Israel's 'Iron Dome' has always been vulnerable to a high-volume attack. This has become a problem.
BIG IF TRUE: This reads like an IDF press release but still...
The gist: The IDF positioned troops for a ground assault, then tweeted the assault had begun. The plan was to prompt Hamas to put their troops into their defensive tunnels and bunkers, and then bomb them. Still assessing whether it worked.
UNPOSSIBLE. HAM ASS could not read TWEETS, because they are poor pooor victims (read animals) and the couldn't have rockets, because they are poor poooor victims (read animals). Tom, your new friends like these animals.
Posted by: GUS | May 14, 2021 at 10:14 AM
As long as the Hamas dudes are masked and vaccinated, they are bomb proof. Fauci said so.
Posted by: henry | May 14, 2021 at 10:20 AM
Heh, Henry.
Idf is creaming Hamas, roll out the proportionate response blather again.
Posted by: clarice | May 14, 2021 at 10:33 AM
Clarice, lobbing hundreds of rockets into Israel, specifically Tel Aviv is an attempt to murder children. The left is too stupid to comprehend this, because of the narrative. HAM ASS GOOD, ISRAEL BAD. One tiny little Jewish country, in the entire world. Maybe HAM ASS and it's peeps could move back to JORDAN. A country with the population of 9 MILLION cannot live in PEACE.
APARTHEID!!!!!!
Posted by: GUS | May 14, 2021 at 10:38 AM
Heh clarice when i saw he was a 20 year veteran i suspected it was a feint
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 10:39 AM
If I were Netenyahu, I would wave all the dirt on Biden (that Mossad probably has) in Biden’s face and tell him to mind his own business.
Steady stream of customers, hot sellers are toys and baskets right now.
Posted by: MissMarple2 | May 14, 2021 at 10:42 AM
No doubt the UN will declare this a war crime by those wily Jews.
Posted by: jimmyk | May 14, 2021 at 10:48 AM
In Twitter's sidebar,
A video and an image showing people storing gasoline in plastic bags were taken in Houston and Mexico in 2019, according to PolitiFact and Snopes
Maybe this was pointed out to float the idea that people wuz stoopider under Trump than they are under Dementia Joe.Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 14, 2021 at 10:48 AM
Right next to the bowl of tidepods
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/05/woke-cia-old-news-just-ask-hipsters-fidel-and-che-humberto-fontova/
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 10:51 AM
Wait, the pandemic’s over?
The timing of today’s mask announcement seems…suspicious
https://spectator.us/topic/wait-pandemic-over-cdc-masks/amp/
Colds, Flu and COVID will be tapering off between now and mid-August, when it will then begin anew.
Looks like the Biden Administration is trying to declare it dead before mid-August.
This plan was noticeable when a couple of weeks ago, governors of blue states started to quickly rollback COVID related restrictions.
This all seems to be related to the success of Ron DeSantis in Florida. If the blue state Governors did nothing, Ron DeSantis would own the end of the pandemic.
The big gamble is that COVID won't reappear after mid-August, when the hope of a vaccine will have been spent. That's when Biden will own it.
Bet that jobs report helped to speed it along.
Posted by: Neo | May 14, 2021 at 10:52 AM
For some reason typepad doesnt like cisa bulletins
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 10:57 AM
Much like saigon cree that believed halberstam and acted against diem accordingly.
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 11:03 AM
Lix* Cheney attempts to prod those few Repukes who supported her to recant their votes.
*Proximity key typo, but I prefer it actually.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | May 14, 2021 at 11:03 AM
The 9/11 theater must go on.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/14/jan-6-capitol-insurrection-house-reaches-deal-on-commission.html
Posted by: henry | May 14, 2021 at 11:09 AM
ABC, PDQ, LOL,
https://twitter.com/i/status/1393212993744289795
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 14, 2021 at 11:10 AM
Chy-nah Mars lander
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 14, 2021 at 11:18 AM
The 9/11 theater must go on.
That was the one where, as I recall, they tried to stack it with Democrats. Now it's 5 and 5. But why do I not trust the Rs to choose their members? It wouldn't surprise me if a few them ended up being pro-impeachment Rs.
Posted by: jimmyk | May 14, 2021 at 11:39 AM
You gotta love it when the federal government says the U.S. needs to secure its networks when the whole world is at risk.
'Significant' ransomware attack forces Ireland's health service to shut down IT systems
https://www.zdnet.com/article/significant-ransomware-attack-forces-irelands-health-service-to-shuts-down-it-systems/
Posted by: Neo | May 14, 2021 at 11:44 AM
BREAKING: Republicans Elect Elise Stefanik To GOP Leadership After Kicking Liz Cheney To Curb
https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-republicans-elect-elise-stefanik-to-gop-leadership-after-kicking-liz-cheney-to-curb
Posted by: Neo | May 14, 2021 at 11:46 AM
86% of gas stations in Washington, D.C., are out of fuel today.
Welcome to the Green New Deal
Posted by: Neo | May 14, 2021 at 12:04 PM
An interesting summary of the Benghazi fiasco:
A Marine Colonel friend of a friend says:
This squares with what I knew in 2012. Believe it or not, former U.N. weapons inspector, and a Marine Intelligence Officer that I worked with in 1994-'95, Scott Ritter, was reporting this in open forum in 2013.
Posted by: Manuel Transmission | May 14, 2021 at 12:08 PM
Hah! So, She lied about it all::
"Max Nardou"
@MaxNordau
“REVEALED: Florida data scientist who said she was axed for refusing to alter COVID-19 stats NEVER had access to the data and was fired for insubordination”
“data scientist”
They tried, okay?
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
https://twitter.com/MaxNordau/status/1393226692924256256
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 12:23 PM
10/2/92 Agenda 21 passes in Congress:
https://youtu.be/he7tbK7KC34
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 12:28 PM
Mel--
https://assets-global.website-files.com/5e72518058686ec4adae1482/5f64d9c8fa34609e041db51d_Liberatory%20Thinking%20Interactive%20200917.pdf
from CPS.
Posted by: rse | May 14, 2021 at 12:41 PM
Posted by: Neo | May 14, 2021 at 12:48 PM
Disclose.tv
NOW - Secret Service officers gathering on top of the White House (NBC)
hmmm…
https://t.me/disclosetv/2253
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 12:50 PM
Source: https://equity.cps.edu/
If that isn't Ericson Inst, I'll eat another hat.
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 12:53 PM
From https://equity.cps.edu/tags/liberatory-thinking mel.
Had one webinar this am and another coming up. definitely a convergence I can see because I intuited it and have been reading up and recognize exactly where the language came from even without any offered cite.
Posted by: rse | May 14, 2021 at 12:54 PM
No, my link was from the bottom of yours, and just fits everything Mrs. Bowman and Arne have been striving for all these decades.
Meanwhile, Switzerland is off my list, lest they grab everything on the way through:
Switzerland Cancels it Currency
May 14, 2021
I previously warned that Trudeau had a law passed as of January 1st, 2021 he can cancel the currency of Canada. Little by little, those countries who have joined Schwab’s World Economic Forum’s view that paper money must be eliminated and we must have only digital currency so everything is taxed. Now Switzerland, which has been the hedge in Europe against the euro, has without notice canceled its entire run of currency they call the 8th series which includes the 1,00SF note which has been perhaps the #1 large note used in hoarding.
The notes are NO LONGER legal tender and they are giving everyone until October 30th, to deposit them or lose 100%. Of course, moving for a one-world government headed by the UN, canceling all currency, and COVID lockdowns for a virus that may have been manmade, and a death ratio of just 0.028%, all of this is just a conspiracy theory if you try to connect any dots whatsoever. Our role in society is to play the fool. Just shut up, social distance for everyone is a threat with some disease, and stay in your home and just be ruled. Read the fake news and what fake TV programs that are the new cancel culture. And, btw, have no children. Drink and get drunk that is preferable.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/switzerland/switzerland-cancels-it-currency/
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 01:06 PM
Furthermore doherty and co, had been to all of the stans so they recognized who was showing up to the partv
My money on the ringleader was bin qumu since he was ensconced in gitmo freed by ccr sent to ali salem freed foolishly by saif muamars crown prince sent to train the rebels detaimed by haftars men nearly three years probably atuffed in an oven as is their custom over there
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:18 PM
Not a Single State Reported a Sizeable Increase in Coronavirus Cases Last Week
Posted by: Neo | May 14, 2021 at 01:23 PM
Why would mitre develop a software package like cobalt strike.
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:24 PM
Fair or harsh
https://spectator.org/israel-tlaib-omar-sanders-war-hamas-bombs/
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:28 PM
.Marines Sank a Moving Ship When They Fired a Navy Missile from a Drone Truck
"The Marine Corps took out a moving ship by firing a Navy missile at it from the back of an unmanned vehicle on land -- a new weapon the service's top general says will make "an adversary think twice."
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/05/13/marines-sank-moving-ship-when-they-fired-navy-missile-drone-truck.html
Posted by: Davod | May 14, 2021 at 01:29 PM
Senator Burr asked Fauci, Peter Marks from the FDA, and
@CDCDirector
what percentage of their own employees are vaccinated.
Fauci probably a bit more than half, around 60%.
Marks said about the same.
Walensky dodged the question.
https://mobile.twitter.com/kerpen/status/1393022731373973504
Posted by: Neo | May 14, 2021 at 01:29 PM
Well then
https://mobile.twitter.com/redsteeze/status/1393020916389404673
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:33 PM
Ok then
https://mobile.twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1392965775342850059
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:34 PM
Relief for lumber prices n the way?
Under the hood of the University of Michigan Sentiment Survey, something really ugly appeared.
While homebuilder sentiment (as measured among realtors by the NAHB) remains near record highs, home-buying sentiment has utterly collapsed as surging home prices have overwhelmed any benefits from low rates as urban exodus dominates local purchasing power.
Posted by: Ignatz Ratzkiwatzki | May 14, 2021 at 01:36 PM
Try again
https://tinyurl.com/2w47azd5
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:38 PM
Probably less demand for plywood until the next phase of Chauvin gets underway.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 14, 2021 at 01:38 PM
Good point
https://freebeacon.com/national-security/palestinians-funneled-hundreds-millions-terrorists-state-dept-report-reveals/
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:39 PM
No fair, only the deep state can do if
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/project-veritas-tried-to-undercover-expose-hr-mcmaster-nyt-2021-5%3famp
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:43 PM
One lone voice
https://mobile.twitter.com/julie_kelly2/status/1393255597794017280
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:49 PM
The ventilstors are probably upping the death toll
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:51 PM
In india,
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 01:51 PM
Re. Masks.
They just want to give everyone a break, before reinstituting masks again, for cold, flu, etc.
Posted by: Davod | May 14, 2021 at 01:58 PM
They just extorted 5 million dollars you know how cobalt strike packets that can buy.
https://mobile.twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/1392882691402604548?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 02:00 PM
Re cyber security at the pipeline:
https://www.designdevelopmenttoday.com/industries/energy/news/21427753/tech-audit-of-colonial-pipeline-found-glaring-problems
“We found glaring deficiencies and big problems,” said Robert F. Smallwood, whose consulting firm delivered an 89-page report in January 2018 after a six-month audit. “I mean an eighth-grader could have hacked into that system.”
Posted by: henry | May 14, 2021 at 02:01 PM
ManTran,
Your 12:08 was great. Giving details on what we already knew, and as always, revealing no consequences. What a world we live in!
My iPad croaked a few days ago. It took me until now to get my laptop running. It's tough becoming dumb as a post!
Posted by: Jane | May 14, 2021 at 02:15 PM
Hmm, I wonder what happened....
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/darkside-hackers-reportedly-closing-down-after-retaliation-routs-their-infrastructure
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 02:32 PM
Sunlight into Chicago's back office? What could possibly go wrong?
Becky Vevea
@beckyvevea
Tens of thousands of emails from Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s staff were posted online. Experts weigh in on what should happen next, @MariahWoelfel reports. wbez.org/stories/is-dum…
https://twitter.com/beckyvevea/status/1393267947158835202
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 02:38 PM
AmmoGRRL's CIA ad for herself.
"...Hello, CIA. Well, here I am occupying my space, but frankly not much of it. I am a vertically challenged cisgender woman of pinkish-beige color. Like your poster girl, I also have Generalized Anxiety Disorder, although mine is so bad that it is in a category all on its own called Yucky Everlasting Godawful Anxiety Disorder Syndrome, or as it’s known in the nutjob trade: YE GADS..."
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2021/05/thoughts-from-the-ammo-line-376.php
Posted by: Davod | May 14, 2021 at 03:00 PM
Jesse Livermore @Jesse_Livermore
1h
The "rising rates" justification for growth stock underperformance is a great excuse to sell an overextended asset class, but the logic itself is totally off base.
THREAD below:
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇
Are rising interest rates contributing to growth stock underperformance? Trivially, yes, since people believe there's a relationship & have therefore been transacting in ways that have helped create one. But the fundamental justification itself is deeply flawed.
Here's a charitable "steelman" framing of the theory:
"The earnings that growth stocks generate arrive later in the future than value stock earnings. When discounted back to the present at higher rates, those later future earnings end up being worth less on a relative basis. Thus, growth stocks end up being worth less."
On the surface, the logic seems to make sense. But it's an entangled mess. I'm going to disentangle it in two ways: first, w/ an intuitive argument, and second, w/ an actual discounted cashflow analysis (DCF).
Intuitively, here's a good test for the fundamental legitimacy of any alleged mkt relationship. Assume the mkt permanently violates the relationship. Is there a way for u, the investor, to "arbitrage" the violation, make money off it? Can u turn it into a good deal for yourself?
If the answer is no, then the alleged relationship is probably superficial--a consequence of shared expectations that become self-fulfillingly true, rather than an outcome dictated by fundamentals.
To apply to the test to an example, consider the following alleged market relationship: "Increases in the projected future path of the Fed's short-term interest rate cause increases in treasury bond yields."
To test the fundamental validity of the relationship, suppose the Fed raises short-term rates to 20% & promises to keep them there for the next 30 yrs. But the mkt then violates the above relationship, holding 30 yr yld constant at ~2.5%. Can you make money from the violation?
Yes, obviously. You sell 30 year treasury bonds in your portfolio at the unchanged price and hold the proceeds as cash at the new 20% rate. Over the next 30 years, you'll make an extra 17.5% annually, without having to take on any significant risk.
As an additional example, consider a similar market relationship applied to equities: "Higher real interest rates on long-term bonds push equity prices and valuations down, all else equal."
To test for fundamental validity, suppose LT bond yields rise to 20%, but the market leaves current equity prices unchanged, in violation of the relationship. Can you convert this violation into a good deal for yourself? Yes--sell your equities & take the higher return in bonds.
If people are stupid enough, equity prices could keep rising, creating potential losses in the trade at various points. But the carry tailwind will be so powerful that it's almost impossible to imagine a scenario where you won't end up on top in the end.
You can probably see where this is headed. Let's apply this test to the alleged "rising rates hurts growth stocks" narrative. Does the narrative pass the test?
Well, suppose interest rates rise to 20% as before, but growth stocks fail to underperform value stocks. They both fall, but by the SAME amount, leaving the spread unch'd. With the alleged market relationship violated, is there a way for you to make money, get a good deal?
If Growth is three times as expensive as Value, and then rates go from 0% to 20% overnight, without any change in anything else, where is the alleged "arbitrage"? How does the rate increase translate into you making money or getting a good deal, on any horizon, by buying Value?
The answer is there is no arbitrage. In keeping the relative valuations of Growth and Value unchanged amid the rate increase, the mkt isn't giving you or anyone else anything. There's nothing that you can do to turn the market's rejection of the rule into a gain.
Now, a caveat. If a company has (1) a net cash pile or (2) excess cash flow, that company will offer advantages under higher interest rates relative to the opposite type of company, one that is illiquid & heavily-indebted.
The reason is obvious. Higher rates allow the cash rich company, or the investors that it pays its cash out to, to earn a higher return on that cash, when it gets deposited at the bank or used to buy a bond, etc.
Conversely, higher rates will mean that a cash poor company has to pay more to borrow the cash that it needs to operate, refinance its large debts, etc.
In that sense, the higher interest rates could conceivably create an arbitrage where you profit from buying cash rich companies and selling cash poor companies. Fair enough.
But this observation says nothing directly about Value vs. Growth. Value doesn't mean cash rich & Growth doesn't mean cash poor. What these terms mean, instead, is cheap relative to current fundamentals and expensive relative to current fundamentals.
A Value Company, i.e., a company priced cheaply relative to book, sales, eps, etc. can be cash poor. Think of a small cap energy E&P company. Similarly, a growth company priced expensively relative to those variables can be cash rich. Think Apple or Google.
Now, even if we wrongly stereotype Value companies as cash rich and Growth companies as cash poor, the impact of the kind of rate increase that has occurred over the last year--a roughly 1% rise in long-term treasury yields--is negligible.
A 20% hike in rates might boost the eps of cash rich companies vs. cash poor, but a 1% increase in treasury rates, which is what we're talking about here, will hardly make a difference to anything. In fact, w/ spreads falling, the actual funding costs have hardly risen at all.
For an illustration of the irrelevance of this consideration, look at an actual value vs. growth decision that an investor might make: GM vs. TSLA. Suppose that you have to invest in one or the other at current prices and hold for the next 40 years. Which would you choose?
One could argue that GM has greater capacity for operational cash generation than TSLA, and is able to pay you more in cash dividends over the near term. With a 1% rate increase, you'll be able to earn 1% more in income each year on that cash. But seriously, who cares?
Would this consideration have any effect whatsoever on your preference to own GM vs. TSLA? Of course not! It's ridiculous to even bring it up in the conversation.
Instead of wasting time trying to figure out what interest rate you can earn by depositing GM's dividends or using them to buy bonds, you'll be asking serious questions about the future prospects of the businesses and how those prospects are being priced. Questions such as:
"GM is cheap, but can it survive its legacy issues and the disruptive competition that it will face?"
"TSLA is set to become a major market leader, but can it live up to its OUTRAGEOUSLY high price?"
The rule therefore fails the test. If it's anything, it's just a superficial association that has arisen out of self-fulfilling beliefs, in contrast to a reliable relationship that has emerged based on fundamental considerations that actually matter to the final analysis.
Now, I haven't said anything about "discounting." Let's talk about that. The narrative asserts that bc growth stock earnings are back-dated relative to value stocks, that their present value shrinks more under higher discount rates. But this line of thinking is a confusion.
Here's the steelman of the logic, one more time:
"The earnings that growth stocks generate arrive later in the future than value stock earnings. When discounted back to the present at higher rates, those later future earnings end up being worth less on a relative basis. Thus, growth stocks end up being worth less."
This logic entails a misapplication of the concept of discounting. When using discounting to value something, the thing we're discounting is NOT the future earnings. It's the future distributed CASH--either a stream of future dividends, or some final payout.
We can think of a stock as a collection of future cash payouts, which come either as dividends or in the form of a final liquidation or buyout, etc. When investors purchase those future cash payouts, they are tying up their money in something that has risk.
Not just fundamental risk, but also mark-to-market risk, which can trap them in losing positions for years or even decades. For all anyone knows, sentiment could deteriorate after they buy, leaving them with no way to get the money out except at a loss.
That risk represents a cost, a burden, a negative feature of the investment. For investors to be willing to accept it, they need to get compensation, a return.
To get a return from the investment, they need to pay less cash now than they will get later via the payouts. That's where the "discounting" comes in, why it's necessary.
Buying the "future cash" today at a discount, and then receiving it later in full value, is precisely what makes for the return.
Now, in this process, "earnings" are NOT the same thing as payouts. They are not the right thing to be discounting.
If you try to discount the earnings of a company, i.e., if you put a company's projected future earnings into the numerator of a discounted cashflow analysis, you're going to DOUBLE-COUNT their value.
That's because companies *reinvest* a significant portion of their earnings. They use that portion to purchase future growth in earnings, which translates into higher future payouts.
By discounting a company's future earnings in a DCF, you're wrongly counting BOTH the earnings themselves and the future growth they're being used to purchase. That's the mistake that led G&H to target the notorious "Dow 36,000" in their 1999 book.
An additional problem with the logic is that it's misleading to say that the earnings of growth stocks "arrive later" in the future than the earnings of value stocks.
Both types of companies--Value and Growth--have whatever earnings they have, full stop. The difference between those earnings is not so much in their "arrival times", whatever that would mean, but in how fast they're set to grow, i.e., the growth differential.
You can price a fast-growing stock cheaply, making it a value stock. That will not make its earnings arrive any faster or slower, sooner or later. The value vs. growth distinction speaks to the price that YOU pay for the earnings, not to when they come into the company.
Now, mathematically, what matters to the relative valuation prescribed by a DCF analysis of a Value company vs. a Growth company is (1) the size of the growth differential b/t the two, and (2) the schedule of the payouts. Not the earnings, the PAYOUTS.
If you assume a given growth differential between two companies, and you keep their payout schedules the same, you can manipulate the discount rate in whatever way you want. Your manipulation will not change the relative valuation prescribed by the DCF.
To prove this point, we can just build an actual DCF model of a Value Company and a Growth Company, and tweak the discount rate to see what happens.
So, consider the following:
Value Company: $1 in current EPS. For the first 20 years, the $1 gets fully reinvested at an 8% ROI, yielding 8% annual EPS growth. Then, after 20 years, the company's reinvestment opportunities disappear, and the ensuing earnings get distributed as dividends forever.
Growth Company: $1 in current EPS. For the first 20 years, the $1 gets fully reinvested at a 30% ROI, yielding 30% annual EPS growth. Then, after 20 years, the company's reinvestment opportunities disappear, and the ensuing earnings get distributed as dividends forever.
These companies--the Value Company and the Growth Company--represent two different future payout streams.
The Value Company is a $0 stream for the first 20 years (the reinvestment period) and then a $4.66 stream paid out annually forever ($1*1.08^30).
The Growth Company is a $0 stream for the first 20 years, then a ~$190.05 stream paid out annually forever ($1*1.30^20).
To calculate prices for these companies, we discount all of their future payouts, from now to infinity, back to the present at a rate matching the return we're demanding. We then sum up all the discounted dividends to get the prescribed price. That price will deliver that return.
At a 7% discount rate...
The Value Company's price will be 17.21, which equates to a current P/E ratio of 17.21x, since its currentEPS is $1.
The Growth Company's price will be 701.61, which equates to a current P/E of 701.61x, since its current EPS is also $1.
As expected, the Growth Company trades at a premium current multiple relative to the Value Company (701.61x vs. 17.21x). The ratio b/t the multiples comes out to 40.77 (=701.61/17.21), which is to say, the Growth Company trades 40.77 times as expensive relative to current EPS.
Obviously, the basis for the difference in price relative to current earnings is the fact that the Growth Company has significantly higher future earnings growth in front of it. It's reinvesting at a 30% annual ROI, achieving 30% annual growth, vs. only 8% for the Value.
Now, let's change the discount rate. Let's assume that interest rates rise across the board by 1%, justifying a 1% increase in the discount rate from 7% to 8%. What will happen to the calculated prices and valuations of the Value Company & the Growth Company under the new rate?
At an 8% discount rate...
The prescribed price of the Value Company will drop to 12.50, a 12.50x P/E ratio.
The prescribed price of the Growth Company will drop to 509.69, a 509.69x P/E ratio.
The ratio b/t these multiples is 40.77 (=509.69/12.50).
Notice... that's EXACTLY the same ratio that we had before, under the 7% discount rate.
Turns out, you could make the discount rate 100% if you wanted. You would still get that same prescribed relative valuation: 40.77.
The images below show the results under the two different discount rates (Left = 7%, Right = 8%).
The ratio between the prescribed valuations is exactly the same under both...
https://twitter.com/Jesse_Livermore/status/1393278662137503747
Now, IF the companies have different payout schedules, i.e., if one company is going to start paying out dividends now, and the other company will only start paying out dividends 100 yrs from now...
Tip
...THEN higher discount rates will affect the relative valuation, depressing the later payer relative to the current payer.
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 03:02 PM
OOps, didn't mean to post that...Sorry!
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 03:02 PM
Melinda. I woulda thunk that it was SOP for blackmailing hackers to quit all links/sites after a successful (or even unsuccessful) blackmail.
Posted by: Davod | May 14, 2021 at 03:04 PM
This will definitely leave a mark::
https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/did-china-just-kill-commodity-craze
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 03:09 PM
Nice map!
🇬🇧 𝔻𝕒𝕧𝕚𝕕 𝕀 𝔹𝕚𝕣𝕔𝕙
@dbirch214
Just look at that anomaly in NW Europe for May to date.
Just incredible.
https://twitter.com/dbirch214/status/1393269154854092802
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 03:19 PM
Noted diplomat and State Department Van Driver weighs in:
Channel 4 News
@Channel4News
Former Obama aide Tommy Vietor tells @mattfrei that the US needs to get involved in the Israel-Palestine conflict and says Biden should push for a message of de-escalation.
channel4.com/news/i-hope-bi…
https://twitter.com/Channel4News/status/1393287246418116610
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 03:33 PM
David, noticed your problems posting a pic the other day. Are you using an IPad/IPhone? If so i think that IOS is inserting some non-printable codes that screwup HTML. I have only once successfully posted a pic from my IPad and I had to create the text in another app and then C&P to Typepad comment box with no editing.
Posted by: JohnH | May 14, 2021 at 04:01 PM
Michael Knowles@michaeljknowles ·
*Maxine Waters
Robert Reich@RBReich ·
Folks, this is not complicated. If you harass and incite violence against your colleagues, you do not belong in Congress. Expel Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 14, 2021 at 04:12 PM
Can you say conspiracy to commit vote fraud?
https://www.maciverinstitute.com/2021/05/democrat-mayors-may-have-violated-open-meetings-law-during-secret-election-planning/
Posted by: henry | May 14, 2021 at 04:15 PM
short History of Arab-Israeli conflicts:(1) Arabs attack planning to throw Israelis into the sea;(2) Israel defends and counter attacks.(3) world sits by thinking (1) will be successful and there's no need to do anything. (4) Israel clobbers the heck out of the Arabs and looks to be winning. (5) world starts yammering about disproportionate force. (6) Clear loss to the Arabs in the making--world calls for immediate truce.
This time, I do not see (6) happening or at least not until Hamas is totally wiped out. Enough.
Posted by: clarice | May 14, 2021 at 04:18 PM
So stupid it must be painful. Thread
@govmurphy
Dr. Fauci himself said yesterday that he thinks lifting indoor mask mandates at this time could lead to a rise in infections. So we’re not going to let up for the next few weeks as we keep pushing forward on our statewide vaccination goals.
https://twitter.com/govmurphy/status/1393289848526626816?s=21
Posted by: henry | May 14, 2021 at 04:20 PM
Dr. Fauci himself said
It's like in the Wizard of Oz. "Fauci has spoken!!!" (Pay no attention that man behind the curtain.)
Posted by: jimmyk | May 14, 2021 at 04:31 PM
Janus syndicate closed up shop, well thats convenient
Oh remember neera tanden, shes back!
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 04:35 PM
Omg
https://mobile.twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1393257051321774084
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 04:36 PM
Forget the laws. Woke is more important.
@newsmaciver
.@DHSWI Sec. Karen Timberlake says she doesn't care if JFC said no to the new equity officer positions in the budget - she's going to hire one anyway. #WIright
https://twitter.com/newsmaciver/status/1393299748799590400?s=21
Posted by: henry | May 14, 2021 at 04:50 PM
https://www.westernjournal.com/qualifies-government-pay-internet/ This may be of interest to you.MM
Posted by: clarice | May 14, 2021 at 04:51 PM
Darksidec was on tor routers meaning the dark web the odds of cnn seeing it?
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 05:04 PM
Oh its even stupider than i thought. Theyre not on the dark web
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 05:11 PM
Henry,
Press on Regardless is my motto.
Posted by: Jim Eagle | May 14, 2021 at 05:29 PM
Sounds like the equifax hack that mandiant observed
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 05:31 PM
Chris 🇺🇸
@Chris_1791
Neera Tanden joins White House staff after OMB nomination derailed dlvr.it/RzgKwv via @nypost
https://twitter.com/Chris_1791/status/1393324886169292801
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 05:59 PM
Whoopsie!
Luigi Warren 😊😻
@luigi_warren
twitter.com/HansMahncke/st…
https://twitter.com/luigi_warren/status/1393320615407284224
https://usrtk.org/biohazards-blog/scientists-masked-involvement-in-lancet-letter-on-covid-origin/
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 06:03 PM
Neera Tanden joins White House staff after punching a journalist, outing an anonymous victim of harassment, calling a Senator a vampire.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 14, 2021 at 06:15 PM
Kurt Schlichter
@KurtSchlichter
You suck
Gavin Newsom @GavinNewsom
CA is providing the LARGEST rental relief program. For those that need it, we will pay your back-rent, your rent for months to come, AND your utility bills.
https://twitter.com/KurtSchlichter/status/1393331071807197187
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 06:24 PM
Hunh.
Tom's Hardware
@tomshardware
Blackouts in Taiwan: Foundries & DRAM Makers Unaffected, Chip Packagers Halt Ops trib.al/o5mxlcN
https://twitter.com/tomshardware/status/1393332458318450689
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 06:30 PM
Tᴏɴʏ! Tᴏɴɪ! Tᴏɴᴇ́! 𝚂𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚔 (R.I.P.) 🕙
@StarkTTT
Dennis Miller voice: “There’s been such a sudden shift in favor of unmasking in this administration it’s like John Brennan joined the team.”
https://twitter.com/StarkTTT/status/1393328239087656961
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 06:33 PM
JohnH.
Thanks. My problem is mainly with posting photos from other websites. I can post the link, but every time try to add the extra stuff, so the link appears as a picture, I seem to screw it up.
Posted by: Davod | May 14, 2021 at 06:40 PM
DRAM Makers Unaffected
Pour one for me!No need to be too fussy about the WEE part.
Posted by: Dave (in MA) | May 14, 2021 at 07:29 PM
Oh
https://mobile.twitter.com/rSanti97/status/1393259811559575554
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 08:07 PM
Hmm
https://mobile.twitter.com/SophiaTesfaye/status/1393277602161254401
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 08:08 PM
Civility
https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/05/rep-cori-bush-praises-st-louis-palestinian-activist-infamous-for-pigs-in-a-blanket-fry-em-like-bacon-chant-and-taunting-police-im-praying-for-your-death/
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 08:15 PM
The dam is breaking
https://mobile.twitter.com/chiproytx/status/1393267169673334784
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 08:18 PM
Seriously
https://mobile.twitter.com/josh_hammer/status/1393314732539527173
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 08:24 PM
donsurber's avatar
Don Surber
@donsurber
Firefox slapped this warning on my blog.
Fuck Firefox
https://twitter.com/donsurber/status/1393364778857414657
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 08:38 PM
Intertubes darkness coming…..
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 08:38 PM
It’s a list that just went live.
Don Surber
@donsurber
Firefox slapped this warning on my blog.
Fuck Firefox
7:37pm · 14 May 2021 · Twitter Web App
Doug Ross 🇺🇸 @directorblue
2m
Replying to @donsurber
Mine too.
Doug Ross 🇺🇸 @directorblue
1m
Replying to @donsurber
Happens on Chrome, too. My site was hit. Some kind of "blacklist" now influenced by the anti-free speech crowd.
Non-kneeling Yakov @yakovshap
1m
Replying to @donsurber
Use Brave browser
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 08:41 PM
The capital police have hours of footage of the 1/6 capital “attack” and they refuse to release it. So far, federal judges are going along.
The things going on in this country, daily, are mind blowing.
Posted by: Jane | May 14, 2021 at 08:43 PM
And Anita’s using that list with impunity tonight. Lots of people going bye-bye.
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 08:45 PM
Surber.
Note. The advisory was provided by Google Safe Browsing.
Posted by: Davod | May 14, 2021 at 08:48 PM
In a time of deceit...
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 08:50 PM
Meanwhile, Gruesome’s cronies are all cashed up for the recall from the $13.5B PG&E “Fire Victims” fund::
ai_jared's avatar
AI Jared Bot
@ai_jared
PG&E's Fire Victim Trust in charge of compensating survivors racked up $51 million in overhead costs last year. The Trust disbursed just $7 million to fire victims – less than 0.1% of the $13.5 billion promised + spent nearly 90% of its funds on overhead.
kqed.org/news/11872328/…
Sara G @SaraGreshock
2h
Replying to @ai_jared
They just keep stealing from the tax payers... deep state gonna deep state
Hot Summer Coming - Gird Your Loins @realmajordan
3m
Replying to @ai_jared @wfinalle57
@almostjingo 👀
https://twitter.com/ai_jared/status/1393331639158202372
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 08:52 PM
Of course
https://dailycaller.com/2021/05/14/fox-news-peter-doocy-jen-psaki-neanderthal-thinking-mask-mandate/
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 08:53 PM
I’m noting the irony of the great purge tonight with my burning of Benny Goodman’s famous 1938 Carnegie Hall Concert, 1950 re-release. Just before Europe’s purge….
Posted by: Melinda | May 14, 2021 at 08:54 PM
Oh
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2021/05/14/anticipate-alinsky-styled-language-insurrection-deniers-to-be-main-element-of-current-democrat-narrative/#more-212006
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 08:59 PM
How did they lose in 2018
https://mobile.twitter.com/SwainForSenate/status/1393368109113774081
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 09:06 PM
Sure why not
https://mobile.twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1393338666886569999
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 09:07 PM
Well, I am watching the season premiere of The A Team. Mexican drug lords and a snake journalist! Prescient!
Posted by: MissMarple2 | May 14, 2021 at 09:16 PM
The a team had been framed for unspecified reasoms i never understood why robbing the bank of hanoi was an indictable offende
Posted by: Narciso | May 14, 2021 at 09:25 PM