JustOneMinute

Debate Night And More

Mini-Mike hits the debate stage in Vegas. Can all his money buy him a box to stands on?

'Assault" Weapon Ban Fails In Virginia

A straw in the wind for the Democrats, but they'll ignore it:

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam's push to ban the sale of assault weapons failed on Monday after some of his fellow Democrats balked at the proposal.

Senators voted to shelve the bill for the year and ask the state crime commission to study the issue, an outcome that drew cheers from a committee room packed with gun advocates.

Four moderate Democrats joined Republicans in Monday's committee vote, rejecting legislation that would have prohibited the sale of certain semiautomatic firearms, including popular AR-15 style rifles, and banned the possession of magazines that hold more than 12 rounds.

Related: The Times took a deep dive into Mike Bloomberg's philanthropy and the ways it has left him with a lot of progressive groups feeling as if they owe him a favor or two. (No, I don't recall such a probe of the Clinton political machine vis a vis the Clinton foundations, but my memory isn't what I remember it to be...)

Anyway, the odd point is that Bloomberg was a huge backer of gun control groups through Everytown For Gun Safety but did not want to push for an assault weapons ban. Thought it was divisive relative to agenda items such as expanded background checks.

Here we go, from the Times:

Other members greatly appreciated the new direction from Everytown. “A structure began to be put into place, and we could avail ourselves of the data that was offered so we could speak more intelligently,” said June Rubin, a Moms Demand Action volunteer in New York. “So we’re focused and single-issue and highly recognizable and speaking with one voice, and it’s powerful.”

The policy agenda was to be focused on tightening background checks; more radical ideas like banning assault weapons were off the table. “There were people who were very, very troubled by that,” Ms. Rubin said. “I became very pragmatic.”

"Radical ideas"? How many liberals would describe an AWB as "radical"? Not the New Mike, as we flash forward to 2020:

In his campaign, Mr. Bloomberg has proposed a gun control agenda that goes far beyond Everytown’s, including a ban on assault-style weapons and a national licensing system.

Yeah, well. You're damn right he'll take away your guns.

 

Sunday Excitement

Away we go.

Clouds On The Blue Horizon

If I were a Democratic strategist I'd keep it very quiet. But I'd also have a long list of concerns. A couple of stray ones:

- Bernie can't win Pennsylvania. His fracking ban is poison, or so local Dems believe. But such a ban will boost his support in NY and CA, so there's that!

 - Can Gun Control Mike win Pennsylvania, not to mention Ohio or Michigan? The conventional wisdom says no, but maybe the Dems will find out!

 - Finally, where is the much-heralded, over-promised Bernie Wave of newly enthused arrival to the political process and the Democratic voting booths? Per the Times, turnout has been quite average in Iowa and New Hampshire - on the Democratic side. But what about on the Republican side?!?

Across the aisle, more than 150,000 voters — 151,602, to be precise — turned out for the Republican primary even though its outcome was never in doubt. That is extremely high for a noncompetitive primary. By comparison, about 54,000 people voted in the New Hampshire Democratic primary in 2012, and about 57,000 voted in the Republican primary in 2004.

Hmm, the enthusiasm gap may not favor Team Blue.

Now Its Barr v. Trump. Unless Its Not

AG Barr blasts Trump's tweets directed at DoJ generally and on the Roger Stone case specifically. The reported White House reaction is even-keeled:

About two hours after the interview aired, the White House issued a statement.

“The President wasn’t bothered by the comments at all and he has the right, just like any American citizen, to publicly offer his opinions. President Trump uses social media very effectively to fight for the American people against injustices in our country, including the fake news. The President has full faith and confidence in Attorney General Barr to do his job and uphold the law,” White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said.

Well, so far so good. Let's see what the 3 AM tweetstorm brings.

Andrew McCarthy explains the sentencing fiasco.

And set aside the details - thematically, Democrats howling about the sanctity of an independent Department of Justice fall on deaf Republican ears. That independence was quite threadbare when Obama and Lynch whitewashed the Hillary email "investigation". The only good thing you can say about it is they pretended to be discreet, mostly. OK, a couple of inappropriate Obama interviews, that ridiculous tarmac meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton - just oopsies. And oh, yeah, how did people read the Horowitz report on the FBI/DoJ FISA process with Carter Page and come away assured of the absence of political motivation? Please. The official conclusion of no political motivation is hard to take seriously.

And now we have, from an irate Republican perspective, a bunch of DC establishment "Get Trump BAMN" attorneys showboating with a max sentence for Roger Stone, quite possibly hoping to precipitate this sort of "outrage". And it has been Mission Accomplished. Obama misbehaved, now Trump misbehaves, and away we go.

Angry, divided and confused - this is how Trump wins.

Back To The Future

With the "OMG Bernie, now what?" panic at the Times and every other mainstream Dem mouthpiece, I am having a bit of a flashback. Who said this, and when?

I have not found this glorification of the establishment center to be the mood of the American people. Indeed, most Americans see the establishment center as an empty, decaying void that commands neither their confidence nor their love.

Coulda been Bernie! But that was George McGovern from April 1972 as he sought the Democratic nomination.

And here we are in June of that year with the Dem establishment in mini-panic mode:

It is hard to believe that the impressive delegate total amassed by Mr. McGovern necessarily reflects considered voter backing for all the elements in his program, especially since he has himself had great difficulty in indicating just what his program entails, what it would cost or how it would answer specific national needs.

The primary spur for McGovern votes, it would appear, is a widespread questioning among the electorate of vested centers of authority, political and economic, and a consequent eagerness to identify with a candidate who gives an impression of earnestness in challenging established approaches to solving the country's problems.

And what to do? Not much:

But the stop‐McGovern forces will have to reckon with two compelling deterrents to overaggressiveness in attempting to muscle the South Dakota Senator aside. One is the absence of any potential rival with demonstrated mass appeal; the other—and even more forceful —is party awareness that a recourse to old‐fashioned wheeling and dealing to block Mr. McGovern at Miami Beach would so outrage all the reform elements active in his ascent that the Democrats might be irretrievably fragmented.

We are back in reruns.

To Dixville Notch And Beyond

Blomentum in Dixville Notch! Just wait'll Magic Mike gets on the ballot! Not to mention the debate stage.

Bloomberg pulls out win in tiny Dixville Notch, NH

Share The Pain, or, Why Should New York City Suffer Alone?

At the Friday night debate Bernie Sanders called for an end to cash bail as part of an overhaul of our criminal justice system. His timing is awkward because even progressive stalwarts such as NYC Mayor deBlasio now admit that the NY state no-bail experiment is unfolding badly.

San Francisco is entering the experiment, so we may yet see a real-time success of Bernie's progressive vision. Or reality may continue to be uncooperative. So much to look forward to in 2020! 

BACKGROUND: Sen. Sanders proposed a bill in 2018. No mention of risk assessments or public safety concerns in their summary but the bill mentions the issue.

Let me excerpt the public safety mechanism in San Francisco as described by the UPI:

Under the new policy, while prosecutors can seek to hold defendants without bail in serious felony cases such as those involving acts of violence or sexual assaults, they have been instructed to no longer seek money bail for suspects assessed by an algorithm-based system to pose little or no risk to public safety or for flight.

"By replacing money bail with a risk-based system, people who are safe to be released get released quickly with appropriate, non-monetary conditions, and those who pose a serious threat to public safety are detained, regardless of their wealth," Boudin said.

A version of the algo has been in use for a while and of course it has had occasional hiccups:

In this case, Mims was already on felony probation after an arrest last November for breaking into cars at Twin Peaks, a popular tourist spot. He did three months in jail.

Then on July 4, police arrested him again, this time for gun possession and parole violations.

But on July 11, San Francisco Superior Court Judge Sharon Reardon released Mims with "assertive case management" a pretrial program that requires check-ins. Judge Reardon followed the recommendation of what's called a "public-safety assessment" or PSA score. It's a computer-generated score that's used here to help calculate whether a suspect is a flight risk or likely to return to court.

French's partner calls Reardon's decision "insane."

"I mean, he's violated two probations. He was a convicted felon. And he had a gun charge just five days before the murder of Ed French! It's absolutely crazy. I think the judge has to be held accountable," he says.

Hmm. In NYC, an early train wreck involved a woman, Tiffany Harris, who would slap, spit at curse at other women (some or all Jews), be detained, released, and then recycled. Not exactly a non-violent offender, one might think. Eventually the publicity got too awkward and she was put in a psych ward.

Saturday All Day

Here we go again.

Don't Stop Smiling (Unless You Start Laughing)

Was it only three days ago I noted that elections are won in November, not February? My goodness, there is a lot to smile about and strong hints that the Democratic clown car explosion will exceed expectations.

The good news: Gallup has spent the week strafing the Democrats. Let's see:

Trump has a record job approval rating;

In a bit of a non-coincidence, a record percentage of Americans believe their financial position is better than a year ago. That eclipses the Clinton boom years by a statistically insignificant 59% to 58%, but beating Clintons by a hair is what Trump does. Also in that report, a new record high think next year will be even better. The sun is shining today AND it will come out tomorrow!

Not done yet: Also setting a new record is the percentage of Americans who feel happy or satisified with their lives. And before you ask, yes, Republicans (especially well-off and married ones) are over-represented in the Sunshine Gang, so yes, time for a group chortle. (No Dr. Evil laughs, PLEASE.)

But there is bad news looming... for Democrats. Jonathan Chait, trapped in amber as a reminder of what moderate Democrats think, outlines the impending meltdown of the Democratic primary. His gist - Biden is too weak to win but too strong to die so Bernie is likely to swoop, Trump-like, to the nomination. Which will end disastrously.

Reading it all risks a schadenfreude overdose; this may be a safe amount:

So it is entirely possible that, following South Carolina, Sanders will have won three or all four of the contests. If nobody has emerged as a viable alternative by then, Michael Bloomberg’s campaign will be stepping in. It is extremely hard to estimate the probability of success of a candidate who has skipped the first four races. FiveThirtyEight’s model currently gives Bloomberg less than a one percent chance of winning.

To be sure, if Bloomberg is the last Democrat standing against Sanders, he may well attract substantial support from Democratic elected officials and put up a strong fight. Still, he would face enormous opposition from the left. This is, after all, a billionaire who endorsed George W. Bush in 2004. And while the left has previously whipped itself into an angry frenzy against, successively, O’Rourke, Biden, Harris, and Buttigieg, the rage against Bloomberg would reach a new level.

At that point, the victory scenario would involve a long, bloody struggle all the way to the convention, with the Sanders movement claiming at every step of the way that the party is rigging the race against them, culminating in a convention where his enraged supporters will again try to shout down the proceedings. Unless one of the non-Bloombergs can somehow get off the mat and defeat Sanders, this is probably the best-case scenario for liberals at this point. It seems more probable that Sanders crushes the field and brings his historically unique suite of liabilities to the ticket.

Now obviously Team Sanders already believes the DNC is out to thwart them, again. Left unmentioned by Chait - Bloomberg is basically buying the DNC. He hosts "fundraisers" but won't take people's money - if they want to write a check he points them to the DNC or Swing Left. 

I am just guessing but I don't think that will leave Sanders and his supporters feeling the love.

Well. A week from now (or a tweet from now) this may all be ashes, but today? So far, so good!

Send Better Fixers

In the Iowa Update du Jour Bernie Sanders will claim the popular vote (both rounds) and may eke out a win in the SDE tally, or State Delegate Equivalents. Apparently Team Sanders organized new satellite caucuses and is turning in great results from them.

Uh, satellite caucuses? Say what? Let's give credit where due - the Iowa State Democrats really leaned into accommodating Bernie and implementing Operation Own Goal:

In particular, the campaign focused heavily on bringing people out to the satellite caucuses that were held across the state and in other parts of the world for Iowans who couldn’t make it to the 7 p.m. caucuses. This was the first year the party hosted satellite caucuses, and no other campaign seems to have invested serious resources in turning those voters out. With 41 state delegates available to be swept up, and fewer than 25 delegates currently separating Pete Buttigieg and Sanders, they could end up making the difference when the delegate count is finalized.

The first caucus was held in Tbilisi, Georgia, of all places and reports are that Sanders led the delegates there. Another was held in St. Petersburg, Florida, where former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is heavily on the airwaves. The first in Iowa was held at a UFCW union hall in Ottumwa, with Sanders winning all 14 of the final votes to net four precinct delegates, a relatively large pickup. At Drake University in Des Moines, workers and students went overwhelmingly for Sanders, giving him five delegates and Sen. Elizabeth Warren two, meaning that he netted five relative to Buttigieg....

In all, there were 87 satellite caucuses. According to Iowa Democratic Party rules, the total delegate value of those caucuses will be determined by satellite turnout and in proportion to the total number of people who came out to vote in the regular caucuses. They are to be worth some percent of the total, meaning that the four delegates Sanders won in Ottumwa, for instance, could actually rise or shrink in the final analysis. But what we know about those caucuses suggests that Sanders may have won those caucuses by enough to overcome his deficit with Buttigieg, which at the time of writing sits at 23.987 delegates with 86 percent of the precincts reporting.

Great. Now let's have the Democrats rewrite the rules for health care and pharmaceutical development.

IN OTHER NEWS: The sun rose in the East and the Senate acquitted Trump. The mini-surprises were a Romney defection but no aisle-crossing from Manchin (D, WV) or Sinema (D, AZ).

Meanwhile, Back In Iowa...

More results have trickled in. At last look, 538 had 71% of the votes. Their prediction jibes with that of the NY Times Upshot: Sanders will probably have more total votes (both first and second round) and Buttigieg will probably get more delegates. Why? Sort of an Electoral Pre-School effect:

So far, Sen. An urban areas and college towns, which punch a bit below their weight in terms of delegates.

I wouldn't spend much more time delving into the details of the Iowa Way - After what one wag described as an explosive shower of radioactive clowns I doubt these caucuses will be first in the nation again.

State Of The Union

My goodness, what else can go right for Trump before today's State of the Union?

 - The Democrats running their Iowa caucuses make a strong case for the Electoral College as their radioactive clown car explodes in a shower of No Results.

 - Gallup tells us Trump's job approval is a Personal Best of 49% as he awaits his acquittal tomorrow.

 - And the Dow is up 500 to near-record territory (the NASDAQ is at a new high) as... due, we guess to some combo of reduced coronavirus fears and (some cynics say!) a newfound respect for the DNC determination to Stop Bernie.

Look - elections are won in November, not February. But we can agree that for Team Trump this is setting up nicely.

All the Democrats had to do was not be crazy, and maybe even project an air of competence. Missions Unaccomplished! Trump ought to have the same basic goals - be capable and not crazy. Doable!

Caucus Night Open Thread

Iowa takes its star turn tonight. And yes, the news about Rush is a bummer.

Super Sunday

Is it just me or has this been an unusually under-hyped Super Bowl? The death of Laker great Kobe Bryant took a lot of air out of the sports world balloon.

Well. I may have rooted for San Francisco back when they were led by Notre Dame's own Joe Montana and battling the other Evil Empire, the Dallas Cowboys. But as a general rule I can't root for California teams so its Kansas City for me.