There are partisans on both sides of the gun control screaming match that rely on hyperbolic rhetoric to rouse their donors. To pick an example seemingly at random, people like Hillary Clinton will prefer to pander rather than lead.
However, I am feeling a mad surge of optimism today. From the right, let me single out Dan McLaughlin as a hard-headed righty who is surely not a reflexive gun grabber yet seems to be fed up with the current non-debate (OK, that may be me projecting...). A snippet:
There are only easy answers if you are willing to sacrifice rights you don't care about, and that other people do. That's never been a solution Americans could pursue without embarrassment and regret. Unless and until we can find a better, more reliable way to identify potential mass shooters early, we have to acknowledge the nature of the choice before us: Punish many innocent people or remain mostly defenseless against the malicious few.
Nobody wants to make one side of that trade. But nobody wants to face the other side either.
And on the left, Nick Kristof recycles a column where he tried to actually talk a bit of sense into his fellow lefties. Let me extract this:
Frankly, liberal opposition to guns has often been ineffective, and sometimes counterproductive. The 10-year ban on assault weapons accomplished little, partly because definitions were about cosmetic features like bayonet mounts (and partly because even before the ban, such guns were used in only 2 percent of crimes).
Whoa, say what?!? Normally libs are eager to parade their utter lack of knowledge of guns by railing about an assault weapons ban as the first order of business. That does not generally lead to a calm and productive discussion. On the other hand, the Washington Post shows signs that they are not afraid of the truth on gun control, which is a hopeful sign.
In any case, I would like to see Messrs. McLaughlin and Kristof co-chair a Pundits Panel on gun control. Their chief of staff can be Leah Libresco, author of "I used to think gun control was the answer. My research told me otherwise."
My hope is that we can move beyond the famous Onion headline:
No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens
A valuable suggestion: The WaPo has an article on Red Flag Laws. Sadly, a key source is the not-trustworthy Everytown site, but still, the idea can be examined independently. From the WaPo:
Five states allow guns to be seized before someone can commit violence
In the wake of massacres like Wednesday’s school shooting in Parkland, Fla., a small number of states have passed “red flag laws” that allow the seizure of guns before people can commit acts of violence.
California, Washington, Oregon, Indiana and Connecticut have statutes that can be used to temporarily take guns away from people whom a judge deems a threat to themselves or others. Lawmakers in 18 other states — including Florida — plus the District of Columbia have proposed similar measures. At the federal level, California lawmakers Rep. Salud Carbajal (D) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D) introduced legislation last May that would encourage states to adopt the approach.
Mental illness, escalating threats, substance abuse and domestic violence are among the circumstances in which a judge can order weapon restrictions under the laws.
That is a court-supervised process that could be effective while preserving due process rights, unlike the absurd proposals to expand the role of the No Fly list to become a No Buy list as well.
Some of the other Kristof suggestions, such as raising the legal gun purchase age to 21, as with cigarettes and alcohol, don't faze me. I should add that he notes domestic violence restraining orders but does not expand on that to pick up the Red Flag Laws. I have no doubt he would support it, however, and yes, that gives me pause.
In any case, there are some positive steps we could take that might improve our national record on gun violence while respecting (but slightly rebalancing, under court supervision) our right of self defense. And as a matter of pure politics it might behoove the Republicans to put forward some ideas of their own rather than simply knock down the stupider ideas from the other side.
Connecticut is one of the five states with a Red Flag law. Their law, passed in 1999, did not prevent Adam Lanza of Sandy Hook horror, but with a different "See something, say something" social norm, who can say? In any case, here is a Duke study on the impact of that law.
For those who can separate citations from the source, here is an Everytown article with lots of footnotes on Red Flag laws. Distrust but verify!
"Cruz, Rubio , Graham, also campaigned against Trump during the election process.
Should we ban them from politics as well?
If I could, I would lock them up on Elba in a heartbeat.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 03:02 PM
Rand Paul campaigned against Donald Trump as well.He disagrees with him from time and was beat up on his front lawn forit.
Shall we ban Murkowski and Collins as well.
They don’t walk in lock step so off with their heads.
Seriously ,President has persuaded many including Corker who was Darth Vader here a few weeks ago.
He can persuade Mitt to see the light on his policies.
It is his secret skill.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:04 PM
Is the solution to get rid of all the duly elected senators who disagree with President Trump even in the slightest because that is not what is done?
I don't think I implied anything like that. Occasional disagreement on narrow issues is not inconsistent with overall strong support for the administration.
I do think that Rs in Congress should be cautious about going against Trump for the sake of the '18 and '20 elections. Trump not being able to get his agenda through would be a big problem.
Posted by: jimmyk | February 16, 2018 at 03:06 PM
OL:
Unfortunately, you live in the wrong state in order to vote them out of office.
Only their constituents can do that.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:06 PM
Tell me the truth.
Are any guys here more upset by this headline "Ronan Farrow’s latest report accuses Trump of affair with former Playboy Playmate"
Than last weeks story about the affair between an 18 year old male and his beautiful 21 year old coach?
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 03:08 PM
Jimmyk:
I agree.
I honestly feel people are pre- judging Romney and don’t like him because he wasn’t a pro- Trumper.
At some point I feel we have to let President Trump win him over and I think he will vote the right way in support of the Republican agenda.
Others disagree but I think we have to wait and see.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:09 PM
Rand Paul campaigned against Donald Trump as well.He disagrees with him from time and was beat up on his front lawn forit.
That's not why he was attacked.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 16, 2018 at 03:09 PM
As I recall, Romney has been commenting against the Trump administration since the inauguration.
Posted by: Davod | February 16, 2018 at 03:10 PM
This is another Playboy Playmate that Trump is supposed to have had an affair with.

In my next life I wanna' come back as Donald Trump.
Posted by: daddy | February 16, 2018 at 03:10 PM
OL:
I am going out on a limb here in stating that the words Romney and Playboy bunny would probably not appear in any publication, but I could be wrong.
When you saw that what was your reaction?
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:11 PM
His domestic policies would lead to recession. His foreign policies would make America and the world less safe. He has neither the temperament nor the judgment to be president. And his personal qualities would mean that America would cease to be a shining city
Congressman Mo Brooks of Alabama is a Tea Party conservative who was originally opposed to Trump claiming he wasn't a real conservative. He made similar statements like what Romney has said during the GOP primaries.
During the Alabama Senate special election Luther Strange ran countless ads of audio/video of Brooks making similar anti-Trump statements. They were very effective causing a lot of Trump supporters to abandon Brooks to vote for Roy Moore or Strange instead.
Hopefully that will be the case in Utah as well.
Posted by: Tom R | February 16, 2018 at 03:11 PM
I never said 'ban', maryrose - don't misrepresent my comment. I said he should remove himself. Big damned difference.
Cruz, Rubio, and Graham were candidates in 2016, unlike Romney. They've also eliminated themselves from any shot at the presidency. Cruz has rehabilitated himself a good bit since then; Rubio and Graham continue to be jokes...
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 16, 2018 at 03:11 PM
Maryrose. It is not a matter of banning Romney from politics. Being honest about Romney's animosity towards Trump and the deplorables is.
Posted by: Davod | February 16, 2018 at 03:13 PM
At least we now have a POTUS who gets hawt chicks .... instead of WHATEVER Michael/Michelle Robinson was. LOL
Posted by: fdcol63 🇺🇸 | February 16, 2018 at 03:13 PM
Maryrose, with the long record we have with Romney, the last thing we are doing is pre-judging him.
wiki: "A scorpion asks a frog to carry it across a river. The frog hesitates, afraid of being stung, but the scorpion argues that if it did so, they would both drown. Considering this, the frog agrees, but midway across the river the scorpion does indeed sting the frog, dooming them both. When the frog asks the scorpion why, the scorpion replies that it was in its nature to do so."
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 03:13 PM
I read the NYT article about the Senate vote. Besides the obvious slant on the substance, it said 60 votes were needed to open debate. This was on the front page. Ben Rhodes was right.
Posted by: Ralph L | February 16, 2018 at 03:15 PM
'...people are pre- judging Romney and don’t like him because he wasn’t a pro- Trumper.'
Hahahahahahahahaha!!
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 16, 2018 at 03:15 PM
TomR:
And that proved an effective strategy by Luther Strange didn’t it?
He ended up losing his Senate seat.
We need smarter people than that.
Remember I was a pro Moore supporter and still believe he was railroaded.
Romney was cheated out of the presidency by lying Obama and his Fake Benghazi video story and persecution of the Tea Party as well as fraud in Florida.In my opinion he deserves this chance in Utah.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:15 PM
Beasts:
Don’t understand why you are laughing?
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:16 PM
What is wrong with Playboy Bunnies?
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 03:16 PM
Old Lurker. I didn't realize Wikki was so mainstream that you can go to it for the parable of the scorpion and the frog.
Posted by: Davod | February 16, 2018 at 03:19 PM
"Romney was cheated out of the presidency "
Mitt and Hillary.
Sittin in a tree...
K I S S I N G
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 03:19 PM
Shep is salivating as Catherine Herridge gives her take on the Russians indicted:
Herridge: ...Based on my experience an indictment like this really has two functions. One, it puts out into the Public Square information that every American can read and make their own decision about what happened in the 2016 Election, that there was sufficient evidence to bring criminal charges, and if they ever are indicted, which seems entirely unlikely, at least there would be a platform to bring charges against them, Shep.
Shep Smith: You asked about that, because extradition you know, it's out there.
Herridge:We're still waiting for Edward Snowden. Right? (Smiles)
Shep: Yeah. (Doesn't smile) So it's not as if you can just get them.
Posted by: daddy | February 16, 2018 at 03:19 PM
I don't know how Romney comes up so often in conversation around here.
I voted for Romney twice in primaries and once in a general.
I'm done with preachy choir boys who are afraid to scuff their knuckles.
If others like that type there's nothing wrong with that.
It doesn't make Mitt impervious to criticism.
Posted by: Bubarooni | February 16, 2018 at 03:20 PM
What is wrong with Playboy Bunnies?
Who are they flirting with, Dow Jones?
Posted by: Ralph L | February 16, 2018 at 03:20 PM
Romney has rehabbed himself as well in my opinion.Many here still hate Cruz and will never forgive him.
I believe in second chances for people.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:20 PM
slick, huh, Davod? It was a lot faster than writing it out from memory.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 03:20 PM
Not saying I could be bribed,OL, but someone might show the beautiful and gracious Mrs OL your posts otherwise.
Posted by: clarice | February 16, 2018 at 03:20 PM
There has been a tidal wave of mud thrown at Trump this week.
In the meantime Mueller just came up 2's and 12's on the Russia investigation and we are now up to a dozen FBI/DoJ officials who have been disciplined related to that "nothingburger" memo.
Once again we find the FBI falling down on their primary job, keeping the American people safe from criminals.
And the Left is silent.
Posted by: matt - deplore me if you must | February 16, 2018 at 03:21 PM
"Romney was cheated out of the presidency by lying Obama and his Fake Benghazi video story and persecution of the Tea Party as well as fraud in Florida."
Based upon what we are finding aout the 2016 election -You might want to add manipulation by the FBI and US intelligence services.
Posted by: Davod | February 16, 2018 at 03:21 PM
Bubsrooni:
MM posts every negative article about Romney she can find. Then we comment.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:22 PM
Davod:
Duly noted, thank you.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:22 PM
Cruz, Rubio , Graham, also campaigned against Trump during the election process.
Should we ban them from politics as well?
They campaigned against him in the primaries. That’s what they were supposed to do.
Romney (and the rest of the nevertrunpers) campaigned against him after he became the nominee and the only other choice was Hillary. He (and they) need to begin with groveling apologies before I have the slightest interest in listening to anything they say, let alone supporting them in their own future campaigns.
Posted by: James D. | February 16, 2018 at 03:23 PM
Clarice "Not saying I could be bribed,OL, but someone might show the beautiful and gracious Mrs OL your posts otherwise."
So if I buy her a Thermomix I can keep posting?
:-)
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 03:23 PM
Trump is banging more hot chicks than I am. What a jerk...
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 16, 2018 at 03:24 PM
Extradition? Would election fraud (what is fraud) be covered under the extradition agreement with Russia. If so, the Russians might want to seek extradition of Soros, and many in the Obama State Department.
Posted by: Davod | February 16, 2018 at 03:25 PM
Matt:
Excellent post as always!
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:25 PM
So the Russians are accused of running their own Operation Chaos?
Posted by: Extraneus | February 16, 2018 at 03:25 PM
At some point I feel we have to let President Trump win him over
Doesn't that seem a bit presumptuous for a loser to expect from a winner?
Posted by: jimmyk | February 16, 2018 at 03:28 PM
and another thing with the foreign influence crap..
Candidate Obama went & CAMPAIGNED in Berlin, Germany & the MFM wet themselves in their euphoria.
Posted by: Janet 🚬 - I wish my family had a poncho | February 16, 2018 at 03:28 PM
PS. Extradition of US State Dept. officials by Albania, Macedonia, UK, Israel, Honduras...for electioneering.
Posted by: Davod | February 16, 2018 at 03:30 PM
Our paper reported that Doug Jones raised almost $21M dollars to help with his and McTurtle's campaign to defeat Moore; who relatively raised a paltry $5M. The dems can't continue that 4:1 ratio across the senate races in 2018. Just sayin'...
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 16, 2018 at 03:31 PM
Here's some bad news I have to announce.
Google images has changed their access to images. Prior to last week I could go to images lets say of Trump and this Playboy Model and up would pop a pic and if I did not like the size I could select an option that would give me different sizes of the image and I also had the option of selecting similar images, showing Trump and the Playboy Model in a slightly different pose or setting.
Well Google has eliminated those very helpful functions so now I am only shown one picture, and I can no longer access any other sizes of the image nor can I click on similar images. Those functions have been deleted, thus making my ability to post pics whenever I get that wild hair up my rear-end now much more difficult.
Some JOMer's I suspect will cheer this news, tho' I am certain at least a few here will join me in being bummed:(

Crow: That blows!
Joel: Life sucks!
Tom Servo: JOM'll never be the same:(
Posted by: daddy | February 16, 2018 at 03:31 PM
Cock Curious and the Beast ineffectively worked against Putin's election. Having them in the Gulag would be a fair way to reciprocate Mueller's fishing trip.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 16, 2018 at 03:33 PM
maryrose, you are being obtuse.
Romney didn't "disagree" with the candidate---he failed to support the duly nominated candidate of the party. He disparaged him after the Access tape was released. He too would have allowed for HRC to be elected.
That says it all. He's finished with being able to represent the party. Period.
Maybe you can grasp it if you think of it as a mortal sin--because it is, in equivalency.
And you well know it's not because there are Trump Cultists here--but because of the irreparable damage electing HRC would have done to this country.
Posted by: anonamom | February 16, 2018 at 03:33 PM
I bet the Democrats will use Mueller's indictments against Russian propaganda bots as an excuse to say they were duped and that is why they got the FISA warrant on Page so they could in turn spy on Trump.
Posted by: Tom R | February 16, 2018 at 03:34 PM
Thank you, Google.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 16, 2018 at 03:35 PM
I didn't quite put it that way,OL--but. And you can get a travel kit so you can take it easily back and forth from Nantucket..Think how easily you can make nutritious food for the kiddies.
Posted by: clarice | February 16, 2018 at 03:36 PM
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-16/doj-complaint-russians-organized-rally-called-trump-not-my-president
Posted by: Extraneus | February 16, 2018 at 03:36 PM
This was linked at Lucianne:
Quick thinking Junior ROTC bravely covered almost 70 students with bulletproof Kevlar sheets during the deadly Florida school shooting.
After hearing seven shots Colton Haab, 17, ushered pupils into a training room
He covered his fellow pupils with Kevlar sheet to hide them from the gunman.
Haab was ready to attack the gunman should he enter the room, but he never did.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5399439/Student-covered-pupils-Kevlar-Florida-attack.html?ICO=most_read_module&mrn_rm=als1
Posted by: Davod | February 16, 2018 at 03:38 PM
Anonamom:
Do you have proof that Romney voted for Hillary?
Don’t appreciate being called obtuse.
Did I miss the detente achieved between President Trump and Romney and the dinner they shared together.
I bet Romney spent the entire evening trashing Trump to his face.
Let go of the past people.
It is truly liberating when you do.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:40 PM
Though for the record, if Romney is nominated, I shall support the duly nominated R candidate over the D!
Posted by: anonamom | February 16, 2018 at 03:42 PM
MM wants a groveling mea culpa from Romney and nothing less.
That’s as misrepresenting as Romney was on immigration.
As far as Trump or Congress, we certainly don’t want a senator who can’t speak clearly and concisely, do we.
Romney comes across to me like a Me-First professional politician and God knows, after McCain, Flake, Collins, and so many others, we do not need another so cognizant of the 51-49 split.
Posted by: sbw | February 16, 2018 at 03:44 PM
Is Vincente FOX.........colluding with Pelosi Galore to interfere with our ELECTIONS.
Has MUELLER decided that ONLY RUSSIANS can DO THAT??? Btw. Vincente "not LOMBARDI" Fox, went to High School here in Wisconsin.
Posted by: GUS | February 16, 2018 at 03:45 PM
That argument could cost me $$$, Clarice.
Then YL would want one so you know who gets to buy that one.
Then YL2 will say, but I like cooking more than my sister does, so...
Then Mrs. OL will say "I hate taking it back and forth to Nantucket (just as she did with our coffee machine) so..."
Then POOF. I have to buy FOUR of them.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 03:45 PM
Anonamom:
Sorry only a venial sin in my book, entirely forgivable.
On a par with Cruz’s comment of vote your conscience at the convention.
Basically I want Justice for Romney after collusion with Media, Crowley and Obama.
I also believe has good ideas and experience to do the job.
I stand alone but that is how I roll.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:45 PM
"Thank you, Google.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 16, 2018 at 03:35 PM"
Hah!
Posted by: boatbuilder | February 16, 2018 at 03:46 PM
"Let go of the past people."
I am having trouble typing while shaking with laughter. Without going into an extended rant, I will say look to the Tea Party and 2010. The ROPe campaigned on the Tea Party platform and laughed about the fools who believed them - afterwards.
Posted by: Davod | February 16, 2018 at 03:46 PM
OL:
Then now is the time to buy with the special deal and all.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:46 PM
"I also believe has good ideas"
List three, please.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 03:47 PM
I would lose a lot of money playing poker with Andy McCarthy. I would simply be unable to believe that he could be as mind-numbingly obtuse as he apparently is.
Posted by: boatbuilder | February 16, 2018 at 03:48 PM
Nothing wrong with that,OL. It' called the Bimby in Italy where it's considered the most desired wedding gift and was created abut 50 years ago when Italian women contacted Vorwerk and begged them to make something they could easily make baby food with. It quickly expanded to Michelin chefs' kitchens who loved how easily they could make sauces and purees with and now it does practically everything but bake, broil or deep fry.
Posted by: clarice | February 16, 2018 at 03:49 PM
Trump supporters marching in NEW York City!
Posted by: daddy | February 16, 2018 at 03:49 PM
'Then POOF. I have to buy FOUR of them.'
Just as Clarice intended. :)
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 16, 2018 at 03:51 PM
WHAT negative articles? I posted ONE comment from Twitter and then left my own opinion!
maryrose, You are one who supports all Republicans no matter what stuff they have pulled. I am not like that. If Romney had been running against Trump in the primaries, like Cruz, it would be one thing. But he said that stuff AFTER Trump secured the nomination!
I had about all I could take of that "he's a phony, he's a fraud" clip during the election, because everyone like Shep Smith played it all the time, it was in dem ads on the radio here, and it drove me absolutely nuts.
THAT is why I want Romney to publicly come out in support of the President and say he was wrong. I bet people would feel better about him if he did. Right now, all I see is someone angling to get to DC so that he can undermine the President.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | February 16, 2018 at 03:51 PM
Personally, I think Romney thinks a great deal more of himself and his chances on the national stage than I do.
Posted by: clarice | February 16, 2018 at 03:53 PM
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/russia-rejects-absurd-us-charges-of-election-manipulation/article/2649333
Posted by: Extraneus | February 16, 2018 at 03:53 PM
So you mean there's still a chance for extradition?
Posted by: Extraneus | February 16, 2018 at 03:55 PM
SBW:
See MM ‘s post above where she specifically uses the word grovel.You may not want Romney but I believe he will be the next senator from Utah.
I could be wrong but Repubs like that leader in Utah forming a circular firing squad isn’t helpful, but that is what Repubs do.. sabotage themselves.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 03:55 PM
And run for president in 2020, Miss Marple.
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 16, 2018 at 03:56 PM
OL, you know better than to call for incarceration of Elba--not escape-proof, as Waterloo shows. What's needed instead is putting them all on St. Helena. Penguins are cute! Global warming won't bother anyone! Plenty of time to write memoirs, mo' and mo' memoirs!
Posted by: Catsmeat | February 16, 2018 at 03:56 PM
George Romney, father of Willard, campaigned against Reagan and Goldwater.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 16, 2018 at 03:57 PM
If Russia was so influential why did Dem. activist groups have to plant Russian flags at conservative events?
Russians sure did a lousy job, unless they hired the Dems to do their bidding.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/321138-two-progressive-activists-were-behind-trump-russian-flag-prank
Posted by: Janet 🚬 - I wish my family had a poncho | February 16, 2018 at 03:58 PM
If we look at Romney with the eyes of Robert Mueller, then Maryrose is completely correct---Romney's vocal condemnation and demonstrated lack of support for Trump translated thru Mueller means that just like the Russian dupes marching down Fifth Avenue screaming for Trump to go to Hell is actually a huge call for supporting Trump as President.
Thanks Mitt, keep it up. Love, Donald Trump.
Posted by: daddy | February 16, 2018 at 03:59 PM
Clarice:
You could be right and the voters of Utah will decide.
MM :
I am not going to argue the point.
I can point to countless other threads where Romney is trashed by one and all.
We disagree.
I can leave it at that.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 04:00 PM
"...that is what Repubs do.. sabotage themselves."
Yeah--Mitt tried. Didn't work.
Posted by: boatbuilder | February 16, 2018 at 04:01 PM
Thanks Catsmeat exactly so. I did mix up my resort getaways.
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 04:01 PM
Without going into an extended rant, I will say look to the Tea Party and 2010. The ROPe campaigned on the Tea Party platform and laughed about the fools who believed them - afterward
That's when my eyes were forced wide open.
Posted by: Captain Hate | February 16, 2018 at 04:01 PM
"That's when my eyes were forced wide open."
Pretty much when my own needle moved from "wary" to "hate".
Posted by: Old Lurker | February 16, 2018 at 04:05 PM
'See MM ‘s post above where she specifically uses the word grovel.'
Not seeing any such comment.
Posted by: Beasts of England | February 16, 2018 at 04:07 PM
Captain:
The sins of the father must naturally fall down to the son.
Sorry, no sale.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 04:10 PM
Tell me the truth.
Are any guys here more upset by this headline "Ronan Farrow’s latest report accuses Trump of affair with former Playboy Playmate"
Than last weeks story about the affair between an 18 year old male and his beautiful 21 year old coach?
I am only upset that it wasn't me in either case:)
In my day, the 18 year old would have been elevated to hero status!
Posted by: Buckeye | February 16, 2018 at 04:12 PM
Boatbuilder:
They may try to sabotage Mitt but history has proven that doesn’t always work.
Posted by: maryrose | February 16, 2018 at 04:12 PM
I'd like for someone to ask Romney who he voted for in the 2016 election. I think I know but I'd give him the benefit of doubt if I'm wrong.
Posted by: Extraneus | February 16, 2018 at 04:15 PM
I would bet cash money he wants to do just that, Beasts. He is one who considers himself a TRUE Republican, not like that upstart from Queens.
I have had enough of this. I thought the idea of a political party was to be a team player, not to just suck up donation money and then fight against what the voters want in order to advance your own agenda.
Mitt supports free trade and probably wants to stay in NAFTA. He has zero knowledge of blue collar workers and the true middle class. His money as made in iffy Wall Street deals.
So no, I am not exactly thrilled with him. And yes, I DO want him to grovel a bit - maybe not outright but at least show a little humility.
And that dinner they had at Trump Tower was when Romney thought he was in the running for Secretary of State.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | February 16, 2018 at 04:18 PM
Romney has had a serious case of butt hurt ever since Trump told him "no fucking way" he was going to make him SoS.
Petulant asshole.
He will get elected, and he will be a pain in the ass, not just for Trump.
Posted by: Buckeye | February 16, 2018 at 04:18 PM
DiGenova says the collusion fantasy is over.
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/former-prosecutor-on-collusion-narrative-its-over/
Posted by: Extraneus | February 16, 2018 at 04:18 PM
Maybe polenta is more a regional thing...
Interesting -- when I saw one, the first thing that popped into my head was polenta. My nonno rigged up a crank-and-paddle gizmo to make polenta in a pot on the stove.Posted by: cathyf | February 16, 2018 at 04:19 PM
Here's McCarthy on FOX Business 2 minutes ago. Fox Host David reads the big sentence that stood out to him in the just released 37 page indictment of Russians that just came out
FOX Host David: Let me just read it to you: "Some defendants, posing as US persons and without revealing their Russian association, communicated with unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign and with other political activists to seek and to coordinate political activities." "Unwitting individuals", Andy, to me that seems to mean no Americans committed a crime here.
McCarthy: Yeah, I think that's not only what it means David, I think it's also what Deputy AG Rosenstein stressed in his remarks at the Press Conference. It seems to me that this shows that there's no Collusion, not that that's surprising at this point, on at least 2 levels. One is, if they had to talk to American's unwittingly obviously the Americans who were connected to the Trump Campaign did not know that they were dealing with Russians, but more to the point, if there had been a pipeline of corrupt conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and the Kremlin then the Russians would not have had to dupe Campaign Officials, whether they were Trump Officials or anyone else into what they were trying to accomplish. That would have been an open pipeline of assistance.
Posted by: daddy | February 16, 2018 at 04:19 PM
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/374288-mueller-probe-into-possible-collusion-ongoing-report
I know you aren't supposed to assume but after today's indictment of 13 Russian propaganda trolls, if they were formally colluding with the Trump campaign to help him win isn't it safe to assume that information would have been leaked to the leftwing media a long time ago?
Assuming the absence of damaging leaks means there is still no evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russian government, how long will Mueller be allowed to keep the investigation going?
Posted by: Tom R | February 16, 2018 at 04:20 PM
I don't care about Ronan Farrow's article.
8 years of Bill Clinton taught me that it doesn't matter.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | February 16, 2018 at 04:20 PM
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump
Russia started their anti-US campaign in 2014, long before I announced that I would run for President. The results of the election were not impacted. The Trump campaign did nothing wrong - no collusion!
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | February 16, 2018 at 04:23 PM
The FBI guy at the FL school shooting presser is in CYA mode. Bigly. All of his agents in the Miami field office could be making more money in the private sector. That is an odd thing to say.
Posted by: Marlene | February 16, 2018 at 04:28 PM
TheLastRefuge
@TheLastRefuge2
13m13 minutes ago
I strongly recommend anyone interested to read the actual Robert Mueller indictment details. This is nothing more than manufacturing an "illusion of action" to justify an investigation.
=================================
I strongly agree with Sundance on this.
Posted by: Miss Marple the Deplorable | February 16, 2018 at 04:28 PM
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/16/asst-attorney-general-rod-rosenstein-announces-robert-muellers-russian-election-interference-indictments/
Posted by: clarice | February 16, 2018 at 04:31 PM
Host David: Is it vital for Americans to find out which Americans associated with the Trump Campaign were the unwitting participants of this?
McCarthy: Well, we'll have to see where this goes. My own view of it, FWIW, is I really don't understand what they are doing here. It seems to me that they have filed what ostensively is a Political Document, because everybody knows that there is not a chance that we are going to get any of the Russians into an American Courtroom for a Trial. What's implicated here is a lot of activity that Americans engage in, and a lot of activity that our Government and Representatives of our Government engage in in the world in order to try to influence events in other countries, and it just seems to me that if, as the Justice Department has said, the Russians are engaged in Information Warfare, it doesn't seem to me that the Criminal Justice System is the way that you respond when a country is engaging in Warfare against you. That seems like a Political and a Diplomatic issue, and by making it into a Criminal issue we at least provoke the possibility that other countries are going to act in kind against us.
Posted by: daddy | February 16, 2018 at 04:31 PM
Marlene, yeah--they could put on their resumes what a great job they did with Cruz.
Posted by: clarice | February 16, 2018 at 04:32 PM
As Jimmyk said before what did the Russians do differently than what Obama did to Netanyahu in Israel election. Why is his meddling and using US taxpayer $$ to oppose Netanyahu less offensive than what the Russians did.?
Posted by: simply stupid | February 16, 2018 at 04:33 PM
Maryrose did you watch the Romney video and Utah values . It was a dig at Trumpo on immigration and he is part of the chambers of commerce who want cheap illegal immigrants even though he played loose with the legal and illegal immigration in the video.
Also he was main behind the scenesof Evan McMullin who was with McCain in Syria a bunch of vipers if you ask me.
Posted by: simply stupid | February 16, 2018 at 04:36 PM
"George Romney, father of Willard, campaigned against Reagan and Goldwater."
Let go of the past, people.
Posted by: Davod | February 16, 2018 at 04:38 PM