Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, an Obama holdover, thrills her future employers by refusing to put the weight of the DoJ behind Trump's travel ban. Even the Times admits this gesture is somewhat symbolic since she is on her way out and Jeff Sessions is on his way in, but they include this odd detail:
Mr. Trump has the authority to fire Ms. Yates, but as the top Senate-confirmed official at the Justice Department, she is the only one authorized to sign foreign surveillance warrants, an essential function at the department.
Say what? I am not an authority on departmental succession but I have seen the trailers for "Designated Survivor" and I can't believe there is no Plan B if, God forbid, Ms. Yates is hit by a car or taken ill in the next few days.
So send in the lawyers! [SPOILER ALERT: Team Lawfare is all over this, and I am mostly right] This looks like the key bit of the FISA Act:
50 U.S. Code § 1801 - Definitions
...
(g) “Attorney General” means the Attorney General of the United States (or Acting Attorney General), the Deputy Attorney General, or, upon the designation of the Attorney General, the Assistant Attorney General designated as the Assistant Attorney General for National Security under section 507A of title 28.
As to where Acting Attorney Generals come from, this looks relevant:
5 U.S. Code § 3345 - Acting officer
Just to introduce some complications, here are the first few paragraphs:
(a) If an officer of an Executive agency (including the Executive Office of the President, and other than the Government Accountability Office) whose appointment to office is required to be made by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, dies, resigns, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office—
So just to stop there - it seems that so far, the Acting AG must come from the ranks of either the confirmed deputy or another officer high enough in rank to have required Senate confirmation. It is possible that during the Obama/Trump transition the top people appointed by Obama and confirmed by the Senate have all left except Ms. Yates and there are no remaining senior Justice officials eligible under this clause. Lacking access to the DoJ roster, I don't know that to be true, but the Times story points that way.
But there are more provisions under which the President can make an appointment. Here are the next bits:
(3) notwithstanding paragraph (1), the President (and only the President) may direct an officer or employee of such Executive agency to perform the functions and duties of the vacant office temporarily in an acting capacity, subject to the time limitations of section 3346, if—
I think that means that anyone who has been with the DoJ at least three months with at least a GS-15 pay grade can take over any top spot on any acting basis. I could easily be wrong (Kiefer Sutherland skimmed over that point), and again, maybe all such people have moved on to their K-Street lobbying gigs. But that passage in the Times strikes me as a "too good to check" progressive fantasy rather than something the Times drilled down on. Then again, I would think that...
As I said, over to the lawyers! Aided by DoJ payroll and roster savants wherever they may be.
UPDATE: I guess we will find out - Trump has fired Yates and the new Acting AG is Dana Boente, former US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. In that role he was subject to Senate confirmation and should qualify under paragraph (2). The bench may have been deeper than the Times realized.
MORE: A Deplorable commenter noticed this Obama Executive Order, signed a week before he left. Quite likely the top appointees were heading for the exits, so it formalized a chain of succession for the Attorney General. Key takeaway - down the list a bit are some US Attorneys:
(a) United States Attorney for the District of Columbia;
(b) United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois; and
(c) United States Attorney for the Central District of California.
Next is a clause allowing the President to make any alternative legal appointment. Presumably, if one US Attorney is eligible another ought to be as well. Hence, Boente.
YET MORE: JustOneMinute gets results! The latest from the Times:
Administrations of both parties have interpreted surveillance laws as requiring foreign surveillance warrants be signed only by Senate-confirmed Justice Department officials. Ms. Yates was named as acting attorney general to allow her to continue signing those warrants. Mr. Boente was Senate confirmed as United States attorney and, though the situation is unprecedented, the White House said he was authorized to sign the warrants.
Well, it is not just the White House saying so. Even hack legal wanna-bes like me can see this logical thread, so I am sure the high-priced talent at the Times can do the same.
Now, we are all wondering what the Times does with their first, pre-firing story, which included this bit of speculative fiction:
Mr. Trump has the authority to fire Ms. Yates, but as the top Senate-confirmed official at the Justice Department, she is the only one authorized to sign foreign surveillance warrants, an essential function at the department.
Not a lot of caveats there, yet the Times no longer stands by it. Correction, with embarrassing editor's note, or midnight revision? Time will tell!
APPARENT RESOLUTION: It never printed so it never happened. This was a fast-moving story so the original article never made the print edition, and has now been disappeared. The original link to "Acting Attorney General Orders..." now re-directs to the current version, "Trump Fires...". And the original problematic paragraph disappears.
To Be Fair, that paragraph appeared with no sourcing at all, which may have been a waving red flag even within the Times newsroom. Still, folks were citing that bit of misinformation yesterday. Breaking news remains an ongoing challenge in the Twitter/Trump era.
LEST WE FORGET: A screenshot of the original story:
UNPRECEDENTED!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/30/statistics-trump-administration-numbers-manipulation
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 30, 2017 at 10:55 PM
HOF Levin:
http://therightscoop.com/on-fire-mark-levin-rips-hysterical-left-pathetic-repubs-who-oppose-trumps-immigration-ban/
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 10:56 PM
Where's James Taylor when they need him?
When would anyone need him?
Posted by: PD | January 30, 2017 at 10:58 PM
--Somehow I suspect that Ms. Yates is not nearly as critical--or important--as she thinks she is.--
Or smart. Seems like she didn't exactly think this while thing through. I would not advise her to take up chess.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 10:58 PM
This is one of those events that calls for a trip to Ace of Spades.
Posted by: Beasts of England | January 30, 2017 at 11:01 PM
Guys, even though the Travis County judge is a loon (her mother was an aide to LBJ and Molly Ivins) she is not a judge in the usual sense of the term. The county judge in each county is the chief exec of the county. Sort of like a mayor is to a city. The woman is a typical Austin nut but thank God she has no judicial role
Posted by: mike in houston | January 30, 2017 at 11:02 PM
EmoCrats on the receiving end. It's "like" this...
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 30, 2017 at 11:03 PM
Kev did you find the senators who voted for this bill in the omnibus legislation
Posted by: narciso | January 30, 2017 at 11:12 PM
Just in: Homeland Security Secretary Kelly names Thomas D. Homan as Acting ICE Director, replacing Daniel Ragsdale
Since 2013, Mr. Homan has served as the executive associate director of ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO). In this capacity, he led ICE’s efforts to identify, arrest, detain, and remove illegal aliens, including those who present a danger to national security or are a risk to public safety, as well as those who enter the United States illegally or otherwise undermine the integrity of our immigration laws and our border control efforts.
Posted by: lurkersusie | January 30, 2017 at 11:12 PM
Sebastian Gorka PhD Verified account
@SebGorka
Well the radio silence is over.
Congrats to those who guessed!
Honored to be Deputy Assistant to the President of the United States.
MAGA
----------------------------
We are going to war with ISIS very soon, if you ask me. Gorka is one of my favorites! Yay!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 30, 2017 at 11:14 PM
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/congressman-executive-orders-democrats-really-panicked/
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 30, 2017 at 11:21 PM
Narc-
Gave up.... endless morass of .gov sites.... but nothing relevant to that specific bill after it was introduced in the house.
114th Congress...HR 158.
I may have a new hobby though.... congressional rules. I know diddly.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 30, 2017 at 11:24 PM
Schumer's calling the firings a "Monday Night Massacre"
CNN News Banner at the bottom reads:
"MONDAY NIGHT MASSACRE"
I think we've figured out what Rush is going to play in a looping soundbite on tomorrows show:)
EJ Dionne
(@EJDionne)
Monday Night Massacre: Trump fires Sally Yates...
Neera Tanden
(@neeratanden)
An FBI Director of integrity would take on Trump for his Monday Night Massacre or resign in protest...
Impeach Donald Trump
(@Impeach_D_Trump)
Shout out to whoever updated the Sally Yates Wikipedia page. Monday Night Massacre #SallyYates #TheResistance
GQ Magazine
(@GQMagazine)
Donald Trump gave us the Monday Night Massacre
Chad Pergram
(@ChadPergram)
Schumer now on floor blasting Yates firing as "the Monday Night Massacre"
Meg Kinnard
(@MegKinnardAP)
Monday night massacre? Geez
Laurence Tribe on Twitter: "1/Monday night massacre: Trump just fired ...
The Guardian-11 hours ago
...cable networks are calling “the Monday night massacre”...
I could do this exercise all night long but I just don't have enough gravitas to go on that "charm offensive."
Posted by: daddy | January 30, 2017 at 11:27 PM
I'm listening to Levin's audio tonight for the first time in a long time. Anybody thinking that he isn't on board with what Trump has done would be well advised to give this a hearing. He demolishes anybody who thinks that Trump isn't well within his power as President to do much more than what his executive order stated. He also states that the GOP is on notice to cut the crap of trying to make cheap points by acting like democrats.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 11:27 PM
HOF Levin
The commenters at that site are pretty butthurt over Levin's statement. TRS is not one of my goto sites, so I don't know if it's full of #NeverTrumpers, but they are really on the fainting couches.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 11:29 PM
Nytol!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 30, 2017 at 11:32 PM
Much like ahab had a concern about whales, Jimmy.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 11:34 PM
Except Yates would resign according to her principles so-called.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 11:36 PM
Wouldn't resign, so now the conspiracy hill staffers were writing up the eon?
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 11:39 PM
Upon further review....
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr158
"Introduced:
Jan 6, 2015
114th Congress, 2015–2017
Status:
Died in a previous Congress
This bill was introduced in a previous session of Congress and was passed by the House on December 8, 2015 but was never passed by the Senate.
On GovTrack Insider:
H.R. 158 (114th): Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act of 2015
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 30, 2017 at 11:42 PM
TRS is not one of my goto sites, so I don't know if it's full of #NeverTrumpers, but they are really on the fainting couches.
SooperMexican is a #NeverTrumper who tries to split the baby to retain his audience. I think the numbers of clicks have taken a hit but that's just a guess.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 11:42 PM
instalanche
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | January 30, 2017 at 11:42 PM
Bow the head of dubai'security, important since they are a major transit point from Iran, is fine with the pause.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 11:44 PM
A bunch of the less butthurt commenters were saying things like, "I agree with the EO, but not with the chaotic rollout." How much of the chaos was Trump's fault vs manufactured by the media and protesters? And are they going to now have the satisfaction of being able to produce chaos every time Trump does something beyond saying "Good morning?" That's not a victory I want them to have.
About the only thing I can think of that was possibly mishandled was the green card issue. From what I understand, that may not have even been part of the EO, and in any case it seems to have been quickly clarified (not "reversed" as the NYT put it).
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 11:44 PM
Levin thinks this tantrum over Trump's EO is a shot across the bow as a warning not to do anything about dreamers. He also skewers McTurtle for not moving Trump's cabinet people through.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 11:47 PM
That charge, interestingly has no named source,
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 11:48 PM
Yor: "Teach your kids -- don't grab women by the pussy"
If you don't you'll have no kids to teach. This is basic mechanics.
:)
Posted by: grrr | January 30, 2017 at 11:51 PM
That doesn't track, Obama did sign it as part of a omnibus bill.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 11:51 PM
Net impact on EmoCrat leader Chuckie:
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 30, 2017 at 11:54 PM
"That doesn't track, Obama did sign it as part of a omnibus bill."
If it's anywhere the provisions were cherrypicked and buried in a DHS appropriation.
Any clue as to the title of the omni?
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 30, 2017 at 11:56 PM
Congress still has the power to tap the 25th amendment, remove cheto dust from office and install it's Trojan horse, Mike pence.
We're fast approaching the Rubicon.
Posted by: dublindave | January 30, 2017 at 11:59 PM
So you are suggesting that the New York Times might be trying to blow some smoke up my heinie? Say it ain't so Tom!
Posted by: Comanche Voter | January 30, 2017 at 11:59 PM
From KK's Guardian link at 10:55
1st Paragraph:"US statisticians are concerned that Donald Trump’s administration might suppress or manipulate public statistics that don’t fit his narrative of the truth, the Guardian has learned."

Golly!
2nd Paragraph: ...that’s a fear that many of us have at this point – it’s that picking and choosing your numbers to suit your politics is not the way that we ought to be doing it”...

13th Paragraph: Groshen said her biggest worry is about cuts to the department.

Posted by: daddy | January 30, 2017 at 11:59 PM
It was in frantzman's account, which seems to be a best kept secret since the coal's original recipe
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 31, 2017 at 12:12 AM
How does Carlson keep getting his chew-toys to agree to appear on his show?
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | January 31, 2017 at 12:22 AM
https://twitter.com/High1and3r/status/826300248175865857
Posted by: High1and3r | January 31, 2017 at 12:26 AM
If this isn't "Thinking outside of the box," I don't know what is!
North Dakota wants hired pipeline protesters to pay state income taxes
After spending more than $22 million on the Dakota Access pipeline protest, North Dakota wants to make sure any paid activists remember to submit their state income taxes.
Tax Commissioner Ryan Rauschenberger said his office is keeping an eye out for tax forms from environmental groups that may have hired protesters to agitate...
...millions have been funneled into the six-month-old demonstration...
more than 30 environmental organizations, including the Sierra Club, Indigenous Environmental Network, Food and Water Watch, 350.org and Greenpeace, have backed the protest.
Sic 'em, boys!
Posted by: daddy | January 31, 2017 at 12:29 AM
Neurolinguistic programming, is my best bet
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 31, 2017 at 12:29 AM
It didn't take long for despicable, former Coward-in-Chief Obama to open his lying yap.
Open and vocal contempt is now in order.
Pfui!
Posted by: Frau Staatsangehörigkeit | January 31, 2017 at 12:30 AM
No longer POTUS, eternally POSOTUS.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | January 31, 2017 at 12:42 AM
Re: The pussyhat judge
For the record, "County Judge" is Texian for "Head County Commissioner" and they don't do any judge stuff at all.
Posted by: ObeliskTouchrr | January 31, 2017 at 12:42 AM
The torygraph's summary of the order, does mention a statute reference, huzzah, but then appeals to the debunked 'illegal' characterization in Carlos slims by the top man staffer and cato lobbyist, David bier
And the labor party has been driven mad, it was a short trip.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 31, 2017 at 12:48 AM
Take yvette cooper, asking Boris Johnson to denounce trump, well he went along as with the Iraq museum scam of 2003, but want enough.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 31, 2017 at 12:51 AM
Late in althouse's thread, a familiar name, pops the narrative with a sharp needle.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 31, 2017 at 01:07 AM
Do young pups vet sniffles even if they are wrapped in a blanket?
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 31, 2017 at 01:09 AM
I know...deep in the heart of the male Trump supporter....there's a begrudging respect for Sally Yates. Think about it.....she stood up to a tyrannical government for the sole purpose of defending the united States Constitution.... and paid the ultimate price for being a patriot.
Sally Yates.
You're trying to demonize and hate her but deep deep down....she epitomizes the true Conservative spirit of telling big government to go fuck themselves. Sally Yates would make Ronald Reagan proud.
Republican men hid behind rocks and shook in their own urine......while Sally Yates carried a sword and went after tyrannical big government.
Posted by: dublindave | January 31, 2017 at 02:08 AM
Yates could be disbarred.
Posted by: glasater | January 31, 2017 at 02:44 AM
Sally Yates was fired for incompetence. A constitutionally valid executive order with precedent established by a prior administration's legal execution of it was something Mustang Sally was bound by law to uphold.
Instead, Mustang Sally abdicated her responsibility and violated her oath to uphold the laws of these United States. That isn't a patriot. That's criminal.
And she played to the mob. Something she wouldn't be able to do had she been consistent under Obama. There wasn't any mob protesting the same suspension.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 31, 2017 at 02:51 AM
"Sally Yates was fired for incompetence"
Your Mom was fired for incompetence. Right or wrong or hate her motives, Sally Yates served both Republican and Democratic administrations for 30 years. Republicans publicly stated that she was someone with unquestionable integrity and the Trump administration personally requested she stay on as acting Attorney General.
She's made you angry, I understand that. But make no mistake that Yate's reasoning for going up against the President of the United States was based in her belief that she was DEFENDING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.
Respect. She a badass bitch!
Also, Obama's Iraqi ban(not Muslim) followed word of a very definitive threat emanating from the region. It's scope was restricted to the area of threat. Ya'll have a muslim ban goin on.
Posted by: dublindave | January 31, 2017 at 03:18 AM
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/317019-meet-the-doj-official-who-just-defied-trump
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 31, 2017 at 03:22 AM
Both EOs are bans on refugees from countries embroiled in jihadist conflicts.
Learn the issue before you run your game, Dave.
At least I had a mother.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 31, 2017 at 03:26 AM
"She's made you angry, I understand that. But make no mistake that Yate's reasoning for going up against the President of the United States was based in her belief that she was DEFENDING THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION."
She made me "angry?" That's ridiculous and indefensible. You seem to be flailing here, Dave.
"Yate's reasoning"...that's rich. She gave an opinion unfounded on fact or the patent legality of the EO itself.
A person in her position doesn't have the luxury of operating on "her belief" of what is constitutional or otherwise. There are legal standards and precendents for doing the AG job.
How long have you been suffering from wet brain, Dave?
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 31, 2017 at 03:30 AM
Good nite, Dave. Why don't you sleep it off and take some vitamin B in the morning? I'd say "cheers" but I don't want your canoe-sized liver to suffer any more than it is.
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 31, 2017 at 03:31 AM
"Both EOs are bans on refugees.."
Wrong! Obama's ban was on 'refugee processing;-during which time Iraqi Refugees were granted admittance to the United States. Trump's ban applies to all non-us citizens from 7 countries.
Do keep up, Dear boy.
"Learn the issue before you run your game, Dave"
***snicker***
"At least I had a mother"
Trust me...I know you did. All the guys down the pub know you did.
Posted by: dublindave | January 31, 2017 at 03:44 AM
"Yate's reasoning"...that's rich. She gave an opinion unfounded on fact or the patent legality of the EO itself."
Mmmmmm, That's actually true. She was short on substance and failed to elaborate on her reasons for refusing to support said law. Conclusions are awesome, but a little bit of meat on the bones would have gone a long way.
You win that point.
Posted by: dublindave | January 31, 2017 at 03:48 AM
https://waysandmeans.house.gov/icymi-brady-promotes-tax-reform-blueprint-fox-business/
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 04:39 AM
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/30/at-least-20-alleged-terrorists-since-2014-came-from-countries-affected-by-trumps-immigration-ban/
"The Obama administration’s Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security refused to make public the immigration status of individuals implicated in terrorism, so the exact number of immigrant terrorists is unknown."
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 04:49 AM
Equivalence for that 'massacre' and this 'massacre' is absent. Along with brain cells for those trying to make them equivalent.
Posted by: Compare Nixon's crimes with Hillary's, or with Obama's. | January 31, 2017 at 04:59 AM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-30/trump-files-early-fec-2020-candidacy-outmaneuvers-nonprofits
"More importantly, 501(c)(3) nonprofit organizations would no longer be able to engage in "political speech" which could theoretically affect the results of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election without running the risk of losing their nonprofit status. The move effectively bars interest groups from creating nonprofits which they could funnel money into for the purposes of opposing Trump's initiatives. This will likely create chaos for political opponents of Trump such as George Soros, who has sunk significant amounts of money into various nonprofit groups with the intent of opposing Trump's government. How 501(c)(3) organizations will comply with the FEC's regulations when participating an actions which qualify as political speech remains to be seen."
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 05:02 AM
We need a little background on Yates. She was NOT a hardworking honest DOJ lawyer. She was a bureaucratic tyrant who threw her weight around. She was well known to industry who suffered EPA audits and had to produce "Yates" files of material the EPA was not entitled to.
Posted by: Sdharms | January 31, 2017 at 05:16 AM
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/30/acting-us-attorney-general-tells-doj-lawyers-not-to-defend-trumps-travel-ban.html
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 05:31 AM
https://www.scribd.com/document/337535680/Full-David-Brock-Confidential-Memo-On-Fighting-Trump#from_embed
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 05:52 AM
Chinese friends say they hear that the Trump Admin purposely chose not to issue a standard "Happy Lunar New Year" message this year.
I'm not finding a White House statement that provides confirmation or refutation.
Chinese New Year is widely considered an apolitical holiday, many many US citizens of Chinese descent voted Trump out of disgust for Hillary so they're disappointed.
Could be a conscious act by Trump Admin to show concern over Chinese policies.
Could be overlooked during a busy week, just not a priority.
Could be State Dept officials not bringing it to the attention of the Trump Admin in order to undermine them and cause friction.
Posted by: JimNorCal | January 31, 2017 at 05:55 AM
Heh, JiNC, the Chinese are aware that there is a 'New Year' about.
Posted by: Orange crowned cock crows. | January 31, 2017 at 06:24 AM
JimNorCal,
My guess is a combination of 2 and 3. I think there is someone in the White House who is supposed to handle stuff like that, Office of protocol maybe?
One other thing: I have had trouble locating statements on the White House web site. It might be there and not easily located.
I am trying to think about how best to contact them so they get the message quickly.
Tweeting to Spicer, Conway, or Priebus would just get lost in the thousands they get every hour.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 06:24 AM
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump 3m3 minutes ago
Nancy Pelosi and Fake Tears Chuck Schumer held a rally at the steps of The Supreme Court and mic did not work (a mess)-just like Dem party!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 06:25 AM
I think I like "Fake tears Schumer." Has a nice ring to it.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 06:26 AM
Donald J. Trump Verified account
@realDonaldTrump
When will the Democrats give us our Attorney General and rest of Cabinet! They should be ashamed of themselves! No wonder D.C. doesn't work!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 06:30 AM
Egg McMuffin, toeing the Soros line as usual.
Posted by: henry | January 31, 2017 at 06:33 AM
It's all McMullin now. Whatever became of Jon Huntsman?
Posted by: Obama's ambassador to China. | January 31, 2017 at 06:44 AM
http://nypost.com/2017/01/30/how-rikers-island-inmates-became-heroes-after-a-1957-plane-crash/
I had never heard this story. It's nice to be reminded that there is a lot of good even in those who have made mistakes.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 06:52 AM
I tried to reply to narc's question about Yates as we overlapped in law school and she married Comer Yates of Atlanta Speech School (a high-end place to send child to preschool) who also ran for Congress and lost.
Posted by: rse | January 31, 2017 at 06:55 AM
8:30 am || Receives the Presidential Daily Briefing
9:00 am || Meets with the prescription drug industry trade association, Pharma
10:30 am || Meets with Chief of Staff Priebus
12:30 pm || Lunch with Rudy Giuliani
2:00 pm || Holds a listening session with cyber security experts; Roosevelt Room
3:15 pm || Signs an executive order
8:00 pm || Announces nominee to the Supreme Court
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 06:56 AM
This is either Comer's dad or granddad who is the famous golfer linked to Bobby Jones. http://www.golftoday.co.uk/news/yeartodate/news05/yates1.html
The lawyer who recruited me to Big Law was married to another Yates brother, which is why I remembered the golfing connections.
This obstinance will serve Sally well in now going to K&S which I believe had been doing about as much gitmo work as covington & burling.
Posted by: rse | January 31, 2017 at 07:00 AM
McMuffin's 15 minutes are up.
No more attention is needed.
This guy is a loon.
Posted by: maryrose | January 31, 2017 at 07:01 AM
Father according to this. http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/atlanta/obituary.aspx?pid=15430867 and Sally's father-in-law.
All this screams Old Atlanta connections even apart from the links to the Masters.
Posted by: rse | January 31, 2017 at 07:04 AM
Late in althouse's thread, a familiar name, pops the narrative with a sharp needle.
Was it Theo or Some Guy?
Posted by: Threadkiller | January 31, 2017 at 07:15 AM
maryrose,
I am more concerned that McMullin is a Deep State operative. He was recruited at brigham Young to be a CIA intern, and then worked for them for 7 years, followed by stints at Goldman Sachs and then UN refugee work before going to work for Congress. He was photographed with McCain and Kinzinger in Syria.
He's up to no good.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 07:27 AM
She's one of Charlie Yates' grandchildren? How depressing...
Posted by: Beasts of England | January 31, 2017 at 07:29 AM
MM, i'm more worried about how many more like him there are, except they're not tweeting and making public asses of themselves but instead they're busily sabotaging and undermining the President quietly and sneakily and invisibly.
Posted by: James D | January 31, 2017 at 07:38 AM
James D.,
I know. I am sure the President is aware. He seems to know a lot more than one would have assumed. Plus he's got Bannon and Miller who are very attuned to this sort of stuff.
Keeping my fingers crossed!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 31, 2017 at 07:41 AM
She is married to one of charlie yates' sons.
Posted by: rse | January 31, 2017 at 07:46 AM
Bgates now as to the runny n
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 31, 2017 at 07:46 AM
Nancy singing This Land is Your Land - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW6uuwg7Jhw
#Sad
Perhaps they could have all opened jars of pickles in unison to show their strength.
Posted by: Janet S. | January 31, 2017 at 07:48 AM
A good broom sweeps clean.
Time to get rid of Obama holdovers that are not on board the President Trump train.
Posted by: maryrose | January 31, 2017 at 07:50 AM
Thanks, rse. I'd hate to think that she was related to a British Am champion by blood. :)
Posted by: Beasts of England | January 31, 2017 at 07:51 AM
Is it just me Oreo Pelosi and Schumerlook increasingly pathetic?
Term limits now.
Flake should be primaried by Sandoval if goes off the reservation.
Yes Rick Scott should run against dim senator space traveler in Florida.
This guy has surpassed his sell by date.
Posted by: maryrose | January 31, 2017 at 07:53 AM
Oreo should be or are.
Posted by: maryrose | January 31, 2017 at 07:54 AM
When did narciso start posting as maryrose?
Posted by: gentlejim | January 31, 2017 at 07:56 AM
I just listened to former DDCI Mike Morell refer in loving terms to the CIA as a 'national treasure'. Jeepers. On its best days, it's a functional tool and a necessary evil. On its worst, it's a deadly nightmare. It ain't the Smithsonian.
Posted by: Beasts of England | January 31, 2017 at 08:00 AM
Without Soros funding the nonsense we have seen over the last week and a half, the Dems would already be in the wilderness.
Continuing to pray for early onset rigor mortis for the old dude.
Posted by: Buckeye | January 31, 2017 at 08:00 AM
When will the Democrats give us our Attorney General and rest of Cabinet! They should be ashamed of themselves! No wonder D.C. doesn't work!
When does McConnell schedule a vote and get things done? He needs to take his turtle jammies off, put on his big boy pants and start acting like a leader and get these confirmations done. Stop giving Schoooomer photo ops by dragging things out.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 31, 2017 at 08:01 AM
This is from before Obama appointed her. http://www.myajc.com/business/attorney-sally-yates-nobody-success-their-own/douXrIvSM94UcGacc2pbdM/
Posted by: rse | January 31, 2017 at 08:04 AM
Sally's husband Comer insisted to one of my cousins that it was a "terrible thing" that the daughter had spontaneously started reading before she was four. The girl is now at Harvard.
Posted by: rse | January 31, 2017 at 08:12 AM
wiki This Land is Your Land - tune was an old Carter Family (southern gospel) tune. Woody Guthrie replaced the lyrics with his own because he was sick of hearing Kate Smith's "God Bless America". One of his verses:
"There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me. The sign was painted, said 'Private Property.' But on the backside, it didn't say nothing. This land was made for you and me."
Posted by: DebinNC | January 31, 2017 at 08:13 AM
Btw what is the ostensible reason for the libs being hair on fire over Bannon? I saw something on Zuckerberg from one of my idiot friends who tries to keep the Shitberger family financially solvent so I knew automatically it was an ill informed opinion.
I'm kind of pleased with how insane Bannon makes the Soros bots. Rove did the same thing despite being otherwise a detriment.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 31, 2017 at 08:15 AM
I love the smell of burnt hair in the morning, it smells like victory.
Steve Bannon -- from the bunker
Posted by: Appalled | January 31, 2017 at 08:19 AM
"There was a big high wall there that tried to stop me. The sign was painted, said 'Private Property.' But on the backside, it didn't say nothing. This land was made for you and me."
Hippie chick I knew in HS moved to a commune instead of going on to school. Went to visit her once.
What a dysfunctional cluster. Yeah, that's the ticket. Let's turn the whole country into one big commune, and all are welcome.
Morons
Posted by: Buckeye | January 31, 2017 at 08:27 AM
This appears to be the week all customized baked goods in atlanta are being offered in red and black. Not the most appetizing of colors.
Lots of red dye being consumed because the falcons are in the super bowl.
Posted by: rse | January 31, 2017 at 08:27 AM
I am, too, CH.
It really is amazing how quickly and completely they've all lost their minds, though, isn't it?
I don't remember marches in the streets and total meltdowns on FB and the nightly news when Obama asserted the power to kill American citizens totally at his whim without due process (or really any process at all).
I don't recall any hair-on-fire protests when the DoJ flatly refused to defend an established statute before the Supreme Court, even though it had been the law of the land for two decades and had been signed into law by a Democrat president.
Etc etc etc.
Posted by: James D | January 31, 2017 at 08:27 AM