Let's excerpt this from Nancy Pelosi's statement condemning the violence of the antifa, operating with near impunity in her home district (my emphasis):
“In California, as across all of our great nation, we have deep reverence for the Constitutional right to peaceful dissent and free speech. Non-violence is fundamental to that right. Let us use this sad event to reaffirm that we must never fight hate with hate, and to remember the values of peace, openness and justice that represent the best of America.”
Whoa, that is quite a deviation from the left-wing talking points! Per the script, the antifa aren't haters, they are standing up to hate. Those are fists of love!
Or at least, when Sheryl Gay Stolberg of the failing NY Times made that same observation about hate on both sides she was beaten into conformity by her leftist critics on Twitter.
Her offense:
2. The hard left seemed as hate-filled as alt-right. I saw club-wielding "antifa" beating white nationalists being led out of the park 2/2
And after the crowd roared, her sprint-back:
Rethinking this. Should have said violent, not hate-filled. They were standing up to hate.
Well, maybe Nancy Pelosi will fold up like an equally cheap suitcase.
Ichi!
Posted by: daddy | August 30, 2017 at 01:18 PM
Nah, the Judge ruled it's safer if the NYT reporters stay stoopid.
Posted by: henry | August 30, 2017 at 01:21 PM
Och!
Posted by: DrJ | August 30, 2017 at 01:27 PM
Hate is a thought.
Violence is an action.
The stupid bitch must not know about STICKS and STONES......etc etc.
The LEFT (FULL COMMIE) has allowed and cheered on VIOLENCE as a means to stop THOUGHT.
Chew on that friends. The mf'ers have supported VIOLENCE as a means to shut down "HATE".
Posted by: GUS | August 30, 2017 at 01:28 PM
henry - the question of endorsing peace through violence isn't a question of legal jeopardy. It's a question of pandering jeopardy. Virtue signaling has to be "just so."
As all leftists know, one cannot "stand up to hate" and "harbor hate" at the same time.
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 01:28 PM
It all depends on the definition of "hate" doesn't it?
The press should be careful. If we adopt these new rules, I can think of a few reporters who need to be beat strongly around the head and shoulders.
Looking at you, Acosta.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 01:30 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIfpIfOWsAQR-5J.jpg
Crowd in line to get in to hear the President.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 01:31 PM
Good thing she didn't rule out fighting hate with violence. Peolisi is green-lighting antifa.
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 01:31 PM
Patriot Prayer, she's looking at you ...
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 01:35 PM
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/30/theres-a-simple-reason-women-journalists-attacked-melanias-footwear-guest-tells-tucker-theyre-harpies/?utm_source=site-share
Tammy Bruce never pulls any punches.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 01:35 PM
Milo chimes in on Lynn Yaeger, and boy, like a lot of gay guys, he is VERY good at slicing and dicing!
https://milo.yiannopoulos.net/2017/08/meet-the-vogue-writer-who-criticized-flotuss-shoes-warning-graphic/
Warning! There are pictures!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 01:41 PM
They are having a class on how to protest President Trump in Springfield today.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DIfrwkoWAAAHEr5.jpg:large
Look how they all have American flags as a disguise. Morons.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 01:49 PM
You better not make a mistake ...
Reminds me of Smothers Brothers "My Old Man's a Sailor," and the stanza that goes "My old man's a cotton pickin' finger lickin' chicken plucker, what do you think about that?"Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 01:54 PM
I feel aggressed by that nameless horror, by nyarthalop
https://althouse.blogspot.com/2017/08/which-statues-need-to-come-down-line.html
Posted by: narciso | August 30, 2017 at 02:03 PM
Cboldt from the last thread;
--The upshot of the collection, in Rakoff's terms, is that defamation requires mens rea; e.g., serious doubt the statement is true.--
Yeah, who could possibly have any doubt serious or otherwise that a loony tune leftwing nutjob started shooting people because of a political ad he probably did not even see which "targeted" several congressional districts?
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | August 30, 2017 at 02:03 PM
I love the little Hitler moustache on the thing from Vogue. I would have thought she was a bag lady if not identified.
How many nits can a nitwick pick if a nitwit could pick nits?
Posted by: matt, deplore me if you must | August 30, 2017 at 02:09 PM
The SPLC is targeting entire cities because 2 wannabe Nazis met at a diner for coffee. And SPLC's targets have actually led to real violence.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 30, 2017 at 02:10 PM
Feinstein Booed in San Francisco for Saying Trump Could Be a ‘Good President’
Posted by: Extraneus | August 30, 2017 at 02:17 PM
Overblown hype about Court scheduling oral argument in dismissal of Arpaio conviction
Judge's stuff at the link.
Etc.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 30, 2017 at 02:23 PM
Prof. Jacobson at the end:
Posted by: Extraneus | August 30, 2017 at 02:24 PM
2 wannabe Nazis *reportedly* met at a diner for coffee.
What the hell is this country coming to.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 30, 2017 at 02:27 PM
True. They say it was "confirmed." I say they should be sued.
Posted by: Extraneus | August 30, 2017 at 02:36 PM
Another SPLC fan:
BREAKING: Trump Hater Threatens to Shoot President at Austin Airport-Secret Service Investigating, “I Will Go Down in History Today”
Posted by: Extraneus | August 30, 2017 at 02:43 PM
With President Trump: Steve Mnuchin, Wilbur Ross, Linda McMahaon, Senator Blunt, Governor and Lt. Governor, and a bunch of Congressmen.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 02:44 PM
Ext, I was worried about something like that happening in this Godforsaken town.
Posted by: Porchlight | August 30, 2017 at 02:53 PM
Yes about those CIA findings
www.tabletmag.com/scroll/212105/declassified-cia-briefings-us-yom-kippur-war-israel
The left out angletons discoveries but still.
Posted by: narciso. | August 30, 2017 at 03:00 PM
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/08/29/us/volunteer-rescue-crews-hurricane-harvey-houston.html?emc=edit_th_20170830&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=51066019&referer=
One good thing about Harvey: some of these reporters get a real taste of America instead of their cartoon versions.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 03:01 PM
Nice Trump... McCaskell votes for tax reform, or your guys vote her out. (hehehe... now he can use it on McTurtle)
Posted by: henry | August 30, 2017 at 03:01 PM
Also there, Ivanka and General Kelly, whom I am beginning to think Trump likes to call General at every opportunity.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 03:06 PM
henry,
I think this is a good speech explaining the principles of the tax reforms and cuts and why it is good for workers.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 03:07 PM
Where's Cruz? Iirc his church is Second Baptist Houston - 20,000+ members.
Posted by: DebinGA | August 30, 2017 at 03:07 PM
Yes Miss M. Excellent teaching going on. MSM will call it all hate filled racism.
Posted by: henry | August 30, 2017 at 03:08 PM
BREAKING: Trump Hater Threatens to Shoot President at Austin Airport-Secret Service Investigating, “I Will Go Down
in HistoryToday” (fixed)Posted by: Momto2 | August 30, 2017 at 03:18 PM
It will be interesting to see if he gets this plan through, or the Donohue Chamber of Cronies keeps their piece of the action.
Posted by: henry | August 30, 2017 at 03:18 PM
I saw on Twitter Paul Ryan chimed in allegedly supporting it real quick.
Talk is cheap, Ryan.
Deeds, not words.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 03:20 PM
I sure Ryan has a "Better Way" to reform taxes in his pocket. One that Donohue wrote for him.
Posted by: henry | August 30, 2017 at 03:23 PM
Has RODHAM'S brother gotten the cell phone concession in Houston yet??
Posted by: GUS | August 30, 2017 at 03:27 PM
Ann Coulter on Twitter informs me that the speech is the worst and most tone-deaf Trump has ever given, and the tax reform is for Wall Street and not the middle class.
I detect a pattern here with her and the alt-right media. They have now gotten as much money as they can from naive Trump supporters, so they have decided to "convert" and fleece the left.
I am sick of these people. They don't care about anything except money and fame. Coulter is a disgrace.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 03:31 PM
Coulter is just mad she will lose her NY state/city income tax deductions from her federal returns. Move somewhere sane there slick, get out of your stupid city.
Posted by: henry | August 30, 2017 at 03:35 PM
Here are Ryan's tweets:
Paul RyanVerified account @SpeakerRyan 34m34 minutes ago
.@POTUS is absolutely right. America’s tax code is way too complicated. Congress is committed to working w/ the @WhiteHouse to simplify it.
613 replies 153 retweets 612 likes
Paul RyanVerified account @SpeakerRyan 26m26 minutes ago
This Congress and the Trump administration are in sync → Let's make sure that American companies stay, grow, and hire in America. 🇺🇸
196 replies 70 retweets 287 likes
Paul RyanVerified account @SpeakerRyan 16m16 minutes ago
Thank you, Mr. President, for calling for a level playing field for American workers & job creators. The time for major tax reform has come.
200 replies 36 retweets 167 likes
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 03:36 PM
Your (weekly-ish) George Neumayr!
https://spectator.org/the-media-any-stick-will-do-against-trump/
Posted by: lyle | August 30, 2017 at 03:40 PM
This is interesting. DDE's answer to a man who complained that Eisenhower kept a picture of REL in his office
Eisenhower
August 9, 1960
Dear Dr. Scott:
Respecting your August 1 inquiry calling attention to my often expressed admiration for General Robert E. Lee, I would say, first, that we need to understand that at the time of the War between the States the issue of secession had remained unresolved for more than 70 years. Men of probity, character, public standing and unquestioned loyalty, both North and South, had disagreed over this issue as a matter of principle from the day our Constitution was adopted.
General Robert E. Lee was, in my estimation, one of the supremely gifted men produced by our Nation. He believed unswervingly in the Constitutional validity of his cause which until 1865 was still an arguable question in America; he was a poised and inspiring leader, true to the high trust reposed in him by millions of his fellow citizens; he was thoughtful yet demanding of his officers and men, forbearing with captured enemies but ingenious, unrelenting and personally courageous in battle, and never disheartened by a reverse or obstacle. Through all his many trials, he remained selfless almost to a fault and unfailing in his faith in God. Taken altogether, he was noble as a leader and as a man, and unsullied as I read the pages of our history.
From deep conviction, I simply say this: a nation of men of Lee’s calibre would be unconquerable in spirit and soul. Indeed, to the degree that present-day American youth will strive to emulate his rare qualities, including his devotion to this land as revealed in his painstaking efforts to help heal the Nation’s wounds once the bitter struggle was over, we, in our own time of danger in a divided world, will be strengthened and our love of freedom sustained.
Such are the reasons that I proudly display the picture of this great American on my office wall.
Sincerely,
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Posted by: mike in houston | August 30, 2017 at 04:17 PM
Thanks Mike. That was wonderful. Wish I had been half that well spoken last week when I was preaching to my kids why they must not "hate" the Confederates which whose statues they had grown up, and why those who did were revealing how shallow and unread they all are.
Posted by: Old Lurker | August 30, 2017 at 04:27 PM
What do our lawyers think of this take?:
https://lawnewz.com/high-profile/not-so-fast-why-palin-could-win-on-appeal-against-the-new-york-times/
Posted by: Old Lurker | August 30, 2017 at 04:43 PM
OL here is the source of the DDE letter for your kids to read
http://www.civilwarprofiles.com/dwight-d-eisenhower-in-defense-of-robert-e-lee/
Posted by: mike in houston | August 30, 2017 at 04:45 PM
I saw on Twitter Paul Ryan chimed in allegedly supporting it real quick.
Tax reform or the assassination threat?
Posted by: Rocco | August 30, 2017 at 04:49 PM
Didn't Paul Ryan speak out often about needing to repeal Obamacare before he didn't?
Thought so.
Fem.
Posted by: Old Lurker | August 30, 2017 at 04:53 PM
Thanks Mike.
You dry?
Posted by: Old Lurker | August 30, 2017 at 04:53 PM
Old Lurker,
True. I told him that we were watching and that talking is easy; we want results. Plus no shenanigans, as we are watching.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 05:01 PM
John McNaughton paints President Trump.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMNmESpor6w&t=11s
He says this is the look he has when Fake News is at it again.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 05:03 PM
As usual, you are too polite, MM.
I would tell Ryan that he has lied through his teeth way too many times and that we are sick and tired of his using his office for his own political gains and unrealistic pipe dreams ideas of offices he might achieve, and we are sick and tired of his backstabbing our President and the MAGA Agenda, and he can take himself and his GS wifey poo and get out of town before I lock him in that house James has for creeps like him.
There. Isn't that what you meant to say?
Posted by: Old Lurker | August 30, 2017 at 05:07 PM
OL, I agree with that article and I think it clear cboldt does.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | August 30, 2017 at 05:08 PM
Thanks C. I thought you would and cboldt too. Now if we can just get TC to get on board...
Posted by: Old Lurker | August 30, 2017 at 05:09 PM
Actually, you are closer to my heart on this, Old Lurker.
It's just that I don't want the Secret Service knocking on my door. LOL!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 05:13 PM
:-) MM.
Thought so.
Posted by: Old Lurker | August 30, 2017 at 05:14 PM
OL - I thought the "Rakoff got it wrong" article is fine, meaning I agree with the author's findings that Rakoff was weighing evidence, and where he is supposed to take everything most favorable to plaintiff, he didn't.
He also added an overarching flaw, that Palin didn't name living breathing human beings - and then he concluded that even if she amended the complaint to remedy that, no jury would find for her - that the evidence pertaining to the authors conduct cannot possibly be read as reckless disregard.
Appellate courts have set up this method of dealing with first amendment cases, whereby the appellate courts MUST step into the shoes of the jury. Harte-Hanks Communs. v. Connaughton, 491 U.S. 657 (1989) is the case Rakoff cited, that deals with "willfully overlooking information."
Comical, in a way. The courts have set standards for their own conduct, and the courts can't follow their own rules.
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 05:24 PM
Thanks cboldt.
Hope she appeals.
Hope she wins.
Posted by: Old Lurker | August 30, 2017 at 05:29 PM
I am watching the Army Blackhawk guys lift up a family and their dog from a rooftop.
Mother, father, son, daughter, and Chihuahua in a carrier, lifted up in a basket.
Little girl was crying because she was afraid for the dog. All smiles when he came up.
Father was the last one up. Good job, Army!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 05:50 PM
OL - I disagree with some slop in the article's presentation. "Actual malice" is a term of art that embodies EITHER 1) knowing the statement is false or 2) reckless disregard. Finding "actual malice" does not depend on finding spite, ill will or any motive at all. At any rate, if reckless disregard is proved, that constitutes proof of actual malice. The terms are synonymous, in a way.
I think there is a fair argument that the authors knew or believed the statement was false (or did not believe it was true), but short of asking them point blank, I don't what sort of evidence would be alleged in a pleading to allow that inquiry to proceed to a jury. Maybe cite the footnote and allege that you will prove at trial that the NYT authors either read it, or knew the contents.
I'd have to study the case law and Rakoff's opinion in more detail to conjure up a summary of why Rakoff is wrong, in my own words. Sufficient to say, I think, the case should go to a jury to decide if the NYT authors are lying, at the very least.
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 05:57 PM
My take--the fact that the editorialists assumed Palin was guilty of incitement, and did not even bother to look for exonerating evidence, shows malice.
Posted by: anonamom | August 30, 2017 at 05:58 PM
Daughter just got home. She took a claim today from a business in Houston that lost 17 trucks, all flooded out.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 06:04 PM
Where did the defamatory allegation in the NYT article come from? Who is the source? The context of the Connaughton case has the reporters repeating a fact reported to them by a liar; and liability attached because the reporters deliberately avoided asking one particular witness for information. They feared that witness would contradict the juicy story.
I think the analysis changes, and the case law is "off," when the allegation comes out of the writer's own head.
Separately, I notice Rakoff's analysis on pp23-25, where there are some editorials making the same false linkage the defamatory piece does. This sets up a question I asked earlier. If all the reports in the world are false and defamatory, Rackoff's proposed test would find independent existence of the lie to work as protection for the liars. If the author of a defamatory piece can find one other liar, he's protected.
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 06:15 PM
Who runs a business and lets 17 trucks get flooded in a storm all saw coming?
Posted by: Old Lurker | August 30, 2017 at 06:26 PM
cboldt, I'd love to see a jury when Bennet testifies he didn't know that Pallin supported the candidate running against his brother.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | August 30, 2017 at 06:28 PM
A little creepy, but fascinating ...
Killer Ants Snap Their Spring-Loaded Jaws 700 Times Faster Than You Can Blink
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 06:29 PM
Clarice - I think Palin will press on. I don't see this case taking an emotional toll on her, and I would guess the legal fees are manageable at least, if not fully paid without question or concern.
Do we know where the defamatory allegation came from, in this particular piece?
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 06:33 PM
Kamela Harris aide arrested last year for claiming to run a Masonic Police Force over 3000 years old.
https://twitter.com/chiIIum/status/903011805894774796
All-righty, then.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 06:34 PM
H/T Powerline
While 10 million people live in the coastal areas hit by the brunt of the storm, only 300,000 lost electricity. The resiliency of the Texas grid has been remarkable. Partly that is the result of Texas deregulating its electricity market much more seriously than any other state, and investing well over $10 billion over the last 15 years to upgrade its transmission infrastructure.
Posted by: mike in houston | August 30, 2017 at 06:35 PM
Just got back from Regent Park, which is a theater outdoors in the center of London. We saw Jesus Christ superstar with a bunch of friends. Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice were at the performance last night, and rice has said that this addition in London is the best performance of Jesus Christ superstar that he has ever seen. As you know it was created in the 70s. It was cold cold cold and my shoes really hurt, my goodness it was spectacular. And Jesus was as good-looking as you can imagine. I've actually never seen it before but it was absolutely mind blowing in.
Posted by: Janeprobably about 10 minutes after getting there | August 30, 2017 at 07:09 PM
We leave tomorrow so I'll have no Internet for a week and therefore I won't bore you with stories that summon up the never trump angst. Hope everybody has a good week.
Posted by: Janeprobably about 10 minutes after getting there | August 30, 2017 at 07:10 PM
Jane,
Have enjoyed your reports from London. Glad you got to see the Churchill War Rooms, one of my favorite attractions in London.
Have a great cruise! You can give Kevin Williamson the raspberries from me. LOL!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 07:19 PM
Fake Science! if killer ants are biting me (or about to!) I'm not blinking - my eye are shut so tight I... they... well, anyway, they're shut real tight. No blinking involved.
Posted by: Tom Maguire | August 30, 2017 at 07:45 PM
"Will NY Times Reporter Now Correct Her Correction On Antifa and Hate?"
I'm sitting here watching Pelosi say the Antifa types are bad.
I'm telling you right now the Dems are polling this internally and it's gotta be absolutely dreadful numbers.
Posted by: Bubarooni | August 30, 2017 at 07:54 PM
Eyes closed? I'm on scan for bug spray. Chemical warfare is appropriate where killer ants are concerned. Or fire in a pinch.
Posted by: henry | August 30, 2017 at 07:56 PM
You don't need me, OL. Justices cboldt and Clarice have outvoted me!
Posted by: Thomas Collins | August 30, 2017 at 07:56 PM
Forget about the NY Times reporter. What about Romney, McCain, Flake and Ryan?
Posted by: Davod | August 30, 2017 at 08:05 PM
The War Rooms are just round the corner from 10 Downing St. Jane, you should drop by for some TEA!
Posted by: GUS | August 30, 2017 at 08:11 PM
Lived in Dallas in the early '80's. Shared a house with a bunch a dudes.
'killer ants'
Had a 'Jungle Juice' party one weekend.
The next morning I was the guy that got up early. As I was surveying the damage, I saw a bottle of white lightening that hadn't been opened.
I picked it up, walked outside and in a moment of genius, removed the top and and jammed it straight into a Fire Ant hill.
The next day they were gone.
Back then you could get, for free from the state, a white powder that was supposed to run them off but which they actually picked up and seemed to take down into the colony and eat and grow stronger.
It was one of my early lessons into doubting government is always right.
Posted by: Bubarooni | August 30, 2017 at 08:14 PM
Jesus Christ! Scroll down.
Some confusion but I think it's officially Regent's Park, planned by George IV when Prince Regent.
Posted by: Ralph L | August 30, 2017 at 08:18 PM
But those ants had one hell of a party. So drunk they couldn't find their way home.
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 08:20 PM
Bubaroni--ithey must see the death notices flashing before their eyes.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | August 30, 2017 at 08:22 PM
A college friend's parents had been Baptist missionaries in South America Guyana? (later Greneda until '81) when they had an ant problem. Authorities pooh-poohed it until finally one came out. Their entire house was covered in ants. Can't remember how they got rid of them.
Posted by: Ralph L | August 30, 2017 at 08:24 PM
Buckeye,
Mrs. H came home 2 weeks ago last night. It was a perfect day to go to Malabar Farms Restaurant. SR 603 is such a fun up and down drive. Stopped at Grandpa's Cheesebarn in Ashland on the way back for a care package.
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 30, 2017 at 08:24 PM
cboldt, my memory flickers, but I believe Krugman was the first liar about Pallin and Giffords.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | August 30, 2017 at 08:24 PM
cboldt, it's happened to me when white lightening was involved.
Posted by: Bubarooni | August 30, 2017 at 08:25 PM
I'd be willing to bet counsel for Pallin is not charging her for this service.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | August 30, 2017 at 08:25 PM
Yes comandante krugman waa the one:
https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/08/30/splc-warns-of-turmoil-and-bloodshed-with-new-map-identifying-confederate-monuments-cities-middle-schools/
What could go wrong?
Posted by: narciso. | August 30, 2017 at 08:28 PM
http://donsurber.blogspot.com/2017/08/suddenly-antifa-does-equal-nazis.html?spref=tw
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | August 30, 2017 at 08:28 PM
Clarice, come to think, it happened to me when drinking that devils brew.
Hard to fault the ants for the revelation!
Posted by: Bubarooni | August 30, 2017 at 08:28 PM
I'll never forget inviting my bro down to visit.
I said something along the lines of 'see that 2 foot tall mound. them's be fire ants. don't f*ck wif 'em.'
He, of course, walked up and kicked it.
1 minute later he was in my front yard pulling his pants off and crying.
For the record, we were laughing with him and not at him.
Posted by: Bubarooni | August 30, 2017 at 08:33 PM
Who even knew there was a monsoon in Mumbai, much less Niger:
https://mobile.twitter.com/alimhaider/status/903010680311353346?p=v
Its mostly desert. Didn't you see the opening to hitman?
Posted by: narciso. | August 30, 2017 at 08:37 PM
Back from parent indoctrination or rather parent orientation at Frederick's new school - McGann-Mercy.
mikeinHouston, Texas has its own separate grid interconnected to the NERC but it keeps its electrical grid safe and secure.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | August 30, 2017 at 08:40 PM
This is why that story has gone down the memory whole
www.elperiodico.com/es/politica/20170831/mossos-recibieron-alerta-atentado-cia-25-mayo-6255194
Posted by: narciso. | August 30, 2017 at 08:44 PM
The ewok must have had a gun pointed at him to force him to write this:
http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=371358
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 30, 2017 at 08:44 PM
"Back from parent indoctrination or rather parent orientation at Frederick's new school - McGann-Mercy."
There's a story in there JiB. Don't hold back.
I'm a bit interested as I went to one last week for my sophomore daughter at the local public high school.
Posted by: Bubarooni | August 30, 2017 at 08:47 PM
Clarice - my question wasn't first who came up with it ever. It was for purposes of that particular OpEd, where did the author get the "fact?" From testimony in the Palin v NYT case, the "fact" didn't come any of the footnoted articles - the authors did not read any of the footnoted articles, for any purpose.
Posted by: cboldt | August 30, 2017 at 08:49 PM
Has anybody mentioned that Dondi is urging people to take in Venezuelans while Pelosi Galore has denounced Antifa? Any questions about just how stupid the GOP is?
Posted by: Captain Hate | August 30, 2017 at 08:52 PM
I'm on edge, JiB.
I'm about 8 miles west of a BIG10 school and both the High Schools in that town are inhabitated by frustratred and wanna be Education Majors.
Transgender bathrooms are all the rage over there.
My daughter's Algebra II teacher still cares only about math so the infection hasn't spread west but I'm still concerned.
Posted by: Bubarooni | August 30, 2017 at 08:56 PM
Remember gotham city under bane, with scarecrow as hanging judge, that what's life is like in Venezuela now, sasse can't be bothered to give a farthing, but yes poor timing on his part.
Posted by: narciso. | August 30, 2017 at 08:57 PM
Good point, cboldt.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | August 30, 2017 at 08:58 PM