The NY Times has an interesting story about a Missouri Democrat's attempt to bring her party's activist base home to the notion that the state is too conservative for the hard-line stance of the Democratic Party.
It went about as you might expect - being right is more important to the progressives than actually winning elections.
The pro-life Democrat:
She worried that the Democratic Party had moved too far left on abortion. Gone were the days when the party, under President Bill Clinton, called for abortion to be “safe, legal and rare.” She also noticed fellow Democrats showing contempt for her when they learned her stance on abortion.
...
On June 30, when dozens of Democratic State Committee members gathered in a university conference room in Jefferson City to vote on the new platform, Ms. Barry nervously introduced her plank. It said that the party recognized “the diversity of views” on abortion and “we welcome into our ranks all Missourians who may hold different positions on this issue.”
(Full text is here.)
The pro-choice pushback:
“My stomach dropped,” said Ms. Merritt, who had agreed to join the committee after the party’s steep losses of 2016, thinking she needed to do more than criticize from the sidelines.
In her view, Missouri Democrats needed more progressive politics, not less.
“I don’t understand Democrats who quote Truman and F.D.R. and then act like they are terrified to run as an actual Democrat,” said Ms. Merritt, 45, who lives in St. Louis. “You have to believe in something in order for somebody to believe in you. You can’t be such a watered-down thing.”
The fight over abortion in the party, she said, epitomized that. So she sprang into action, talking on Facebook and Twitter with hundreds of angry progressives, some of whom were threatening to stop their donations, calling her fellow committee members, and ultimately the party’s chairman.
“I felt horrified that someone would associate me with that bizarre, regressive anti-woman language,” she said.
The party was trying to placate people who opposed abortion at the very moment that abortion was most under threat, Ms. Merritt said. Days before the vote, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy had announced his retirement and the court had backed anti-abortion pregnancy centers. Missouri, one of the most restrictive states in the country, is now down to one abortion clinic.
“The last thing we needed was for that language to linger,” she said of the plank. “It was a foul stench that needed to be addressed sooner rather than later.”
"Foul stench". Let's pencil her in as "Maybe not open for a calm discussion".
Finally, words of wisdom from an older Democrat about the benefits of compromising:
That is simply savvy politics [referring to Sen. McCaskill ducking the issue during her campaign], said Christopher Kelly, a retired judge from Columbia who served nine terms in the Legislature, several with Ms. McCaskill. He said Ms. McCaskill has a near perfect Democratic voting record on abortion, and believes the struggle points to a larger problem among young progressives.
“They operate in this fantasy,” he said, “that we’re going to have a political renaissance or enlightenment, where everyone is going to decide that their ideas — the ideas of the lefties — are now their ideas.”
He added: “You will not win seats, because even though people might agree with you on some of the issues, you will scare them away. You will seem alien to them.”
He said history does not support the claim that more anti-abortion Democrats in the Legislature translates to less abortion rights. Many of the restrictions have come more recently, he said, since Republicans have gained the majority.
“When you become contemptuous of conservative Democrats, you promote the election of their opponents,” said Mr. Kelly, who believes it was a mistake to scrap Ms. Barry’s plank. “And their opponents are 100 percent worse for the environment, 100 percent worse for working people, 100 percent worse for L.G.B.T. people, for women, for black people, for immigrants.”
I mean, duh. But not for the progressive highlighted here, who gets the last word:
Ms. Merritt admits that some districts may be difficult for Democrats to win, but that is partly because the party has not really tried to persuade people. Candidates need to seize the chance this fall to teach people why Democratic ideas are better, she said.
“I believe 110 percent that if we run on full-throated, unapologetic progressive politics, we will win,” she said.
She added: “At a certain point, when you compromise your values, you are not winning. How far are we going to bend over before we tumble and fall?”
You keep on believing, sweetie. Trump will keep on winning.
The progressives would rather try to amend the Constitution and pack the courts rather than moderate their positions on abortion, guns and immigration. And they will continue to struggle in flyover country. But they'll raise lots of Hollywood money!
Over in PA-1, the AFL-CIO has multiple big signs up endorsing Brian Fitzpatrick (R) ...
over Bob Wallace(D)
I didn't get a picture
Posted by: Neo | October 18, 2018 at 11:02 AM
It's so much more peaceful here, since the PHELAN PHUCKFACE PSYCHO got SHITCANNED.
Posted by: GUS | October 18, 2018 at 11:17 AM
Let 'em. Let them show their true fascist faces. Awe need more of this, not less.
Every time the far left agenda of the Democratic Party is exposed it will disgust more of their pro-life base. Every time the anti-Semitism of Democratic Party leadership is exposed, it will prepare the ground for an abandonment of the party by the pro-Israel wing.
Every time another heckler or attack is exposed, it will cause revulsion among decent people.
The Democratic Party's message is not hope, but hate.
Posted by: matt - deplore me if you must | October 18, 2018 at 11:17 AM
Dems in MO went full NPC. No surprise.
Posted by: henry | October 18, 2018 at 11:29 AM
Wow, Neo, it's not often you see a candidate with endorsements from the Chamber of Commerce AND AFL-CIO/Teamsters/United Mine Workers/NEA:
https://www.brianfitzpatrick.com/endorsements/
Posted by: Porchlight | October 18, 2018 at 11:30 AM
You keep on believing, sweetie. Trump will keep on winning.
:)
Posted by: Porchlight | October 18, 2018 at 11:31 AM
CNBC Now @CNBCnow
1m
BREAKING: U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin backs out of Saudi investing conference amid questions about missing journalist
https://twitter.com/CNBCnow/status/1052945253609742336
Posted by: henry | October 18, 2018 at 11:34 AM
i'll never catch up ... still way behind.
>>>There are numerous reports that the fentanyl-laced opioids that are outright killing people on the spot are coming from China and that its an intentional ploy by the Chinese government.
Posted by: Tom R | October 18, 2018 at 10:35 AM<<<
from the other thread ... The Art of War has a chapter on Incendiary Attacks and the translation I have has sections extending it from fire to things like propaganda (things that can spread like fire). It is a short drive to extend it to narcotics trafficking and radical movements. And interesting take and seems to fit well within Unrestricted Warfare especially as economic warfare.
Posted by: rich | October 18, 2018 at 11:36 AM
Porch light,
That is an amazing set of endorsements!
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 11:36 AM
From the last thread...
To my mind, Horowitz proved himself feckless with his first report, whitewashing the FBI scammers.
The first Horowitz IG report was on McCabe's criminal activity and we know he is currently the target of a federal grand jury so I don't think "feckless" is the proper term to use.
Posted by: Tom R | October 18, 2018 at 11:37 AM
From the last thread:
"I totally agree and the Cheryl Mills immunity deal is so egregious that I can’t even see straight."
IIRC, if you get immunity you cannot lie under oath or you lose that immunity. So Cheryl Mills will have to turn on Hillary.
Unless I got it wrong. Any good lawyers out there?
Posted by: Jane | October 18, 2018 at 11:38 AM
Now that the leftwing Treasury Dept employee with 4 names has been arrested for leaking private financial data to the media, I wonder how many search warrants have been approved to scour her private and business phone/email records to see if she reported to someone higher up the Deep State chain of command?
Posted by: Tom R | October 18, 2018 at 11:42 AM
Jane,
Wouldn't prosecutors have to have evidence that she lied?
To my mind, this explains part of the delay. People like Mills have to be trapped into telling the truth or else.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 11:42 AM
don't think that is the case. the immunity agreement was overly broad but wouldn't be applicable to the issues with JW. the judge could refer her to the bar if she is still a practicing attorney or at least still licensed to practice. he could also sanction her for contempt.
(note i am not a lawyer though so i don't know)
Posted by: rich | October 18, 2018 at 11:42 AM
if you get immunity you cannot lie under oath or you lose that immunity.
Jane, my impression is that the lying Judge Lamberth referred to had occurred earlier. He was saying Mills shouldn't have gotten immunity because she lacked credibility.
But my complaint has always been that in addition, someone should only get immunity in exchange for incriminating information regarding a higher-up. Since no one higher up (or lower down) has been indicted much less convicted over the whole email scam, the immunity grants were just "get out of jail free" cards dispensed to friends of Hillary.
Posted by: jimmyk | October 18, 2018 at 11:46 AM
It was all a fraud and a coverup, jimmy. From the very outset. They have been hiding behind their immunities and stonewalling and withholding and destruction of evidence from day one.
I think there is a RICO case in this.
Posted by: matt - deplore me if you must | October 18, 2018 at 11:53 AM
When the top levels of DoJ itself is part of the criminal conspiracy, why should it be permitted to grant immunity to other conspirators?
Huh? Huh?
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM
is=are of course
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM
Re the progressive young (or old) fascists in Missouri. I'll be damned if I'll be "taught" by some young twit. Of course if they come to power I may be sent to a re-education camp where I'll learn to "right think". Meanwhile I'll take my chances and live my life.
Posted by: Comanche voter | October 18, 2018 at 11:57 AM
...and don't be telling me some judge might have said it was OK. Gigo of course. See FISA warrants.
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 18, 2018 at 11:58 AM
But of course that all depends on whether the prosecutors have the stomach to actually use the immunity that they give out as the tool that it is meant to be, as opposed to using it to sell out the justice system to their cronies.
More important, if you have immunity then you lose your 5th-Amendment right against self-incrimination. So if Cheryl Mills refuses to testify against others for the crimes she has immunity, she can be thrown in jail for contempt until she testifies. And if she lies then she loses the immunity AND is in jeopardy for perjury.Posted by: cathyf | October 18, 2018 at 12:00 PM
Is this the guitar thread?
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 18, 2018 at 12:00 PM
Mnuchin met with President Trump and Pompeo, and they decided he will not attend the investment conference in Saudi Arabia.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 12:00 PM
Is this the guitar thread?
Yes.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 12:02 PM
Bingo, Cathy "But of course that all depends on whether the prosecutors have the stomach to actually use the immunity that they give out as the tool that it is meant to be, as opposed to using it to sell out the justice system to their cronies."
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 18, 2018 at 12:06 PM
Thank goodness, Extraneus!! :)
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 18, 2018 at 12:06 PM
Mnuchin met with President Trump and Pompeo, and they decided he will not attend the investment conference in Saudi Arabia.
...and Erdogan smiles
Posted by: Frau Feind hoert mit | October 18, 2018 at 12:07 PM
Cashill:
Gosnell Movie “Good Abortionist” Unnerves Left
https://www.wnd.com/2018/10/gosnell-films-good-abortionist-unnerves-the-left/
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 12:13 PM
>>>Is this the guitar thread?
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 18, 2018 at 12:00 PM<<<
always. a bit too early for KJOM though.
Posted by: rich | October 18, 2018 at 12:13 PM
Frau,
I don't know what to think. Yesterday Pompo was very firm in saying Prince denied completely. Then this. What to think?
Placate Erdogan due to NATO. Security risk in SA from radical factions? Saudis really are guilty and we have the goods? I have zero idea.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 12:13 PM
>>>that is partly because the party has not really tried to persuade people. Candidates need to seize the chance this fall to teach people why Democratic ideas are better<<<
yikes!
Posted by: rich | October 18, 2018 at 12:19 PM
Rep. Jim Jordan
@Jim_Jordan
4h
Rosenstein interviews with @WSJ where he says Mueller investigation is “appropriate and independent.” Translation—there’s time for media spin to justify Mueller probe but no time to answer questions from Congress about his statement on recording the President.
#4DKabukiTheater
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 12:20 PM
Beasts:
"Is this the guitar thread?"
I don't know about anybody else, but this is my anything-but-DoJ day.
Posted by: JM Hanes | October 18, 2018 at 12:23 PM
---"I don't know about anybody else, but this is my anything-but-DoJ day."---
Me too.
Posted by: J Sessions | October 18, 2018 at 12:26 PM
that is partly because the party has not really tried to persuade people.
This is about as believable as the "Socialism works, it just hasn't really been tried" argument.
Posted by: jimmyk | October 18, 2018 at 12:27 PM
And TK was right in the last thread. The reason I mentioned Lerner was that she could have been prosecuted by the Sessions DoJ, but they chose not to pursue charges. Unforgivable in my opinion. The woman should have been bankrupted and jailed.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 12:28 PM
i thought it was a variant of it, jimmyk.
let's give her even more power than she already has.
Posted by: rich | October 18, 2018 at 12:28 PM
#4DKabukiTheater
You are 100% correct.
Jim Jordan isn't an idiot. He knows full well if Trump wanted Rosenstein to testify before Congress then Rosenstein would be testifying.
Posted by: Tom R | October 18, 2018 at 12:40 PM
Looking like a fool isn't looking like an idiot. Constituents reward fools.
Wait and see.
Posted by: Threadkilldr | October 18, 2018 at 12:42 PM
I don't think Jim Jordan is acting. No one is as good at acting to be able to fake what he did at the Rosenstein hearing. Plus, he just said a few weeks ago at a rally that it was the first time he'd ever met Trump. I think he's just not in the loop.
I think Trump, Sessions and Rosenstein are hedging on how much cooperation to give the House, which could have Dem committee chairmen with subpoena power in a matter of weeks. Why act like the DoJ is subservient to the House before knowing how the election will turn out?
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 12:50 PM
"...that is partly because the party has not really tried to persuade people..."
Two great quotes in my brain jump to mind:
"The beatings will continue until moral improves"
And from my B School case about the failure of a new dog food brand even though all the marketers and all the lab scientists had convinced the board that they had the next Alpo on their hands but sales flatlined anyway:
"The dogs just don't like it".
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 18, 2018 at 12:55 PM
Ext just when you said the truth about Lerner, you follow with this "Why act like the DoJ is subservient to the House before knowing how the election will turn out?"
Because the law charges the House with that oversight, the law provides funding to that department on the condition that that oversight be facilitated, the People assumed that the House is providing that oversight and the Administration is facilitating it, and that unlike under recent administrations, we accept that the law is the law until it is changed through proper channels?
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 18, 2018 at 01:00 PM
"The dogs just don't like it".
lol
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 01:01 PM
Ext, I know those were not your thoughts, but if they are those of the Trump team, we are in trouble.
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 18, 2018 at 01:02 PM
'I don't know about anybody else, but this is my anything-but-DoJ day.'
But maybe tomorrow. :)
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 18, 2018 at 01:04 PM
Thanks for that 12:55, OL!! I can't stop laughing about it...
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 18, 2018 at 01:07 PM
I don't see any reason for the Trump DoJ to bend over for Jerrold Nadler, Maxine Waters, Nancy Pelosi or any other Dem, and I don't care what the law says about it. Let them censure Sessions. We all know how painful it was for poor Holder to experience that excruciating penalty.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 01:12 PM
"Jane, my impression is that the lying Judge Lamberth referred to had occurred earlier. He was saying Mills shouldn't have gotten immunity because she lacked credibility. "
So we take her deposition, and if she lies get rid of her immunity. It seems to me it's the same case, but even if it's not, if she lies again about something she lied about before, she should be toast.
Tom Fenten has a new case pending about Benghazi which was the subect of the hearing where the Judge made those remarks. And it was Benghazi she lied about - I think.
Posted by: Jane | October 18, 2018 at 01:13 PM
Isn't it interesting that the dems are demanding all this repudiation against SA for the killing of a Muslim Brotherhood guy, but demanded none against the Benghazi killers who killed our diplomats.
Posted by: Jane | October 18, 2018 at 01:19 PM
What's amazing is that Pompeo and Trump seem to be falling for it.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 01:22 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
New updates on the President's Twitter feed. Includes a video with Pompeo after th meetin plus a 2-part tweet on where we are with Saudi Arabia.
-----------------
Separate news from Twitter:
Also, one of the 15 Saudis in that group that went to Turkey was killed in a traffic accident in Riyadh today.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 01:23 PM
MM, Arkancide?
Posted by: sbwaters | October 18, 2018 at 01:24 PM
Extraneous,
Not sure they are falling for it. Mitt Romney is out on Twitter virtue signaling like he is the arbiter of all things moral, though.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 01:25 PM
MM "Mitt Romney is out on Twitter virtue signaling like he is the arbiter of all things moral, though."
Oh brother. Please make him but one of 55 or 56, please God. I will agree to one more year of funding the country with CRs if you will only deny Romney the McCain Swing Vote.
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 18, 2018 at 01:29 PM
Sbwaters,
Who knows? Could have been a summary execution, a witness offed by pals, Turkish agents, Muslim Brotherhood trying to hide contacts, or of cours, Deep State and the Clntons.
Who the hell know?
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 01:29 PM
Well if Mitt's perturbed, you can bet I am (not).
I couldn't care less if the Saudis off'd their own Jim Acosta.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 01:30 PM
I don't think Jim Jordan is acting. I think he's just not in the loop.
Even if that is the case it doesn't change the fact that Jordan isn't an idiot and knows full well that Trump controls whether Rosenstein testifies before Congress or not.
Posted by: Tom R | October 18, 2018 at 01:30 PM
A reminder
https://mobile.twitter.com/nntaleb/status/105
2917419398877184
Posted by: Bernardi Dr la paz | October 18, 2018 at 01:31 PM
True, I wasn't disagreeing with that. Just the kabuki aspect of it.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 01:34 PM
Putin Hints At New Russia-Saudi Axis: "No Reason To Spoil Saudi Ties Over Khashoggi Killing"
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 01:36 PM
"I couldn't care less if the Saudis off'd their own Jim Acosta."
or even OUR Jim Acosta.
Posted by: Old Lurker | October 18, 2018 at 01:37 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/MittRomney/status/1052960036475961344
I brought his tweet over just to show you how annoying he is.
1. How do we know the guy was murdered and if so, how do we know it was at the consulate?
2. How do we know for sure it was gruesome? Who told us that?
3 why is he suggesting withering sanctions when we have done nothing to Erdogan for HIS human rights violations?
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 01:38 PM
True, I wasn't disagreeing with that. Just the kabuki aspect of it.
In that regard Jordan is just playing to the camera knowing it looks good to his constituents. Nothing wrong with that at all since all politicians do it.
Posted by: Tom R | October 18, 2018 at 01:40 PM
Russia is haram to most Sunnis. They have been hammering them in Syria among other things.
Saudi Arabia has a 100# stick with its oil. So I think we need to be very cautious in dealing with this. We have said nothing about Navalny either. This is a byzantine affair defined.
Posted by: matt - deplore me if you must | October 18, 2018 at 01:42 PM
Heck, for all we know, the Russians offed Khashoggi!
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 01:43 PM
Can anyone doubt that regardless of his actual influence in the Senate as a first-term backbencher, Mitt will get huge attention from the MFM if and only if he fills the McCain slot, and therefore he will do exactly that?
Posted by: jimmyk | October 18, 2018 at 01:44 PM
matt,
I agree with you 100%!
I thnk that is what the President and Pompeo are doing. It is also NOT what Romney is doing!
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 01:45 PM
jimmyk,
No doubt about it. That is why I would like to have the journalist show up alive somewhere and all of those carrying on be discredited, particularly Mitt Romney, but also Erdogan and the Washington Post.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 01:48 PM
No curiosity about miss cengiz, do you wonder why that is, who did she work for?
Posted by: Bernardi Dr la paz | October 18, 2018 at 01:51 PM
Perhaps this,is why?
https://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/gulf/2018/10/18/Khashoggi-s-alleged-fianc-e-and-ties-to-a-radical-charity-linked-to-ISIS-al-Qaeda.html
Posted by: Bernardi Dr la paz | October 18, 2018 at 01:52 PM
See what I mean when I saw Romney is loathsome?
Looks to me likeDJT is going to give this time for SA and Turkey to deal with it.Having Mnuchin pull out of the conference is a signal for Salman to do just that, and I bet the mysterious death in Riyadh is related.
Posted by: Clarice Feldman | October 18, 2018 at 01:56 PM
Mitt and McRino:
Failed GOP POTUS candidates
NeverTrumpers
Out-spoken & Vindictive
Supported failed healthcare programs
[So, what can go wrong, when he takes over the "maverick" chair in the Senate?]
Posted by: Jim Eagle | October 18, 2018 at 02:01 PM
So that dead fellow was published in yeniz zayfak that dodgy paper.
Another fellow an effendi al shihri (seriously) says he was a,tourist in turkey years ago, but not this month
Posted by: Bernardi Dr la paz | October 18, 2018 at 02:02 PM
Is this a sign of things to come?
https://kstp.com/news/kstp-terry-albury-fbi-minnesota-sentenced/5113351/
Posted by: Tom R | October 18, 2018 at 02:02 PM
Clarice,
A prime example of you being proven right!
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 02:09 PM
If you want to hear a very good assessment of our current favorite topic, please listen from about 2:00 to 17:00 at the link:
https://youtu.be/5aizF3AopO0
Posted by: Beasts of England | October 18, 2018 at 02:16 PM
Trump is using leverage against Rosenstein...
Dan Bongino and I are on the same page so far. I will listen to the whole thing, BoE. Thanks for the link. 👍
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 02:24 PM
Beasts,
I cannot get that to play. It is frozen on the ad.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 02:32 PM
Tommy boy is still trying to sell the Mueller a and Rosenstein are working with Trump bullshit!
Posted by: Eye Doctor . | October 18, 2018 at 02:41 PM
Is that Bngino's pod cast? Which episode number?
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 02:42 PM
The summary is that Bongino sees Rosenstein as a criminal that Trump has evidence against and Trump dangles that evidence everhtime he need the criminal to keep Mueller (Bongino compares him to a politically driven hoaxster) in check.
I guess Bongino drinks the same Kabuki-aid as Jordan and Medows.
I hope Bongino can do a quick rewrite and reissue of his book when he tells his fans that it is full of lies after Operation Wait and See reveals the truth.
"Thanks for buying my book, but you should have waited for me to tell the truth... Which is in my new book!"
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 02:48 PM
Episode 827, MM.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 02:49 PM
Thanks, TK!
It gives me confidence that Bongino, a former Scret Servic agent, is as clueless about this stuff as I am!! 😀
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 02:57 PM
Meanwhile, car will not start again. Tow guy is on his way and that sucker is going to the garage!!!!
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 02:58 PM
My limited summary must have conveyed something I didn't intend, MM.
Bongino is far from clueless. He has chapter and verse of non-imaginary information. Granted that he is pimping a book, but he appears to have done actual rresearch as opposed to random Twitter Tbeanezzz dot connecting.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 03:02 PM
I already despise Utah for inflicting more Romney on the rest of the nation now that McStain is gone.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 18, 2018 at 03:03 PM
I missed the details of your car, MM. I came in later and heard it was fixed by tightening a battery cable. Is that correct? Is it doing the same thing now?
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 03:04 PM
Here's a double header for TK:
https://mobile.twitter.com/jasoninthehouse/status/1052924279912685569?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1052924279912685569&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Facecomments.mu.nu%2F%3Fpost%3D377660
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 18, 2018 at 03:06 PM
TK,
Yes. It is deader than a door nail. My son had it run for about 15 minutes after it starts, but I didn't drive it yesterday, and now nothing.
I am going to and it to the garage and have them figure it out. I think it's the alternator, myself.
Or evil spirits.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 03:08 PM
ChafedPutz and Sassehole on the side of righteousness, CH.
Is it any wonder nothing gets done.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 03:08 PM
Send Ito the garage...
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 03:09 PM
Just sitting shouldn't kill a good battery. Either there is a draw like a light being left on or the battery met its maker.
I would hope they did a charging test before you got it back the 1st time.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 03:12 PM
Just to be clear, Mutt Rombley is urging we tilt our entire ME strategy over some MB clown who has a green card.
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 18, 2018 at 03:13 PM
I had one car fail a draw test because of a broken switch to the glovebox light. The light stayed on with the door closed. The customer never saw the light. Another was a hood light switch. Same thing.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 03:15 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1052970471887699968
Posted by: Captain Hate | October 18, 2018 at 03:16 PM
Heading out.
Posted by: Threadkiller | October 18, 2018 at 03:16 PM
TK,
It never went anywhere. The tow guy said it was a loose battery, he tightened it and it started up, son let it run for about 15 minutes and we thought everything was ok.
It needs to go in for an oil change and winterizing, anyway. I will bite the bullet and pay the tow fee. Even if he got it started, I would be afraid it would die at an intersection and there I would be. Plus there is no one to bring me home. Son is about 20 miles south of me and daughter is at work 20 miles north.
Posted by: Miss Marple | October 18, 2018 at 03:17 PM
The summary is that Bongino sees Rosenstein as a criminal that Trump has evidence against and Trump dangles that evidence everhtime he need the criminal to keep Mueller (Bongino compares him to a politically driven hoaxster) in check.
In other words, Bongino is plagiarizing the "leverage" narrative that Sundance first posited that treats their assumptions as facts to explain why Trump hasn't fired Rosenstein yet.
Posted by: Tom R | October 18, 2018 at 03:17 PM
Mutt Rombley is urging we tilt our entire ME strategy over some MB clown who has a green card.
He'd have been great at the State Dept.
Posted by: Extraneus | October 18, 2018 at 03:21 PM
FBI and DOJ Didn’t Catch Yesterday’s Indicted Leakers (Treasury IG Did) but They Did Cover Up One of Their Names
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/fbi-and-doj-didnt-catch-yesterdays-indicted-leakers-treasury-ig-did-but-they-did-cover-up-one-of-their-names/
Posted by: Eye Doctor . | October 18, 2018 at 03:21 PM