that the girls are making college plans?
How much have we spent jet-setting her all over the world? Do other presidents take their m-i-ls on every single trip? I honestly don't know - maybe some have and I've not noticed.
Isn't this her peeking behind Malia? (may require a right click to see)
Posted by: Momto2 | March 22, 2016 at 09:15 PM
The universities are evermore worthless outside the sciences.
There is a traditionalist art school in NYC - The New York Academy of Art:
http://nyaa.edu/nyaa/about.html
Posted by: Porchlight | March 22, 2016 at 09:16 PM
and the black knight school of strategy
https://twitter.com/alimhaier/status/712443344278855684
a reminder they kept me out, despite I imagine good scores on the foreign service exam,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 09:19 PM
Abuela is along for the glitzy ride, Momto2. Watch her get dumped into some gated community as soon as the WH staff is no longer at her beck and call.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 22, 2016 at 09:19 PM
Narciso, that tweet could be Kasich talking about his campaign prospects. What is in the beltway water supply these days?
Posted by: henry | March 22, 2016 at 09:22 PM
Thanks for that very relevant Theodore Dalrymple link, Iggy. I love that guy.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 22, 2016 at 09:22 PM
well he's a psychologist by training, which is a decent template to understand this idiocy,
https://twitter.com/OrenKessler/status/712404593037209602
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 09:26 PM
Interesting
http://www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/gender-ideology-harms-children
Gender Ideology Harms Children
The American College of Pediatricians
Posted by: mike in houston | March 22, 2016 at 09:27 PM
some more of red queen's sterling leadership choices,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qRs3LcpAO4
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 09:29 PM
narciso,
I heard that guy this morning. Definitely a gift due to donations, although I wonder if Obama got him the job.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 09:33 PM
I tuned him out, he got his job through bundling, and insinuations against the huntress, I would say the latter,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 09:41 PM
17 minutes until Az polls start coming in.
Posted by: clarice | March 22, 2016 at 09:44 PM
Classy Romney strikes again:
Alex Moe @AlexNBCNews 1h1 hour ago
Romney at NRCC dinner went on to say Donald Trump's wives are foreign and there really are some jobs Americans just won't do, per attendee
173 retweets 129 likes
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 09:46 PM
Romney edging up to Carter as most mean-spirited loser.
Posted by: clarice | March 22, 2016 at 09:48 PM
so if nate falls in the woods and no one saw,
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-to-expect-in-the-gop-race-in-arizona-and-utah/
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 09:51 PM
MM-In Romney's defense I'm sure it was meant as a joke-and as far as being classless I'm sure you can find many more classless things Trump has said. Lying Cruz comes to mind.
Posted by: Texas Liberty Gal | March 22, 2016 at 09:52 PM
Oh, Texas Liberty Gal, I can find quite a few classless things Cruz has done.
1. Using his statement about the terrorist attack in Brussels to attack Trump.
2. Misrepresenting Trump's position on NATO (rethinking it) as wanting to withdraw from it. (Trump's speech is on line and can be checked.)
3. Dragging that imbecile Beck around with him and letting him make statements inferring that peole who don't vote for Cruz aren't Christian.
4. Making that "New York values" comment, dividing the country further.
I think that's enough. Mrs. Trump is NOT a candidate and this was a low-class comment. As far as "Lyin' Ted", the shoe fits.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 09:56 PM
I am going to bed. I find I am short-tempered these days.
Nytol.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2 | March 22, 2016 at 09:57 PM
so the greaney tome, posits a scenario where someone like brennan, although the details are more like karzai's sherpa, has been manipulated by saudi intelligence, for the better part of a decade,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 09:57 PM
This is funny too - Mitt on Trump at NRCC dinner on whether he's actually a Mormon: "He could have just asked my wives."
Lol~ Some peope here need to ligthen up!
Posted by: Texas Liberty Gal | March 22, 2016 at 09:58 PM
I guess I'm a bit of an old fashioned Cruz supporter because calling a political opponent you're actually running against a liar is a hell of a lot more classy than some dumbshit loser who could barely bring himself to even criticize a gangly little popcorn fart like Barry and who isn't even running for pres making tasteless jokes about some guys wives.
Mittens has lowered himself to the level of the scum making fun of his wife.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 10:00 PM
TLG, granted Trump can be crude, and if a comedian said it in a stand-up routine I'd say it's a funny line, but it's not appropriate for the last R nominee to say about the current R front-runner.
Posted by: jimmyk | March 22, 2016 at 10:02 PM
And that second one by Mitt is better because it's sort of self-deprecating.
Posted by: jimmyk | March 22, 2016 at 10:04 PM
what makes it not so funny, is it's also the subtext of wile e coyote's I mean liz mair's superpac,
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 10:07 PM
Iggy - I am sad to see the Mitt who I believed to be a sweet family man, making pancakes for his large family on Saturday mornings, turn into this vindictive, sore-loser man.
Posted by: Momto2 | March 22, 2016 at 10:07 PM
Couldn't think of a good caption.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 22, 2016 at 10:13 PM
Too large - click on it
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 22, 2016 at 10:18 PM
sort of the livingstone of the zeitgeist,
http://city-journal.org/html/molenbeek-problem-14307.html
Posted by: narciso | March 22, 2016 at 10:23 PM
Dave, somehow this subsequent line comes to mind:
"And the LORD regretted that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart."
Posted by: jimmyk | March 22, 2016 at 10:24 PM
A few additional angles on the Apple case.
Apple wasn't 'flouting' iPhone order, judge says. Loved this bit:
And this:Ya think?
Poor timing, scrambled strategy mar Feds’ fight with Apple
In addition to describing The DoJ’s screwed up strategy, the article reiterates this point a number of times:
Oddly enough, I think Justice made precisely that kind of assumption with regard to San Bernardino, and essentially created a case for expanding their power to demand corporate cooperation on decryption in an attempt to take advantage of the timing.Posted by: JM Hanes | March 22, 2016 at 10:26 PM
And God created pansy.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 22, 2016 at 10:29 PM