Imagine our surprise - the Hillary campaign picked up the funding for the "Trump dossier" which was a batch of stories passed along by Russian intelligence by way of Brit Christopher Steele.
So when Don Trump Jr. meets with a Russian in order to get dirt on Hillary it's "Begin impeachment hearings!". But when Team Hillary spends millions hoovering up salacious Russia dirt it's just politics as usual, move on.
Ann Althouse notes the connection to the other Russian investigation that the FBI hid from Congress because, well, other than its potential to embarrass Barack and Hillary I don't know why they hid it.
First
Posted by: maryrose | October 24, 2017 at 10:27 PM
So happy this is all coming out now.
My two month deadline has just passed.
Now for the unmaskings.
Posted by: maryrose | October 24, 2017 at 10:29 PM
I wonder who leaked this story.
Posted by: maryrose | October 24, 2017 at 10:30 PM
Per Dave Brat of the HFC, House leadership is blocking any investigation into the Uranium One Deal, the 100 million Russian quid pro quo to the Clinton Foundation or anything having to do with the Clinton's
The above was posted in a previous thread with no supporting link. I googled and binged this several times and only source was verbatim copy and paste from a comment on Ace of Spades from somebody called Kreplach.
Gloom and doom Ledgers are always asking for links from the Veranda'ers so I'd like to know where this was sourced.
Posting internet BS that agrees with your worldview does not meet JOM standards.
Rep. Devin Nunes announces investigation into Obama-era uranium deal
http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-tulare-s-rep-devin-nunes-announces-1508873578-htmlstory.html
Posted by: windansea | October 24, 2017 at 10:47 PM
I copied and pasted it because it named Brat as a source so I thought it was legit. It didn't have anything to do with whether I wanted it to be true and, since the Nunes announcement came not long after that, it obviously wasn't. I didn't feel good about being misled and sorry I ultimately did it to others. Kreplach is a regular on the AoS morning thread so I'll be sure to call him out tomorrow.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 24, 2017 at 10:59 PM
Thanks CH. I usually google anything that looks suspect to me to see where it came from. Good on you for admitting the error.
Posted by: windansea | October 24, 2017 at 11:03 PM
So no one answered my question in the last thread about what makes this shocking news, when it had been reported that the DNC was behind the dossier.
I'll answer with this comment over on Althouse:
That about does it?
Posted by: jimmyk on iPad | October 24, 2017 at 11:04 PM
Thanks to you, windandsea; I've scorched people for sketchy links before and definitely deserve my share of blame.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 24, 2017 at 11:06 PM
Hahaha. Saw this on Facebook today:
At first, they came for the Libertarians, and I cheered, because it was time that SOMEONE took care of those dope-smoking freaks. Then, they came for the NeverTrumpers, and I laughed, that would teach those fucktards the value of virtue-signaling. Then they came for me, but the concealed minefields and clearly marked fields of fire on my automatic weapons put an end to that shit tout suite. What did they expect? They had telegraphed their intentions a mile away when they went after the libertardians and the NTs.
David
Posted by: David, Internet Deplorable | October 24, 2017 at 11:06 PM
Like groundhog day, until it isnt anymore.
Posted by: narcisoyea | October 24, 2017 at 11:10 PM
From maryrose last thread;
Holy Kaboley, that may be the most anti-biblical statement I have ever read.
For starters I give you;
Romans 3:10 and 23,
Psalm 14:3 and
Jeremiah 17:9.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | October 24, 2017 at 11:11 PM
Gorka on Lou Dobbs
Hillary/Dems pulled a Tupelov with Trump dossier.
Love that guy.
Posted by: windansea | October 24, 2017 at 11:12 PM
Tout suite! Hilarious, David.
"What did they expect?";
Just a variation on "What did they think was going to happen?" :)
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | October 24, 2017 at 11:13 PM
How long has CNN and the rest of the MFM obsessed about Russian collusion to fix the election? Either they have to admit that they've spent almost a year on something that is no big whoop, and conned their viewers to believe otherwise, or they have to direct all their attention and accusations on their Clinton heroes. And admit that they were ass covering liars about Trump's accusations about being wiretapped; particularly that groveling whore Raddatz.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 24, 2017 at 11:16 PM
Holy Kaboley, that may be the most anti-biblical statement I have ever read.
I'd pretty much given up by then.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 24, 2017 at 11:18 PM
windansea! thanks, the LATimes is not my friend but I saw that the Clinton News Network had the story.
Boy, Adam Schiff (Happens-CA) is going to have a triple tantrum. I hope it's Rumpelstiltskinesque.
Posted by: Frau Grimm | October 24, 2017 at 11:19 PM
I think the spin now is RUSSIA! destabilizing our country and it isn't a partisan issue now that it quite obviously is exactly that, according to some pansy ass Dem creep on Carlson's show.
Good luck with that, buddy.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | October 24, 2017 at 11:19 PM
Iggy:
I was talking about the Republicans in the House and Senate.
I think they are good people.
Posted by: maryrose | October 24, 2017 at 11:21 PM
I am a Catholic so you will have provide quotes on those Bible references.
Posted by: maryrose | October 24, 2017 at 11:24 PM
somebody needs to ask McCranky about being Hillary's delivery boy to Comey.
Posted by: windansea | October 24, 2017 at 11:24 PM
http://dailycaller.com/2017/10/24/grassley-calls-for-special-counsel-in-uranium-one-deal/?utm_campaign=thedcmainpage&utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=Social
Grassley calls for special counsel.
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 24, 2017 at 11:26 PM
If we were in a state of sin, Jesus wouldn't have needed to redeem us, for we could never do anything on our own to be worthy. That fundamental reality is what the world fails to grasp. Furthermore it is not only our physical body that perishes but our soul must undergo judgment, except for special dispensation.
Posted by: narcisoyea | October 24, 2017 at 11:29 PM
So if Amazon UnPrime delivered this story, which could ultimately disgrace Preznit Cock Curious, who are they trying to protect? Soros?
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 24, 2017 at 11:32 PM
https://twitter.com/HuffPost/status/923023335155535875/photo/1?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=fb&utm_campaign=DanRiehl&utm_content=923023617247600640
Seems the stellar republican is a slimy tove.
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 24, 2017 at 11:32 PM
Question for JOM detectives.
USA uranium reserves are estimated at 1% of world supplies.
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/uranium-resources/supply-of-uranium.aspx
Why would Russian/Rosatom/Uranium One execs donate $145 million to Clinton Foundation to control 25% of 1 percent?
Posted by: windansea | October 24, 2017 at 11:34 PM
ChuckGrassley
@ChuckGrassley
·
1h
Whoever in DOJ is capable w authority to appoint a special counsel shld do so to investigate Uranium One "whoever" means if u aren't recused
Posted by: lurkersusie | October 24, 2017 at 11:36 PM
Do Catholics not use the same Bible that has Romans, Psalms and Jerwmiah?
Posted by: Sue | October 24, 2017 at 11:38 PM
What does "pulled a Tupelov" mean?
Remember when it was the "CIA Dossier"?
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | October 24, 2017 at 11:38 PM
What does "pulled a Tupelov" mean?
Fire a torpedo that comes back at you.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 24, 2017 at 11:44 PM
What does "pulled a Tupelov" mean?
In movie Red October, Russian sub commander Tupelov fired a torpedo that killed his own sub.
Posted by: windansea | October 24, 2017 at 11:45 PM
--I was talking about the Republicans in the House and Senate.
I think they are good people.--
That makes you a group of one. They don't even think they're good people.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | October 24, 2017 at 11:45 PM
McCain used RODHAM'S criminal and fake RUSSIAN DOSSIER, in attempt to bring down OUR PRESIDENT.
Does ANYONE REFUTE this???
What does this SAY about BENEDICT McSLIME???
Posted by: GUS | October 24, 2017 at 11:47 PM
Gosh,,how may times have I used it, shooting your foot off, with the solons shotgun.
Posted by: narcisoyea | October 24, 2017 at 11:50 PM
In the order of my comment;
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
They have all turned aside, together they have become corrupt; There is no one who does good, not even one.
The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | October 24, 2017 at 11:51 PM
My guess, CH and Windansea, is that the AoS poster mixed up names.
Here is a video of Ron DeSantis:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/10/stunning-gop-leadership-blocked-investigation-explosive-clinton-uranium-deal-evidence-video/
One could argue that when he said that previous oversight leadership blocked him he was talking about the Clinton foundation in general. That would be splitting the wrong hair IMO.
What you are hearing from him is that Chafed-Putz, the nevertrumper quiter, worked against the interests of this nation.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 24, 2017 at 11:51 PM
Lovely, kind and decent Maryrose.
I am a devout Catholic. A sinner too.
Can you give me your TAKE on John McCain's involvement and COMPLICITY in the RODHAM-RUSSIA FAKE DOSSIER and McCain's personal complicity in this BEARING OF FALSE WITNESS??
I am CATHOLIC, and I am a DEVOUT AMERICAN as well.
Both of my PARENTS are buried at ARLINGTON.
Posted by: GUS | October 24, 2017 at 11:52 PM
Thanks, I've seen that movie multiple times but I never would have figured that out.
Especially since it's Tupolev. :)
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | October 24, 2017 at 11:57 PM
Do Catholics not use the same Bible that has Romans, Psalms and Jerwmiah?
The short answer is yes. I don't know why maryrose made the comment because a Catholic site I went to after doing a Bing of "do Catholics read the Bible" emphatically answered yes, which I'd suspected.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 24, 2017 at 11:58 PM
.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 25, 2017 at 12:03 AM
Steph, PAUL RYAN as SPEAKER of the HOUSE........always.....ALWAYS......ALWAYS.....tries to PLEASE, the EXACT PEOPLE who CANNOT/WILL NOT BE PLEASED nor PLACATED.
VIRTUE SIGNALLING AS A WEAK TIT.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 12:04 AM
I’m not exactly sure but I think Catholics have the same Bible as the KJV with additional books added, not taken away. But maybe I’m wrong and it’s the other way around.
Posted by: Sue | October 25, 2017 at 12:07 AM
Perkins and Coie at the middle of this. Just like they were at the middle of the Palin saga.
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 25, 2017 at 12:07 AM
Did we ever discover what happened inthat Vegas coroners office.
Peter firth always does the dead pan,
Posted by: narcisoyea | October 25, 2017 at 12:08 AM
Books added IIRC, Sue. the Apocrypha (sp) ook of Mary and I forget what else.
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 25, 2017 at 12:09 AM
Sue, I'm no expert. I am CATHOLIC and I try my best to PRACTICE the CHURCH DOCTRINE, but I WILL ADMIT. I have a KING JAMES BIBLE, in my BRIEF CASE at all times.
Maybe I'm hedging my bets!!
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 12:09 AM
I knew I recognized that name Stephanie. Didn’t they also represent Obama’s when people were suing to see his birth certificate?
Posted by: Sue | October 25, 2017 at 12:10 AM
MARK LEVIN!!! A.k.a. OLD YELLER..... is on a ROLL tonight, in the last hour of his show.
MARK LEVIN is bombastic as HELL. He is also HONEST AS HELLLLL.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 12:11 AM
Yes they did, Anita dunn, who was advising weinstein recently, was the wife of the chief counsel bar, they provided the bulk of ethic complaint lawfare against the huntress. They even took up a gitmo detainee fromnthe Sudan
Posted by: narcisoyea | October 25, 2017 at 12:13 AM
Speaking of Amazon, does anyone else find the whole spectacle of all these cities courting Amazon for its HQ2 as unseemly as I do? It's worse than the Olympics because it's all here in the US. Over 200 "bids"--using your tax dollars of course, for the status and alleged benefits that will allegedly pay for themselves many times over, but never do.
If only one of these bids said something like: "If you locate here, we will cut our sales and property taxes by one percentage point," I would feel better about the whole thing.
Posted by: jimmyk | October 25, 2017 at 12:14 AM
Indeed they were, Sue.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 25, 2017 at 12:14 AM
So we dodged a torpedo on 08Nov16, not a bullet.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | October 25, 2017 at 12:15 AM
Hello Jimmy K. WISCONSIN Negotiated one of the BIGGGGGGEST PRO ECONOMIC DEALS in 50 years. FOXCON. BILLLLLIONS and BILLLLIONS in MERELY INITIAL ECONOMIC benefits, without regard to the MORE BILLLLLLLIONS of ancillary BENEFITS for GENERATIONS to come.
WHO IS TRYING TO IMPEDE one of the most INCREDIBLE PRO-JOB, PRO-GROWTH, PRO-AMERICAN, and PRO-FOREIGN INVESTMENT DEALS IN AMERICAN HISTORY????
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 12:20 AM
But foxconn is evil because rotating knives, or something all the outlets are still darning their sucks over fudeloflake.
Posted by: narcisoyea | October 25, 2017 at 12:21 AM
DAVE, I've said your exact words many times, since last NOVEMBER.
For the LOVE OF GOD......Imagine RODHAM has WON!!!!!!
Imagine the UNBRIDLED CORRUPTION. IT IS MIND BOGGGGGGGGGLING. Look at what the MARXITARD PARTY and the CLINTON CRIME SYNDICATE HAS DONE ALREADY.
TODAY is a HUGE day in HISTORY.
I told my son, to remember and PAY ATTENTION to the CRIMES that were EXPOSED today....
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 12:24 AM
Narciso. Did you ever hear about...THE FULL COMMIE???
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 12:26 AM
Gus, I'm listening to OL YELLER unloading on Flake and it is glorious.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 25, 2017 at 12:28 AM
Why would Russian [want] to control 25% of 1 percent?
We'll need to pay higher prices for NA-sourced U, making theirs more valuable? Also gets their hooks into Clington.
Posted by: Ralph L | October 25, 2017 at 12:29 AM
Yes, Sue and IIRC they are also the law firm that was repping Obama on his birth cert and other documents being 'unaccessible.'
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 25, 2017 at 12:29 AM
Catholics weren't allowed to read the Bible in the vernacular until when, the Counter-Reformation?
Luther's German and Wyclif's (underground) English Bibles were the driving forces of the Reformation.
Posted by: Ralph L | October 25, 2017 at 12:33 AM
Why would Russia want to control the uranium?
Before that deal we were net exporters of Uranium... now we are net importers of Uranium.
Russia has us over a barrel.
If I were Donald, I'd nullify the deal and use asset forfeiture and claw back the $$ from the Clinton's.
/donning tin foil hat
Now we know why Sessions was so gung ho for forfeiture.
/removes tin foil hat.
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 25, 2017 at 12:33 AM
Capn, I'm listening to O-Y myself. I wish I could hear his show LIVE in Wisconsin.
Flake is/was an ASS-HOLE, a relatively intelligent peep, who has any proclivity to be PATRIOTIC or is at least a smidgen INFORMED, would recognize, that
JEFF FLAKE, is a PHONY and a FUKWAD.
McCAIN, FLAKE, and CORKER....ALL BEING SELF ...............SHITCANNED.....is what DRAINING THE SWAMP entails. THE GOP ass-holes being SHITCANNED, is the EASY LIFTING. This subject is fun and interesting, but CAPN'......TOMORROW, THE REAL SHIT HITS THE FAN.
The MFM will SHIT ALL OVER THEMSELVES in PARSING and crawling over DEAD LIBTARD CAREERS.
It will be fun my friend.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 12:35 AM
Steph, you are wise. I believe a better POINT, would be.......WHY WOULD RODHAM, HOLDER et al, agree to sell URANIUM to A RUSSIAN COMPANY. And why would RUSSIAN URANIUM PEEPS, give $145,000,000 to the HILLARY CLINTON FOUNDATION, before, during, and after this URANIUM TRANSACTION? AND why would ONE of those PRINCIPLES of the RUSSIAN side of the deal, BE, a HILLARY CLINTON FOUNDATION, Board of Directors MEMBER??
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 12:43 AM
Gorka on Lou Dobbs
Hillary/Dems pulled a Tupelov with Trump dossier.
Love that guy.
Posted by: windansea | October 24, 2017 at 11:12 PM
"You arrogant ass. You've killed us!" Andrei Bonovia - First Officer of Soviet Alpha Submarine Konovalov.
We are seeing poetic justice blossom before our very eyes. Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus.
Posted by: Shirley Reynolds | October 25, 2017 at 12:44 AM
Still a lot of denial on Twitter tonight - they are falling back on GOP started the dossier so must be true meme.... we need the name of the GOP who paid for this initially! ASAP
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 25, 2017 at 12:47 AM
Thanks Gus... excellent points.
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 25, 2017 at 12:48 AM
Shirley Reynolds, I remember you!! Are you THE OMEN??
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 12:49 AM
Whenever I see the words John and Solomon in a sentence I know we're in for another round of Solyndra/fast n furious fake scandals.
These stories get the right all in a tizzy until it's discovered that they're absolute horseshit and not scandals at all and then no one seems to ever mention them again because it's just too humiliating to acknowledge you've been taken for a ride.
Here's a little experiment. I will return here in 2 weeks...say November 8th and I will ask the following question;what happened to the uranium one/Clinton dossier scandal?I will wager a fin that not a single person will answer me.
NOT A SINGLE PERSON WILL ANSWER ME.
November 8th.
Posted by: 2 minute duda | October 25, 2017 at 12:50 AM
Gus, in honor of fall weather finally here (not in the World Series @ 103) this is for you, buddy
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NNTSk8EsoAM
Nytol
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 25, 2017 at 12:51 AM
Don't call her Shirley.
Posted by: narcisoyea | October 25, 2017 at 12:53 AM
Stephanie, I am extremely LOGICAL, and I've been accused of having a photographic memory.
One year ago TODAY, Rodham over played her FAT ASS, errrr, her hand, when Donald Trump was non-committal as to whether he would ACCEPT the OUTCOME/RESULTS of the ELECTION.
RODHAM blubbered that it was HORRIFYING for TRUMP to QUESTION the SANCTITY of our DEMOCRATIC PROCESS, and ELECTION.
Doth quote the raven: ""“It was horrifying what he said,” Clinton told reporters, referring to her Republican opponent’s remark that he would keep the American public “in suspense” about whether he would question the outcome of a race that he says is rigged. “we are a country based on laws. And we’ve had hot, contested elections going back to the very beginning, but one of our hallmarks has always been that we accept the outcomes of our elections.”"
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 01:00 AM
CAPN'!!!!! I am a YOOOOOOOGE fan of THE OUTSIDERS, and EVEN MOAR SO...........THE RASPBERRIES.
Great song, by THE CHOIR. My band gigs, tomorrow night. We play POP and ROCK, we don't just go thru the motions. WE.....HIT IT.
I'm THE guitarist, AND lead singer. I ONLY GET PAID one share. NOT 2.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 01:06 AM
>>>Why would Russian/Rosatom/Uranium One execs donate $145 million to Clinton Foundation to control 25% of 1 percent?
Posted by: windansea | October 24, 2017 at 11:34 PM<<<
Posted by: rich | October 25, 2017 at 01:10 AM
dang it, that got chopped.
Access to Q level clearances. Pretty sure marrying up their access through U-1 and what they could get their hands on from the OPM breach they could have a pretty good roster for nuclear espionage.
Posted by: rich | October 25, 2017 at 01:13 AM
Welp Rick Wilson is playing his part in Animal House.
ALL IS WELL!!!
https://twitter.com/TheRickWilson/status/923024229418917888
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 25, 2017 at 01:17 AM
Rich. TOUCHE!!!!
>>>Why would Russian/Rosatom/Uranium One execs donate $145 million to Clinton Foundation to control 25% of 1 percent?
Posted by: windansea | October 24, 2017 at 11:34 PM<<<
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 01:23 AM
STEPH. I told my nearly 17 year old son, that he should PAY ATTENTION. He is living thru an EPIC SCANDAL, not ever seen here-to-fore.
WATERGATE is NOTHING compared to what YOU and I SEE AND RECOGNIZE.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 01:26 AM
I took 20 seconds, and I looked at PATTERICO.
WOW.
The #NEVER TRUMP, we'd allow our MOM and SISTERS to be raped, rather than admit that WE are WRONG.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 01:31 AM
Now that we know which dems paid for the dossier, I'd like to know who the clients of Perkins and Coie were from the republican side. The uniparty has been active for years and this firm is the intersection of it all. From Palin to Obama to Clinton scandals this firm is always lurking in the background.
Nytol.
Posted by: Stephanie Nene Not your normal Grandma | October 25, 2017 at 01:48 AM
Stephanie-
yikes on that Rick Wilson link. Doth protest to much methinks ... surprised no one there named Singer as the original funder, which leads to Sippy Rubio. He had the money, the access, and is very much anti-Trump (the congressman and senators that ride around in his vest pocket are a roster of NeverTrumpers).
He claims to be a "Republican" but supports all manner of progressive ideas. Mostly I think those mega-donors, and Wall Street generally, saw that the field was just far too crowded on the left and decided it was more worthwhile to start funding the light in the loafers right.
Posted by: rich | October 25, 2017 at 01:50 AM
Rich, you and I have respected friends and blog buddies, who STILL, don't recognize the levels of TREASON, that we are facing. Rich, I mean IN OUR FUCKING FACES this VERY EVENING.
And some of "us", still want to play NICE.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 01:58 AM
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | October 25, 2017 at 02:00 AM
PAUL RYAN: 'DREAMERS' WILL BE PART OF SPENDING BILL...
gotta keep Singer and The Gas Chamber happy.
Posted by: rich | October 25, 2017 at 02:02 AM
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 01:58 AM
that is not who we are.
Posted by: rich | October 25, 2017 at 02:03 AM
Rich, this is going to get VERY VERY interesting.
RODHAM is TOAST.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 02:17 AM
we'll see.
Posted by: rich | October 25, 2017 at 02:21 AM
whatever happened to the fbi funding it too? seems like a lock they used it for some of their FISA applications? also seems a lock that the FBI was leaking info to politico et al.
the media has got to work overtime to get a Republican name in front of all this.
Posted by: rich | October 25, 2017 at 02:25 AM
It's over RICH. It's time to unravel the OBVIOUS truth. Of course the MOTHERFUCKING MARXIST LEFT, OBAMA and RODHAM are going to LIE.
IT'S OVER.
If there is no justice HERE. We WILL have a BLOODY REVOLUTION. THERE HAS NEVER, been this level of CORRUPTION and BRIBERY, AMERICAN HISTORY.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 02:49 AM
Rich, the FBI, CIA and all "smirk" 17 agencies of INTELLIGENCE.....FUCKING....AGREED, that "RUSSIA" had INTERFERED and had "HACKED" our ELECTION!!!!!
WHAT A FUCKING PROFOUNDLY CRAPTASTIC PILE OF HORSE SHIT. WHAT KIND OF FUCKING IMBECILE BOUGHT THIS PACKAGE OF CRAP????????
THE IMBEDDED DEEP STATE, and CORRUPT MEDIA, all AGREED that RODHAM was A BEAUTIFUL PROM QUEEN.
What is STUNNNNNING TONIGHT, is that, THIS UNBIASED MEDIA CABAL hasn't committed collective SUICIDE. ZERO HONOR, ZERO PRINCIPLES, ZERO HONESTY, ZERO MORALITY, ZERO CHARACTER. The RANCID DESPOTIC, BIASED, SELF SERVING, LIBTARD, MARXIST, CLOWNISH FOOLS, are too EAR DEEP in their COLLECTIVE MIS-EDUCATION and inability to be HONEST, THAT IT IS STUNNING and SCARY.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 02:59 AM
OH DEAR, It's HARD to refute!!!
Then-Attorney General Eric Holder was among the Obama administration officials joining Hillary Clinton on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States at the time the Uranium One deal was approved. Multiple current and former government officials told The Hill they did not know whether the FBI or DOJ ever alerted committee members to the criminal activity they uncovered.
Posted by: GUS | October 25, 2017 at 03:33 AM
This appears to be the Official Leftist Feminist position paper (in the NYT) on MeAgain. Always oh so interesting to see how they "think." Will her revelation that she sent an email
to Fox executives in 2016, when O’Reilly dismissed sexual harassment allegations on air. “Perhaps he didn’t realize the kind of message his criticism sends to young women across this country about how men continue to view the issue of speaking out about sexual harassment,” Kelly wrote.is how the author puts it, not letting the readers know the context--the unsubstatiated charges against Ailles--which they so often tell us is vital as they editorialize their "news" coverage--- be enough to redeem her poisoning the American public with her years of work on Fox? Because she is why Trump is POTUS.
I kid you not.
I was there to see their front page coverage of the WaPo story on who paid for the dossier. Gosh, surprise--there isn't any!
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/24/opinion/megyn-kelly-problem.html?action=click&contentCollection=Movies&module=Trending&version=Full®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article
Posted by: anonamom | October 25, 2017 at 04:35 AM
I am a Catholic too, and this maryrose post made me LOL:
I am a Catholic so you will have provide quotes on those Bible references.
because truer words have never been written!
What a tribute to Martin Luther on the upcoming 500th anniversary of his posting of the 95 theses.
To answer CH's question "Do Catholics read the Bible?" I'd have to say just about never in 12 years of daily religion/theology classes.
Yes, yes, of course individual Catholics read the Bible; it's not a forbidden practice or anything. And we certainly hear plenty of it, with two Epistles as well as a Gospel each Sunday and holy day of obligation.
But my guess is you could ask the next 100 Catholics you run in to to recite one of the three cited lines, and maybe one could give you one of them.
My husband the heathen who took a one semester course on The Bible as Literature in his public high school (back when they were in to education) is far more familiar with the Bible than just about any Catholic my age I know, except the converts.
FTR, I do own four Bibles, and grew up with one in our living room bookcase , as well had my own since age 12.
Posted by: anonamom | October 25, 2017 at 04:57 AM
The Department of Justice needs to appoint a special counsel to investigate the Obama-era Uranium One nuclear deal, Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley said on Tuesday.
In a statement posted to Twitter Tuesday night, Grassley called on “whoever in DOJ is capable” of appointing a special counsel to do so, noting that “‘whoever’ means if [you] aren’t recused.”
OK, so here is the question. Who should be appointed? I don't want Fitz. I don't want Andy McCarthy. I don't want Preet Bahara and I don't want anyone remotely connected to the Mormon Mafia. I don't want anyone that the "top men" at the DOJ and the FBI would find acceptable because I don't trust any of the "top men" at the DOJ or the FBI. Enough of swamp critters investigating swamp critters. I want an Elliot Ness type with the least amount of ties to the Feds as possible, and if he happens to be an outsider who loathes everyone in DC and New York City that is fine by me.
Anybody got any suggestions?
Posted by: daddy on iPad | October 25, 2017 at 05:03 AM
daddy,
I think Rudy Guiliani would be good.
Interestingly, he seems to have been missing in the news for some time.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | October 25, 2017 at 05:25 AM
https://pjmedia.com/trending/protester-threw-russian-flags-trump-longtime-dem-political-operative-ryan-clayton/
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | October 25, 2017 at 05:40 AM
Works for me Miss M!
Posted by: daddy | October 25, 2017 at 05:42 AM
The JFK papers will be released tomorrow, and President Trump will be in Dallas for a fundraiser.
Boy, that is either ultimate trolling or bizarre coincidence.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | October 25, 2017 at 05:48 AM
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5011759/The-unique-anatomy-374-million-year-old-tree.html?ito=social-twitter_mailonline
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | October 25, 2017 at 05:50 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/24/connecticuts-capital-faces-fiscal-meltdown-tied-to-union-promises-default-deemed-likely.html?cq_ck=1508874165449
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | October 25, 2017 at 05:53 AM
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-after-trump-dossier-revelation-fbi-is-next/article/2638540
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | October 25, 2017 at 05:54 AM
Oops. Looks like President Trump will be in Dallas today, not tomorrow.
Dallas, TX -Briefing on Hurricane Recovery Efforts. Roundtable with RNC supporters. Remarks at a Dallas Trump Victory Reception.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | October 25, 2017 at 05:56 AM