Have you punched a Nazi today? Or even someone with a political vision that differs from yours? Hollywood and the NY Times are down with you! Here is Cara Buckley pretending that political violence is OK if the cause is just:
SAG Awards 2017: Acceptance Speeches Turn Pointedly Political
Any doubts that Hollywood would take sharp aim at President Trump’s immigration order were swiftly vanquished at the Screen Actors Guild Awards on Sunday night. Amid upsets, winner after winner lashed out at the policy, pleaded for acceptance of differences in a bitterly divided time and, in the case of the cast of “Stranger Things,” adopted the stance of political firebrands.
“We will get past the lies, we will hunt monsters,” said David Harbour, a cast member of the Netflix series, which won for best television drama, as the audience roared its approval. “And when we are lost amid the hypocrisy and casual violence, we will punch some people in the face when they seek to destroy the weak and the disenfranchised and the marginalized.”
Well, now. Who among us is not in favor of protecting the weak, the disenfranchised and the downtrodden? I am Batman! But there are a couple of problems - first, Batman was a vigilante and that is not how we like to do things in this country. But perhaps more interestingly, that is not what David Harbour originally wrote, if I can believe the Mediate presentation and my lying ears. Roll the tape [Youtube version here], my emphasis [and I am switching sides here after listening a few more time. My bad. It's easier to hear correctly when NOT reading along, as students of confirmation bias will know.]:
And when we are at a loss amidst the hypocrisy and casual violence of certain individuals and institutions, we will, as per Chief Jim Hopper, punch some people in the face when they seek to destroy what we have envisioned for ourselves and the marginalized.
As written, "what we have envisioned for ourselves" can go well beyond protecting the weak, etc. and can easily encompass all manner of political differences. Perhaps Mr. Harbour envisions stronger gun control, just at a guess, and would like to punch some NRA people in the face. Their policies are getting people killed, amirite?
Of course, Mr. Harbour may not be feeling lucky so NRA backers might be safe, for now anyway. But how does he feel about those pro-lifers limiting a woman's right to choose? Is punching them OK? What about folks who don't want to raise the minimum wage - are they oppressing the weak? Are people who don't favor an amnesty for our undocumented friends from south of the border harming the disenfranchised? Hey, punch 'em out! Per Ms. Buckley, that is merely "the stance" of a "political firebrand".
David Burge, as Iowahawk, had a classic tweet noting masked thugs breaking windows during the Inaugural demonstrations in order to protest the imminent arrival of fascism. Just what sort of threats of political violence would actually prompt the NY Times to express concern? Sorry, silly question. Let me rephrase: just what sort of threats of political violence from the left would actually prompt the NY Times to express concern?
MORE: The Times runs the full speech in the story titled "The Best Speeches from the SAG Awards" with the same quote as above. My guess is that Mr. Harbour, who was clearly reading from a prepared text, had his publicist pass that along but improv'ed the lines in question. Or Mediate had hearing lock. Either way, my current view is that the NY Times quotes are accurate. Other listeners welcome.
JUST WHAT HE WANTED: This is the new political order Mr. Harbour advocated and for which the SAG crowd cheered. From the Portland Airport, a Trump supporter knocked unconscious. Although he may have been sucker-punched in the back of the head, not the face.
Wow! Another thread. Thanks, Tom! -- First?
Posted by: sbw | January 30, 2017 at 11:25 AM
As you watch (I say "you" because you won't see ME watching) those Hollywood A**holes patting themselves on their backs, take some solace in this (from Drudge):
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/01/why-hollywood-as-we-know-it-is-already-over
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 11:30 AM
I say "you" because you won't see ME watching
. . . but you would read Vanity Fair?!
Posted by: sbw | January 30, 2017 at 11:33 AM
:-)
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 11:34 AM
From the Vanity Fair article:
As they stood there chatting, the screenwriter noticed that a tiny droplet of rain remained on the actor’s shoulder. Politely, as they spoke, he brushed it off. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, an employee from the production’s wardrobe department rushed over to berate him. “That is not your job,” she scolded. “That is my job.”
Posted by: PD | January 30, 2017 at 11:35 AM
Another day...another grin:
"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump signed an order on Monday that will seek to dramatically pare back federal regulations by requiring agencies to cut two existing regulations for every new rule introduced.
"This will be the biggest such act that our country has ever seen. There will be regulation, there will be control, but it will be normalized control," Trump said as he signed the order in the Oval Office, surrounded by a group of small business owners.
Trump's latest executive action will prepare a process for the White House to set an annual cap on the cost of new regulations, a senior official told reporters ahead of the signing.
For the rest of fiscal 2017, that cap on new regulations would be $0, the official said on customary condition of anonymity."
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 11:38 AM
Buccaneer, if you've come over here, I just saw that comment about the Moroccan Jews on a comment at a link I'd followed from another link. I was probably a little quick off the mark, but I don't want the vicious, vile left to have any kind of propaganda moment.
Posted by: Joan | January 30, 2017 at 11:39 AM
As I was saying Joan there's something wrong when you attack any house of worship, but that rule isn't observed in Syria or Yemen, its acceptable in Germany to attack synagogues, they block out an instance in some other German town to assault a cathedral.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 11:45 AM
Tom Lipscomb
58 mins ·
ONE OF THE KEY SCENES IN "THE LAST EMPEROR" IS THE EXILING OF THE IMPERIAL EUNUCHS FROM THE FORBIDDEN CITY, WHO PROCEED TO DEMONSTRATE THEIR ANGUISH BY WAVING THEIR MUMMIFIED MASCULINITY AND HOWLING.
Sound familiar?
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | January 30, 2017 at 11:47 AM
Anyone see that dummy Dick Durbin on one of the shows yesterday, promising he'd be happy to consider any "moderate" that the president might nominate to the Court? How many moderates did Obama offer up?
Meanwhile dummies on our side of the aisle, i.e. McCain and Graham, think it's just awful that the president is doing what he said he would do. I read some nonsense from Time magazine this morning, celebrating that Republicans are abandoing ship and in a tizzy about what's going on; what Time doesn't mention, though, is that all of those people were never on the ship in the first place.
I support allowing legitimate political refugees who bode us no ill will entry into the U.S.; I think humanitarian efforts are a responsibility we must assume. But President Trump's immigration EO doesn't preclude that from happening, in due time - safety first, America first. Going into the ninth day, I haven't seen one action from this administration that I even remotely disagree with. I'd love to hear that the next EO supports profiling travelers in an attempt to nab the bad guys, the way Israel does it.
Posted by: hrtshpdbox | January 30, 2017 at 11:48 AM
The idea that the left will make much progress with this "punch some people in the face" meme is simply laughable.
Bubba thinks that when they say things like "seek to destroy the weak and the disenfranchised and the marginalized” it describes his situation almost perfectly.
He is also just waiting for a libtard to "make his day".
Posted by: Buckeye | January 30, 2017 at 11:51 AM
I would support trading McCain and Graham for any 100 unvetted visitors from anywhere in the ME.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 11:53 AM
I figured these commie symps would be the place to debunk this steaming pile:
http://www.snopes.com/putin-issues-arrest-warrant-for-george-soros/
Plus if Volodya wanted him gone, the world polonium stockpiles would be trending downward.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 11:55 AM
"punch some people in the face"
That is an OLD leftist idea. Can't that actor come up with something new?
Hell, the Dems were paying people to attack Trump supporters.
Instead of - " we will, as per Chief Jim Hopper, punch some people in the face "
He should have said - 'we HAVE BEEN punching people in the face'.
Posted by: Janet 1 | January 30, 2017 at 12:00 PM
CH--I agree with you on Zuckerberg--there's really only one way to clear title in such a situation--file quitclaims and resolve the issue. He was tarred but folded.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | January 30, 2017 at 12:01 PM
Pesky blinders is a much better show, William Murphy was robbed.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 12:02 PM
I don't support any immigration until we have absorbed the number flooding in here the past decade or two -- it was a 'take my breath away' moment yesterday as I watched one tv report that over 300,000 ME were arriving on our shores just yesterday. Honestly? 300,000 every day for a month or so adds up. I wonder how many we'd see if that continues ad nauseam?
And, I think that guy at the leftist SAG awards is a bloated, hypocritical moron. They are hypocrites.
Posted by: Joan | January 30, 2017 at 12:03 PM
Further to my link at the top about the numbered days of Hollywood:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-30/sony-says-it-will-take-1-billion-writedown-on-movie-business
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 12:05 PM
I billion dollars, that's the star destroyer crashing through the gate.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 12:17 PM
NPR: Starbucks Chairman and CEO Howard Schultz says his company plans to hire 10,000 refugees in the next five years in the 75 countries where it does business.
So Trump's order gets companies like this to get off their butt and help refugees. The Donald strikes again.
Posted by: PD | January 30, 2017 at 12:18 PM
As some one put it, wynona Ryder was the smart one at the sag awards (she was laughing and smirking through the speech)
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 12:20 PM
hmmm the Quebec shooting coverage sure has dropped down
Funny how words like Mohamed and Aloha Snackbar can cause a story to plummet
Posted by: windansea | January 30, 2017 at 12:23 PM
Joan the 300K figure is not refugees but plane travelers. That includes all people coming into the country including citizens. Out of 300K some less than 1000 were detained.
Posted by: Stephanie despicable me | January 30, 2017 at 12:30 PM
A bit more on Trump coming to Milwaukee on Thursday. Maybe he will do an EO on govt unions or something while Schumer is freaked about the SC pick.
Posted by: henry | January 30, 2017 at 12:31 PM
Speaking of GOPe.
Wonder how long they think they can hide behind the rocks before it occurs to them to start supporting the objectives of the voters who elected Trump?
I do not think they have any idea how little we care about the antics of Schumer and Warren and Durbin and the rest since that is just exactly what we expected of them.
But if the followers of Ryan and McConnell think that they can avoid our wrath for long, I pray they are sadly mistaken, and that the pain, when they feel it, is intense.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 12:32 PM
Well, thanks, Stephanie! :) I was astonished yesterday -- so I quit watching. Sometimes the news is so ugly that I give up.
I laugh at myself. :)
Posted by: Joan | January 30, 2017 at 12:33 PM
" Starbucks Chairman and CEO Howard Schultz says his company plans to hire 10,000 refugees "
Allahu akhbarista?
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 12:34 PM
Also, the report I happened to catch was backed up with a video of distraught hijab wearing women, and I (and I acknowledge that this is bad) have a visceral reaction of loathing when I see women here in the US wearing hijabs.
Please, don't anyone try and convince me it's their right to be stuck home, unable to drive cars, and having their clits shaved off is their choice. What? American women don't have to follow all of those rules? I'm astonished again.
Posted by: Joan | January 30, 2017 at 12:37 PM
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/01/amazing-video-small-business-owners-heap-praise-potus-trump-white-house-meeting/
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 30, 2017 at 12:39 PM
American women don't have to follow all of those rules?
They will if the Caliphate gets enough of its followers over here.
Posted by: PD | January 30, 2017 at 12:47 PM
On a lighter note:
https://twitter.com/iowahawkblog/status/825384850303512576
Though there's a good argument for actually cutting them in half (since we are normalizing violence).
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 12:48 PM
MM, soon I hope Trump ends every such video opportunity with a request that, if you like what you see, contact your Republican member and tell them we need a cabinet and legislative action to match our goals.
And "yesterday", not at some distant date in the future, maybe.
BTW, one of those clips from Ryan last week, speaking from the taxpayer funded "retreat" for those hardworking politician, suggested that as soon as they get back from this vacation, they will tackle some of the other things they hope they might have maybe by the time of their "August Vacation" (OK, he said "Recess"). You know when you pencil in this break and that break, while getting ready for the longer breaks, wowza is it difficult to make things happen. Donchaknow.
Femall. Get up early and go to work when Trump does.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 12:51 PM
True OL... plus if they stayed and worked, maybe we'd get a break from all this fundraising bs.
Posted by: henry | January 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM
We will get past the lies, we will hunt monsters
Uh huh. Pretty tough talk for some prick who has almost assuredly never once hunted anything in his life.
Posted by: lyle | January 30, 2017 at 12:53 PM
jimmyk wins the Internet at 12:34!!
Posted by: Beasts of England | January 30, 2017 at 12:54 PM
Henry, the right response of every one of us when asked for money should be "Sorry. I have no intention of writing you a check until sixty days prior to the next election, and the size of that check will depend on how much I think you have helped us with our new agenda. So leave me alone until then and get to work."
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 12:56 PM
I am happy that he moved up the SC announcement as I predicted somewhere yesterday (maybe here). I didn't expect prime time, but that's even better.
Reinforces that he IS the president, removes at least an hour of Trump bashing on a couple of cable networks, and makes the newsrooms scramble for research and lining up judicial analysts.
Confusion to the enemy!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 30, 2017 at 12:57 PM
OL: "Wonder how long (GOPe) think they can hide behind the rocks before it occurs to them to start supporting the objectives of the voters who elected Trump?"
It's already spent years and years hating on TEA people.
"if the followers of Ryan and McConnell think that they can avoid our wrath for long, I pray they are sadly mistaken, and that the pain, when they feel it, is intense."
Imagine Trump deciding to enjoy a comfortable life, not running. Imagine, say, Jeb winning the nom. Would the GOP still exist? Hillary would be extending Prog policies at warp speed and cementing SCOTUS. May or may not involve conscious thought but GOPe depends on the People not being able to replace them while simultaneously resisting the Dem agenda.
Posted by: JimNorCal | January 30, 2017 at 12:58 PM
Allahu akhbarista?
How did I miss this on first scroll? Too good, jimmyk!
Posted by: lyle | January 30, 2017 at 12:58 PM
Jimmy:
Barista comment a classic!
Merkley says Dems will filibuster SC candidate and don't know who it is yet?
Demented folks all and time for the super nuclear option.
Posted by: maryrose | January 30, 2017 at 01:01 PM
"They will if the Caliphate gets enough of its followers over here."
The only stocks that seem to be up today is the gunny sack makers and the black dye manufacturers.
If the women are restricted to only having their eyes showing I suspect the award shows are going to be awful boring.
Posted by: pagar, a bacon, ham and sausage supporter | January 30, 2017 at 01:03 PM
"Sorry. I have no intention of writing you a check until sixty days prior to the next election
When I got the RNC phone call last week I said, ”No I won’t. Not yet.”
Posted by: sbw | January 30, 2017 at 01:05 PM
The Swimsuit Issue's gonna be a problem, too, pagar.
(Hi folks.)
Posted by: Extraneus | January 30, 2017 at 01:06 PM
If the women are restricted to only having their eyes showing I suspect the award shows are going to be awful boring.
Yeah. How these leftists can be so stupid to think that if the Islamists they support really take power over here they won't be the first ones to be put under the thumb of Sharia, is beyond me.
Posted by: PD | January 30, 2017 at 01:07 PM
Extraneus! Where you been, pard?
Posted by: lyle | January 30, 2017 at 01:08 PM
Maryrose "... says Dems will filibuster SC candidate and don't know who it is yet?"
Thus it will be until they feel appropriate pain. And that won't happen until the R's get some of their own.
In my dreams, McConnell announces a floor vote on the entire cabinet this Friday at noon. Then another at noon three weeks later for the SCOTUS nominee. Announce there will be a meeting of the rules committee 24 hours in advance of each of those dates.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 01:09 PM
The Swimsuit Issue's gonna be a problem, too, pagar.
Maybe. Isn't is pretty common to find stashes of porn in the hideouts of jihadis after our guys kill them? Swimsuit issue would be mild in comparison.
Oh, wait, I forgot: Public position, private position.
Posted by: PD | January 30, 2017 at 01:09 PM
Thanks, but TM already gave me the highest honor by putting #AllahuAkbarista on Twitter. I demand 20% royalties!
Merkley is the fool who put up those inauguration crowd photos at Mulvaney's confirmation hearing.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 01:12 PM
SBW, the problem with "No not yet" is that to a politician that means well then I will ask you again in the morning. Pushing the check off to some fixed future date pending verified proof of actual productivity, frees them from calling you back, and focuses their minds on doing something.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 01:12 PM
Extraneus!
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 01:12 PM
The Horrific TRUTH MSM is Going Out of its Way to Cover Up!
http://think-critically.tumblr.com/post/154869116016/i-want-you-to-take-a-good-look-at-this-guy-pic
Posted by: Truthbetold5 | January 30, 2017 at 01:13 PM
Hi Ext!
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 01:13 PM
Extraneus back and jimmyk pens a winner--and the day is still youngish!
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | January 30, 2017 at 01:15 PM
Merkley says Dems will filibuster SC candidate and don't know who it is yet?
Oh, really? This guy sez it won't matter:
http://nypost.com/2017/01/29/why-the-supreme-court-fight-is-sure-to-go-nuclear/
Looks like the Searchlight Pederast left the Dems in a bit of a pickle. We'll see if McTurtle has the stones.
Posted by: lyle | January 30, 2017 at 01:18 PM
I had figured it would be a few more but:
http://shoebat.com/2014/10/09/30-year-muslim-plan-control-america-six-years-go/
Posted by: pagar, a bacon, ham and sausage supporter | January 30, 2017 at 01:19 PM
Liberal Jonathan Turley says the law is on Trump's side, and it's not a "Muslim ban."
This was the shot of his reaction to that crazy Rula Jabreal:
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 01:19 PM
Howzit extraneous?
Welcome back to Jesus country.
He weeps real tears for judgemental poseurs, unlike Schumer the schmarter.
Posted by: XERXES COST FREE WALL | January 30, 2017 at 01:21 PM
I thought McTurtle already said he wouldn't go nuclear on SCOTUS. Fool that he is--even if that's the outcome he wants, giving it away displays Zippy-like bargaining skillz.
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 01:21 PM
But if the followers of Ryan and McConnell think that they can avoid our wrath for long, I pray they are sadly mistaken,
I think it's time to send Timken a letter to get a primary challenger ready for Portman in five years. He seems to be trying to be indistinguishable from the Restraining Order, which certainly wasn't the message of his campaign.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 01:25 PM
Explain THIS One Thing Alefantis, YouTube & FakeStream Media!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OeN-7TWIodc
Posted by: Truthbetold5 | January 30, 2017 at 01:25 PM
IMO, it should be 100 rescinded.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-30/trump-signs-executive-orders-regulation-every-new-regultion-two-regulations-must-be-
Posted by: pagar, a bacon, ham and sausage supporter | January 30, 2017 at 01:25 PM
I hope the "two repealed" are each of comparable value to the new one, and that the benefits fall on the same target.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 01:28 PM
OL,
No Rules Committee in the Senate. Majority leader runs everything and makes the rules. This will be a Mitch moment as to how he handles filibuster and cloture. He is going to need all his members including the RINO's (you know who they are) plus at least 8 Dems.
I think a guy like Machin may come over, then you have to get 7 more, likely from those states Trump won and are up for re-election in 2018.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | January 30, 2017 at 01:29 PM
Isn't is pretty common to find stashes of porn in the hideouts of jihadis after our guys kill them?
Allegedly OBL's PC was chock fulla porn. Allahu Spankbank.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 01:30 PM
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/exclusive-casino-mogul-steve-wynn-new-rnc-finance-chair/
Heh. I like thinking about Mitt Romney with his nose pressed to the glass.
Also, this should get Egg McMuffin in another snit since he likes to pose all sinless and constitutional and such.
Trump told them he was going to show them how to win, and it looks like he's well on his way.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 30, 2017 at 01:32 PM
OK, Jack. Then I would modify my notice for each Friday noon vote to say "First order of business will be to approve a change in the Filibuster Rule as to the upcoming vote, and then then the up or down vote will follow. You can be back in the Dining Room slurping Bean Soup by 12:30 each day".
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 01:33 PM
There is zero chance McConnell will find 60 votes any time in the foreseeable future for the SCOTUS person. 50 + the VP will be hard enough.
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 01:37 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEJJ0-9nS4A
Life stream of White House press briefing (Sean Spicer).
Hasn't started yet (1:36). Should start shortly.
He was very good with Martha Radditz yesterday. Did not back down one bit.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | January 30, 2017 at 01:37 PM
Clarice Feldman
Your buddy James Alefantis supports good clean family fun occult schools as well.
JAMES ALEFANTIS DONATES 2 LUCIFERIAN WALDORF SCHOOL ! COMET PING PONG PAN PIZZAGATE
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cbG-qPFFxs0
Posted by: Truthbetold5 | January 30, 2017 at 01:37 PM
Free bean soup along with all the other massive bennies for Congress.
Yuuge public relations coup if Trump calls out our most privileged class on their feathered nests. But will he?
Posted by: XERXES COST FREE WALL | January 30, 2017 at 01:38 PM
On the contrary, Spicer was subdued and responsive...it only took a week for them to realize they DO need mainstream reportage.
The Learning curve COMETH..lol.
Posted by: XERXES COST FREE WALL | January 30, 2017 at 01:41 PM
Trump needs a positive bump. He hates low ratings.
Posted by: XERXES COST FREE WALL | January 30, 2017 at 01:42 PM
Multiple news outlets reporting Quebec police saying of the two men apprehended after the mosque shooting - 1 is a suspect and 1 is a witness - no info re which is which.
Posted by: DebinNC | January 30, 2017 at 01:43 PM
According to Rush, Trump's phone call to the King of Saudi Arabia and other ME like Dubai was to get them on board to use the Medina tent city for the refugees. I think it holds close to 2 million + for the hajj. Airconditioners and sanitary facilities all working.
This has been brought up before as a recommendation to Zippy but fell on deaf ears.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | January 30, 2017 at 01:44 PM
Yeah, I wanted to come here to spend election night with you guys but I had my head under my pillow.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/matt-drudge-despicable-congress-making-trump-do-everything-alone/article/2613358
Posted by: Extraneus | January 30, 2017 at 01:45 PM
henry | January 30, 2017 at 12:31 PM
Well, that probably blows my earlier SCOTUS prediction. I'd gotten wind of location scouting in Milwaukee and suspected it was about a Sykes announcement.
Wonder if it'll be Pryor despite the alleged gay magazine photo?
Posted by: Another Bob | January 30, 2017 at 01:45 PM
There is zero chance McConnell will find 60 votes any time in the foreseeable future for the SCOTUS person
McQueeg will never forget the blow to his image by Trump in the primaries (which surely added to his simpleton willingness to spread that "dossier" garbage which most house pets' IQs would know was bogus) so the best we can hope from that senile menace is to abstain.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 01:45 PM
Extraneus!!
Posted by: Beasts of England | January 30, 2017 at 01:46 PM
There is zero chance McConnell will find 60 votes any time in the foreseeable future for the SCOTUS person. 50 + the VP will be hard enough.
I have a sneaky suspicion that Trump will work the PR game 10X harder than Zippy did for Garland.
It will be an uphill battle that may ultimately require a nuke detonation, but my gut says this will be fun to watch.
Posted by: Buckeye | January 30, 2017 at 01:47 PM
But will he?
Missed the speech he gave after being inaugurated, did we?
Posted by: PD | January 30, 2017 at 01:48 PM
But can it spell your name?
http://www.wsj.com/articles/robot-baristas-serve-up-the-future-of-coffee-at-cafe-x-1485781201
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 01:49 PM
Welcome home prodigal Ext!
Posted by: Buckeye | January 30, 2017 at 01:50 PM
"Republicans kept repealing Obamacare while O was in office [knowing would go nowhere]," he wrote. "Now... NOTHING!"
Can anybody recommend a good knife sharpener? Asking for a friend.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 01:51 PM
Looks like the Searchlight Pederast left the Dems in a bit of a pickle. We'll see if McTurtle has the stones.
He held the nomination until the election of Trump. He has the stones -- real issue is whether McCain or some of the other Republicans will agree to killing the filibuster for this. I'm pretty sure they will, but McCain thwarted a previous effort to kill the filibuster on nominees, so no guarantees.
As an observation, a leader can lead only if he has enough people to follow him.
Posted by: Appalled | January 30, 2017 at 02:03 PM
Per Tammy: GHWB has been discharged from the hospital.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 02:03 PM
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | January 30, 2017 at 02:07 PM
he Lone Ranger's Last Request
The Lone Ranger was ambushed and captured
by an enemy Indian War Party.
The Indian Chief proclaims,
"So, YOU are the great Lone Ranger"...
"In honor of the Harvest Festival,
YOU will be executed in three days."
"Before O kill you, I grant you three requests"
"What is your FIRST request?'
The Lone Ranger responds, "I'd
like to speak to my horse."
The Chief nods and Silver is brought
before the Lone Ranger who whispers in
Silver's ear, and the horse gallops away.
Later that evening, Silver returns with
a beautiful blonde woman on his back.
As the Indian Chief watches, the blonde enters the Lone Ranger's tent and spends the night.
The next morning the Indian Chief admits he's impressed.
"You have a very fine and loyal horse",
"But I will still kill you in two days."
"What is your SECOND request?"
The Lone Ranger again asks to speak to his horse.
Silver is brought to him, and he again whispers in the horse's ear.
As before, Silver takes off and disappears over the horizon.
Later that evening, to the Chief's surprise, Silver again returns,
this time with a voluptuous brunette, more attractive than the blonde.
She enters the Lone Rangers tent and spends the night.
The following morning the Indian Chief is again impressed.
"You are indeed a man of many talents,"
"But I will still kill you tomorrow."
"What is your LAST request?"
The Lone Ranger responds, "I'd like to speak to my horse...alone."
The Chief is curious, but he agrees, and Silver is brought to the Lone Ranger's tent.
Once they're alone, the Lone Ranger grabs Silver by both ears, looks him square in the eye and says,
"Listen Very Carefully!!! FOR...THE...LAST...TIME...
"BRING POSSE!"
Posted by: Stephanie despicable me | January 30, 2017 at 02:07 PM
Hey ext, how have you been,
Rush wAS citing a journal story where they are floating another gang of 8 bill.
Posted by: buccaneer morgan | January 30, 2017 at 02:08 PM
I didn't know Donald Trump was the Lone Ranger....
Posted by: Appalled | January 30, 2017 at 02:09 PM
As an observation, a leader can lead only if he has enough people to follow him.
Troo dat. Not to speak harshly of the absent, particularly because there were plenty of positives, but some nameless people who used to excuse doing nothing because "we don't have the numbers", as if we put a bunch of ten key adding machines into positions of responsibility, infuriated me. Politics is about persuading people to commit to a course of action. Reagan understood that but then precious few bothered because it was too hard or something.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 02:10 PM
I didn't know Donald Trump was the Lone Ranger....
Remember that the next time you think he has a terrible job:)
Posted by: Buckeye | January 30, 2017 at 02:11 PM
In the mood I am in, I say dealing with Obamacare is easy. Pass a one page bill:
"Effective July 31, 2017 every Law, Regulation, Finding and Order associated with the ACA shall terminate and all such requirements will be as they were the day before the ACA took effect.
Deal with it."
Posted by: Old Lurker | January 30, 2017 at 02:12 PM
Doing ok, nar--, I mean buccaneer.
Rasmussen:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poll-most-support-trumps-temporary-refugee-ban/article/2613360
Posted by: Extraneus | January 30, 2017 at 02:13 PM
Bissonette is the suspect, Mohamed was a witness.
Posted by: henry | January 30, 2017 at 02:20 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/30/iran-conducts-ballistic-missile-test-us-officials-say.html
Don't worry. All the sooper smart set have assured us that this is nothing. The real provocation would be Trump tearing up Zippy's deal with the mullahs.
Posted by: lyle | January 30, 2017 at 02:23 PM
Yes. Gotcha. Check. #simonequeSiEse. Right on.
About all that fake news which led to Hildo Balloona Clintoona's humpty dumpty momentito in publico.
It appears that since Candidate XXXL fell from the stairs to her expected throne, David Brock is beginning to feel the wrath of Left media nibbling his fingers like the Mohawks did to St. Isaac Jogues back in colonial times.
St. Isaac was, well, a saintly Jesuit (I keed, I keed), but was doing religious missionary work.
Check out how Davey Brock is insinuating himself and Media Matters into the bosom of Zuckerberg's hobby horse, El Libro de Cara.
A b-grade journolista calls for Brock's kiwis on a platter. Big talk regarding a dispensary of Soros cash in Big Media today.
"Not that Brock will go away quietly. His left-wing advocacy group, Media Matters for America, announced last week that it was “engaging with Facebook behind the scenes to share our expertise and offer input on developing meaningful solutions” for all the “fake news” on social media platforms it believes contributed to Clinton’s downfall."
Read Mo: http://nypost.com/2017/01/29/democrats-dont-need-this-money-sucking-hatchet-man/
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 30, 2017 at 02:23 PM
Tammy: the jugeared fool who sued the Little Sisters of the Poor, unsuccessfully, says he would never discriminate against a religion.
Posted by: Captain Hate | January 30, 2017 at 02:23 PM
The fretting over 404Care is a good example of why government keeps growing. Clearly some people (recipients of subsidies, mainly) benefited from it. Many others (people who lost their plans, doctors, are paying more) were harmed.
Yet somehow merely to revert to the status quo ante is deemed politically impossible because...some people benefited, and those benefits can't be taken away. Why not? What about the people who benefited from the status quo ante? Why was it ok to harm them?
Posted by: jimmyk | January 30, 2017 at 02:24 PM
""Listen Very Carefully!!! FOR...THE...LAST...TIME..."BRING POSSE!"
Ahem. Miss Stephanie? Would you carefully consider riding off into the sunset with me?
OMG! This is one of my favorite yolks of all time!
10Q.
(I'm not kidding.) ;)
Posted by: Account Deleted | January 30, 2017 at 02:26 PM
I think I need to ask in an editorial, for anyone who wishes to understand government and how it is reported to listen occasionally to a Sean Spicer press conference and then look at what the media reports through their lens.
Posted by: sbw | January 30, 2017 at 02:26 PM