Politico delivers a puff piece on Hillary's debate prep which completely ignores the real questions that are no doubt terrifying Team Hillarity!.
Inside Hillary Clinton’s debate prep
The Democrat holds more moot court than mock debate as she prepares to show her opponent as unbalanced and ill prepared.
"Ill prepared" is either a Freudian slip or a secret coded message highlighting the key question - how sick is Hillarity! and will she have some weird episode on stage?
Seriously, what is the plan
if she commences a coughing fit? Do they let her stand their and hack away, or have they worked out a time-out signal? Can she really try to joke it off as "allergic to Trump" with Trump standing there? And by the way, both Trump and the moderator ought to have a plan in the back of their mind for this. Should Trump rush over and perform the Heimlich maneuver? It shows he is a take-charge guy but sort of disrespects personal boundaries. Tricky!
And a coughing fit is a minor worry. Suppose Hillarity! collapses on stage? Is Chelsea's apartment a reasonable drive from the Hofstra University debate site or might her staffers have to whisk The Her to an actual hospital for a real evaluation? Doesn't that imperil the cover-up? And again, Trump needs to a contingency plan for this as well - as a Man of Action he can't just stand there pondering events.
Politico also omits any discussion of just how Hillarity! will be transported onto the stage. She needed help
climbing two steps at Temple University the other day - what is the plan for Hofstra? I am certain that Team Hillary has surveyed the site, so where is the reporting? I want a juicy quote along the lines of "It's downhill to the debate stage so we think she can make it. She just won't leave afterwards."
Must See TV.
She has trouble getting on or off the stool, either of them.
Posted by: Or the bathtub. | September 23, 2016 at 11:54 AM
Small podium. How revealing.
Posted by: Decolletage. | September 23, 2016 at 11:56 AM
Small business, small podium.
Posted by: Make America Small Some More. | September 23, 2016 at 11:57 AM
From the Drudge headline article:
EDITOR'S NOTE: The presidential debate commission settled an early flashpoint when Clinton demanded a step-stool at the podium to add height to her 5'4" frame. Campaign Chairman John Podesta expressed concern that Hillary would be dwarfed by 6'2" Trump. The request was quickly rejected. The commission is allowing for a custom-made podium, which will accommodate the difference in stature.
Posted by: Buckeye | September 23, 2016 at 12:00 PM
100 amp fuses in short supply.
Someone looking curiously like John Podesta seen at Home Depot buying out their stock:)
Posted by: Buckeye | September 23, 2016 at 12:02 PM
I will guess that you will not be able to distinguish her performance from a hologram.
No, that's a bridge too far. But this debate does seem to be a make or break moment. I'm betting she does just well enough for the media to support(heh) her and Trump will be just enough himself to allow the piranha to feed.
And I could be very wrong, too.
Posted by: Time to set up the rabbit ears. Now where have they run? | September 23, 2016 at 12:02 PM
I think that may be a good thought to follow. She can't function without the support of the media, and he can.
Posted by: Crowd's bubbled. | September 23, 2016 at 12:05 PM
These are both epic figures.
Posted by: I'm losing the plot. | September 23, 2016 at 12:13 PM
Heh, Trump should ask for a chair, at what moment, even kim doesn't know.
Posted by: Won't be an empty one. | September 23, 2016 at 12:15 PM
These competing visions are pretty well articulated, and beautifully divided; one is orthogonal to reality and only sustained by narrative.
Posted by: Hall of Mirrors. | September 23, 2016 at 12:21 PM
Enantiomeric.
Posted by: One more useful, nay, sustainable, than the other. | September 23, 2016 at 12:21 PM
C'mon mine needs another monologue with which to intersect, before it blows a fuse. Front and center, Iggy, my old BF.
Posted by: Sad. | September 23, 2016 at 12:24 PM
I'm sad that PuK couldn't experience Brexit, but he certainly smelled it in the theatre. I can hope he's still laughing his ass off.
Posted by: In the thunderclouds. | September 23, 2016 at 12:27 PM
It's an outstanding monologue you've got going on here though.
Posted by: rse | September 23, 2016 at 12:29 PM
I have been off tracing that Right Pincer I have been following straight through to experimental economics and neuroeconomics.
Makes me want to go watch the Blacklist as direct tv did not show the crucial 15 minutes last night.
Posted by: rse | September 23, 2016 at 12:31 PM
Test
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 23, 2016 at 12:36 PM
Typhuspad acting up again on me. Had to go in and change my avatar, clear history and caches and restart.
Off to Young Authors at schooll where Frederick is presented an award but not based on his latest posted this morning on prior thread.:)
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 23, 2016 at 12:37 PM
did it I haven't checked the dvr, with lester holt running interference, I don't see that much of a problem,
so 'in the heart of the sea' got me intrigued to attempt moby dick, that great leviathan of a novel,
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | September 23, 2016 at 12:39 PM
and I'll still take a gander at gabriel vasquez latest, if anything for anne mclean's translation,
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | September 23, 2016 at 12:49 PM
Sarah Palin didn't demand a lower podium than the much taller Biden, and neither did John McCain with BOzo. Hillary wants to be lower to buttress her theme of Trump the bully.
Posted by: DebinNC | September 23, 2016 at 12:54 PM
GOP LAWMAKER: FBI GAVE IMMUNITY TO TOP CLINTON AIDE
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_FBI_CLINTON_EMAILS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2016-09-23-11-28-54
Posted by: Truthbetold5 | September 23, 2016 at 01:13 PM
Fat Boy Erickson has endorsed McMuffin, illustrating why nobody should take him seriously.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 23, 2016 at 01:18 PM
CH:
He's endorsed a guy I don't even think in on the ballot in Georgia. So he can't vote for the guy he endorses.
Unimpressive.
Posted by: Appalled (Alt-Moderate) | September 23, 2016 at 01:23 PM
I wonder if she is practicing keeling over on the stage.
Posted by: Marlene | September 23, 2016 at 01:28 PM
He endorsed McMuffin? Crap. That's seventeen lost votes...
Posted by: Beasts of England | September 23, 2016 at 01:32 PM
http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-campaign-to-normalize-terrorism-1474651216?mod=djemBestOfTheWebFTA:from the centerpiece article:Again, that’s a great argument against Mrs. Clinton. One of our values is freedom of speech, and she is using fear of Muslims to demand suppression, at least through self-censorship, of ideas and rhetoric she dislikes.
And then the chaser:
Two Lichtmen in One!
“And, of course, as I have said for over 30 years, predictions are not endorsements. My prediction [of a Trump victory] is based off a scientific system. It does not necessarily represent, in any way, shape or form, an Allan Lichtman or American University endorsement of any candidate.”—Alan Lichtman, interview with the Washington Post, Sept. 23
“We’ve never before seen a candidate who’s spent his life enriching himself at the expense of others. He’s the first candidate in our history to be a serial fabricator, making up things as he goes along. Even when he tells the truth, such as, ‘Barack Obama really was born in the U.S.,’ he adds two lines, that Hillary Clinton started the birther movement, and that he finished it, even though when Barack Obama put out his birth certificate, he didn’t believe it. We’ve never had a candidate before who not just once, but twice in a thinly disguised way, has incited violence against an opponent. We’ve never had a candidate before who’s invited a hostile foreign power to meddle in American elections. We’ve never had a candidate before who’s threatened to start a war by blowing ships out of the water in the Persian Gulf if they come too close to us. We’ve never had a candidate before who has embraced as a role model a murderous, hostile foreign dictator. Given all of these exceptions that Donald Trump represents, he may well shatter patterns of history that have held for more than 150 years, lose this election even if the historical circumstances favor it.”—Lichtman, same interviewftT
Posted by: clarice | September 23, 2016 at 01:44 PM
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/five-clinton-aides-received-immunity-deals-in-fbi-probe/article/2602684?utm_
5 Clinton staff received email immunity from FBI
Posted by: clarice | September 23, 2016 at 01:46 PM
Amazing, Clarice. If someone is granted immunity do we not assume that they are guilty?
Posted by: caro | September 23, 2016 at 01:51 PM
Hi JOM friends!
Some of you may know that our friend and longtime commenter Ignatz Ratzkywatzky has gone offline for personal reasons. I reached out to him and he is going through a really rough patch. He needs our help.
With his permission, I've set this up:
https://gogetfunding.com/ignatz-needs-our-help/
There are more details at the link. I've tried to email a bunch of folks, but I may have old addresses for some of you, since they're gleaned from our old JOM group emails.
Many of you know me on Facebook so please feel free to reach out, and share the link with others if you are so inspired.
You are all such lovely people. I hope we can help our good buddy Iggy who has brought so much wisdom, kindness, and wit to this group. I know he is very humbled and grateful.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 23, 2016 at 01:52 PM
Another question. Can any of these people be granted security clearances for a Clinton administration?
Posted by: caro | September 23, 2016 at 01:53 PM
I would caro
Posted by: Buckeye | September 23, 2016 at 01:56 PM
Timing of my post obscures the meaning..I would assume they are guilty caro.
Posted by: Buckeye | September 23, 2016 at 02:01 PM
So they all get immunity and there is absolutely no justice. Way to go, Comey.
Posted by: caro | September 23, 2016 at 02:03 PM
Bless you porch for your good deed today.
Posted by: clarice | September 23, 2016 at 02:04 PM
Ditto to Porch.
Posted by: caro | September 23, 2016 at 02:04 PM
You're awesome, Porch!! 😎
Posted by: Beasts of England | September 23, 2016 at 02:05 PM
Porch
Thank you for going to the effort to help, and thank you for letting us know.
Kudos
Posted by: Buckeye | September 23, 2016 at 02:12 PM
Nice work, Porchlight
Posted by: Art in Newport | September 23, 2016 at 02:13 PM
Typhus pad profiles users like those cops who pullover them wife and little girl abusers like terrorist human smugglers and brad pitts / Angoline Jollies. So clear browser cache evey time cuz typhus pad doesn't want to know...🚔👮
Posted by: Brigg | September 23, 2016 at 02:16 PM
I presume this immunity was limited to what they told the FBI, and not some kind of lifetime "get out of jail free" card. Any chance a Trump administration will pursue them?
Thank you, Porch.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | September 23, 2016 at 02:17 PM
Porchlight:
Nice thing to do.
I guess this isn't the crowd to say "It Takes A Village"? (He ducks a brick...)
In seriousness, I doubt this would happen at the Political Animal or Daily Kos Threads
Posted by: Appalled (Alt-Moderate) | September 23, 2016 at 02:20 PM
Well done, Porch and JOMers.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 23, 2016 at 02:21 PM
Very good of you, Porch. I'm in.
Posted by: lyle | September 23, 2016 at 02:24 PM
Hi, everyone!
My good friend from high school came to help me sort papers and things at the old house, then we went to lunch.
She started to tell me about signs she had seen that said that both candidates suck. Since SHE (as a democrat) brought up politics, which I NEVER do as I am considerate, I stopped her right there.
Actually, said I, I LOVE the guy! Best candidate ever! She was horrified. Said it made her sick to hear me talking like that.
So I asked her if she thought we should redo trade deals, help the inner cities, give women breaks on their childcare. Yes to all.
Then she started in on making fun of the handicapped guy. I said that was false and explained why (through the info Ann Coulter gave us).
So then she said that she was AFRAID of him because he is a bully.
At this point I looked at her and said "He's not a bully. He's just a big guy. I was MARRIED to a bully, and Donald Trump is not a bully."
Then I asked her if she knew who George Soros was.
NO!
So there you go. She will probably vote for Hillary, but at least I spoke my mind.
Posted by: Miss Marple 2, Deplorable and Proud of it | September 23, 2016 at 02:26 PM
Thanks for the kind words, all. It was nothing. You are the ones who are helping! Our village is the best.
I'm just glad Iggy is letting us do it. :)
You are all so awesome! Coming through in record time. Thank you.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 23, 2016 at 02:27 PM
FOX Clinton E-Mail Immunity Deals: (My transcript)
Melissa Francis: A brand new bombshell in the Hillary Clinton E-Mail investigation sparking a major uproar on Capital Hill. It turns out the Justice Department gave an Immunity Deal to Clinton's Former Chief of Staff, Cherul Mills, and 2 other Staffers, as part of the now closed FBI Investigation. Catherine...what do you make of this development?
Catherine Herridge: Based on new documents provided by the FBI to Congress, the Republican Chairman of the House Government Oversight Committee told FOX by phone, now 5 people were given limited Immunity by the Justice Department. As you mentioned they do include Clinton's Lawyer Cheryl Mills who got her Deal in exchange for FBI access to her computer...
(Plays clip of Comey on July 7 fumbling an answer to Jason Chaffetz in a previous Hearing
(Chaffetz---Why did you offer him Immunity and what did you get for it?
(Comey---I'm not sure I can talk about in open setting.
Chaffetz---Well he's not going to be prosecuted, so...?
(Comey---Right. I want to be careful. I'm doing this 24 hours after the Investigation closed. I want to be thoughtful you know because as you know we're big about the Law, and I'm following the Law about what I disclose about that. I'll have to get back to you on that one.
Catherine Herridge: That is one of those TV situations where you got something you were not expecting. That was clearly not the phoner(sp) with the Congressman from this morning, though he did tell us in that phone call that the 4 other Immunization went to Clinton IT specialist Brian Pagliano, who set up the server that took classified info outside secure Government channels, Heather Samuelson the Clinton Aide, who decided which E-Mails were Government Business and which should be destroyed, Paul Combetta of Colorado based Platte River Networks, who used a technology called "Bleach-bit, to destroy the Clinton E-mail archives, even though he knew there was a Congressional order to preserve the records, and State Department Employee John Bentel, who ordered those who voiced concern about Clinton's private E-Mails use never to discuss it again. The Congressman (obviously Chaffetz) said that they pressed the FBI to see these Immunization Deals, and they just arrived this morning...and it was not timed to coincide with the upcoming Presidential debate Monday...
Catherine Herridge:...The bottom line is that next week is going to be a very big week for the FBI Director as he is back on the Hill and he will be testifying before the House Judiciary Committee...That's really a hearing to watch, many people on that Hearing are also on the Oversight Committee and they were really taken aback by the number of (immunity) Deals and clearly they had to press the FBI to get them.
Melissa: Amazing.
----------------------------
The fix was in.
Posted by: daddy | September 23, 2016 at 02:31 PM
Now that Sister Theresa has been sainted, its time to begin the campaign for St. Porchlight!
Just when I was starting to lose faith in my fellow man while watching the events in Charlotte, Porch steps and restores it. God bless her.
Posted by: common man | September 23, 2016 at 02:33 PM
The issue with immunity is that it's given in order to get prosecutable info on bigger fish. Giving that many people immunity and having not even a formal charge (much less a conviction) is prima facie evidence of incompetence, corruption, or both.
Posted by: jimmyk on iPhone | September 23, 2016 at 02:36 PM
Another question. Can any of these people be granted security clearances for a Clinton administration?
Posted by: caro
Caro,
2 weeks back I did a history search and discovered that there were as I recall dozens if not close to a hundred bureaucrats in the previous Clinton Administrations who were never put through any Security Screenings whatever, and many staffers and aides were put in positions dealing with Classified material many months before they actually underwent any Security Screening/background checks at all. Dee Dee Myers for example.
The Clinton practice in the past was to blow off Security clearances and background checks whenever they felt like it and I have no reason to believe that that won't be the case in a future Clinton Administration.
Posted by: daddy | September 23, 2016 at 02:39 PM
Makes one wonder if the DOJ will immunize FBI Director Comey for his upcoming testimony in front of Chaffetz next Wednesday?
Why not?
Posted by: daddy | September 23, 2016 at 02:40 PM
I don't know how Comey is walking around without a clown outfit on. How can anybody respect such a crooked tool trying to pretend, in ways that are convincing nobody, that he's trying really really hard to discover any lawbreaking and exact punishment.
Posted by: Captain Hate | September 23, 2016 at 02:42 PM
Comey was exposed years ago! Why has it taken so long for folks to acknowledge what a piece of shit he is.
Posted by: Truthbetold5 | September 23, 2016 at 02:47 PM
Remember all that talk about Comey being such a stand-up, straight-shootin', non-partisan, down-the-middle, judicious stalwart? Good times, huh?
Posted by: lyle | September 23, 2016 at 02:48 PM
Time to take another look at Plamegate!
Posted by: Truthbetold5 | September 23, 2016 at 02:51 PM
So they Immunized all the Bank Robbers.
They immunized the guy who set up all the equipment to allow her to operate illegally, the immunized the girl who decided what was illegal and needed to be illegally deleted, they immunized the guy who illegally deleted all the stuff, and they immunized the guy at the State Dept who ordered everyone to never say a word about any of it to anyone.
And Cheryl Mills.
Nice job Comey, nice job.
Posted by: daddy | September 23, 2016 at 02:52 PM
WSJ has an op-Ed today:
A Dangerous Rush to Impeach John Koskinen
By John Conyers
I glanced at the title and half expected it to be penned by Eddie Munster.
Posted by: lyle | September 23, 2016 at 02:53 PM
lyle,
He's the Jake Tapper of law enforcement. Talks a good game, but when you peer under the hood you see the tentacles of corruption. (Mixed metaphor but that's all I could come up with.)
Posted by: Miss Marple 2, Deplorable and Proud of it | September 23, 2016 at 02:55 PM
this will crack the mcmuffin omelet,
https://pjmedia.com/diaryofamadvoter/2016/09/22/why-trump-will-win-its-the-likability-stupid/
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | September 23, 2016 at 02:55 PM
Again, maybe I've watched too much television, but I thought in granting someone immunity, they basically know (a) that they can otherwise prosecute that person for criminal wrongdoing, which is their leverage; (b) they know what that person can tell them in order to get someone higher up. Without (b) they just go ahead and prosecute the lower down people. This was quid without the quo.
Posted by: jimmyk | September 23, 2016 at 02:58 PM
Oh, and for even moar comedic value, just above that op-ed is this:
The Democrats' Methodist Moment
This is the opening sentence (put whatever you're drinking down and swallow):
"After Bill Clinton, a Bible-toting Southern Baptist, was elected..."
Elmer Gantry couldn't be reached for comment.
Posted by: lyle | September 23, 2016 at 03:00 PM
God Bless you, Porch. You'll have many stars in your crown written with tears in my eyes.
Posted by: glasater | September 23, 2016 at 03:00 PM
nothing to see hear,
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/23/ahmad-khan-rahami-pakistan-taliban-new-york-bombing-terrorism?CMP=twt_gu
honestly they need to make the paper out of durable nonflammable items,
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | September 23, 2016 at 03:02 PM
Dave in Ma, Captain Hate, Henry, et all.
A friend has a problem with her MacBook air computer. It is slow as molasses and getting clobbered with MacKeeper crap. My suggestion is to do whatever it takes to eliminate Mackeeper from her computer but that is a chore just in itself, and to instead install Malwearbyte. I recommend going to the Apple Store to let them install that program and it works great and they installed it for free. Cost nothing.
Any advice on if that is the way you iTech guys would recommend going, and any tips on deleting MacKeeper?
Thanks for any replies guys.
Posted by: daddy | September 23, 2016 at 03:04 PM
Local Talk Radion news reports that 9th Circuit Court just ruled that Cook Inlet, the body of water that surrounds Anchorage all the hundreds of miles down past Homer to the Ocean, is now legally under some Federal Control.
Posted by: daddy | September 23, 2016 at 03:06 PM
Miss M:
Comey is that guy you see in old Westerns. You know, the one who pretends to be upholding law and order, and helping Gene Autrey or Roy Rogers apprehend the villains, but, really, he's either the big villain himself, or the loyal henchman of the big villain.
Posted by: Appalled (Alt-Moderate) | September 23, 2016 at 03:09 PM
Daddy, I don't know. Apple Store sounds like a good idea though.
Posted by: henry the deplorable | September 23, 2016 at 03:10 PM
yemen was a step too far on his frequent flyer miles,
https://twitter.com/nbcnightlynews/status/779338494988652544
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | September 23, 2016 at 03:11 PM
Thank you everyone for being so sweet, and for all your generous contributions. What a gang we have!
I've been texting with Iggy and he is very moved. Thanks everyone for helping.
Posted by: Porchlight | September 23, 2016 at 03:11 PM
daddy,
I am a MacBook Air guy. You can uninstall MacKeeper. It is a bad piece of softwared disguised as a Mac product. Once you uninstall you have to got and trash the caches associated with it as well as the widgets. Finder window->Go ->hold down Option key and look for Library. Then clear History (click on the Safari label). Restart.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 23, 2016 at 03:12 PM
Thanks Jack, thanks Henry. Keep 'em coming.
Posted by: daddy | September 23, 2016 at 03:13 PM
Daddy:
This is the Cook Inlet story, I think:
http://www.alaskajournal.com/2016-09-21/9th-circuit-overturns-state-control-cook-inlet-salmon#.V-V_hPkrKUk
Posted by: Appalled (Alt-Moderate) | September 23, 2016 at 03:17 PM
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/exclusive-cruz-endorse-trump-friday/?utm_content=bufferb1ca5&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Posted by: Miss Marple 2, Deplorable and Proud of it | September 23, 2016 at 03:26 PM
Immunity deals for all!
This is beyond belief, but not surprising.
I feel like such s fool for expecting justice and honesty from the F B I.
I am sure Obama said "make this go away" to Comey and Bill checked in with Lynch to make sure she was on the same page.
JOMer of the year award for Porchlight!
Well done!
Posted by: maryrose | September 23, 2016 at 03:32 PM
I sincerely hope that I never sink so far that I have to have the likes of John Conyers running interference anx vouching for my integrity. That would be the ultimate in humiliation.
Posted by: Common man | September 23, 2016 at 03:32 PM
Immunity for all!
Not even the pretense of a fair and honest investigation with. Bubba making sure Lynch got the memo.
FBI corrupt and dishonest on orders from Hussein to " make this go away"
Posted by: maryrose | September 23, 2016 at 03:36 PM
Cruz will vote for Trump!
Posted by: maryrose | September 23, 2016 at 03:36 PM
Porchlight --
I would like to help Ignatz, but I do not have a Pay Pal account and I am squeamish about giving out credit card information online. Can you email me at theollow at gmail.com so that we can try to figure something out?
Thanks,
Posted by: Theo | September 23, 2016 at 03:37 PM
Better than Trump wasting time trying to prosecute them, start the purge of the agencies.
DOJ/FBI just tip of the iceberg.
Posted by: Buckeye | September 23, 2016 at 03:37 PM
darddy,
One other action. While in Library go to Application support, open it up and scroll down to any App supports for MacKeeper and trash them.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 23, 2016 at 03:38 PM
Washington DC needs to be shrunk like a prune, and I don't give a shit how much it "costs".
Posted by: Buckeye | September 23, 2016 at 03:39 PM
Comey will take the 5th on Wednesday I am guessing or be a no show.
Holder got contempt of Congress and nothin g happened to him.
Posted by: maryrose | September 23, 2016 at 03:40 PM
Cruz endorsed Trump
Posted by: clarice | September 23, 2016 at 03:45 PM
Thanks T M for the new thread.
Jane: I hope you are having a wonderful day.
Posted by: maryrose | September 23, 2016 at 03:47 PM
Hi Theo - absolutely. Thank you so much. I'll be in touch!
Posted by: Porchlight | September 23, 2016 at 03:48 PM
maryrose,
I doubt Comey will take the 5th or no show. He is a power lawyer and ex-Judge. He thinks he is strong, smart and clever enough a lawyer to joust with anyone even Gowdy. Just more lame rationale and obfuscation.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 23, 2016 at 03:48 PM
Actually, said I, I LOVE the guy! Best candidate ever! She was horrified. Said it made her sick to hear me talking like that.
MM, Good for you!
THEY have the crap candidate. Period.
Don't drag us into YOUR nightmare.
Posted by: Janet | September 23, 2016 at 03:55 PM
Beasts,
Do you speak Spanish? If not, better brush up.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3802953/Working-class-Alabama-woman-says-changing-demographics-brought-illegal-immigration-left-struggling-employment.html
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 23, 2016 at 03:59 PM
Hablo un muy poco...
Posted by: Beasts of England | September 23, 2016 at 04:06 PM
Janet:
"Don't drag us into your nightmare"
Comment of the day!
Posted by: maryrose | September 23, 2016 at 04:06 PM
Media will try to bury immunity deals for Clinton's fellow criminals.
Trump needs to work it into a debate answer.
Posted by: maryrose | September 23, 2016 at 04:08 PM
Damn...Brady under House Arrest, Garappolo out with an AC Strain and now Brissett's out with a torn thumb ligament. What now, Edelman? All I know is I can't wait to find out.
Posted by: Rocco | September 23, 2016 at 04:09 PM
yikes it's like that agatha christie tale,
http://www.weaselzippers.us/296992-american-hostage-was-left-to-buy-his-own-ticket-home-after-release-from-iran/
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | September 23, 2016 at 04:11 PM
Bless you Porch! I'm so glad you are in touch with Iggy.
Posted by: Marlene | September 23, 2016 at 04:12 PM
Tebow!!
~ ~ ~
Has Glenn Beck exploded yet? :)
Posted by: Beasts of England | September 23, 2016 at 04:14 PM
well his hawkeye proxy has agita,
http://therightscoop.com/steve-deace-just-tweetstormed-about-ted-cruz-endorsing-trump/
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | September 23, 2016 at 04:19 PM
Rocco,
Belichick being an old Naval Academy kid may just go up into the stands and pull someone out just like Navy did last week.
If everyone is tired of Goodell football, Arsenal hosts Chelsea tomorrow at 12:30 on NBCSN. BPL is a contact sport believe me. Go Blues.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 23, 2016 at 04:22 PM
very calm and resolute, lol:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/07/17/glenn_beck_if_ted_cruz_endorses_trump_i_will_officially_lose_faith_in_washington_dc.html
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | September 23, 2016 at 04:23 PM
it's a start, although I would think another analogy is more apt,
https://twitter.com/Channel4News/status/779003555067879424
the preponderant arrogance that we are the masters of the earth, is offputting,
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | September 23, 2016 at 04:27 PM
What I don't understand about the #NeverTrump conservatives like Erikson and Beck is are they globalist? What is their base objection to Trump since that is his headline message: Anti-elitist, globalist uniparty politics in DC as usual.
They seem too damn comfortable with that ideal.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | September 23, 2016 at 04:28 PM
Let Glenn Beck trust Short Circuit.
What an asshole.
Posted by: Buckeye | September 23, 2016 at 04:28 PM