Ross Douthat on the collapse of the center left. He makes a good point: The Rubinomics "center-left" focused on economics issues, such as trade, tax reform and health care but unlike Bill Clinton were silent on cultural issues.
Ross barely mentions the great trainwreck of the day, which has also been the trainwreck in Europe, to wit, immigration, especially illegal immigration. He does say this:
But then consider a third distillation, a third narrative, in which the center-left’s signal political failure was that it never really sought to preserve a cultural centrism, which meant over time that its party’s approach to social issues has been dictated more and more completely by the left. In this story the political success of Bill Clinton reflected not only his compromises with Republicans on taxes and spending, his tacit nods to Reaganomics, but also his ability to infuse a centrist liberalism with reassuring nods to various kinds of moderate cultural conservatism — the school uniform and v-chip business and the rhetoric of “safe, legal and rare” on abortion, the easy Baptist religiosity, the tacitly center-right positions on immigration and crime and same-sex marriage.
If Clinton had matched this cultural conservatism with decency in his private life, Al Gore would have won re-election as his heir and the larger story of the center-left might have been entirely different. But instead, from the mid-2000s onward, the leftward flank of the Democratic Party looked at the country’s changing demographics and growing social liberalism and decided that Clinton’s compromises with cultural conservatism weren’t as politically necessary as they had been (which was true), and that therefore they were free to become increasingly ideologically maximalist on everything touching gender or race or sexuality or immigration (which was … not true).
Team Rubinomics fled the field on immigration, which has clear economic and cultural components. As an example, in 2006 Krugman briefly touched the third rail and acknowledged, citing Borjas, that unskilled immigrants (legal or otherwise) depress the wages of the native unskilled.
By 2017 Krugman had more comforting studies and realized that such a conclusion was "wrong", although the once-admired Borjas continues to push it. Thank heaven for the liberal take-over of academia!
So what happened? Please. Peter Beinart explains the obvious - faith in their emerging Democacratic majority and rising political correctness pushed the Democrats to their current "Stop hating, hater" position on illegal immigration.
A larger explanation is political. Between 2008 and 2016, Democrats became more and more confident that the country’s growing Latino population gave the party an electoral edge. To win the presidency, Democrats convinced themselves, they didn’t need to reassure white people skeptical of immigration so long as they turned out their Latino base. “The fastest-growing sector of the American electorate stampeded toward the Democrats this November,” Salon declared after Obama’s 2008 win. “If that pattern continues, the GOP is doomed to 40 years of wandering in a desert.”
Let's not overlook Big Business, which had sway with both Democrats and the Chamber of Commerce Republicans:
Alongside pressure from pro-immigrant activists came pressure from corporate America, especially the Democrat-aligned tech industry, which uses the H-1B visa program to import workers. In 2010, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, along with the CEOs of companies including Hewlett-Packard, Boeing, Disney, and News Corporation, formed New American Economy to advocate for business-friendly immigration policies. Three years later, Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates helped found FWD.us to promote a similar agenda.
The experience of unreconstructed socialist Bernie Sanders was instructive:
This combination of Latino and corporate activism made it perilous for Democrats to discuss immigration’s costs, as Bernie Sanders learned the hard way. In July 2015, two months after officially announcing his candidacy for president, Sanders was interviewed by Ezra Klein, the editor in chief of Vox. Klein asked whether, in order to fight global poverty, the U.S. should consider “sharply raising the level of immigration we permit, even up to a level of open borders.” Sanders reacted with horror. “That’s a Koch brothers proposal,” he scoffed. He went on to insist that “right-wing people in this country would love … an open-border policy. Bring in all kinds of people, work for $2 or $3 an hour, that would be great for them. I don’t believe in that. I think we have to raise wages in this country.”
Say what?!? Americans first?
Sanders came under immediate attack. Vox’s Dylan Matthews declared that his “fear of immigrant labor is ugly—and wrongheaded.” The president of FWD.us accused Sanders of “the sort of backward-looking thinking that progressives have rightly moved away from in the past years.” ThinkProgress published a blog post titled “Why Immigration Is the Hole in Bernie Sanders’ Progressive Agenda.” The senator, it argued, was supporting “the idea that immigrants coming to the U.S. are taking jobs and hurting the economy, a theory that has been proven incorrect.”
"Proven incorerect"! Yet as a political theory it worked for Trump and here we are. Beinart goes on:
But has the claim that “immigrants coming to the U.S. are taking jobs” actually been proved “incorrect”? A decade ago, liberals weren’t so sure. In 2006, Krugman wrote that America was experiencing “large increases in the number of low-skill workers relative to other inputs into production, so it’s inevitable that this means a fall in wages.”
It’s hard to imagine a prominent liberal columnist writing that sentence today. To the contrary, progressive commentators now routinely claim that there’s a near-consensus among economists on immigration’s benefits.
There isn’t. According to a comprehensive new report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “Groups comparable to … immigrants in terms of their skill may experience a wage reduction as a result of immigration-induced increases in labor supply.” But academics sometimes de-emphasize this wage reduction because, like liberal journalists and politicians, they face pressures to support immigration.
Wow. How could so many be so wrong? Beinart mentions that some academics are funded by, eg, Microsoft. But his second point will surprise no one:
Academics face cultural pressures too. In his book Exodus, Paul Collier, an economist at the University of Oxford, claims that in their “desperate [desire] not to give succor” to nativist bigots, “social scientists have strained every muscle to show that migration is good for everyone.” George Borjas of Harvard argues that since he began studying immigration in the 1980s, his fellow economists have grown far less tolerant of research that emphasizes its costs. There is, he told me, “a lot of self-censorship among young social scientists.” Because Borjas is an immigration skeptic, some might discount his perspective. But when I asked Donald Davis, a Columbia University economist who takes a more favorable view of immigration’s economic impact, about Borjas’s claim, he made a similar point. “George and I come out on different sides of policy on immigration,” Davis said, “but I agree that there are aspects of discussion in academia that don’t get sort of full view if you come to the wrong conclusion.”
Beinart goes on to float all sorts of proposals that would address the conflicting concerns of two groups the Democrats claim to care about, unskilled natives and immigrants. That is a conversation a center-left could lead, but it won't be happening. Lest you trail off before what seems to be his punchline I will put it here:
Liberals must take seriously Americans’ yearning for social cohesion. To promote both mass immigration and greater economic redistribution, they must convince more native-born white Americans that immigrants will not weaken the bonds of national identity. This means dusting off a concept many on the left currently hate: assimilation.
Promoting assimilation need not mean expecting immigrants to abandon their culture. But it does mean breaking down the barriers that segregate them from the native-born. And it means celebrating America’s diversity less, and its unity more.
As if. Beinart goes on:
The next Democratic presidential candidate should say again and again that because Americans are one people, who must abide by one law, his or her goal is to reduce America’s undocumented population to zero. For liberals, the easy part of fulfilling that pledge is supporting a path to citizenship for the undocumented who have put down roots in the United States. The hard part, which Hillary Clinton largely ignored in her 2016 presidential run, is backing tough immigration enforcement so that path to citizenship doesn’t become a magnet that entices more immigrants to enter the U.S. illegally.
Uh huh.
Democrats should put immigrants’ learning English at the center of their immigration agenda. If more immigrants speak English fluently, native-born whites may well feel a stronger connection to them, and be more likely to support government policies that help them.
Oh, "English spoken here". That will happen.
And if you have made it this far:
Americans know that liberals celebrate diversity. They’re less sure that liberals celebrate unity. And Obama’s ability to effectively do the latter probably contributed to the fact that he—a black man with a Muslim-sounding name—twice won a higher percentage of the white vote than did Hillary Clinton.
n 2014, the University of California listed melting pot as a term it considered a “microaggression.” What if Hillary Clinton had traveled to one of its campuses and called that absurd? What if she had challenged elite universities to celebrate not merely multiculturalism and globalization but Americanness? What if she had said more boldly that the slowing rate of English-language acquisition was a problem she was determined to solve? What if she had acknowledged the challenges that mass immigration brings, and then insisted that Americans could overcome those challenges by focusing not on what makes them different but on what makes them the same?
Some on the left would have howled. But I suspect that Clinton would be president today.
He may be right about Clinton winning but obviously she didn't and couldn't say those things within her party today.
Kind of grim - when the proposed solutions are this far from possible for the Democrats one wonders where we are headed.
Iowahawk
btw, is there an option between Purgatory and Heaven? Something a little more upscale and fun without the high prices. Seems like a lucrative market segment, afterlife-wise
Posted by: clarice | March 05, 2019 at 11:05 AM
I will just wait here for the gang to arrive.
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 05, 2019 at 11:06 AM
when the proposed solutions are this far from possible for the Democrats one wonders where we are headed
start planting banana trees in your yard.
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 11:06 AM
CH,
There was only a photo of Curly, Larry, and Moe. Shemp not in the picture. Possibly taking the photo:)
Reposting the UTube link to Natalie's performance to all coming here without having seen it on the last thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2N0G-td1uA&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR3xM4qLsViEx6Zf2P1zoJnCqfIhABu4gYQuaVLAhVd9FSyDYDYvSaxRDSw
Posted by: Jim Eagle | March 05, 2019 at 11:11 AM
Old Lurker, did you see this? I posted it at the tale end of the last thread. Article at link.
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 11:12 AM
the political success of Bill Clinton reflected not only his compromises with Republicans on taxes and spending, his tacit nods to Reaganomics, but also his ability to infuse a centrist liberalism with reassuring nods to various kinds of moderate cultural conservatism — the school uniform and v-chip business and the rhetoric of “safe, legal and rare” on abortion, the easy Baptist religiosity, the tacitly center-right positions on immigration and crime and same-sex marriage.
It was all bullshit and lies with Slick, which is why he never received 50% of the popular vote. The GOP running hapless Failure Theater candidates like GHWB and Dole were the only reasons he won.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 11:13 AM
Ialways thought Bill Clinton sounded like the Flim=flam Man from a medicine show.
There was a reason he got nicknamed "Slick Willy."
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 11:15 AM
There's a 9:41 picture on the JOM Zuckerberg group with Shemp that jimmyk took.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 11:16 AM
Actually the legendary Jodi took that pic. She's no Shemp.
Posted by: jimmyk | March 05, 2019 at 11:18 AM
I mean Jodi took the first one. I took the second one with bearded Shemp.
Posted by: jimmyk | March 05, 2019 at 11:20 AM
RIP
https://www.abcactionnews.com/entertainment/wrestling-star-king-kong-bundy-dies-at-61
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 11:20 AM
Re Barack Obama---winning a greater percentage of the "white vote" than Hillary is a damned low bar to clear. He did it twice; so did Trump.
You could say the same thing about winning a greater percentage of the sentient being vote when you are talking about Hillary and any candidate X.
She's not only old news, she's toxic.
Posted by: Comanche Voter | March 05, 2019 at 11:26 AM
https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/432534-critics-of-americas-support-for-israel-cannot-escape-history
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 11:27 AM
There was a reason he got nicknamed "Slick Willy."
He reportedly hates that nickname, probably because it's so accurate.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 11:28 AM
Well done, Natalie. I believe that was the Susanna tune that triggered (Agatha's) Miss Marple to unravel The Body in the Library.
Posted by: Ralph L | March 05, 2019 at 11:29 AM
There is no CENTER LEFT. Name a DEMOCRAT against ABORTION.
Posted by: GUS | March 05, 2019 at 11:36 AM
Americans know that liberals celebrate diversity.
Really? Which Americans? What kinds of diversity?
They’re less sure that liberals celebrate unity. And Obama’s ability to effectively do the latter...
Ha. More like the MSM’s eagerness to lie endlessly about Obama’s obvious disinterest in unity.
Posted by: James D. | March 05, 2019 at 11:40 AM
I can't remember who said "If you can sing Mozart well, you can sing anything."
Posted by: Ralph L | March 05, 2019 at 11:42 AM
Right James D. Mouthing unity words occasionally (while consistently *doing* the opposite) with MSM cover.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 05, 2019 at 11:43 AM
"The Center Left Flees the Field"
"Kind of grim - when the proposed solutions are this far from possible for the Democrats one wonders where we are headed."
Kind of grim is how I feel about the direction the left and media (synonymous, why do I separate them, they are identical) are driving our country. The ideological juggernaut driving us seems to have no brakes since the GOPe has refused to help our president.
I felt sick to my stomach when I read this article posted on lucianne, which ties in directly to Mr. Maguire's topic for today. And, what a depressing topic it is -- unchecked immigration with no assimilation, whether legal or illegal.
http://www.startribune.com/east-african-community-reeling-from-weekend-violence-demands-solutions/506679952/
Posted by: joan | March 05, 2019 at 11:43 AM
Thanks, Ralph, didn't know that about the Miss Marple movie. So there's a JOM connection of a sort.
Posted by: jimmyk | March 05, 2019 at 11:44 AM
Stolen from Twitter:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D06C6PyWoAEn2OQ.jpg
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 11:44 AM
"obvious disinterest"
Wrong word, James.
"disinterest" is way too passive for Obama. His investment in disunity was active and energetic.
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 05, 2019 at 11:44 AM
Gasp! Melting Pot? Assimilation? What will Democrats pretend to believe in next!?!?
Posted by: Tom Bowler | March 05, 2019 at 11:46 AM
Incidentally, I suspect daddy might have a pic of Jodi, but I doubt we'll get him to post it.
Posted by: jimmyk | March 05, 2019 at 11:49 AM
Tom Bowler, this week it's "rule of law" while they chase ghost crimes through Trump's past.
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 11:49 AM
We hold these truths to be self-evident ...
Congress shall make no law ...
Posted by: rich | March 05, 2019 at 11:50 AM
https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/05/schilling-bulwark-trump
"Sorry, Bulwark Flunkies - Trump Already Crushed You in 2020Z"
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 11:53 AM
Is this a new word?
Democacratic
for when AOC seems more like a poster child than a donkey?
Posted by: rse | March 05, 2019 at 11:53 AM
Incidentally, I suspect daddy might have a pic of Jodi, but I doubt we'll get him to post it.
After Shemp made obvious references to their subsequent homo relationship, he probably deleted it.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 11:56 AM
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/05/2020-presidential-dems-trump-money-1202938
Six of the democrat candidates have received donations from Trump or his family in the past,
This is why so many were leery of him when he ran. Do I wish he hadn't? Yes. I understand why, being in New York construction as well as the Trump University thing, but I wish it hadn't happened.
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 11:59 AM
A great pithy comment from Surber's blog.
"GOP has to pretend to be something America likes.
DNC has to pretend not to be something America hates."
Posted by: JimNorCal | March 05, 2019 at 12:02 PM
Apparently david brooks is not just writing for nyt and fawning over pants' creases, he is also heading up the Aspen Institute's Weave: The Social Fabric Project. https://www.educationdive.com/news/sxsw-edu-2019-educators-discuss-transformation-strategy-neuroscience-base/549661/
Now who gets to define what a conservative is?
Aspen? The NYT? David French or Jonah?
Posted by: rse | March 05, 2019 at 12:03 PM
Do I wish he hadn't? Yes. I understand why, being in New York construction as well as the Trump University thing, but I wish it hadn't happened.
Eh, I don't think it hurts him nearly as much as taking money from lowlifes would.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 12:03 PM
CH, which #nevertrump can complain about Trump's donations to D's? They all did last cycle.
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 12:05 PM
When were the photos posted?
Posted by: Ralph L | March 05, 2019 at 12:05 PM
Sunday night on the JOM group on Facebook, Ralph.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 12:07 PM
Has anyone come forward yet, who remembers Zippy at Columbia?
Posted by: Jim Eagle | March 05, 2019 at 12:09 PM
Vicki McKenna @VickiMcKenna
2m
Obama wants to create a "university of social change"; says "there's hope 'if we can train a million Baracks and Michelles'
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/obama-theres-hope-if-we-can-train-a-million-baracks-and-michelles
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 12:18 PM
Yes, but I'm sure the bi-sexual turkey baster boy is a FINE FAMILY MAN and FATHER.
Posted by: GUS | March 05, 2019 at 12:21 PM
Lindsey Graham @LindseyGrahamSC
15h
We are facing an illegal immigration crisis at our southern border.
President @realDonaldTrump is on sound legal footing to declare an emergency to deal with the problem.
I expect the President’s position will prevail – in Congress and the courts.
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 12:22 PM
Fie! Facebook didn't notify me.
Posted by: Ralph L | March 05, 2019 at 12:26 PM
Levin had a good explanation in his second hour of how Rand Paul is 100% wrong on there being a Constitutional principle that DJT violates by spending money Congress already allocated.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 12:26 PM
Zuckerberg's trained monkeys have really bolluxed up the notification system.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 12:28 PM
Reasons to flee any state that elects a Dem to Governor:
http://www.maciverinstitute.com/2019/03/analysis-what-you-need-to-know-about-gov-tony-evers-first-biennial-budget/
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 12:33 PM
https://www.nysun.com/national/its-now-time-for-the-real-scandal-of-2016/90596/
Posted by: clarice | March 05, 2019 at 12:40 PM
Henry, isn't it hilarious to see the Democrats develop this sudden reverence for the rule of law and assimilation. I'm trying to imagine Beinart writing this and keeping a straight face:
Translation: The next candidate can say that again and again because the smart folks, like Beinart, know it's only campaign talk. Pap for the dummies and deplorables.
Posted by: Tom Bowler | March 05, 2019 at 12:42 PM
GREEN BAY (WLUK) - Thirty vehicles and multiple minor injuries, including broken bones, were reported in a crash on the Leo Frigo Bridge Tuesday morning.
https://fox11online.com/news/local/crash-closes-i-43-southbond-on-frigo-bridge
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 12:48 PM
Translation: The next candidate can say that again and again because the smart folks, like Beinart, know it's only campaign talk. Pap for the dummies and deplorables
Exactly.
Posted by: James D. | March 05, 2019 at 12:49 PM
clarice,
Conrad Black (@12:40) always writes an excellent column. That one is outstanding in assessing the dems' chances.
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 12:52 PM
I think so,MM.
Posted by: clarice | March 05, 2019 at 12:55 PM
Who's the almost normal looking guy in the photo?
I'm too lazy to backtrack to the write-up.
Posted by: Ralph L | March 05, 2019 at 01:00 PM
If you guys tell me how I'll post my birthday pix with my nieces -if I can figure it out.
Posted by: Jane | March 05, 2019 at 01:09 PM
Anyone here of Cambodian descent? I can't figure out why I get so many notifications from Cambo-Americans.
Posted by: Ralph L | March 05, 2019 at 01:12 PM
How can Obama create a university of social change when his minions have already created that chaos? He's way behind the curve.
Totalitarian members of Congress have already raised the red flag and the Cultural Revolution is in full swing. Why Dr. Seuss is now a racist! From my understanding, Horton actually hates Who's. And we all know where the Grinch stood on that. He confiscated all of their toys (guns) after all to create a Grinch-centric world order.
the University of South Dakota Law School declared Aloha Day racist. That just isn't Aloha.
Men are reassigning themselves into women's sports and the women can't win squat anymore.
The Red Guards are out in force and denouncing everyone they find as bourgeois saboteurs, revanchists or not revolutionary enough.
We even have our own Gang of Four; Omer, Ocasio-Castro, Tlaib and Waters (you could add 20-30 more if you like). Pelosi is rapidly losing control and really doesn't have any promise of regaining it.
And the People's Press just acts as scribes for the latest diktats.
The Revolution will not be Televised has changed to CNN's latest fake scandal.
Now in several states there are 2nd Amendment sanctuary cities and counties, New Mexico prominent among them and Oregon right behind. Despite the evidence that 60% of gun deaths are by suicide and the a large majority of the rest are African-Amrican on African-American, the Left continues the sham. But that horse is well out of the barn.
Encouraging Illegal immigrants, gun bans, de-assimilation and woke/#metoo, toxic masculinity exclusivity just ain't gonna cut it.
Posted by: matt - deplore me if you must | March 05, 2019 at 01:14 PM
Here you go, Iggy: National Coyote Calling Championship.
40 Coyote but they finished 2nd. Video with the article
https://www.gunsamerica.com/digest/hunt365-the-best-2nd-place-finish-of-all-timepart-2/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=20190305_HUNT365_7&utm_campaign=/digest/hunt365-the-best-2nd-place-finish-of-all-timepart-2/
Posted by: Jim Eagle | March 05, 2019 at 01:20 PM
What's the name of the JOM group on Facebook?
Posted by: Jane | March 05, 2019 at 01:25 PM
Didn't Michelle Malkin get excoriated just the other day for saying something along the lines of "celebrating America’s diversity less, and its unity more" at CPAC? Of course, most MSM hit-pieces dropped the "unity" part of the quote.
Posted by: Extraneus | March 05, 2019 at 01:26 PM
JOM
It's closed, so you have to get Stephanie? to let you join.
Posted by: Ralph L | March 05, 2019 at 01:28 PM
Jane, you are already a member of JOM Facebook. its Called JOM.
Posted by: Sidwhite | March 05, 2019 at 01:39 PM
Fast-food chain KFC is memorializing a popular Chinese Communist hero with restaurant decor extolling his deeds, in a rare matching of an iconic American brand with Communist propaganda.
https://www.apnews.com/175211b4d61b4ed1ab4c20039a333fab
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 01:42 PM
--Here you go, Iggy: National Coyote Calling Championship.--
Hah, used to do that years ago, JiB. Had one gallop right up to about ten yards away when I only had my bow with me. Kinda hard to get a shot off when they're that close.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 05, 2019 at 01:43 PM
Jane, You're already a member. Here's the URL
https://www.facebook.com/groups/608445655858581/
Posted by: Tom Bowler | March 05, 2019 at 01:43 PM
The center left [and the center right for that matter] has never been anything but a way-station on the road to the Gulag. There is no practical or theoretical limit to progism so whether it takes five years or a hundred, the left's project always ends in tyranny, misery and revolt. Always.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | March 05, 2019 at 01:47 PM
Tytler Cycle, Iggy
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 05, 2019 at 01:50 PM
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 01:51 PM
I agree with every word of Henry's 1:51
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 05, 2019 at 01:56 PM
Rider University Dean Resigns Over Ban on Chick-fil-A in Defense of Company’s Christian Values
]
Posted by: Extraneus | March 05, 2019 at 01:59 PM
Denisovan skull fragment confirmed:
https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/323433/#respond
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 01:59 PM
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
3m3 minutes ago
Our great First Lady (@FLOTUS) will be doing a LIVE show TODAY at 1:00 PM PT with the terrific @EricBolling at the @WestgateVegas Resort. She’s on her #BeBest Tour, helping address the #OpioidCrisis. Free admission for the first 1,500 people!
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 02:03 PM
Good for Cynthia Newman!
Makes me want to buy some Chick-Fil-A.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 05, 2019 at 02:04 PM
Chick-Fil-A exposing nasties everywhere.
Posted by: clarice | March 05, 2019 at 02:07 PM
Porchlight,
President Trump just happened to serve Chik-fil-A along with McDonald's yesterday when the North Dakota Bison football team visited. He even mentioned it.
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 02:08 PM
Paul Sperry
@paulsperry_
Mar 3
New Mark Penn poll: 57% of Americans think Democrats are more socialist than capitalist
They'll regret their lurch to socialism. They're handing Trump the state of Florida & its electoral votes on a silver platter. Cuban-Americans hate socialism;saw Castro turn it into communism
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 02:10 PM
Compare Cynthia Newman’s willingness to leave a job in defense of her values, to the behavior of all those “good” FBI and DoJ personnel who sit quietly on their hands while evil is done all around them.
Posted by: James D. | March 05, 2019 at 02:11 PM
She's still a prof but no longer a dean. Less pay but less heartburn, unless they bring in Popeye's.
Posted by: Ralph L | March 05, 2019 at 02:14 PM
MEEP MEEP
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | March 05, 2019 at 02:15 PM
Breaking News Feed @pzf
2m
Trump just announced he’s headed to Alabama Friday to view storm damage.
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 02:20 PM
She's still a prof but no longer a dean. Less pay...
Unlikely. Faculty retain the pay rate of their highest-paid position. So if a Dean or Department Chair falls back to a "normal" faculty position, they keep the pay rate of the former position.
Posted by: DrJ | March 05, 2019 at 02:27 PM
And one wonders why tuitions cost so much...
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 05, 2019 at 02:28 PM
They'll charge her for witnessing, financially and socially if they can't do it criminally.
Zuckerfucker wouldn't let me change my HS back to its original, pre-coed name, so I removed it. My college is so lefty PC now, I almost took it off.
Posted by: Ralph L | March 05, 2019 at 02:35 PM
So if a Dean or Department Chair falls back to a "normal" faculty position, they keep the pay rate of the former position.
That's not always the case. In my experience department chairs can get a bonus or stipend for the extra work, and that definitely disappears if they step down as chair.
I have no knowledge of how it works with dean positions.
Posted by: jimmyk | March 05, 2019 at 02:36 PM
Ahoy!
RetainingTaking on water!http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=380056
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 02:36 PM
https://babylonbee.com/news/nations-republicans-weep- bitterly-upon-learning-hillary-clinton-not-running-in-2020
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 02:38 PM
Meanwhile in France "le gilet jaunes" have stepped it up notch, by using "poo" bombs thrown at police.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/french-police-hit-with-poo-bombs-at-yellow-vest-protests/
Posted by: Jim Eagle | March 05, 2019 at 02:39 PM
Hmmmm, that Babylon Bee link won't post after removing the space.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 02:41 PM
ThinkProgress published a blog post titled “Why Immigration Is the Hole in Bernie Sanders’ Progressive Agenda.” The senator, it argued, was supporting “the idea that immigrants coming to the U.S. are taking jobs and hurting the economy, a theory that has been proven incorrect.”
The idea that this "theory" could possibly be proven incorrect is one of the many problems with the "science" of economics (or maybe just the practice of "journalism") today. Either immigrants are getting jobs (and therefore taking jobs) or they are not (and therefore they are burdening our social support system). It is possible (and seems likely in the current Trump economy) that at times there are enough new job opportunities being created by the economy and filled by immigrants to create a net benefit to the overall economy, but unless everybody who has a job is in no danger of losing it or not getting a raise or not getting the better job that they would like to have, the "theory" is pretty much a statement of an obvious truth.
Posted by: boatbuilder | March 05, 2019 at 02:42 PM
I heard about carmen Miranda's nuptials on the fat paparazzi show but I didnt gaze at the basilisk
Posted by: Narciso79 | March 05, 2019 at 02:43 PM
jimmyk,
It may be different at private institutions, but hat I describe is pretty much the rule at public ones. The most egregious example was when the UC Davis Chancellor fell back into a faculty position.
Posted by: DrJ | March 05, 2019 at 02:47 PM
The Horde saves some of their best work for dream marriages.
Posted by: Captain Hate | March 05, 2019 at 02:54 PM
You already effed up the federal legal system, why screw ours?
Vicki McKenna @VickiMcKenna
29m
ERic Holder spending $350,000 in #DarkMoney to help Lisa Neubauer (who claims to HATE #DarkMoney) for Supreme Court
https://lacrossetribune.com/news/state-and-regional/wi/holder-spending-to-help-neubauer-for-supreme-court/article_32c65357-9769-5711-b7cd-bde03f2cafbe.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share
Posted by: henry | March 05, 2019 at 02:56 PM
At my university library, you keep your rate of pay even if you drop down into a lesser position. It is quite the plum gig to do a temporary stint as an associate director and then go back to your regular job.
Or, there are even people who get a promotion, absolutely fail at the job, and then drop back to their prior position (no one ever gets fired) and keep making the higher amount.
Some people who don't care about their reputation do this on purpose.
And people wonder why university budgets are bloated.
Don't even get me started, it turns my stomach.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 05, 2019 at 03:05 PM
Public university library, I should stipulate.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 05, 2019 at 03:05 PM
Porch and DrJ.
That system is just flat out CRAZY.
Posted by: Old Lurker | March 05, 2019 at 03:14 PM
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
25m25 minutes ago
Just a few moments ago, I signed an EO addressing one of our nation’s most heartbreaking tragedies: VETERANS SUICIDE. To every Veteran—I want you to know that you have an entire nation of more than 300 million people behind you. You will NEVER be forgotten.
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 03:16 PM
henry,
A USNA friend calls them termites eating their way into the house as the tent opens for the camel:)
Holder is both a termite and a chinless camel.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | March 05, 2019 at 03:16 PM
Jimmyk:
Your daughter was fantastic.
Good luck in her future decisions.
Totally disagree with TK’s assessment of Cruz.
Definitely stuck in the past.
Cruz has been nothing but supportive to the Trump administration.
Glad he has 6 more years to represent Texas.
Cornyn should be re-elected on the border alone.
Omar should be removed from the foreign relations committee.
AOC now knows her high profile is going to subject her to intense scrutiny.
The downside of her big mouth and self promotion.
Posted by: D | March 05, 2019 at 03:16 PM
You can pre-order the Mueller Report on Amazon, with an introduction by Alan Dershowitz. Publication date is set for Mar. 26.
Only 3 weeks left.
And please, no more of those will they release it and will Congress have to go to court tripe.
742 pages. 726 without Dershowitz's introduction.
Posted by: Neo | March 05, 2019 at 03:17 PM
How weird. Typepad wouldn't post the embedded tweet from the President (with the video). I tried twice and both times it disappeared.
Posted by: MissMarple2 | March 05, 2019 at 03:18 PM
A theory. It makes sense to me, too.
Posted by: Porchlight | March 05, 2019 at 03:20 PM