Referring to the Flint water supply problem, some pantsuit-load recently said of the Governor of Michigan, "“The governor of that state acted as though he didn’t really care. He had a request for help and he had basically stone walled."
Buckeyette said yesterday she will vote Kasich in Ahia to try to stop Trump (you, Mrs. Buckeye and Buckeyette are clearly like minded).
She has inherited my smart-ass demeanor. When I said that sounds like a good idea, her response was "so did Rush's Operation Hillary in 2008, hows that working out for you?"
Jane, I'd say vote Cruz if that's who you prefer. Marco doesn't look like he's going to get it done. Maybe if Jeb and Clarence Thomas and the Pope hold a joint presser to endorse Rubio...
Jane,
I think I would go with Cruz. Rubio is unlikely to win Florida and loosing might get him out of the race sooner. I would rather not encourage him to stay in by showing him any support. That would leave Cruz in a one-on-one with Trump which I think he might win.
Jane - just vote for Trump. He's inevitable and you want to be on the side of a winner, right? You'll be winning so much you'll get bored with it.
Not to mention, in his last appearance in Kansas, Trump threatened the people at his rally...“After making this huge U-turn to Kansas, if I lose, I’m going to be so angry at you.”
I'm not sure if that was before or after he had attendees raise their right hand and pledge allegiance to him. When he did that he said, “Don’t forget you all raised your hand. You swore. Bad things happen if you don’t live up to what you just did.”
You don't want President Trump coming after you, do you? Probably safer if we all just accept our fate. I mean, he was probably joking. He's a kidder. But why take chances?
Jane, I would recommend voting for Cruz. Cruz wants Rubio out because Team Cruz has concluded that Cruz's best chance against Trumpster is mano a mano. The notion that Cruz won't be able to beat Trumpster in states such as Florida, Pennsylvania and California is misguided. Rubio and Kasich are at best distractions and at worst will facilitate convention gridlock and Mittster emerging as the nominee. Think about it this way: Cruz is unlikely to come out of a deadlocked convention with the nomination. His best chance is one on one MMA with Trumpster.
The Top Men approved consultants are showing their usual amount of insight by not featuring Dondi's most obvious asset, Jeanette, at any campaign event with a significant male component.
And if Cruz can't beat Trumpster mano a mano in the later states, it's over anyway. Having Rubio and Kasich hanging around won't help Cruz get to 50% plus one when going into maryrose's and CH's hood.
Having spent the mosrning thus far trying to track down all the W-2 and 1099 forms for my Mom so we can figure out if she even needs to file or not for 2015, I am totally down with the Ted Cruz abolish-the-IRS program.
So far I've got seven separate W-2 or 1099s for her, and I'm still missing one, and this for someone whose gross income in 2015 was less than $30K. It's insane!
This is what happens when you put an addled drunk in highly controlled situations and she fills her Depends. She's a hopelessly toxic combination of Costanza and Uncle Leo.
If she paid federal taxes, James D, she needs to file to get a refund (which she may or may not do at 30k, depending). The missing W-2 can usually be emailed to someone by contacting that company's HR dep't. Don't forget that you'll need to make sure you've at least seen all of the 1095 forms (health care availability) too. I need to do my taxes as well, guess I'll put it off for another...oh, five weeks.
We've actually got an accountant who's going to determine all that, I just have to do the legwork to get the forms. Good reminder on the health care form, I'll make sure we've got that.
Kevin Smith ranks with Shelton Lee on not knowing how to end movies except in the most gut wrenchingly sappy way possible. Speaking of which, was anybody put in a diabetic coma by the last episode of Downton Abbey, assuming anyone was still watching that state run soap opera?
Jay Cost on the race.
Makes a pretty good case Trump will have a hard time getting a majority of delegates by the convention as he will at this point need to win 58% of the remaining delegates to do so.
TC, the problem with your Cruz-Kasich ticket, seems to me, is that for those who really like Cruz for being the conservative he is, they hate Kasich for being the opposite.
I would see it that way myself (I confess a lot of my hatred is because Cap'n told me what a scum he became, after having started out so well in the House), and I would see Kasich being a constant sea anchor for a President Cruz.
was anybody put in a diabetic coma by the last episode of Downton Abbey, assuming anyone was still watching that state run soap opera?
I believe the entire series aired while I was in the room, but I paid little to no attention to it other than to notice it looked like there were rich people and servants walking around and talking a lot.
OL, as much as I can't stand what the mailman's son has become, he could be useful to Cruz in the same way that Poppy Bush was to Reagan. I think he's smart enough to keep his RINO tendencies under wraps and his goofy persona could be an asset in debates against whoever gets to pick up the trail of empty Coronas in the wake of the HMS Pantloadsuit.
OL, Kasich may be a better pill to swallow, but I think ticket balancing is necessary. Cruz-Sessions is not going to get it done: Look at it this way: You may not like Cruz-Kasich in the abstract, but when the choice is Cruz-Kasich or Clinton-Castro, your Kasich pill will be easier to swallow. Think Reagan-Bush vs. Carter-Mondale.
CH, I swear I didn't see your post when I was writing mine.
I am becoming the Joe Biden of JOM. In the last few days, I have made three posts that could serve as the basis for an indictment for Bidenizing cc, Tom Bowler and CH!
Dave (in MA), Kasich is a favorite of Dems who want to sound reasonable. In November, of course, they'll vote for The Hill. But in battleground states, I think Kasich will bring in persuadables.
The Top Men approved consultants are showing their usual amount of insight by not featuring Dondi's most obvious asset, Jeanette, at any campaign event with a significant male component.
They are afraid she will confirm he has "small hands".
A woman on a Cruz ticket would bring in more suburban women votes. Carly?-- love her but she may be too hard edge to have on the ticket with Cruz. Nikki Haley?
See my 10:07.
At least Susanna Martinez would bring in a blue leaning state even if a tiny one and is a lot more conservative than Haley.
If the Reps aren't going to win SC then it doesn't matter who they run.
Martinez is a woman and a Hispanic and a governor and is fairly conservative.
Haley is two of those things.
So unless the converted Sikh vote is a ballooning demographic, what does Haley have Martinez doesn't?
A woman on a Cruz ticket would bring in more suburban women votes.
Maybe. I think if you care about this sort of thing you're already voting for Hillary. Nikki Haley is not impressive and the opposition would rightly criticize this as token box-checking.
I like Kasich as VP for the reasons CH and TC and others have mentioned.
I think Kasich winning OH on 3/15 goes a long way in either direction in his VP chances.
Of course, if Trump wins in OH with 33-35 and Kasich gets 30-32 - it's not like that tells us Kasich can't deliver (or help in delivering) OH in the general. But it puts a little bit of a taint on that argument if he does lose.
Frau and Iggy, I am strictly looking at what produced landslides in 80 and 84. Poppy was a terrible President but he helped stem the flood of country clubbers to the great John Anderson as the VP candidate. I'd rather have Carly in the slot but I doubt that brings as many voters into the fold as the mailman's weird son; i.e. I think people who like Carly would vote for Cruz anyway.ppp
Frau, don't be fooled by his goofy attitude; the mailman's son can go postal on anybody while still keeping a holier than thou attitude. If he was debating Rodham I would expect him to drop a "this is how we do it in Ohio; unlike Illinois, Arkansas, New York or wherever you've plopped down your carpetbag" on her.
I think people who like Carly would vote for Cruz anyway.
Right. If VP strategery means anything, the goal is to bring in voters that wouldn't already be on board. Kasich potentially does that for both Cruz and Trump.
Reverse psychology, that's an interesting notion, that is what happened to capt tupolev by the way, he was so obsessed with his prey, he allowed himself to be torpedoed from his own ship.
The main risk with Cruz is losing the debates to Hillary because ManBully
Trump is not as vulnerable, he can lose gracefully without much damage. Debates are not his forte.
I think that Trump would have the advantage that he's got a reputation for being rude, bombastic, insulting, etc. So it won't be an "oh my God" moment if he behaves that way in a debate with Hillary.
And if he doesn't behave that way? Huge bonus for him, it becomes a big "man bites dog" story.
--Would Martinez really bring New Mexico? I would think Kasich's chances of bringing Ohio would be a much bigger payoff.--
The premise of the comparison was "if you're going to pick a woman", which, unless you know something about Kasich I don't, makes him not germane.
That would explain several things, though.
I was mucking around YouTube last night and I ran across this snippet from the Steve Allen show. First of all this was live tv and no lip syncing (note how Lesley moves the mic stand in mid stanza); the band plays the charts in a tight professional manner. Allen was a good keyboard player on his own so he'd have no slouches in the band; without looking I think Monk made at least one appearance so they were used to being on a tightrope without a net. I wish the whole song was included.
The main risk with Cruz is losing the debates to Hillary because ManBully
This is a real concern. Cruz has a tendency to let his inner "preacher" pop out every once in a while.
I don't think he means to come off as condescending, and I don't think he is, but people see it that way. This will provide the Dems with an opportunity to attach the ManBully label.
As far as I know, Ignatz, Nikki Haley hasn't been caught playing the "do you know who I am" card with the police at a staff party that got out of control. Whether or not Martinez was drunk or, as she claimed, was dancing for four hours and maybe had a cocktail at the end of the night, her behavior in my opinion makes her not eligible for Veep this time. The last thing Cruz needs is a tape of Susana trying to get the police called off played on MSM right after Cruz's speech.
Hey!
Posted by: Jane | March 07, 2016 at 09:42 AM
Ann Coulter retweeted
18h18 hours ago
Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias
Rubio is weak in states, but strong in non-states. Beyond Puerto Rico, I’m bullish on him in DC & the Northern Marianas.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 07, 2016 at 09:43 AM
Is it still smart to vote for Rubio in Florida to beat Trump, or should I go directly to Cruz?
Posted by: Jane | March 07, 2016 at 09:45 AM
So Kasich can karate chop in glee as his plan comes together?
Posted by: henry | March 07, 2016 at 09:45 AM
Referring to the Flint water supply problem, some pantsuit-load recently said of the Governor of Michigan, "“The governor of that state acted as though he didn’t really care. He had a request for help and he had basically stone walled."
Cough Benghazi cough.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 07, 2016 at 09:50 AM
No, he gets a copy of the home game and a case of rice aroni.
Posted by: narciso | March 07, 2016 at 09:50 AM
Jane
Buckeyette said yesterday she will vote Kasich in Ahia to try to stop Trump (you, Mrs. Buckeye and Buckeyette are clearly like minded).
She has inherited my smart-ass demeanor. When I said that sounds like a good idea, her response was "so did Rush's Operation Hillary in 2008, hows that working out for you?"
Posted by: Buckeye | March 07, 2016 at 09:51 AM
Jane, I'd say vote Cruz if that's who you prefer. Marco doesn't look like he's going to get it done. Maybe if Jeb and Clarence Thomas and the Pope hold a joint presser to endorse Rubio...
Posted by: hrtshpdbox | March 07, 2016 at 09:52 AM
Even with that effort, red queen couldn't put it away, the shield wall of superdelegates were breached by atomic.
Posted by: narciso | March 07, 2016 at 09:53 AM
http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-scalia-seat-let-the-people-speak-1457307358
Donald would be well advised to rethink his desire for a one-on-one with Cruz.
I still am off put by Cruz's mannerisms, but he can think and speak circles around Teh Donald
Posted by: Buckeye | March 07, 2016 at 09:55 AM
Buckeye, I think Cruz can think and speak circles around just about everyone,
Posted by: hrtshpdbox | March 07, 2016 at 09:56 AM
Jane,
I think I would go with Cruz. Rubio is unlikely to win Florida and loosing might get him out of the race sooner. I would rather not encourage him to stay in by showing him any support. That would leave Cruz in a one-on-one with Trump which I think he might win.
Posted by: Tom Bowler | March 07, 2016 at 10:00 AM
Maybe they kept retelling is this.
This is why aff is pestering the state with trump university ads.
Posted by: narciso | March 07, 2016 at 10:04 AM
Trump U is just one example of why Trump said "I love the poorly educated"
Sounds like something the Clinton's would say!
Posted by: Truthbetold | March 07, 2016 at 10:06 AM
If Rubio knows he can;t win Florida he should get out now.
Cruz it is.
Posted by: Jane | March 07, 2016 at 10:06 AM
This is really a fascinating dynamic.
Lots of energy and money being expended for reasons other than supporting a favorite candidate.
Posted by: Miss Marple | March 07, 2016 at 10:07 AM
Its four dimensional chess, as if we haven't seen how these matches play out.
Posted by: narciso | March 07, 2016 at 10:08 AM
MM
Lots of money and free media went into pushing Trump on the public as well
Posted by: Truthbetold | March 07, 2016 at 10:09 AM
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/amazon-to-open-second-brick-and-mortar-bookstore-in-san-diego-2016-03-07?mod=MethodeStories
Posted by: Miss Marple | March 07, 2016 at 10:09 AM
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/03/07/navy-seals-forced-to-share-rifles/
Posted by: Miss Marple | March 07, 2016 at 10:11 AM
Bezos is quite the Mr potter, he's got the cribsheet, the distribution system, etc.
Posted by: narciso | March 07, 2016 at 10:13 AM
Cruz it is.
Good choice!
Posted by: Tom Bowler | March 07, 2016 at 10:19 AM
Jane - just vote for Trump. He's inevitable and you want to be on the side of a winner, right? You'll be winning so much you'll get bored with it.
Not to mention, in his last appearance in Kansas, Trump threatened the people at his rally...“After making this huge U-turn to Kansas, if I lose, I’m going to be so angry at you.”
I'm not sure if that was before or after he had attendees raise their right hand and pledge allegiance to him. When he did that he said, “Don’t forget you all raised your hand. You swore. Bad things happen if you don’t live up to what you just did.”
You don't want President Trump coming after you, do you? Probably safer if we all just accept our fate. I mean, he was probably joking. He's a kidder. But why take chances?
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | March 07, 2016 at 10:20 AM
No Rubio could have done something smart and repeated the enemy action intent of zaphod, but instead he tupolev'd himself.
Posted by: narciso | March 07, 2016 at 10:21 AM
Jane, I would recommend voting for Cruz. Cruz wants Rubio out because Team Cruz has concluded that Cruz's best chance against Trumpster is mano a mano. The notion that Cruz won't be able to beat Trumpster in states such as Florida, Pennsylvania and California is misguided. Rubio and Kasich are at best distractions and at worst will facilitate convention gridlock and Mittster emerging as the nominee. Think about it this way: Cruz is unlikely to come out of a deadlocked convention with the nomination. His best chance is one on one MMA with Trumpster.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 07, 2016 at 10:22 AM
The Top Men approved consultants are showing their usual amount of insight by not featuring Dondi's most obvious asset, Jeanette, at any campaign event with a significant male component.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 10:23 AM
Jane, Tom Bowler said it perfectly at 10:00.
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 07, 2016 at 10:24 AM
Of the two ineligible candidates, Jane, I would recommend the one that can dial "lawyerly" up to 11.
Posted by: Threadkiller | March 07, 2016 at 10:26 AM
And if Cruz can't beat Trumpster mano a mano in the later states, it's over anyway. Having Rubio and Kasich hanging around won't help Cruz get to 50% plus one when going into maryrose's and CH's hood.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 07, 2016 at 10:27 AM
Having spent the mosrning thus far trying to track down all the W-2 and 1099 forms for my Mom so we can figure out if she even needs to file or not for 2015, I am totally down with the Ted Cruz abolish-the-IRS program.
So far I've got seven separate W-2 or 1099s for her, and I'm still missing one, and this for someone whose gross income in 2015 was less than $30K. It's insane!
Posted by: James D | March 07, 2016 at 10:28 AM
Its four dimensional chess, as if we haven't seen how these matches play out.
Played by a bunch of people who all think they're the smartest one at the table. Which just reminds me of a line from "Rounders":
If you don't know who the sucker at the table is, it's you.
Posted by: James D | March 07, 2016 at 10:29 AM
If Cruz and Kasich could cut a deal now, it would be all over. Cruz-Kasich in 2016! The Strange Bedfellows ticket!
http://www.moviepostershop.com/strange-bedfellows-movie-poster-2004
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 07, 2016 at 10:30 AM
Cough Benghazi cough.
This is what happens when you put an addled drunk in highly controlled situations and she fills her Depends. She's a hopelessly toxic combination of Costanza and Uncle Leo.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 10:31 AM
Rounders is a great movie; so much so I can even endure MATT DAMON.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 10:33 AM
If she paid federal taxes, James D, she needs to file to get a refund (which she may or may not do at 30k, depending). The missing W-2 can usually be emailed to someone by contacting that company's HR dep't. Don't forget that you'll need to make sure you've at least seen all of the 1095 forms (health care availability) too. I need to do my taxes as well, guess I'll put it off for another...oh, five weeks.
Posted by: hrtshpdbox | March 07, 2016 at 10:34 AM
True, Cap'n Hate; I also liked Damon in the Mr. Ripley movie, since I can imagine he's actually just playing himself.
Posted by: hrtshpdbox | March 07, 2016 at 10:36 AM
Ugh.
I have to get my stuff together for taxes. I guess I will do that later this week.
Posted by: Miss Marple | March 07, 2016 at 10:37 AM
Thanks, hrt!
We've actually got an accountant who's going to determine all that, I just have to do the legwork to get the forms. Good reminder on the health care form, I'll make sure we've got that.
Posted by: James D | March 07, 2016 at 10:37 AM
Top Men are played Martin Landau in Rounders, although even that's giving them far too much credit.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 10:38 AM
Trumpmentum, Cruz has most LA delegates.
Posted by: henry | March 07, 2016 at 10:40 AM
Thanks, OL.
Posted by: Tom Bowler | March 07, 2016 at 10:40 AM
Speaking of Matt Damon movies, I still haven't forgiven my oldest daughter for dragging me to Dogma.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 10:40 AM
CH, that's cause for writing her out of the will.
Posted by: James D | March 07, 2016 at 10:43 AM
I actually enjoy watching Dogma. At least it posits the existence of the Biblical God....kinda.
Posted by: NK | March 07, 2016 at 10:44 AM
And if Cruz can't beat Trumpster mano a mano in the later states, it's over anyway.
Exactly. You don't demonstrate your strength as a candidate by saying "well if these other guys would just drop out I'd be winning."
Posted by: Porchlight | March 07, 2016 at 10:44 AM
Speaking of Matt Damon movies, I still haven't forgiven my oldest daughter for dragging me to Dogma.
Just a horrible, horrible movie.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 07, 2016 at 10:45 AM
Kevin Smith ranks with Shelton Lee on not knowing how to end movies except in the most gut wrenchingly sappy way possible. Speaking of which, was anybody put in a diabetic coma by the last episode of Downton Abbey, assuming anyone was still watching that state run soap opera?
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 10:46 AM
Jay Cost on the race.
Makes a pretty good case Trump will have a hard time getting a majority of delegates by the convention as he will at this point need to win 58% of the remaining delegates to do so.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 07, 2016 at 10:48 AM
TC, the problem with your Cruz-Kasich ticket, seems to me, is that for those who really like Cruz for being the conservative he is, they hate Kasich for being the opposite.
I would see it that way myself (I confess a lot of my hatred is because Cap'n told me what a scum he became, after having started out so well in the House), and I would see Kasich being a constant sea anchor for a President Cruz.
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 07, 2016 at 10:48 AM
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 07, 2016 at 10:56 AM
OL, as much as I can't stand what the mailman's son has become, he could be useful to Cruz in the same way that Poppy Bush was to Reagan. I think he's smart enough to keep his RINO tendencies under wraps and his goofy persona could be an asset in debates against whoever gets to pick up the trail of empty Coronas in the wake of the HMS Pant
loadsuit.Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 10:56 AM
TC, the hostess and host of the Globe morning radio talk show both seem to think that Kasich is going to be the VP candidate.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 07, 2016 at 10:57 AM
OL, Kasich may be a better pill to swallow, but I think ticket balancing is necessary. Cruz-Sessions is not going to get it done: Look at it this way: You may not like Cruz-Kasich in the abstract, but when the choice is Cruz-Kasich or Clinton-Castro, your Kasich pill will be easier to swallow. Think Reagan-Bush vs. Carter-Mondale.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 07, 2016 at 10:58 AM
OK so long as he leaves the voodoo doll at home, Cap'n.
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 07, 2016 at 10:59 AM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/with-obama-visit-cubans-hope-for-home-run-in-baseball-diplomacy/2016/03/06/666c4eb2-e064-11e5-8d98-4b3d9215ade1_story.html
Fidel can probably name a few White Sox.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 07, 2016 at 11:00 AM
I know, TC, I know. I will vote as often as I can for any R Ticket.
I had such hopes for a Cruz-Carly ticket.
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 07, 2016 at 11:00 AM
CH, I swear I didn't see your post when I was writing mine.
I am becoming the Joe Biden of JOM. In the last few days, I have made three posts that could serve as the basis for an indictment for Bidenizing cc, Tom Bowler and CH!
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 07, 2016 at 11:01 AM
CH - so Cruz would have to be his own attack dog against the Red Queen/Red Diaper Baby Castro duo? Kasich seems rather toothless to me. OR?
Posted by: Frau Edith Steingehirn | March 07, 2016 at 11:01 AM
Dave (in MA), Kasich is a favorite of Dems who want to sound reasonable. In November, of course, they'll vote for The Hill. But in battleground states, I think Kasich will bring in persuadables.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 07, 2016 at 11:03 AM
The Top Men approved consultants are showing their usual amount of insight by not featuring Dondi's most obvious asset, Jeanette, at any campaign event with a significant male component.
They are afraid she will confirm he has "small hands".
Posted by: Buckeye | March 07, 2016 at 11:05 AM
A woman on a Cruz ticket would bring in more suburban women votes. Carly?-- love her but she may be too hard edge to have on the ticket with Cruz. Nikki Haley?
Posted by: NK | March 07, 2016 at 11:07 AM
--he could be useful to Cruz in the same way that Poppy Bush was to Reagan--
By dismantling a good portion of what Cruz does after he's out of office?
GHWB was RR's biggest mistake.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 07, 2016 at 11:07 AM
henry:
Trumpmentum, Cruz has most LA delegates.
Most district delegates. Including the at large delegates, it's tied 18-18 between Trump and Cruz.
At large:
Trump 12, Cruz 11
District:
Trump 6, Cruz 7
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | March 07, 2016 at 11:10 AM
--Nikki Haley?--
See my 10:07.
At least Susanna Martinez would bring in a blue leaning state even if a tiny one and is a lot more conservative than Haley.
If the Reps aren't going to win SC then it doesn't matter who they run.
Martinez is a woman and a Hispanic and a governor and is fairly conservative.
Haley is two of those things.
So unless the converted Sikh vote is a ballooning demographic, what does Haley have Martinez doesn't?
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 07, 2016 at 11:13 AM
Make that 11:07.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 07, 2016 at 11:13 AM
A woman on a Cruz ticket would bring in more suburban women votes.
Maybe. I think if you care about this sort of thing you're already voting for Hillary. Nikki Haley is not impressive and the opposition would rightly criticize this as token box-checking.
I like Kasich as VP for the reasons CH and TC and others have mentioned.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 07, 2016 at 11:14 AM
Would Martinez really bring New Mexico? I would think Kasich's chances of bringing Ohio would be a much bigger payoff.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 07, 2016 at 11:15 AM
Cruz should pick Allen West.
Posted by: Truthbetold | March 07, 2016 at 11:16 AM
Carly would be better than Niki because she can construct coherent arguments and deliver punches.
Posted by: boris | March 07, 2016 at 11:16 AM
Yes, Boris.
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 07, 2016 at 11:18 AM
Remember Bush didn't even win NM in 2000 due to reservation shenanigans.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 07, 2016 at 11:20 AM
I think Kasich winning OH on 3/15 goes a long way in either direction in his VP chances.
Of course, if Trump wins in OH with 33-35 and Kasich gets 30-32 - it's not like that tells us Kasich can't deliver (or help in delivering) OH in the general. But it puts a little bit of a taint on that argument if he does lose.
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | March 07, 2016 at 11:21 AM
Hillary has small hands (relative to other anatomical regions).
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 07, 2016 at 11:23 AM
Best plan for Cruz/Carly ...
Refuse to debate Clinton 1 on 1.
Only 2 debates Cruz/Carly vs Clinton/Castro.
Carly can take Hillary apart without making Cruz look mean.
Posted by: boris | March 07, 2016 at 11:23 AM
Do you think Kasich could at least get the mail delivered on time?
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 07, 2016 at 11:23 AM
All of us have small hands compared to Hillary's anatomy, Dave.
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 07, 2016 at 11:24 AM
Trump's nasty side at his namesake tower
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20160305/ISSUE01/303059990/trumps-fight-with-friends-and-family-over-his-chicago-tower
Posted by: Truthbetold | March 07, 2016 at 11:25 AM
Maybe Kasich's moral authority in the matter could lead to abolishing the USPS?
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | March 07, 2016 at 11:25 AM
Frau and Iggy, I am strictly looking at what produced landslides in 80 and 84. Poppy was a terrible President but he helped stem the flood of country clubbers to the great John Anderson as the VP candidate. I'd rather have Carly in the slot but I doubt that brings as many voters into the fold as the mailman's weird son; i.e. I think people who like Carly would vote for Cruz anyway.ppp
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 11:25 AM
Frau, don't be fooled by his goofy attitude; the mailman's son can go postal on anybody while still keeping a holier than thou attitude. If he was debating Rodham I would expect him to drop a "this is how we do it in Ohio; unlike Illinois, Arkansas, New York or wherever you've plopped down your carpetbag" on her.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 11:32 AM
I think people who like Carly would vote for Cruz anyway.
Right. If VP strategery means anything, the goal is to bring in voters that wouldn't already be on board. Kasich potentially does that for both Cruz and Trump.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 07, 2016 at 11:33 AM
Cruz VP-- should be a woman who brings in the most suburban woman votes in Va, Pa, Ohio, Colo, Mich, Wisc and even Wash.
Posted by: NK | March 07, 2016 at 11:39 AM
Trump/Kasich makes sense.
Cruz/Carly has more of what makes Cruz formidable.
Romney had more than one disadvantage ... but the debate flub sealed his fate IMO.
The main risk with Cruz is losing the debates to Hillary because ManBully
Trump is not as vulnerable, he can lose gracefully without much damage. Debates are not his forte.
Posted by: boris | March 07, 2016 at 11:46 AM
Wait, has the Webb boomlet passed?
Posted by: Jeff Dobbs | March 07, 2016 at 11:47 AM
I think Trump called on rubio to leave the race because he knew that would keep him in it. And with him in it, I think Trump wins Fla.
Posted by: clarice | March 07, 2016 at 11:55 AM
Could be right. Trump's no saint but knows people better than anyone else.
Posted by: boris | March 07, 2016 at 11:57 AM
I love Jay Cost, but I think Trump's about to pick up some big winner take all states.
Posted by: clarice | March 07, 2016 at 11:58 AM
Reverse psychology, that's an interesting notion, that is what happened to capt tupolev by the way, he was so obsessed with his prey, he allowed himself to be torpedoed from his own ship.
Posted by: narciso | March 07, 2016 at 11:58 AM
The main risk with Cruz is losing the debates to Hillary because ManBully
Trump is not as vulnerable, he can lose gracefully without much damage. Debates are not his forte.
I think that Trump would have the advantage that he's got a reputation for being rude, bombastic, insulting, etc. So it won't be an "oh my God" moment if he behaves that way in a debate with Hillary.
And if he doesn't behave that way? Huge bonus for him, it becomes a big "man bites dog" story.
Posted by: James D | March 07, 2016 at 12:01 PM
John Bolton would make an excellent VP nominee for any of the front runner s.
Posted by: -peter | March 07, 2016 at 12:02 PM
Oh, I realized what I just said there.
Sorry for the mental image...
Posted by: James D | March 07, 2016 at 12:02 PM
--Would Martinez really bring New Mexico? I would think Kasich's chances of bringing Ohio would be a much bigger payoff.--
The premise of the comparison was "if you're going to pick a woman", which, unless you know something about Kasich I don't, makes him not germane.
That would explain several things, though.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 07, 2016 at 12:03 PM
I was mucking around YouTube last night and I ran across this snippet from the Steve Allen show. First of all this was live tv and no lip syncing (note how Lesley moves the mic stand in mid stanza); the band plays the charts in a tight professional manner. Allen was a good keyboard player on his own so he'd have no slouches in the band; without looking I think Monk made at least one appearance so they were used to being on a tightrope without a net. I wish the whole song was included.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iCEdM6h-NPk
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 07, 2016 at 12:03 PM
If my friends and family are an indication, NK, women like Kasich.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 07, 2016 at 12:04 PM
If my friends and family are an indication, NK, women like Kasich.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 07, 2016 at 12:04 PM
The main risk with Cruz is losing the debates to Hillary because ManBully
This is a real concern. Cruz has a tendency to let his inner "preacher" pop out every once in a while.
I don't think he means to come off as condescending, and I don't think he is, but people see it that way. This will provide the Dems with an opportunity to attach the ManBully label.
I hope that he can be coached to avoid this.
Posted by: Buckeye | March 07, 2016 at 12:07 PM
As far as I know, Ignatz, Nikki Haley hasn't been caught playing the "do you know who I am" card with the police at a staff party that got out of control. Whether or not Martinez was drunk or, as she claimed, was dancing for four hours and maybe had a cocktail at the end of the night, her behavior in my opinion makes her not eligible for Veep this time. The last thing Cruz needs is a tape of Susana trying to get the police called off played on MSM right after Cruz's speech.
http://krqe.com/2015/12/18/governors-post-party-call-to-police-call-off-your-officers/
And yes, life is unfair. If she were a Kennedy, she'd still be a viable option for the Dem ticket.
Posted by: Thomas Collins | March 07, 2016 at 12:11 PM
ThomC-- hey... keep it clean .....this is a family Blog.
Posted by: NK | March 07, 2016 at 12:12 PM
I just don't get the Martinez love. She seems like an opportunist and her state is tiny and votes D.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 07, 2016 at 12:14 PM
Martinez had a recent dust-up at some hotel where she got drunk. The left would take that to town.
I'd with OL. Cruz/Carly would be a great ticket. Both would slaughter anyone in the debates.
Posted by: Jane | March 07, 2016 at 12:16 PM